Counties / Minnesota / Koochiching County

Koochiching County, MN

FIPS 27071 · population 11,833 · outside every metro area

$158k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$158k
▲ 5.2% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
ACS median gross rent
$671
occupied-unit survey; not current asking rent
Census ACS · surveyed
Gross yield
n/a
gross yield cannot be computed without measured market rent
requires both measured price and measured rent
HUD 2-bed standard
$973
the Section 8 payment standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

Both annual signals move in the same direction
FHFA five-year cumulative+55.8%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06+5.2%FHFA HPI2025+8.8%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-07-28.
Owner-reported value$157k
Surveyed gross rent$671
Rent burden 30%+31.7%
Median year built1972
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
20.9%vacant
7,426estimated housing units
Occupied tenure19.6% renter
owner 80.4%renter 19.6%
Structure mix85.1% single-family
Single-family 85.1%20+ units 3.0%Mobile home 7.6%Other 4.3%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs4,168▼ 1.8% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments420annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$1,092▼ 0.1% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorTrade, transportation, and utilities22.8% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS−1.8%WEEKLY WAGE−0.1%Trade, transportation, and utilities22.8%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Koochiching County presents a price-momentum-versus-operating-depth decision: buyers willing to investigate parcel economics may find a county-level value signal, while cash-flow-dependent or liquidity-sensitive buyers should be cautious. Zillow reports a $157,683 median home value, up 5.19% year over year, for 2026-06. FHFA’s 2025 annual repeat-transaction HPI rose 8.82%; it corroborates a positive direction but is not a dollar home value and cannot be blended with Zillow into one appreciation rate.

02Housing economics

Measured market asking rent is not published, so gross yield cannot be computed. HUD’s $973 FMR is a payment standard rather than an asking-rent estimate and cannot fill that gap. The effective property-tax rate is 0.74%, with a $1,156 median annual tax; that is a known carrying-cost input against the value measure. Missing insurance, repairs, financing terms, and property-level tax assessment prevent a cash-flow or all-in affordability conclusion.

03Demand & competition

Realtor.com’s MLS listing-market evidence shows 50 active listings, 54.69% more than a year earlier. This is visible asking supply, not closed-sale volume or proof of buyer demand. Tax-return household migration was negative 57, although average income for inbound movers exceeded outbound movers by $9,981; the combination warrants checking the composition and tenure of movers rather than treating migration as a demand verdict. Investors accounted for 6 of 116 purchase mortgages, a limited county-level participation measure rather than evidence that they set prices.

04Risk & next checks

Inland flood is the dominant hazard, and modeled expected climate loss equals 0.23% of building value per year; county modeling cannot substitute for parcel flood history, elevation, insurance availability, or deductibles. QCEW workplace covered employment fell 1.84% in 2025; it is neither resident employment nor unemployment. Trade, transportation, and utilities is the largest disclosed private supersector, not the whole economy. Next checks are market-rent and occupancy evidence, closed-sale and rental comparables, operating costs, and parcel-specific hazard review; their absence prevents underwriting yield, exit liquidity, and risk-adjusted carrying costs.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Koochiching County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
International Falls city5.6KLittlefork city636Ranier city509Nett Lake CDP*171Northome city159Big Falls city136Mizpah city58
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

7 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    International Falls cityIncorporated place
    5,642
  2. 02
    Littlefork cityIncorporated place
    636
  3. 03
    Ranier cityIncorporated place
    509
  4. 04
    Nett Lake CDPCensus-designated place · spans 2 counties
    171
  5. 05
    Northome cityIncorporated place
    159
  6. 06
    Big Falls cityIncorporated place
    136
  7. 07
    Mizpah cityIncorporated place
    58

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.226% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax0.74%

$1,156 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration-57

186 in · 243 out

Arriving vs leaving income+$9,981

$68,462 arriving · $58,481 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors5.2%

6 of 116 mortgages

investorother financed
Current listing pressure

What sellers and visible supply are doing

Realtor.com® Economic Research · county inventory 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-28
Active listings50▲ 54.7% year over year
Median days on market50▼ 8.6% year over year
Listings price-reduced18.3%seller-concession signal
Median listing pricen/a▲ 13.7% year over year

Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.

No rent index is published for this county.Zillow’s county rent series does not cover every county, and estimating one from a neighbouring county would be a guess wearing a number’s clothes. Everything above is measured here; no wider market is mapped for it either.
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Unpublished market rent and operating expenses may leave cash flow below the property’s underwriting requirement.
  2. Inland-flood exposure and insurance terms may differ materially by parcel from the county modeled-loss measure.
  3. MLS inventory and migration measures may not translate into closed-sale liquidity or tenant demand.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Can gross yield be calculated from this record?

No. Market asking rent is not published, and HUD FMR is not a substitute for market rent.

Are Realtor.com listing measures proof of closed-sale demand?

No. They measure the MLS asking market, including visible supply and marketing conditions, rather than completed sales.

Which hazard requires parcel-level diligence?

Inland flood; flood history, elevation, insurance availability, and deductibles are not provided at the parcel level.