Counties / Iowa / Kossuth County

Kossuth County, IA

FIPS 19109 · population 14,516 · outside every metro area

$176k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$176k
▲ 2.6% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
ACS median gross rent
$859
occupied-unit survey; not current asking rent
Census ACS · surveyed
Gross yield
n/a
gross yield cannot be computed without measured market rent
requires both measured price and measured rent
HUD 2-bed standard
$919
the Section 8 payment standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

Both annual signals move in the same direction
FHFA five-year cumulative+36.2%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06+2.6%FHFA HPI2025+2.1%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-07-28.
Owner-reported value$148k
Surveyed gross rent$859
Rent burden 30%+30.9%
Median year built1962
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
9.2%vacant
7,205estimated housing units
Occupied tenure21.4% renter
owner 78.6%renter 21.4%
Structure mix87.2% single-family
Single-family 87.2%20+ units 2.1%Mobile home 0.5%Other 10.2%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs6,481▼ 1.3% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments634annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$1,037▲ 2.2% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorManufacturing26.4% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS−1.3%WEEKLY WAGE+2.2%Manufacturing26.4%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Kossuth County presents modest appreciation beside a constrained visible listing pool, but the underwriting tension is whether an employment and migration base showing softness can support occupancy and resale liquidity. Investors dependent on market-rent cash flow or quick exits should be cautious; buyers prepared to verify property-level rents, flood exposure, and tenant demand should investigate. Zillow's June 2026 county median home value was $176,392, up 2.59% year over year. FHFA's separate 2025 annual repeat-transaction HPI rose 2.05%; it supports the direction but is neither a home value nor a matching interval.

02Housing economics

Carrying-cost underwriting has a decisive gap: market asking rent is not published, so gross yield cannot be computed. HUD's $919 two-bedroom FMR is a payment standard, not an asking-rent estimate, and cannot substitute for rent. The effective property-tax rate is 1.01%, so tax review matters against the observed price; parcel assessments and insurance costs are not published. The different Zillow and FHFA methods and vintages must not be averaged into a single growth rate.

03Demand & competition

Realtor.com's MLS listing market shows 65 active listings, a 73-day median marketing time, and an 8.85% price-reduced share. Visible supply is constrained, but marketing time and reductions indicate seller concessions; none is a closed-sale price or proof of buyer demand. QCEW annual covered employment at county workplaces fell 1.28%, and Manufacturing was the largest disclosed private supersector; this is not resident employment or unemployment. Net migration was negative 50 tax-return households, while average income of movers out exceeded movers in by $2,556. Investor mortgages were 5.83% of 103 purchases, a limited measured non-owner presence.

04Risk & next checks

Inland flood is the dominant hazard, and modeled annual climate loss equals 0.11% of building value; this is a modeled ratio, not a property-specific loss or dollar forecast. The thesis can fail if unreported rents do not cover purchase and tax costs, if thin MLS supply masks weak transaction liquidity, or if flood insurance and site exposure alter operating costs. Next checks are current market rents and lease-up, parcel tax and assessment history, insurance and flood-zone terms, property condition, and sale comparables. Their absence prevents a cash-flow, exit-price, and property-level risk conclusion.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Kossuth County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Algona city5.4KWest Bend city*855Bancroft city626Swea City city591Whittemore city569Burt city511Titonka city452Wesley city360
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

17 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Algona cityIncorporated place
    5,377
  2. 02
    West Bend cityIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    855
  3. 03
    Bancroft cityIncorporated place
    626
  4. 04
    Swea City cityIncorporated place
    591
  5. 05
    Whittemore cityIncorporated place
    569
  6. 06
    Burt cityIncorporated place
    511
  7. 07
    Titonka cityIncorporated place
    452
  8. 08
    Wesley cityIncorporated place
    360
  9. 09
    Lu Verne cityIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    318
  10. 10
    Fenton cityIncorporated place
    290
  11. 11
    Lakota cityIncorporated place
    266
  12. 12
    Ledyard cityIncorporated place
    112
Show 5 more places
  1. 13
    Lone Rock cityIncorporated place
    106
  2. 14
    St. Joseph CDPCensus-designated place
    73
  3. 15
    Irvington CDPCensus-designated place
    34
  4. 16
    St. Benedict CDPCensus-designated place
    25
  5. 17
    Sexton CDPCensus-designated place
    24

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.115% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax1.00%

$1,490 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration-50

289 in · 339 out

Arriving vs leaving income−$2,556

$51,249 arriving · $53,805 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors5.8%

6 of 103 mortgages

investorother financed
Current listing pressure

What sellers and visible supply are doing

Realtor.com® Economic Research · county inventory 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-28
Active listings65▼ 25.4% year over year
Median days on market73▲ 2.5% year over year
Listings price-reduced8.8%seller-concession signal
Median listing pricen/a▼ 0.1% year over year

Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.

No rent index is published for this county.Zillow’s county rent series does not cover every county, and estimating one from a neighbouring county would be a guess wearing a number’s clothes. Everything above is measured here; no wider market is mapped for it either.
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Market rent, insurance, and parcel assessment data are absent, preventing validation of operating cash flow.
  2. Covered-employment decline and negative net migration may coincide with shallower tenant and buyer depth.
  3. Inland-flood exposure and insurance requirements may differ materially by parcel from the county-level modeled loss ratio.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Can a market-rent gross yield be calculated from this record?

No. Market asking rent is not published, and HUD Fair Market Rent is a payment standard rather than a market-rent substitute.

Does the listing data prove buyer demand?

No. It describes the MLS listing market through supply, marketing time, and price reductions, not closed sales or buyer demand.

Is the flood metric property-specific?

No. It is a county-level modeled annual building-value loss ratio; flood zone, insurance terms, and site conditions require parcel-level review.