Counties / Indiana / LaGrange County

LaGrange County, IN

FIPS 18087 · population 40,805 · outside every metro area

$353k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$353k
▲ 9.1% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
ACS median gross rent
$839
occupied-unit survey; not current asking rent
Census ACS · surveyed
Gross yield
n/a
gross yield cannot be computed without measured market rent
requires both measured price and measured rent
HUD 2-bed standard
$977
the Section 8 payment standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

Both annual signals move in the same direction
FHFA five-year cumulative+66.0%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06+9.1%FHFA HPI2025+2.0%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-07-28.
Owner-reported value$256k
Surveyed gross rent$839
Rent burden 30%+32.4%
Median year built1982
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
14.9%vacant
15,151estimated housing units
Occupied tenure17.0% renter
owner 83.0%renter 17.0%
Structure mix85.5% single-family
Single-family 85.5%20+ units 0.5%Mobile home 8.3%Other 5.8%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs14,640▼ 0.8% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments1,073annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$1,095▲ 6.8% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorManufacturing50.6% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS−0.8%WEEKLY WAGE+6.8%Manufacturing50.6%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

LaGrange County has a price-momentum-versus-underwriting-evidence tension: Zillow’s median home value is $353,323, up 9.06% year over year, while FHFA’s repeat-transaction HPI rose 2.04% annually and 66.04% cumulatively over five years. These are distinct measures and vintages, so they cannot be averaged; both point upward, but the Zillow move is materially stronger than the annual transaction index. Buyers relying on appreciation should be cautious, while those needing durable operating support should investigate the gap.

02Housing economics

Market rent is not published, so gross yield cannot be computed. The $977 two-bedroom HUD Fair Market Rent is a payment standard, not an asking-rent estimate, and cannot substitute for rent in a yield calculation. The 0.55% effective property-tax rate and $1,403 median annual tax identify a county-level carrying-cost input, but not a parcel bill. Rent rolls, achieved rents, insurance, utilities, repairs and financing costs are not published; the record therefore cannot test coverage or cash flow against the price level.

03Demand & competition

Demand evidence is mixed. QCEW annual covered employment at county workplaces declined 0.85%, and Manufacturing is the largest disclosed private supersector; this is not resident employment or an unemployment measure. Tax-return migration was net negative by 231 households, although movers in reported average AGI $11,500 above movers out. Investor purchase mortgages represented 3.29% of the 365 recorded purchases, a limited measured non-owner-occupant presence rather than a measure of all cash buyers. Realtor.com’s MLS market showed 46 median days on market, 34.28% price-reduced listings and a 47.06% pending-to-active ratio. These are listing-market evidence on supply and marketing, not sale prices or standalone proof of buyer demand.

04Risk & next checks

Inland flood is the dominant hazard, and modeled annual building-value loss is 0.09%, a property-selection exposure rather than a realized-loss estimate. Modeling cannot replace parcel flood-zone, elevation, drainage, prior-loss, coverage, deductible and premium checks. The thesis could fail if rents do not support acquisition and carrying costs, if MLS concessions persist into closed transactions, or if flood insurance and property condition alter costs. Next checks are parcel-specific tax and hazard records, current rent rolls and leases, closed-sale comparables, and financing terms.

Cities & communities

Where people live within LaGrange County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Lagrange town2.8KWolcottville town*1.1KTopeka town1.1KHowe CDP1.1KShipshewana town822Shipshewana Lake CDP365Ontario CDP301Adams Lake CDP286
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

13 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Lagrange townIncorporated place
    2,790
  2. 02
    Wolcottville townIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    1,143
  3. 03
    Topeka townIncorporated place
    1,137
  4. 04
    Howe CDPCensus-designated place
    1,092
  5. 05
    Shipshewana townIncorporated place
    822
  6. 06
    Shipshewana Lake CDPCensus-designated place
    365
  7. 07
    Ontario CDPCensus-designated place
    301
  8. 08
    Adams Lake CDPCensus-designated place
    286
  9. 09
    South Milford CDPCensus-designated place
    284
  10. 10
    Mongo CDPCensus-designated place
    246
  11. 11
    Stroh CDPCensus-designated place
    238
  12. 12
    Wall Lake CDPCensus-designated place · spans 2 counties
    181
Show 1 more places
  1. 13
    Scott CDPCensus-designated place
    137

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.086% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax0.55%

$1,403 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration-231

666 in · 897 out

Arriving vs leaving income+$11,500

$70,360 arriving · $58,860 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors3.3%

12 of 365 mortgages

investorother financed
Current listing pressure

What sellers and visible supply are doing

Realtor.com® Economic Research · county inventory 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-28
Active listings60▲ 3.5% year over year
Median days on market46▲ 11.5% year over year
Listings price-reduced34.3%seller-concession signal
Median listing pricen/a▲ 7.7% year over year

Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.

No rent index is published for this county.Zillow’s county rent series does not cover every county, and estimating one from a neighbouring county would be a guess wearing a number’s clothes. Everything above is measured here; no wider market is mapped for it either.
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Unpublished market rent prevents a yield and cash-flow test at the recorded price.
  2. Listing-market concessions may not translate cleanly to closed-sale values.
  3. Parcel flood insurance, condition and drainage costs can differ from county-level modeled risk.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Can gross yield be calculated from this record?

No. Market rent is not published, and HUD Fair Market Rent cannot be used as market rent.

What is the measured investor mortgage presence?

Investor purchase mortgages represented 3.29% of 365 recorded purchases; all-cash buyer activity is not published.

What flood information is available for parcel screening?

Inland flood is the dominant hazard and modeled annual building-value loss is 0.09%; parcel flood-zone, insurance and prior-loss details are not provided in the record.