States / Indiana
State rental intelligence

Indiana rental market data

A source-traced view across 27 metro markets and 92 counties. State figures below are labelled medians and totals—not a made-up statewide investment score.

20/27 metros scored92/92 counties with FEMA risk14 sources used in this analysis
Median scored metro59.5out of 100 · 20 measured metros
Indiana identity diorama showing regional landscape, cities, housing, and infrastructure
Median metro home value$250kmedian across published metro values
Median metro rent$1,122monthly · published metro values
Median gross yield5.9%annual rent ÷ price · before costs
Median job trend▼ 0.3%trailing 12-month metro employment
Direct monthly rental evidence

Indiana rent market dynamics

Apartment List measures recent leases, rental vacancy and listing time separately. These figures do not replace Zillow, Census or Realtor measures elsewhere on this page.

Recent-lease rent$1,1292026-07 · ▲ 0.3% year over year
Rental Vacancy Index7.6%2026-07 · +1.7 pp in 12 months
Time on market32 days2026-07 · +10 days in 12 months
US recent-lease rent$1,3882026-07 · ▼ 1.1% year over year
Rent and rental vacancy through timesolid state series · dashed national series · no interpolation across missing observations
Recent-lease rent$1,525$1,096$666Rental Vacancy Index8.1%5.6%3.1%2017-012021-102026-07IndianaUnited States
State research brief

Recent-lease rent in Indiana rose only 0.3% while rental vacancy reached 7.6% and time on market hit 32 days, making leasing friction the clearest measured tension despite stronger metro asking-rent readings.

Updated 2026-08-08 · evidence current to the releases listed below.

Indiana's July 2026 Apartment List rent was $1,129, up from $1,126 a year earlier. That modest gain coincided with a separate Vacancy Index increase from 5.8% to 7.6% and a separate time-on-market increase from 22.3 to 32 days. The combination supports more conservative vacancy and listing-time assumptions, but it does not measure concessions or show that every locality weakened.

The main counter-signal comes from Zillow: median metro market-rent growth was 4.6% across 20 measured metros, slightly above median home-value growth of 4.1% across 27. Demand evidence is less supportive at the aggregate level, with median metro employment down 0.3% and net county migration of negative 1,364, although several named markets posted job growth above 1%. Screening therefore needs local achieved-rent, employment and pipeline checks rather than a single statewide conclusion.

01

Recent-lease rent up 0.3%, vacancy at 7.6% and listing time at 32 days → stress vacancy and marketing-time assumptions instead of relying on rent growth alone

02

Median Zillow metro rent growth of 4.6% versus 4.1% home-value growth → validate whether local asking-rent momentum converts into achieved rent

03

Median metro employment down 0.3% and net migration of negative 1,364 → require local demand evidence before underwriting absorption

04

Median resale supply of 1.9 months alongside concentrated permitting → inspect each submarket's rental pipeline rather than treating permits as current oversupply

05

Median renter burden of 42.7% and median county housing vintage of 1974 → test affordability limits and property-specific maintenance costs

01
Direct state rental dynamics

Flat recent-lease rent meets a clear liquidity slowdown

Apartment List's state recent-lease rent increased 0.3% year over year to $1,129 in July 2026. Its separate Vacancy Index rose 1.7 percentage points to 7.6%, while its separate listing time increased 9.7 days to 32 days. These measures should not be blended, but all three together show that positive nominal rent growth did not prevent weaker measured liquidity.

The rent change was 1.3 percentage points above the national decline of 1.1%, providing a counter-signal to a purely negative reading. Even so, Indiana's vacancy rate was 0.4 percentage points above the national rate and listing time was two days longer. Underwriting should test vacancy and marketing-time assumptions independently from rent growth; the series cannot establish concessions, renewal behavior or property-level occupancy.

Evidence: Apartment List Rent Estimates — recent-lease rent index · Apartment List Time on Market — listing liquidity · Apartment List Vacancy Index — rental vacancy

02
Price and rent momentum

Metro asking-rent growth is the main counter-signal

Zillow's median metro market-rent growth was 4.6% across 20 measured metros, compared with median home-value growth of 4.1% across 27. The packet reports a 0.5 percentage-point median growth advantage for rent, but the coverage counts differ and this asking-rent measure is not interchangeable with Apartment List's state recent-lease series.

The divergence is pronounced in the highlighted markets. Marion recorded 10% rent growth versus 4.1% home-value growth and a 7% indicated gross yield. Crawfordsville recorded 8.4% rent growth versus 3.1% price growth, while Elkhart recorded 7.1% versus 5.6%. These are useful leads for local rent validation, not proof that listed rents are being achieved or that gross yields survive operating costs.

Evidence: Zillow ZHVI — metro home values · Zillow ZORI — metro market rents

03
Employment and household movement

Aggregate demand is slightly negative, with positive local exceptions

Employment growth across 27 measured metros had a median of negative 0.3%, with the middle distribution bounded by a 10th percentile of negative 1.4% and a 90th percentile of 1%. IRS migration data recorded 177,799 movers in and 179,163 out, producing net migration of negative 1,364, or negative 0.2 per 1,000 residents. Inbound mover income exceeded outbound income by $186,765, a small counter-signal within the migration totals.

Local employment readings were stronger in New Castle at 1.2%, Crawfordsville at 1.1% and Huntington at 1.1%. Those markets merit separate demand checks, but the figures do not establish household growth, renter formation or property-level absorption. The migration period is 2022-2023, while the employment and rental measures are more current, so their direction should not be treated as fully synchronized.

Evidence: Census ACS 5-year — population · BLS CES — payroll employment · BLS LAUS — resident employment · IRS SOI — county migration and mover income

04
Supply and resale conditions

Permitting clusters coexist with lean for-sale inventory

Across the measured metros, the median was 296 permitted units and 2.79 permits per 1,000 residents. Separate Redfin resale measures showed median inventory of 1.9 months, median marketing time of 25.5 days, price reductions on 34.5% of listings and a 98% sale-to-list ratio. Those resale readings do not indicate broad excess inventory, even though permitting is substantial in selected markets.

Indianapolis recorded 13,918 permitted units, or 6.53 per 1,000 residents, while Lafayette recorded 1,492, or 6.58 per 1,000. Both had 19-day median resale marketing times and no more than two months of supply. Bloomington was a contrasting resale market at 51 days and 3.9 months of supply. Permits are authorizations rather than completed rental units, so this module identifies where pipeline diligence matters but cannot explain the statewide rental-liquidity slowdown.

Evidence: Census Building Permits Survey — permitted units · Redfin Data Center — inventory, days on market, and price cuts

05
Housing stock and tenant conditions

Single-family-heavy stock meets uneven renter strain

Across 92 measured counties, the median renter share was 23%, the median single-family share was 80.7% and the median year built was 1974. The median ACS housing vacancy rate was 9.2%, but this is a broad housing-stock measure and must not be combined with Apartment List's rental Vacancy Index. The stock profile supports asset-level checks on tenant depth, maintenance and replacement needs.

The median share of renters spending at least 30% of income on rent was 42.7%, ranging from 35.8% at the 10th percentile to 50.9% at the 90th. Highlighted readings were 66.2% in Ohio County, 60.7% in Monroe County and 59.3% in Tippecanoe County. Ohio County also had only an 18.7% renter share, while Monroe County and Tippecanoe County were above 46%, illustrating why burden and tenant-pool size must be screened together. These county aggregates do not measure a property's collections or tenant default risk.

Evidence: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock

06
Physical risk and property tax

One leading hazard label masks meaningful county cost dispersion

Inland flood is the mutually exclusive leading-hazard label for all 92 counties. That classification does not mean every parcel has flood exposure. County climate-loss ratios had a median of 0.125%, with a 10th-to-90th percentile range of 0.090% to 0.167%; highlighted ratios were 0.221% in Posey County, 0.221% in Perry County and 0.215% in Crawford County.

The median effective property-tax rate was 0.66%, ranging from 0.50% to 0.81% between the 10th and 90th percentiles. Highlighted rates were higher in Lake County at 0.92%, Marion County at 0.91% and Vigo County at 0.88%. County screening should therefore lead to parcel-level flood, insurance and actual-tax review rather than a statewide cost assumption.

Evidence: FEMA National Risk Index — hazard loss ratios · Census ACS 5-year — effective property tax

State ZIP rental intelligence

How direct rental evidence varies inside Indiana

The distribution uses 14 current published ZIP reports across 13 cities and 9 counties. Twelve measured counter-signals are shown below; this is not a statewide neighborhood ranking.

Published ZIP rent range$973$2,070full direct-ZORI report cohort
Median rent / income22.0%annual asking rent ÷ ACS household income
Median one-year growth▲ 2.6%exact direct Zillow endpoints
Renter households covered83,968across published ZCTA matches
01 · RENT DISPERSIONRepresentative direct ZIP ZORI
Horizontal bars compare direct Zillow asking-rent indexes for the twelve representative published ZIP reports.46074$2,07046037$1,96647906$1,84146032$1,75146060$1,74046168$1,73846143$1,65446140$1,56247401$1,50047201$1,40247714$1,05246805$973
02 · AFFORDABILITY PRESSURERent / income × observed burden
Horizontal position is annual Zillow asking rent divided by ACS median household income. Vertical position is the ACS share of renter households paying thirty percent or more.64.3%56.8%49.4%41.9%34.5%479064740146143472014603246060477144614046168468054603746074Annual asking rent / ACS household income →ACS renter burden share →
03 · PATH QUALITYOne-year growth × variability
Each point compares exact one-year Zillow asking-rent growth with annualized variability from the direct monthly series.5.8%4.6%3.4%2.2%1.0%479064740146143472014603246060477144614046168468054603746074Exact one-year Zillow rent growth →Annualized monthly variability →
WHAT THE STATE DISTRIBUTION SAYS

Indiana’s current published direct-evidence distribution puts the Zillow ZORI observed asking-rent index between $973 and $2,070 per month, a $1,097 span around a $1,739 median. The practical question is consequently not a single state rent, but which reported area aligns with a household’s budget and capacity to absorb rent movement. Westfield (46074) marks the high end, while Fort Wayne (46805) marks the low end. The statewide distribution is limited to 14 current published direct-evidence ZIP reports; it is not a census of every Indiana delivery ZIP, neighborhood, rental unit, or available listing. It describes reported market-index observations, not a complete inventory of rental units offered in any location at a given time.

Current asking-rent affordability and renter burden answer different questions. The annualized Zillow asking-rent-to-ACS-median-income ratio ranges from 15.9% in Carmel to 41.6% in West Lafayette. At a 30% income reference, the corresponding required annual income is $70,040 in Carmel and $73,640 in West Lafayette, versus their area median household incomes of $132,085 and $53,103. By contrast, the ACS five-year ZCTA share of renter households paying 30% or more of income toward gross rent ranges from 37.0% in Fishers to 61.8% in West Lafayette, with a 42.2% distribution median. The first is a current index-to-income comparison; the second is a surveyed household burden measure, so neither substitutes for the other.

Rent momentum should also be read separately from month-to-month variation in the direct Zillow series. One-year ZORI growth ranges from 0.04% in Greenfield to 10.15% in Evansville, compared with a 2.61% statewide-distribution median. Annualized volatility spans 1.96% in Greenwood to 4.75% in Evansville, with a 2.89% median. Evansville therefore combines the strongest one-year gain with the widest measured variation and a 5.25% maximum drawdown, and is classified high-variability. Greenfield’s nearly flat one-year result sits alongside 3.35% annualized growth over three years, a counter-signal against treating the latest growth reading as a full trend. These backward-looking measures describe observed rent-index history, not future paths.

HUD adds a useful but distinct administrative comparator. The current asking-rent-to-HUD-two-bedroom ratio is 85.8% in Carmel and 166.2% in West Lafayette; the published-distribution median is 102.7%. HUD FMR/SAFMR is a program and bedroom standard, not an asking-rent observation, and ZORI is not a quote for an identified two-bedroom home. Accordingly, a ratio above or below the benchmark does not establish that any particular listing is expensive, inexpensive, available, or suitable. Property-level assessment requires unit-specific asking rent, bedroom count, lease terms, and availability; the ACS income, gross-rent, vacancy, and burden figures remain area-level five-year ZCTA estimates rather than USPS ZIP facts.

Representative direct evidence

Twelve useful contrasts, every one traceable

The statewide summaries use all 14 qualifying reports. The table preserves measured extremes in rent, affordability, burden, momentum, volatility and the HUD benchmark gap.

ZIP reportPlaceZillow rent1Y growthRent / incomeBurden 30%+VariabilityHUD 2BR gap
47906West Lafayette$1,841▲ 3.1%41.6%61.8%2.9%▲ 166.2%
47401Bloomington$1,500▲ 1.9%26.9%55.5%2.2%▲ 122.0%
46143Greenwood$1,654▲ 0.7%21.7%42.9%2.0%▲ 93.4%
47201Columbus$1,402▲ 4.5%20.0%38.5%3.2%▲ 98.0%
46032Carmel$1,751▲ 2.6%15.9%39.6%2.9%▲ 85.8%
46060Noblesville$1,740▲ 2.5%22.7%41.5%2.4%▲ 109.4%
47714Evansville$1,052▲ 10.1%22.6%49.7%4.8%▲ 94.5%
46140Greenfield$1,562▲ 0.0%22.6%46.2%3.0%▲ 114.0%
46168Plainfield$1,738▲ 2.3%23.2%41.1%2.3%▲ 108.0%
46805Fort Wayne$973▲ 3.4%22.4%48.6%3.6%▲ 99.3%
46037Fishers$1,966▲ 6.8%16.6%37.0%2.6%▲ 102.4%
46074Westfield$2,070▲ 2.6%19.6%39.4%3.1%▲ 108.9%
READ BEFORE USING

Zillow ZORI is an observed asking-rent index, not a lease-level transaction record or a guarantee of units available at that value. It can differ from a particular unit’s listed rent because of bedroom count, lease term, concessions, and timing.

ACS housing, income, vacancy, and burden figures are five-year survey estimates for Census ZCTAs, which are statistical areas and not identical to USPS delivery ZIPs. HUD FMR/SAFMR is an administrative, bedroom-specific benchmark, so it should not be treated as a current asking-rent measure.

SOURCE LEDGERCensus ACS five-year — ZCTA housing and incomeACS 2024 5-year ZCTA · pulled 2026-08-08HUD USPS crosswalk and Small Area FMRs — ZIP rent fallbackZIP-CBSA 2025Q4 + SAFMR FY2026 · pulled 2026-07-26Zillow ZORI — ZIP market rentsZORI ZIP 2026-06 · pulled 2026-08-08
Evidence selected for Indiana

The ranges behind the analysis

Each row keeps its own unit and shows the measured 10th percentile, median and 90th percentile. A single-value row is labelled directly.

Price and rent momentumAre home values and asking rents moving together or separating?
10th pct.median90th pct.Home-value change1.6%4.1%6.0%Asking-rent change2.1%4.5%7.2%Rent minus price0.5%
Employment and household movementDo jobs, household movement and mover income point in the same direction?
10th pct.median90th pct.Job change-1.4%-0.3%1.0%Net migration / 1k-0.2Net household movement-1,364
Supply and resale conditionsWhat do permits, inventory, marketing time and price cuts say about pressure?
10th pct.median90th pct.Permits / 1k1.02.84.4Months of supply1.5×1.9×2.5×Days on market13 days26 days41 daysListings with cuts26.6%34.5%43.1%
Shape of the state

Distribution before conclusion

A statewide median can hide a wide spread. These SVG charts render at build time and carry no chart library or browser-side data request.

Metro score distribution20 scored metros · median 59.5
00–19220–39840–59760–79380–100
County evidence coverageEvery gap stays visible as missing—not estimated
47%43/92Rent100%92/92Climate100%92/92Migration
Highest measured metro gross yieldsscreening metric only · before expenses and financing
Chicago7.6%Marion7.0%Terre Haute6.9%Logansport6.8%Muncie6.8%South Bend6.7%Indianapolis6.3%
Metro leaderboard

Markets touching Indiana

Multi-state CBSAs appear in every member state. Score is still a metro score; no value is reweighted into a statewide ranking.

#MetroScorePriceRentYieldJobs
1Crawfordsville, IN88$229k$9665.1%▲ 1.1%
2Elkhart, IN86$269k$1,1465.1%▲ 0.9%
3Marion, IN81$157k$9127.0%▲ 0.7%
4Fort Wayne, IN77$262k$1,2845.9%▲ 0.7%
5Richmond, IN76$177k$8846.0%▲ 0.3%
6New Castle, IN69$195k$8415.2%▲ 1.2%
7Terre Haute, IN69$171k$9896.9%▲ 0.5%
8Muncie, IN67$174k$9796.8%▼ 0.3%
9Michigan City, IN63$263k$1,1375.2%▼ 0.3%
10South Bend, IN61$243k$1,3486.7%▼ 0.7%
11Chicago, IL58$360k$2,2757.6%▲ 0.1%
12Warsaw, IN57$294k$1,1224.6%▼ 0.1%

Showing the top 12 scored metros of 27. Unscored metros remain discoverable through the national rankings.

Below the metro line

Largest counties in Indiana

County figures join on the five-digit FIPS code. The table uses measured local values and prints “n/a” wherever a publisher has no record.

CountyPopulationPriceRentYieldHazard
Marion County, IN975,809$234k$1,4167.3%inland flooding
Lake County, IN500,379$254k$1,4656.9%inland flooding
Allen County, IN392,378$260k$1,2885.9%inland flooding
Hamilton County, IN365,056$471k$1,8374.7%inland flooding
St. Joseph County, IN273,040$235k$1,3496.9%inland flooding
Elkhart County, IN207,132$269k$1,1465.1%inland flooding
Tippecanoe County, IN189,071$304k$1,4195.6%inland flooding
Hendricks County, IN183,344$349k$1,8696.4%inland flooding
Vanderburgh County, IN180,117$205k$1,0416.1%inland flooding
Porter County, IN174,818$336k$1,5285.5%inland flooding
Johnson County, IN166,315$318k$1,6416.2%inland flooding
Monroe County, IN140,965$319k$1,4435.4%inland flooding
County yield sample43/92counties have the rent needed to compute yield
Statewide net migration−1,364IRS tax-return households summed across counties
Median investor share5.3%among counties with HMDA purchase records
Bear case

What can break the thesis

  1. Apartment List recent-lease rent, vacancy and time on market are separate measures, and Zillow rent has different coverage; combining them into one growth or liquidity metric would distort the evidence.
  2. Coverage is incomplete: county Zillow rent is available for 43 of 92 counties, metro rent growth for 20 of 27 metros, and Realtor county listing metrics for 68 counties, with no county listing-price records.
  3. IRS migration covers 2022-2023, while major rental and listing measures extend into 2026, limiting direct alignment between household movement and current leasing conditions.
  4. Permits do not establish completions, unit type or delivery timing, while for-sale inventory does not measure rental availability.
  5. The packet lacks property-level achieved rent, concessions, operating expenses, insurance quotes, actual tax bills and parcel hazard exposure, any of which could overturn a screen based on gross market figures.
Investor questions

Before underwriting a property

Should an investor underwrite Indiana rent growth at the 4.6% metro median?

Not from this packet alone. The 4.6% figure is Zillow's median across 20 measured metros, while Apartment List's statewide recent-lease rent rose 0.3%. Property-level achieved rents and comparable leases are not supplied.

Which markets provide positive demand follow-up leads?

New Castle, Crawfordsville and Huntington each recorded employment growth of about 1.1% to 1.2%. Those readings are screening leads, not proof of renter growth or absorption.

Does the permit data show that Indiana has a rental glut?

No. Median measured resale supply was 1.9 months, while high permitting was concentrated in markets such as Indianapolis and Lafayette. The packet does not report completed rental deliveries or unit mix.

How much room is there to raise rents without added affordability pressure?

The packet cannot set a rent ceiling. Across counties, the median share of renters spending at least 30% of income on rent was 42.7%, and the 90th-percentile reading was 50.9%, indicating that affordability constraints vary materially.

Does the statewide inland-flood label mean every property is exposed?

No. Inland flood is only the mutually exclusive leading-hazard label for each county. Parcel maps, elevation, insurance terms and property-specific loss information are still required.