Counties / Indiana / Lake County

Lake County, IN

FIPS 18089 · population 500,379 · part of Chicago, IL

$254k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
Direct county rent answer

What does rent cost in Lake County, IN?

The latest county-level Zillow ZORI is $1,465 per month in 2026-06. It is a typical asking-rent index across rental types—not an arithmetic average, signed lease or quote for one property.

County Zillow ZORI$1,4652026-06 · up 4.2% year over year
County ACS gross rent$1,131ACS 2024 5-year · occupied-renter survey
HUD two-bedroom FMR$1,317FY2026 · administrative standard
HUD Fair Market Rent by bedroom count in Lake County
BedroomsHUD monthly FMRGeographyMeasurement boundary
Studio$959Lake County, INHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
1 bedroom$1,082Lake County, INHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
2 bedrooms$1,317Lake County, INHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
3 bedrooms$1,612Lake County, INHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
4 bedrooms$1,744Lake County, INHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.

Zillow asking rent, ACS gross rent and HUD FMR describe different housing universes. They remain separate and no metro, city or neighboring-county value replaces missing county evidence.Zillow pulled 2026-07-26 · HUD pulled 2026-07-26

The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$254k
▲ 1.7% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
Median asking rent
$1,465
▲ 4.2% year over year
Zillow ZORI · direct
Gross yield
6.9%
annual rent ÷ price, before costs
derived: rent × 12 ÷ price ✓
HUD 2-bed standard
$1,317
market rent is 1.11x the standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

Both annual signals move in the same direction
FHFA five-year cumulative+47.7%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06+1.7%FHFA HPI2025+3.1%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-08-02.
Owner-reported value$231k
Surveyed gross rent$1,131
Rent burden 30%+52.3%
Median year built1968
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
10.3%vacant
217,436estimated housing units
Occupied tenure28.3% renter
owner 71.7%renter 28.3%
Structure mix78.8% single-family
Single-family 78.8%20+ units 4.2%Mobile home 1.5%Other 15.4%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs191,530▼ 0.1% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments12,253annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$1,200▲ 2.0% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorTrade, transportation, and utilities23.6% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS−0.1%WEEKLY WAGE+2.0%Trade, transportation, and utilities23.6%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2021-2025; latest 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-08-02. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

Resident income

How local income has compounded

BEA per-capita personal income divides all personal income by the county population. It is broader than wages, but it is not household income or a measure of what renters can afford.

Per-capita personal income19692024
Per-capita personal income history for Lake CountyA line chart of annual BEA per-capita personal income from 1969 through 2024.$0k$30k$60k196919972024$4k$58k
Nominal annual dollars; not adjusted for inflation. A rising line can reflect wage, business-income, transfer-income and investment-income changes together.
Renter affordability

Who carries the heaviest rent burden

HUD CHAS separates renter households by income relative to local HAMFI. Moderate burden means housing costs above 30% through 50% of income; severe burden means more than 50%.

Share of renter households in each income band2018-2022
Renter cost burden by HAMFI income band in Lake CountyFive horizontal bars show moderate and severe housing cost burden shares among renter households in each HUD income band.0%25%50%75%100%At or below 30% HAMFI15,86568.4% burdened30–50% HAMFI10,75577.2% burdened50–80% HAMFI12,39037.1% burdened80–100% HAMFI5,61511.7% burdenedAbove 100% HAMFI11,1701.8% burdened
Moderate: >30% to 50%Severe: >50%
Each percentage uses HUD’s published subtotal for that income band. For disclosure, HUD keeps 0 as 0, publishes 1–7 households as 4 and rounds 8 or more to the nearest 5. Independently rounded categories can differ from their displayed sum and are not forced into a percentage.
Direct local rental evidence

Recent leases and rental-market liquidity in Lake County, IN

These Apartment List observations match the exact county Census code 18089. They are kept separate from Zillow asking rent, Census occupied-home rent and wider metro measures.

Direct recent-lease rent history

Monthly overall-rent index; missing observations are not filled from another geography.

$1,330$1,191$1,0512021-082026-07
Recent-lease rent$1,3302026-07 · +2.2% year over year
Rental vacancyn/an/a
Time on marketn/an/a
County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Lake County presents an income-versus-liquidity tension. Zillow’s June 2026 median home value is $254,097, with median asking rent of $1,465 and a stated 6.92% gross yield. That supports investigation by buyers underwriting current rental operations, while buyers relying on frictionless resale or broad demand should be cautious. The yield is a market-rent-to-price measure before taxes, insurance, vacancy, repairs, utilities, or financing.

02Housing economics

The measured asking rent must stay separate from HUD’s $1,317 Fair Market Rent: FMR is a payment standard, not an asking-rent estimate. A calculation using the published figures places market rent 11.2% above that standard, which does not change the reported yield. Carrying costs matter: the effective property-tax rate is 0.92%, and median annual property tax is $2,112. Insurance, maintenance, vacancy, utilities, and financing costs are not published, preventing net-yield and cash-flow underwriting.

03Demand & competition

Realtor.com’s June 2026 MLS data point to more negotiating friction rather than completed-sale evidence: active listings rose 4.72%, median marketing time reached 46 days, and 23.87% of listings had price reductions. These are visible-supply, marketing-time, and seller-concession measures; they do not alone prove buyer demand or sale prices. Tax-return migration was negative by 148 households, although arriving movers reported slightly higher average AGI than departing movers. Investors accounted for 10.15% of 5,951 purchase mortgages, making them meaningful but not dominant. QCEW’s 2025 annual covered-workplace data show a slight employment decline and rising covered-worker wages; Trade, transportation, and utilities is the largest disclosed private supersector, not the whole economy.

04Risk & next checks

Risk review should not blend appreciation series. FHFA’s 2025 repeat-transaction HPI rose 3.15% over the year and 47.66% cumulatively over five years; it is an index, not a home value, and has a different method and vintage from Zillow. Inland flood is the dominant hazard, while modeled climate loss equals 0.11% of building value annually. Parcel flood exposure, insurance quotes, condition, lease terms, and closed-sale comparables are not published; their absence prevents asset-level resilience, net-income, and exit-price underwriting.

County ZIP rental landscape

How asking rent and renter pressure vary inside Lake County, IN

This view uses 12 direct Zillow ZIP markets matched to Census ZCTAs. Each ZIP is assigned by its largest HUD residential county share; this is not an exhaustive county inventory.

Selected ZIP range$1,019$1,795Zillow asking-rent index
Monthly spread$776highest minus lowest selected ZIP
Observed burden range35.9%55.9%ACS renter households paying 30%+
Renter households covered38,646across the selected ZCTAs
01 · ASKING RENT LADDERDirect ZIP ZORI
Horizontal bars compare Zillow asking-rent indexes across the selected direct-evidence ZIP set.46307$1,79546322$1,55746324$1,55346410$1,55046323$1,51246408$1,44146404$1,43546320$1,38946342$1,35846403$1,34846407$1,10846312$1,019
02 · PRESSURE MATRIXRent × observed burden
Each point is one selected ZIP and ZCTA match. Horizontal position is Zillow asking rent and vertical position is the ACS renter cost-burden share.58.4%52.2%45.9%39.7%33.4%464104631246342463204630746324463234640446403464084632246407Zillow asking-rent index →ACS burden share →
03 · BENCHMARK GAPZORI vs HUD 2BR
Bars show the percentage difference between the Zillow blended asking-rent index and the local HUD two-bedroom standard. Their housing universes differ.46307+100.8%46322+87.4%46324+87.2%46410+87.0%46323+84.9%46408+80.9%46404+80.6%46320+78.0%46342+76.2%46403+75.7%46407+62.2%46312+57.2%
WHAT THE LOCAL DISTRIBUTION SAYS

Within the selected direct-evidence set, Zillow’s latest ZIP ZORI—a typical observed asking-rent index—ranges from $1,019 to $1,795, a $776 spread, and has a $1,438 median. This is close to Lake County’s Zillow ZORI of $1,465, but the range makes a countywide figure an incomplete screen for a unit search or pricing review. The decision question is whether a lower-index ZIP meets the household’s actual criteria after listing checks, not whether it is simply cheap. At the endpoints, 46312 recorded 9.1% annual ZORI growth and 46307 1.3%; the index is a market measure, not a promise that an available unit will follow that path.

The measures should not be merged. ACS 2024 five-year ZCTA median gross rent, a survey estimate rather than a current asking-rent series, ranges from $854 to $1,391 in this set; the county ACS value is $1,131. Separately, the packet reports an FY2026 HUD two-bedroom standard of $1,781 for every displayed ZIP and a county two-bedroom FMR of $1,317. ZIP ZORI equals 57.2% to 100.8% of the displayed ZIP HUD figure; at the upper endpoint, it exceeds that figure by $14. This is a reference-point calculation, not a conversion among HUD administrative standards, ACS paid gross rents, and Zillow’s observed asking-rent index.

Affordability pressure and availability require separate ACS checks. The ZCTA share of renter households paying at least 30% of income for rent runs from 35.9% to 55.9%, so burden is material even in the lower-burden portion of the set. ZCTA vacancy is much more dispersed, from 2.9% to 40.3%, versus 10.3% countywide. A vacancy rate is a stock condition, not proof that a suitable unit is listed, that a concession is offered, or that tenant costs are lower; a low rate is likewise not a property-quality measure. Use a two-track screen: confirm availability first, then assess the unit’s all-in monthly cost and applicant-specific affordability. These statistics do not establish a causal relationship.

Coverage and geography limit precision. The table presents 12 of 18 eligible direct-ZORI matches, covering 38,646 renter households, rather than a full county or local-market inventory. ACS results here use ZCTA approximations, whereas USPS mailing ZIPs use delivery geography and their footprints can diverge. Each ZIP is displayed with the county receiving the largest HUD residential-address share; that share ranges from 95.1% to full assignment among these entries, so a small portion of some ZIPs can still lie elsewhere. Before a property decision, verify the exact address, bedroom count, current advertised rent, included utilities and fees, lease term, physical availability, applicant requirements, and whether the applicable HUD standard fits the unit.

Selected ZIP evidence

Keep each source universe visible

18 ZIP profiles passed the county gate; the 12 with the most renter households are shown.

ZIP / ZCTAZillow asking rentACS gross rentHUD 2BRBurden 30%+VacancyIncome screenHUD county share
46410$1,550$1,270$1,78152.4%4.7%$62k100.0%
46312$1,019$854$1,78144.7%19.6%$41k100.0%
46342$1,358$1,132$1,78152.8%6.3%$54k96.7%
46320$1,389$994$1,78148.6%13.6%$56k100.0%
46307$1,795$1,391$1,78143.6%2.9%$72k95.1%
46324$1,553$1,172$1,78145.3%8.4%$62k100.0%
46323$1,512$1,274$1,78150.2%6.7%$60k100.0%
46404$1,435$999$1,78148.0%23.2%$57k100.0%
46403$1,348$966$1,78155.9%22.2%$54k99.9%
46408$1,441$1,061$1,78135.9%23.7%$58k100.0%
46322$1,557$1,230$1,78143.1%4.0%$62k100.0%
46407$1,108$868$1,78142.7%40.3%$44k100.0%
READ BEFORE USING

The displayed set was selected from eligible direct-ZORI ZIP/ZCTA matches and is not exhaustive. It assigns cross-county ZIPs by the largest HUD residential-address share, so results do not establish conditions for every county ZIP or address.

ACS figures are 2024 five-year ZCTA estimates, not current USPS ZIP measures, while Zillow is June 2026 and HUD is FY2026. Differences in geography, timing, bedroom specificity, and construction prevent direct substitution or a unified rent estimate.

SOURCE LEDGERCensus ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stockACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30Census ACS five-year — ZCTA housing and incomeACS 2024 5-year ZCTA · pulled 2026-08-08HUD Fair Market Rents — Section 8 standardFY2026 FMR · pulled 2026-07-26HUD-USPS ZIP-to-county residential-address crosswalkHUD-USPS 2026Q1 · pulled 2026-08-09Zillow ZHVI and ZORI — county values and rentscounty ZHVI/ZORI 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-26Zillow ZORI — ZIP market rentsZORI ZIP 2026-06 · pulled 2026-08-08
Cities & communities

Where people live within Lake County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Hammond city76.8KGary city68.1KMerrillville town36.5KCrown Point city34.4KSchererville town29.7KHobart city29.6KEast Chicago city26KMunster town23.7K
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

24 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Hammond cityIncorporated place
    76,768
  2. 02
    Gary cityIncorporated place
    68,113
  3. 03
    Merrillville townIncorporated place
    36,476
  4. 04
    Crown Point cityIncorporated place
    34,393
  5. 05
    Schererville townIncorporated place
    29,701
  6. 06
    Hobart cityIncorporated place
    29,558
  7. 07
    East Chicago cityIncorporated place
    26,022
  8. 08
    Munster townIncorporated place
    23,733
  9. 09
    Highland townIncorporated place
    23,680
  10. 10
    St. John townIncorporated place
    22,567
  11. 11
    Dyer townIncorporated place
    16,400
  12. 12
    Griffith townIncorporated place
    16,273
Show 12 more places
  1. 13
    Cedar Lake townIncorporated place
    15,295
  2. 14
    Lake Station cityIncorporated place
    13,185
  3. 15
    Lowell townIncorporated place
    11,073
  4. 16
    Winfield townIncorporated place
    7,816
  5. 17
    Lakes of the Four Seasons CDPCensus-designated place · spans 2 counties
    7,402
  6. 18
    Ross CDPCensus-designated place
    6,751
  7. 19
    Whiting cityIncorporated place
    4,532
  8. 20
    New Chicago townIncorporated place
    2,225
  9. 21
    Lake Dalecarlia CDPCensus-designated place
    1,169
  10. 22
    Schneider townIncorporated place
    230
  11. 23
    Shelby CDPCensus-designated place
    164
  12. 24
    Leroy CDPCensus-designated place
    85

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.108% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax0.92%

$2,112 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration-148

10,161 in · 10,309 out

Arriving vs leaving income+$261

$56,774 arriving · $56,513 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors10.2%

604 of 5,951 mortgages

investorother financed
Current listing pressure

What sellers and visible supply are doing

Realtor.com® Economic Research · county inventory 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-28
Active listings1,276▲ 4.7% year over year
Median days on market46▲ 7.0% year over year
Listings price-reduced23.9%seller-concession signal
Median listing pricen/a▼ 0.7% year over year

Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.

Same metro

The other counties in Chicago, IL

A metro is an average of these. Which side of a county line a property sits on can change the tax bill, the hazard profile and the tenant pool.

CountyPopulationPriceRentYieldHazard
Lake County500,379$254k$1,4656.9%inland flooding
Cook County5,182,090$343k$2,3368.2%inland flooding
DuPage County930,024$449k$2,1405.7%inland flooding
Lake County714,223$401k$2,2516.7%inland flooding
Will County701,462$379k$2,3477.4%inland flooding
Kane County517,255$389k$2,1236.6%inland flooding
McHenry County312,591$372k$2,0286.6%inland flooding
Porter County174,818$336k$1,5285.5%inland flooding
Kendall County137,675$398k$2,3927.2%inland flooding
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Unpublished insurance, maintenance, vacancy, utilities, and financing costs could erase the gross-yield margin.
  2. Parcel-specific inland-flood exposure or unavailable coverage could exceed the county-level modeled risk.
  3. MLS supply growth and price reductions may correspond with weaker realized sale prices or longer exits.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Is a market rent available for gross-yield underwriting?

Yes. The record publishes median asking rent and a gross yield, but both are pre-expense measures.

Are investor buyers the dominant purchase cohort?

No. Investor mortgages represent a minority of total purchase mortgages in the record.

Can this record establish net cash flow for a specific rental?

No. It lacks property-level insurance, maintenance, vacancy, utility, financing, condition, and lease-cost evidence.