Counties / Illinois / Lake County

Lake County, IL

FIPS 17097 · population 714,223 · part of Chicago, IL

$401k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
Direct county rent answer

What does rent cost in Lake County, IL?

The latest county-level Zillow ZORI is $2,251 per month in 2026-06. It is a typical asking-rent index across rental types—not an arithmetic average, signed lease or quote for one property.

County Zillow ZORI$2,2512026-06 · up 3.6% year over year
County ACS gross rent$1,477ACS 2024 5-year · occupied-renter survey
HUD two-bedroom FMR$1,781FY2026 · administrative standard
HUD Fair Market Rent by bedroom count in Lake County
BedroomsHUD monthly FMRGeographyMeasurement boundary
Studio$1,480Lake County, ILHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
1 bedroom$1,581Lake County, ILHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
2 bedrooms$1,781Lake County, ILHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
3 bedrooms$2,294Lake County, ILHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
4 bedrooms$2,653Lake County, ILHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.

Zillow asking rent, ACS gross rent and HUD FMR describe different housing universes. They remain separate and no metro, city or neighboring-county value replaces missing county evidence.Zillow pulled 2026-07-26 · HUD pulled 2026-07-26

The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$401k
▲ 6.0% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
Median asking rent
$2,251
▲ 3.6% year over year
Zillow ZORI · direct
Gross yield
6.7%
annual rent ÷ price, before costs
derived: rent × 12 ÷ price ✓
HUD 2-bed standard
$1,781
market rent is 1.26x the standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

Both annual signals move in the same direction
FHFA five-year cumulative+54.1%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06+6.0%FHFA HPI2025+6.7%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-08-02.
Owner-reported value$346k
Surveyed gross rent$1,477
Rent burden 30%+49.3%
Median year built1983
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
4.5%vacant
270,618estimated housing units
Occupied tenure25.2% renter
owner 74.8%renter 25.2%
Structure mix76.9% single-family
Single-family 76.9%20+ units 7.5%Mobile home 1.6%Other 13.9%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs325,829▼ 1.1% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments19,993annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$1,784▲ 1.9% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorTrade, transportation, and utilities24.3% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS−1.1%WEEKLY WAGE+1.9%Trade, transportation, and utilities24.3%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2021-2025; latest 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-08-02. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

Resident income

How local income has compounded

BEA per-capita personal income divides all personal income by the county population. It is broader than wages, but it is not household income or a measure of what renters can afford.

Per-capita personal income19692024
Per-capita personal income history for Lake CountyA line chart of annual BEA per-capita personal income from 1969 through 2024.$0k$55k$110k196919972024$5k$104k
Nominal annual dollars; not adjusted for inflation. A rising line can reflect wage, business-income, transfer-income and investment-income changes together.
Renter affordability

Who carries the heaviest rent burden

HUD CHAS separates renter households by income relative to local HAMFI. Moderate burden means housing costs above 30% through 50% of income; severe burden means more than 50%.

Share of renter households in each income band2018-2022
Renter cost burden by HAMFI income band in Lake CountyFive horizontal bars show moderate and severe housing cost burden shares among renter households in each HUD income band.0%25%50%75%100%At or below 30% HAMFI15,18574.6% burdened30–50% HAMFI10,79579.0% burdened50–80% HAMFI13,35043.8% burdened80–100% HAMFI7,82517.3% burdenedAbove 100% HAMFI19,5906.0% burdened
Moderate: >30% to 50%Severe: >50%
Each percentage uses HUD’s published subtotal for that income band. For disclosure, HUD keeps 0 as 0, publishes 1–7 households as 4 and rounds 8 or more to the nearest 5. Independently rounded categories can differ from their displayed sum and are not forced into a percentage.
Direct local rental evidence

Recent leases and rental-market liquidity in Lake County, IL

These Apartment List observations match the exact county Census code 17097. They are kept separate from Zillow asking rent, Census occupied-home rent and wider metro measures.

Direct recent-lease rent history

Monthly overall-rent index; missing observations are not filled from another geography.

$1,725$1,535$1,3452021-082026-07
Recent-lease rent$1,7252026-07 · +5.6% year over year
Rental vacancyn/an/a
Time on marketn/an/a
County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Lake County’s decision tension is a market-rent-backed gross return against carrying-cost, workplace and flood uncertainty. It merits investigation by operators who can verify property-level expenses and tenant depth; buyers relying on thin expense cushions or simple appreciation comparisons should be cautious. The sources do not all share a period, so the evidence should be read as complementary rather than as one synchronized market snapshot.

02Housing economics

At Zillow’s county 2026-06 observation, median home value was $400,964 and had risen year over year, while median asking rent was $2,251 per month. The supplied 6.74% gross yield uses annual market rent before costs. HUD’s two-bedroom FMR of $1,781 is a payment standard, not asking rent and cannot substitute for it. A 2.58% effective property-tax rate adds a material carrying-cost screen; gross yield is not a net yield after tax, insurance, maintenance or vacancy.

03Demand & competition

Realtor’s same-period MLS data show less visible active supply, shorter marketing time and some price reductions; these are listing-market signals, not closed-sale prices or proof of buyer demand. QCEW’s 2025 annual workplace record reports 325,829 covered jobs, down 1.07%, while average weekly covered-worker wage rose. Trade, transportation, and utilities is the largest disclosed private supersector, not the county’s whole economy. Tax-return migration was net negative, but average AGI for incoming movers exceeded that for outgoing movers by $14,771. Nonoccupant purchase mortgages were 624 of 7,179 total purchase mortgages, or 8.69%, indicating measurable but limited investor buyer presence.

04Risk & next checks

Inland flood is the dominant hazard, and the modeled annual climate-loss ratio is 0.11% of building value; that is not a site-specific loss estimate. FHFA’s 2025 repeat-transaction HPI increased 6.73%. Its direction accords with Zillow’s value movement, but its index is not a dollar home value and the observations’ vintages and methods cannot be averaged. Missing flood-zone, elevation, insurance, claim-history, property-condition, lease, operating-cost and closed-sale evidence prevents defensible net-income, hazard-cost and exit-value conclusions.

County ZIP rental landscape

How asking rent and renter pressure vary inside Lake County, IL

This view uses 12 direct Zillow ZIP markets matched to Census ZCTAs. Each ZIP is assigned by its largest HUD residential county share; this is not an exhaustive county inventory.

Selected ZIP range$1,482$2,980Zillow asking-rent index
Monthly spread$1,498highest minus lowest selected ZIP
Observed burden range28.9%55.4%ACS renter households paying 30%+
Renter households covered47,449across the selected ZCTAs
01 · ASKING RENT LADDERDirect ZIP ZORI
Horizontal bars compare Zillow asking-rent indexes across the selected direct-evidence ZIP set.60035$2,98060030$2,46760089$2,44460061$2,43860073$2,37060060$2,35360046$2,34360002$2,23560031$1,96560085$1,72460099$1,52660087$1,482
02 · PRESSURE MATRIXRent × observed burden
Each point is one selected ZIP and ZCTA match. Horizontal position is Zillow asking rent and vertical position is the ACS renter cost-burden share.57.9%50.0%42.1%34.2%26.4%600856007360087600996006160060600896003160030600026003560046Zillow asking-rent index →ACS burden share →
03 · BENCHMARK GAPZORI vs HUD 2BR
Bars show the percentage difference between the Zillow blended asking-rent index and the local HUD two-bedroom standard. Their housing universes differ.60002+149.0%60030+124.6%60073+124.1%60035+121.1%60060+118.2%60046+114.9%60085+111.9%60099+102.4%60061+102.0%60031+96.8%60089+95.5%60087+90.9%
WHAT THE LOCAL DISTRIBUTION SAYS

Zillow’s current county ZORI, a typical observed asking-rent index, is $2,251, up 3.62% year over year. Across the 12 selected ZIP/ZCTA matches, it runs from $1,482 to $2,980, a $1,498 spread. The distribution has a meaningful lower and upper edge—60087 at the low end and 60035 at the high end—rather than a tight central cluster. The decision question is not whether one county figure describes every rental search, but which live listings, bedroom needs, and payment ceiling align with a renter’s circumstances. ZORI is a market index rather than a quote, and it does not establish the rent of a particular available unit.

Each price lens answers a different question and should remain separate. Zillow’s ZIP figures are current typical observed asking-rent indices, providing one market benchmark. By contrast, the ACS five-year county median gross rent is $1,477, and shown ZCTA estimates range from $1,160 to $2,037; they are survey estimates, not current asking rents. HUD’s two-bedroom FMR is $1,781 countywide and $1,490$2,560 across displayed areas; it is an administrative bedroom-specific standard, not asking rent. The ZORI-to-HUD two-bedroom comparison ranges from 90.9% in 60087 to 149.0% in 60002. It can support a standards screen, but cannot replace observed ZORI or the ACS measure.

The ACS five-year burden and vacancy measures frame a separate household trade-off rather than a listing signal. The share of renter households paying 30% or more of income ranges from 28.9% to 55.4%, versus 49.3% countywide. Vacancy ranges from 1.8% in 60087 to 11.2% in 60002, compared with 4.49% countywide. These ranges argue for checking the current unit rather than assuming that a broad ZIP measure represents a building. Higher or lower vacancy does not establish why rent, burden, or availability differs. Neither a burden share nor a vacancy rate tells a household what it will pay for a specific unit; evaluate whether the actual all-in monthly cost fits income and move timing.

Coverage and geography limit how far the comparisons travel. The direct-evidence screen shows 12 matches and covers 47,449 renter households, but it is not an exhaustive county or local inventory; its purpose is a selected screening set. ZIPs are assigned to Lake County using the largest HUD residential-address share, and 60089’s share is 67.8%, illustrating that a ZIP can cross county lines. Census ZCTAs are statistical areas rather than USPS delivery ZIPs, so the ACS geography is not a delivery-area substitute. Before choosing a property, verify the live advertised rent, bedroom count, included utilities, fees, deposits, lease term, income qualification, availability, and the unit’s precise address and county relationship.

Selected ZIP evidence

Keep each source universe visible

20 ZIP profiles passed the county gate; the 12 with the most renter households are shown.

ZIP / ZCTAZillow asking rentACS gross rentHUD 2BRBurden 30%+VacancyIncome screenHUD county share
60085$1,724$1,161$1,54046.5%4.2%$69k100.0%
60073$2,370$1,615$1,91047.5%3.6%$95k100.0%
60087$1,482$1,356$1,63044.1%1.8%$59k100.0%
60099$1,526$1,160$1,49052.4%5.4%$61k100.0%
60061$2,438$1,908$2,39044.9%4.1%$98k100.0%
60060$2,353$1,572$1,99042.6%3.2%$94k100.0%
60089$2,444$2,037$2,56028.9%2.3%$98k67.8%
60031$1,965$1,657$2,03051.8%2.7%$79k100.0%
60030$2,467$1,553$1,98048.8%4.2%$99k100.0%
60002$2,235$1,177$1,50041.0%11.2%$89k100.0%
60035$2,980$1,925$2,46055.4%5.6%$119k100.0%
60046$2,343$1,655$2,04033.5%2.6%$94k100.0%
READ BEFORE USING

Census ACS county and ZCTA values are five-year survey estimates, and ZCTAs are statistical areas rather than USPS delivery ZIPs. They should not be read as current listing data or as precise delivery-area boundaries.

The displayed ZIPs are assigned to Lake County by the largest HUD residential-address share, although ZIPs may cross county lines. The direct-evidence selection is not an exhaustive inventory, and unit-level pricing or availability requires independent confirmation.

SOURCE LEDGERCensus ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stockACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30Census ACS five-year — ZCTA housing and incomeACS 2024 5-year ZCTA · pulled 2026-08-08HUD Fair Market Rents — Section 8 standardFY2026 FMR · pulled 2026-07-26HUD-USPS ZIP-to-county residential-address crosswalkHUD-USPS 2026Q1 · pulled 2026-08-09Zillow ZHVI and ZORI — county values and rentscounty ZHVI/ZORI 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-26Zillow ZORI — ZIP market rentsZORI ZIP 2026-06 · pulled 2026-08-08
Cities & communities

Where people live within Lake County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Waukegan city89.1KBuffalo Grove village*42.9KWheeling village*38.4KMundelein village31.9KNorth Chicago city30.6KGurnee village30.5KHighland Park city30.4KRound Lake Beach village27.1K
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

61 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Waukegan cityIncorporated place
    89,076
  2. 02
    Buffalo Grove villageIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    42,891
  3. 03
    Wheeling villageIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    38,433
  4. 04
    Mundelein villageIncorporated place
    31,915
  5. 05
    North Chicago cityIncorporated place
    30,643
  6. 06
    Gurnee villageIncorporated place
    30,510
  7. 07
    Highland Park cityIncorporated place
    30,398
  8. 08
    Round Lake Beach villageIncorporated place
    27,079
  9. 09
    Vernon Hills villageIncorporated place
    26,876
  10. 10
    Zion cityIncorporated place
    24,600
  11. 11
    Grayslake villageIncorporated place
    20,929
  12. 12
    Libertyville villageIncorporated place
    20,525
Show 49 more places
  1. 13
    Lake Zurich villageIncorporated place
    19,832
  2. 14
    Deerfield villageIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    19,518
  3. 15
    Lake Forest cityIncorporated place
    19,416
  4. 16
    Round Lake villageIncorporated place
    18,628
  5. 17
    Antioch villageIncorporated place
    14,859
  6. 18
    Lindenhurst villageIncorporated place
    14,417
  7. 19
    Beach Park villageIncorporated place
    14,115
  8. 20
    Wauconda villageIncorporated place
    14,027
  9. 21
    Fox Lake villageIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    11,131
  10. 22
    Barrington villageIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    11,077
  11. 23
    Gages Lake CDPCensus-designated place
    10,819
  12. 24
    Hawthorn Woods villageIncorporated place
    9,143
  13. 25
    Lake Villa villageIncorporated place
    8,683
  14. 26
    Long Grove villageIncorporated place
    8,305
  15. 27
    Island Lake villageIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    8,014
  16. 28
    Lincolnshire villageIncorporated place
    7,980
  17. 29
    Round Lake Park villageIncorporated place
    7,919
  18. 30
    Park City cityIncorporated place
    7,827
  19. 31
    Volo villageIncorporated place
    6,706
  20. 32
    Winthrop Harbor villageIncorporated place
    6,559
  21. 33
    Lakemoor villageIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    6,467
  22. 34
    Lake Bluff villageIncorporated place
    6,041
  23. 35
    Lake Barrington villageIncorporated place
    5,442
  24. 36
    Highwood cityIncorporated place
    5,301
  25. 37
    Grandwood Park CDPCensus-designated place
    5,262
  26. 38
    Fox River Grove villageIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    4,523
  27. 39
    Kildeer villageIncorporated place
    4,292
  28. 40
    Green Oaks villageIncorporated place
    4,096
  29. 41
    Riverwoods villageIncorporated place
    4,013
  30. 42
    Barrington Hills villageIncorporated place · spans 4 counties
    3,879
  31. 43
    Deer Park villageIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    3,711
  32. 44
    Wadsworth villageIncorporated place
    3,686
  33. 45
    Hainesville villageIncorporated place
    3,524
  34. 46
    Long Lake CDPCensus-designated place
    3,307
  35. 47
    North Barrington villageIncorporated place
    3,143
  36. 48
    Round Lake Heights villageIncorporated place
    2,592
  37. 49
    Fox Lake Hills CDPCensus-designated place
    2,399
  38. 50
    Venetian Village CDPCensus-designated place
    2,334
  39. 51
    Channel Lake CDPCensus-designated place
    2,052
  40. 52
    Forest Lake CDPCensus-designated place
    1,865
  41. 53
    Knollwood CDPCensus-designated place
    1,864
  42. 54
    Port Barrington villageIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    1,477
  43. 55
    Bannockburn villageIncorporated place
    1,148
  44. 56
    Third Lake villageIncorporated place
    1,137
  45. 57
    Tower Lakes villageIncorporated place
    1,106
  46. 58
    Lake Catherine CDPCensus-designated place
    968
  47. 59
    Indian Creek villageIncorporated place
    874
  48. 60
    Mettawa villageIncorporated place
    663
  49. 61
    Old Mill Creek villageIncorporated place
    143

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.109% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax2.58%

$8,923 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration-3,046

14,956 in · 18,002 out

Arriving vs leaving income+$14,771

$134,752 arriving · $119,981 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors8.7%

624 of 7,179 mortgages

investorother financed
Current listing pressure

What sellers and visible supply are doing

Realtor.com® Economic Research · county inventory 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-28
Active listings954▼ 7.9% year over year
Median days on market29▼ 6.5% year over year
Listings price-reduced11.7%seller-concession signal
Median listing pricen/a▲ 2.6% year over year

Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.

Same metro

The other counties in Chicago, IL

A metro is an average of these. Which side of a county line a property sits on can change the tax bill, the hazard profile and the tenant pool.

CountyPopulationPriceRentYieldHazard
Lake County714,223$401k$2,2516.7%inland flooding
Cook County5,182,090$343k$2,3368.2%inland flooding
DuPage County930,024$449k$2,1405.7%inland flooding
Will County701,462$379k$2,3477.4%inland flooding
Kane County517,255$389k$2,1236.6%inland flooding
Lake County500,379$254k$1,4656.9%inland flooding
McHenry County312,591$372k$2,0286.6%inland flooding
Porter County174,818$336k$1,5285.5%inland flooding
Kendall County137,675$398k$2,3927.2%inland flooding
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Property-level flood exposure or insurance pricing could overwhelm the pre-cost gross yield.
  2. Taxes, maintenance, vacancy and leasing costs could reduce income below underwriting assumptions.
  3. Workplace job contraction and net outmigration could weaken tenant or resale depth.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Is HUD Fair Market Rent the county's market asking rent?

No. It is a two-bedroom payment standard; the record separately publishes median asking market rent.

Does the record establish a property-specific flood loss amount?

No. It provides a modeled county-level climate-loss ratio, not a site-specific loss estimate.

Does the record establish net rental yield?

No. It supplies gross yield before property tax, insurance, maintenance, vacancy and other operating costs.