Counties / Arkansas / Lincoln County

Lincoln County, AR

FIPS 05079 · population 12,950 · outside every metro area

$136k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$136k
▲ 8.3% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
ACS median gross rent
$744
occupied-unit survey; not current asking rent
Census ACS · surveyed
Gross yield
n/a
gross yield cannot be computed without measured market rent
requires both measured price and measured rent
HUD 2-bed standard
$880
the Section 8 payment standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

One annual series is unavailable
FHFA five-year cumulativen/anot annualized · through n/a
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06+8.3%FHFA HPIperiod n/an/a
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-07-28.
Owner-reported value$108k
Surveyed gross rent$744
Rent burden 30%+35.9%
Median year built1984
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
18.2%vacant
4,390estimated housing units
Occupied tenure23.9% renter
owner 76.1%renter 23.9%
Structure mix65.2% single-family
Single-family 65.2%20+ units 0.8%Mobile home 29.0%Other 5.0%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs2,507▼ 6.0% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments228annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$931▲ 3.2% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorTrade, transportation, and utilities23.4% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS−6.0%WEEKLY WAGE+3.2%Trade, transportation, and utilities23.4%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Lincoln County’s decision tension is rising measured value against a contracting local workplace base. At Zillow’s county observation, median home value was $135,849, 8.26% above its year-earlier reading; annual QCEW covered employment at county workplaces was 2,507, down 5.96% in 2025. This is a county for buyers who can validate durable tenant demand and resale depth, and for caution where quick exit matters. Zillow is a value measure, not a closed-sale price; no FHFA annual repeat-transaction HPI is published to independently confirm or contest its direction.

02Housing economics

Housing economics remain unproven rather than cheap by default. County market asking rent is not published, so gross yield cannot be computed. HUD’s two-bedroom FMR is $880 monthly, but it is a payment standard, not measured asking rent. The effective property-tax rate is 0.52% and median annual tax is $566; neither county statistic replaces the parcel assessment, insurance, maintenance, or financing costs. Without rent comps and a property tax bill, an underwriter cannot determine operating margin or cash-flow coverage.

03Demand & competition

Listing and migration evidence argue against treating the county as simply supply-constrained. In Realtor.com’s MLS listing market, median listing price was down 2.03% year over year, marketing time was 102 days, and 17.39% of listings had reductions. These are asking-price, marketing-time, and seller-concession signals—not closed sales or proof of buyer demand. Net tax-return migration was negative 36, yet movers arriving had average AGI a calculated $8,171 above movers leaving. Investor participation was 7.94% across 63 purchase mortgages, a limited share of recorded buyer competition rather than evidence that investors set prices.

04Risk & next checks

Risk screening must be property-specific. Inland flood is the dominant hazard, while modeled annual climate loss is 0.17% of building value; this is a modeled expected-loss ratio, not an insurance quote or a forecast of any parcel’s damage. Obtain flood-zone history, elevation, insurance quotes, closed-sale comps, market-rent comps, and lease performance before setting price or leverage. The record also lacks FHFA HPI, closed-sale data, and vacancy data, preventing a separate repeat-sales trend check and a defensible view of realized demand or income stability.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Lincoln County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Star City city2.4KGould city661Grady city168
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

3 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Star City cityIncorporated place
    2,405
  2. 02
    Gould cityIncorporated place
    661
  3. 03
    Grady cityIncorporated place
    168

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.166% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax0.52%

$566 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration-36

195 in · 231 out

Arriving vs leaving income+$8,171

$47,959 arriving · $39,788 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors7.9%

5 of 63 mortgages

investorother financed
Current listing pressure

What sellers and visible supply are doing

Realtor.com® Economic Research · county inventory 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-28
Active listings13▼ 53.6% year over year
Median days on market102▲ 46.4% year over year
Listings price-reduced17.4%seller-concession signal
Median listing pricen/a▼ 2.0% year over year

Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.

No rent index is published for this county.Zillow’s county rent series does not cover every county, and estimating one from a neighbouring county would be a guess wearing a number’s clothes. Everything above is measured here; no wider market is mapped for it either.
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Property-level rents, vacancy, or lease performance could show insufficient income for carrying costs.
  2. Flood-zone conditions or insurance quotes could differ materially from the county-level modeled hazard burden.
  3. Slow listing-market conditions and reduced covered employment could impair tenant demand or resale liquidity.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Can gross yield be calculated from the county record?

No. Market asking rent is not published, and HUD’s two-bedroom FMR is a payment standard rather than market rent.

Does the record provide an FHFA repeat-sales measure to corroborate Zillow’s value direction?

No. FHFA annual HPI is not published for this record.

What hazard requires the most property-level diligence?

Inland flood is the dominant hazard; modeled annual climate loss is 0.17% of building value, but parcel exposure and insurance costs are not published.