Counties / North Dakota / Logan County

Logan County, ND

FIPS 38047 · population 1,819 · outside every metro area

$102k
ACS owner-reported value · ACS 2024 5-year
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

ACS owner-reported value
$102k
survey estimate; not a current listing or sale price
Census ACS · surveyed
ACS median gross rent
$838
occupied-unit survey; not current asking rent
Census ACS · surveyed
Gross yield
n/a
gross yield cannot be computed without measured market rent
requires both measured price and measured rent
HUD 2-bed standard
$1,014
the Section 8 payment standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Owner-reported value$102k
Surveyed gross rent$838
Rent burden 30%+50.0%
Median year built1967
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
27.4%vacant
1,070estimated housing units
Occupied tenure17.0% renter
owner 83.0%renter 17.0%
Structure mix90.6% single-family
Single-family 90.6%20+ units 0.0%Mobile home 5.6%Other 3.8%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs628▼ 1.6% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments116annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$812▲ 4.1% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorTrade, transportation, and utilities33.2% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS−1.6%WEEKLY WAGE+4.1%Trade, transportation, and utilities33.2%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Logan County is a thin-evidence, low-liquidity underwriting question rather than a demonstrated rental opportunity: annual QCEW shows 628 covered jobs, down 1.57%, while the covered-worker average weekly wage was $812, up 4.10%. That combination warrants investigation by operators able to verify property-level demand and caution for buyers relying on broad growth narratives. Trade, transportation, and utilities is the largest disclosed private supersector, but QCEW measures jobs at county workplaces, not resident employment or the entire economy.

02Housing economics

Housing economics cannot yet establish a rent-to-price case. The ACS owner-occupied median home value is $102,000, an owner-reported survey value, while ACS median gross rent is $838 for occupied units; they cover different populations and cannot be combined into yield. No market rent is published, so gross yield cannot be computed. HUD FMR of $1,014 is a payment standard, not asking rent. The 1.00% effective property-tax rate is a carrying-cost input. A 27.38% ACS vacancy rate and 50.00% renter rent-burden share flag occupancy and collection questions, not forecasts.

03Demand & competition

Migration and purchase evidence temper the case for demand. The record shows net migration of -17 tax-return households; incoming movers' average income was $56,769 versus $45,116 for outgoing movers. This income difference does not establish tenant demand. Of 6 purchases, no investor purchases were recorded, so observed non-owner competition was absent but the sample is too small to characterize all buyers. No Realtor.com listing price, active-listing, days-on-market, or reduction data are supplied, preventing a reading of visible MLS supply or seller concessions.

04Risk & next checks

Inland flood is the dominant hazard, and the modeled annual building-value loss ratio is 0.14%; it is an exposure model, not a property-specific damage estimate or insurance quote. There is no Zillow county home-value series, FHFA appreciation observation, or transaction-price series, so price direction cannot be assessed. Next checks are current achieved rents, lease-up and paid occupancy, flood-zone and elevation review, insurance terms, property condition, and tax bills. Those omissions prevent an expense-adjusted return, price-trend, and insurability conclusion.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Logan County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Napoleon city765Gackle city284Lehr city*66Fredonia city46
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

4 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Napoleon cityIncorporated place
    765
  2. 02
    Gackle cityIncorporated place
    284
  3. 03
    Lehr cityIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    66
  4. 04
    Fredonia cityIncorporated place
    46

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.140% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax1.00%

$1,018 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration-17

26 in · 43 out

Arriving vs leaving income+$11,653

$56,769 arriving · $45,116 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors0.0%

0 of 6 mortgages

investorother financed
No rent index is published for this county.Zillow’s county rent series does not cover every county, and estimating one from a neighbouring county would be a guess wearing a number’s clothes. Everything above is measured here; no wider market is mapped for it either.
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Property-level achieved rent, vacancy, and operating costs may not support cash flow.
  2. Small migration and purchase counts may not represent persistent tenant or buyer behavior.
  3. Flood exposure, insurance terms, and property condition could raise costs beyond county-level indicators.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Can gross yield be computed from this record?

No. Market rent is not published, and HUD FMR cannot substitute for market rent.

What does the record show about investor purchases?

No investor purchases were recorded among the reported purchases.

Which hazard requires property-level diligence?

Inland flood.