Counties / Wisconsin / Marquette County

Marquette County, WI

FIPS 55077 · population 15,746 · outside every metro area

$271k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$271k
▲ 6.2% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
ACS median gross rent
$800
occupied-unit survey; not current asking rent
Census ACS · surveyed
Gross yield
n/a
gross yield cannot be computed without measured market rent
requires both measured price and measured rent
HUD 2-bed standard
$973
the Section 8 payment standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

Both annual signals move in the same direction
FHFA five-year cumulative+63.0%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06+6.2%FHFA HPI2025+3.3%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-07-28.
Owner-reported value$210k
Surveyed gross rent$800
Rent burden 30%+39.2%
Median year built1977
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
28.9%vacant
9,827estimated housing units
Occupied tenure18.9% renter
owner 81.2%renter 18.9%
Structure mix84.1% single-family
Single-family 84.1%20+ units 0.2%Mobile home 10.6%Other 5.1%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs3,964▲ 0.6% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments404annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$979▲ 9.6% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorManufacturing36.0% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS+0.6%WEEKLY WAGE+9.6%Manufacturing36.0%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Marquette County’s tension is appreciation evidence without a published income test: investigate if seeking a property-specific cash-flow case, but be cautious if relying on value gains alone. Zillow reports a $271,265 county median home value, up 6.18%. Separately, FHFA’s 2025 repeat-transaction HPI rose 3.27% over its annual measure and 63% cumulatively over five years. The HPI confirms direction, not a dollar value, and its vintage and method cannot be merged with Zillow’s growth.

02Housing economics

Market rent is not published, so gross yield cannot be computed. HUD’s two-bedroom FMR is a payment standard, not an estimate of asking rent, and cannot supply the missing income input. The reported effective property-tax rate is 1.26%; that burden needs parcel-level confirmation and must be considered against rent that remains unknown. Price appreciation therefore does not establish return after taxes or other operating costs.

03Demand & competition

Realtor.com’s MLS evidence shows 51 active listings, with 14.67% price-reduced and pending listings equal to 51.49% of active inventory. These are visible supply, seller-concession and pipeline indicators, respectively—not closed-sale pricing or proof of demand. Migration shows a net gain of 4 tax-return households, while incoming movers’ average AGI exceeded outgoing movers’ by $12,108; the small net flow limits a demand conclusion. Investors made 15 of 231 purchases, so non-owner buyers are present but must be sized against total activity. QCEW covered workplace employment increased 0.56%; it is neither resident employment nor a forecast.

04Risk & next checks

Inland flood is the dominant hazard, with modeled annual climate loss of 0.16% of building value. This ratio is neither an insurance quote nor a dollar loss. Property-level flood-zone determinations, insurance quotes, closed-sale comps, vacancy, repair and financing data are not published in the record. Their absence prevents asset-specific flood carrying-cost, achieved-price and full cash-flow underwriting; lease comparables and property condition remain necessary next checks.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Marquette County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Montello city1.4KWestfield village1.2KOxford village527Neshkoro village470Endeavor village458Briggsville CDP320Packwaukee CDP244Harrisville CDP156
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

8 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Montello cityIncorporated place
    1,404
  2. 02
    Westfield villageIncorporated place
    1,231
  3. 03
    Oxford villageIncorporated place
    527
  4. 04
    Neshkoro villageIncorporated place
    470
  5. 05
    Endeavor villageIncorporated place
    458
  6. 06
    Briggsville CDPCensus-designated place
    320
  7. 07
    Packwaukee CDPCensus-designated place
    244
  8. 08
    Harrisville CDPCensus-designated place
    156

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.157% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax1.26%

$2,659 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration+4

500 in · 496 out

Arriving vs leaving income+$12,108

$58,886 arriving · $46,778 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors6.5%

15 of 231 mortgages

investorother financed
Current listing pressure

What sellers and visible supply are doing

Realtor.com® Economic Research · county inventory 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-28
Active listings51▲ 2.0% year over year
Median days on market56▼ 7.8% year over year
Listings price-reduced14.7%seller-concession signal
Median listing pricen/a▲ 23.2% year over year

Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.

No rent index is published for this county.Zillow’s county rent series does not cover every county, and estimating one from a neighbouring county would be a guess wearing a number’s clothes. Everything above is measured here; no wider market is mapped for it either.
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Market rent is absent, preventing a tested income and gross-yield case.
  2. Property-specific inland-flood exposure and insurance costs are not published.
  3. MLS asking-price conditions may not translate into closed-sale prices or achieved rents.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Can gross yield be calculated from the record?

No. Market rent is not published, and HUD two-bedroom FMR is a payment standard rather than market asking rent.

How much investor buying is recorded?

Investors made 15 of 231 purchases.

What climate hazard input is reported?

Inland flood is the dominant hazard, and modeled annual climate loss equals 0.16% of building value.