Counties / Minnesota / Martin County

Martin County, MN

FIPS 27091 · population 19,780 · outside every metro area

$225k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$225k
▲ 6.0% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
ACS median gross rent
$761
occupied-unit survey; not current asking rent
Census ACS · surveyed
Gross yield
n/a
gross yield cannot be computed without measured market rent
requires both measured price and measured rent
HUD 2-bed standard
$973
the Section 8 payment standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

Both annual signals move in the same direction
FHFA five-year cumulative+39.6%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06+6.0%FHFA HPI2025+0.6%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-07-28.
Owner-reported value$164k
Surveyed gross rent$761
Rent burden 30%+50.8%
Median year built1960
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
9.2%vacant
9,729estimated housing units
Occupied tenure31.1% renter
owner 68.9%renter 31.1%
Structure mix77.5% single-family
Single-family 77.5%20+ units 7.9%Mobile home 2.3%Other 12.3%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs8,381▲ 1.6% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments714annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$1,050▲ 1.6% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorTrade, transportation, and utilities30.2% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS+1.6%WEEKLY WAGE+1.6%Trade, transportation, and utilities30.2%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Martin County presents a valuation-timing tension for investors who need corroborated appreciation rather than a single headline. Zillow’s county median home value was $224,849 in 2026-06, up 5.99% year over year, while FHFA’s repeat-transaction HPI rose 0.60% in 2025 and 39.61% cumulatively over five years. These are different methods and observation periods: FHFA is an index, not a home value, and neither series should be averaged into one growth rate. Buyers relying on near-term value support should investigate the divergence with local closed-sale evidence.

02Housing economics

No median asking market rent is published, so gross yield cannot be computed. The $973 two-bedroom HUD Fair Market Rent is a payment standard, not an estimate of local asking rent, and cannot substitute for it. The reported effective property-tax rate is 1.02%, with median annual property tax of $1,671. Those figures provide a carrying-cost screen, but they do not establish taxes for a particular home or compensate for the missing rent evidence needed to test income coverage.

03Demand & competition

County workplace conditions are mixed rather than a direct tenant-demand measure. In 2025, QCEW annual average covered employment grew 1.65%; Trade, transportation, and utilities was the largest disclosed private supersector, representing 30.17% of private covered jobs. Tax-return migration showed a net outflow of 84 households, while incoming movers’ average income was $16,184 below that of outgoing movers. Non-occupants accounted for 11 of 198 purchase mortgages, or 5.56%, indicating limited recorded investor participation rather than a definitive measure of all-cash competition.

04Risk & next checks

Inland flood is the dominant hazard, and modeled expected annual building-value loss is 0.11%. That county-level ratio does not identify parcel exposure, flood-zone status, insurance availability, prior losses, or mitigation needs. The supplied 2026-06 Realtor.com record has no MLS listing figures, preventing a screen of visible supply, asking-price concessions, and marketing time. Before underwriting, obtain property-level flood and insurance records, current market rents, lease and vacancy data, and local closed-sale comparables; without them, neither cash flow nor resale liquidity can be tested.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Martin County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Fairmont city10.3KTruman city1.2KSherburn city1KWelcome city978Trimont city546Ceylon city259Granada city243Northrop city240
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

10 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Fairmont cityIncorporated place
    10,296
  2. 02
    Truman cityIncorporated place
    1,212
  3. 03
    Sherburn cityIncorporated place
    1,015
  4. 04
    Welcome cityIncorporated place
    978
  5. 05
    Trimont cityIncorporated place
    546
  6. 06
    Ceylon cityIncorporated place
    259
  7. 07
    Granada cityIncorporated place
    243
  8. 08
    Northrop cityIncorporated place
    240
  9. 09
    Dunnell cityIncorporated place
    177
  10. 10
    Ormsby cityIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    136

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.107% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax1.02%

$1,671 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration-84

366 in · 450 out

Arriving vs leaving income−$16,184

$49,820 arriving · $66,004 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors5.6%

11 of 198 mortgages

investorother financed
No rent index is published for this county.Zillow’s county rent series does not cover every county, and estimating one from a neighbouring county would be a guess wearing a number’s clothes. Everything above is measured here; no wider market is mapped for it either.
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. The Zillow and FHFA measures may remain unreconciled because they use different methods and supplied periods.
  2. Missing market-rent, vacancy, and lease evidence could materially change the income case.
  3. County-level flood-loss modeling may not reflect a specific parcel’s exposure or insurance terms.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Can gross yield be calculated from the supplied record?

No. Market asking rent is not published, and HUD’s $973 two-bedroom FMR is a payment standard rather than market rent.

How much recorded purchase-mortgage activity involved non-occupants?

Non-occupants accounted for 11 of 198 purchase mortgages, or 5.56%.

What published hazard measure is available?

Inland flood is identified as the dominant hazard, with modeled expected annual building-value loss of 0.11%; parcel-specific exposure is not published.