Counties / Missouri / Mercer County

Mercer County, MO

FIPS 29129 · population 3,482 · outside every metro area

$143k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$143k
▲ 3.7% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
ACS median gross rent
$590
occupied-unit survey; not current asking rent
Census ACS · surveyed
Gross yield
n/a
gross yield cannot be computed without measured market rent
requires both measured price and measured rent
HUD 2-bed standard
$888
the Section 8 payment standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

One annual series is unavailable
FHFA five-year cumulativen/anot annualized · through n/a
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06+3.7%FHFA HPIperiod n/an/a
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-07-28.
Owner-reported value$105k
Surveyed gross rent$590
Rent burden 30%+29.3%
Median year built1970
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
31.6%vacant
1,902estimated housing units
Occupied tenure19.0% renter
owner 81.0%renter 19.0%
Structure mix85.0% single-family
Single-family 85.0%20+ units 3.3%Mobile home 6.4%Other 5.3%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs804▼ 1.2% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments121annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$898▲ 6.0% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorNatural resources and mining34.8% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS−1.2%WEEKLY WAGE+6.0%Natural resources and mining34.8%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Mercer County’s underwriting tension is a rising Zillow value signal alongside unproven income and a softer covered-job base. The Zillow county observation labeled 2026-06 places median home value at $142,581, up 3.67% year over year; this is a value measure, not evidence of a closed-sale price or operating return. Investors needing verified cash flow, stable local employment, or flood-cost clarity should be cautious and investigate asset-level support before relying on the county direction.

02Housing economics

Measured market rent is not published, so gross yield cannot be computed. The $888 HUD Fair Market Rent is a payment standard, not an estimate of asking rent, and cannot supply a rent or yield substitute. The effective property-tax rate is 0.96%, with median annual tax of $1,006. Those figures identify a carrying-cost input, but without assessed value, tax history, market rent and operating expenses they do not establish debt-service or expense coverage.

03Demand & competition

Annual 2025 QCEW covered employment at county workplaces fell 1.23%; it is not resident employment or an unemployment measure. Natural resources and mining, the largest disclosed private supersector, accounts for 34.85% of total private covered jobs, concentrating the disclosed private employment base without describing the entire economy. Tax-return movers show 87 households leaving and 84 arriving, while arriving households’ average AGI was $11,762 higher. That combination is modest net out-migration with a positive mover-income mix, not proof of tenant demand. Non-occupant purchase mortgages represented 3.7% of 27 total purchases, too thin a count to establish durable investor competition.

04Risk & next checks

Inland flood is the dominant hazard; the modeled climate loss ratio is 0.15% of building value per year, a modeled expected loss rather than an insurance quote or realized damage. No FHFA annual repeat-transaction HPI is published to independently test Zillow’s direction. Realtor.com MLS listing price, active-listing, days-on-market and price-reduction figures are also not published, preventing a read on asking-price competition, visible supply, marketing time, or seller concessions. Next checks are parcel flood zone and insurance terms, lease comps and vacancy, property condition, and tax assessment history.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Mercer County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Princeton city1.4KMercer town325Ravanna CDP68South Lineville town16
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

4 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Princeton cityIncorporated place
    1,352
  2. 02
    Mercer townIncorporated place
    325
  3. 03
    Ravanna CDPCensus-designated place
    68
  4. 04
    South Lineville townIncorporated place
    16

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.153% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax0.96%

$1,006 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration-3

84 in · 87 out

Arriving vs leaving income+$11,762

$51,429 arriving · $39,667 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors3.7%

1 of 27 mortgages

investorother financed
No rent index is published for this county.Zillow’s county rent series does not cover every county, and estimating one from a neighbouring county would be a guess wearing a number’s clothes. Everything above is measured here; no wider market is mapped for it either.
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. County-level migration and purchase counts may be too small to describe neighborhood demand or buyer competition.
  2. Parcel flood exposure, insurability and repair history may differ substantially from the county modeled-loss measure.
  3. Unpublished market-rent and MLS evidence could reveal rental economics or listing conditions that differ from the cautious county thesis.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Can gross yield be calculated from this record?

No. Market rent is not published, and HUD Fair Market Rent cannot be used as asking rent or as a gross-yield input.

What evidence is available on investor purchase competition?

Non-occupant purchase mortgages represented 3.7% of 27 total purchases, a limited count that does not establish persistent competition.

What hazard requires asset-level diligence?

Inland flood is the dominant hazard, with modeled expected annual building-value loss of 0.15%; parcel flood-zone status and insurance terms are not published.