Counties / North Carolina / Mitchell County

Mitchell County, NC

FIPS 37121 · population 14,992 · outside every metro area

$244k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$244k
▼ 0.9% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
ACS median gross rent
$813
occupied-unit survey; not current asking rent
Census ACS · surveyed
Gross yield
n/a
gross yield cannot be computed without measured market rent
requires both measured price and measured rent
HUD 2-bed standard
$925
the Section 8 payment standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

The annual signals disagree
FHFA five-year cumulative+67.8%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06−0.9%FHFA HPI2025+13.9%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-07-28.
Owner-reported value$220k
Surveyed gross rent$813
Rent burden 30%+40.8%
Median year built1978
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
24.3%vacant
8,697estimated housing units
Occupied tenure23.7% renter
owner 76.3%renter 23.7%
Structure mix77.4% single-family
Single-family 77.4%20+ units 1.2%Mobile home 15.4%Other 6.0%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs4,641▼ 8.7% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments442annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$976▲ 3.8% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorEducation and health services25.8% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS−8.7%WEEKLY WAGE+3.8%Education and health services25.8%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Mitchell County presents a verification case rather than a clear acquisition signal: Zillow’s 2026-06 median home value is $243,680, down 0.9% year over year, while the annual 2025 FHFA repeat-transaction HPI rose 13.89%. The apparent conflict should make value-focused buyers investigate transaction comps and lenders cautious on collateral assumptions. These are distinct vintages and measures—FHFA is an index, not a dollar value—and cannot be blended into an appreciation rate. This record does not establish which measure better reflects an individual property.

02Housing economics

Housing economics are incomplete. No county market asking rent is published, so gross yield cannot be computed. HUD’s $925 two-bedroom FMR is a payment standard rather than market rent and cannot fill that gap. Against the Zillow value, the supplied effective property-tax rate is 0.52%; carrying-cost review also needs insurance, financing, repairs and property-specific assessments, none published here. An underwriter can screen assessed tax burden, but cannot test rent coverage or operating income from this record.

03Demand & competition

MLS listing-market evidence points to more seller accommodation: Realtor.com inventory was 42.94% higher, median marketing time was 62 days, and 16.27% of listings had reductions. Those are asking-market conditions, not closed-sale prices or standalone proof of buyer demand. Annual QCEW covered employment at county workplaces fell 8.73%, a labor-market caution worth verifying; it is neither resident employment nor unemployment. Migration was positive by 42 tax-return households, and the supplied $13,533 in-mover versus out-mover AGI gap supports a potentially stronger incoming income mix, not tenant demand. Non-occupants accounted for 9.17% of 109 purchase mortgages, indicating some buyer competition but not investor pricing power.

04Risk & next checks

Modeled climate loss equals 0.17% of building value per year, with inland flood the dominant hazard; that ratio is modeled rather than a site-level loss estimate. It requires parcel flood-zone, elevation, drainage, insurance-quote and replacement-cost checks. Missing market rent prevents yield and coverage conclusions; missing closed-sale comps prevents a value conclusion; and missing property-level hazard and insurance data prevents a reliable carrying-cost conclusion.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Mitchell County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Spruce Pine town2.4KBakersville town747
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

2 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Spruce Pine townIncorporated place
    2,398
  2. 02
    Bakersville townIncorporated place
    747

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.167% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax0.52%

$1,141 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration+42

357 in · 315 out

Arriving vs leaving income+$13,533

$60,546 arriving · $47,013 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors9.2%

10 of 109 mortgages

investorother financed
Current listing pressure

What sellers and visible supply are doing

Realtor.com® Economic Research · county inventory 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-28
Active listings117▲ 42.9% year over year
Median days on market62▲ 3.8% year over year
Listings price-reduced16.3%seller-concession signal
Median listing pricen/a▼ 6.0% year over year

Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.

No rent index is published for this county.Zillow’s county rent series does not cover every county, and estimating one from a neighbouring county would be a guess wearing a number’s clothes. Everything above is measured here; no wider market is mapped for it either.
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. County-level price, listing and employment measures may not represent the target property's submarket, condition or sale value.
  2. No published market rent prevents testing gross yield, rent coverage or operating income.
  3. Inland-flood exposure and insurance costs can differ materially by parcel from the county-level modeled loss ratio.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Can gross yield be calculated from this record?

No. County market rent is not published, and HUD’s $925 two-bedroom FMR is a payment standard rather than market asking rent.

Do the Realtor.com figures prove that buyers are weak?

No. They show MLS asking-market conditions, including more visible inventory and price reductions, but not closed-sale prices or buyer demand by themselves.

How much investor participation is reported?

Non-occupants accounted for 9.17% of 109 purchase mortgages.