Counties / Texas / Mitchell County

Mitchell County, TX

FIPS 48335 · population 9,018 · outside every metro area

$97k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$97k
▲ 1.2% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
ACS median gross rent
$524
occupied-unit survey; not current asking rent
Census ACS · surveyed
Gross yield
n/a
gross yield cannot be computed without measured market rent
requires both measured price and measured rent
HUD 2-bed standard
$1,091
the Section 8 payment standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

One annual series is unavailable
FHFA five-year cumulativen/anot annualized · through n/a
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06+1.2%FHFA HPIperiod n/an/a
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-07-28.
Owner-reported value$86k
Surveyed gross rent$524
Rent burden 30%+39.7%
Median year built1961
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
25.3%vacant
3,691estimated housing units
Occupied tenure21.3% renter
owner 78.7%renter 21.3%
Structure mix81.3% single-family
Single-family 81.3%20+ units 0.0%Mobile home 12.8%Other 5.8%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs2,152▲ 6.5% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments185annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$1,284▲ 15.1% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorNatural resources and mining25.6% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS+6.5%WEEKLY WAGE+15.1%Natural resources and mining25.6%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Mitchell County poses a price-led but incomplete-income case: Zillow’s June 2026 median home value was $96,728, up 1.21% year over year. That modest value movement is not, by itself, an underwriting return. Income-focused buyers should investigate rather than rely on the price signal, because no county market asking rent is published and no FHFA repeat-transaction HPI observation is supplied to independently test price direction.

02Housing economics

Housing economics remain unresolved. HUD’s two-bedroom FMR is $1,091 per month, but it is a payment standard, not a measured asking rent; it cannot be substituted into a gross-yield calculation. The effective property-tax rate is 1.86%, with median annual tax of $1,599, a carrying-cost input that needs parcel assessment and exemption review. With market rent absent, gross yield cannot be computed, and no conclusion is possible about whether rent covers taxes or other operating costs.

03Demand & competition

County workplace data offer some demand context but not resident labor conditions. QCEW’s 2025 annual average shows 2,152 covered jobs; Natural resources and mining, the largest disclosed private supersector, accounts for 334 jobs, or 25.57% of total private covered employment. Tax-return migration was net positive by 19 households, and incoming movers’ average income exceeded outgoing movers’ by $1,558; this is a small flow, not proof of durable tenant demand. Investors made 2 of 41 purchase mortgages, a 4.88% share, suggesting limited measured non-owner competition but not the full cash-buyer market.

04Risk & next checks

Risk controls deserve equal weight. Modeled annual climate loss is 0.14% of building value and the named dominant hazard is inland flood; this modeled ratio is not a site-specific insurance quote or expected dollar loss. Realtor.com MLS listing price, active listings, days on market and price-reduction data are not published here, so visible supply, seller concessions and marketing time cannot be assessed. Next checks are property-level flood zone and insurance terms, current market rent and lease evidence, and parcel tax/assessment data; without them, cash flow and hazard-adjusted carrying costs remain untested.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Mitchell County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Colorado City city4KLake Colorado City CDP980Loraine town813Westbrook city177
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

4 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Colorado City cityIncorporated place
    3,976
  2. 02
    Lake Colorado City CDPCensus-designated place
    980
  3. 03
    Loraine townIncorporated place
    813
  4. 04
    Westbrook cityIncorporated place
    177

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.138% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax1.86%

$1,599 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration+19

189 in · 170 out

Arriving vs leaving income+$1,558

$52,746 arriving · $51,188 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors4.9%

2 of 41 mortgages

investorother financed
No rent index is published for this county.Zillow’s county rent series does not cover every county, and estimating one from a neighbouring county would be a guess wearing a number’s clothes. Everything above is measured here; no wider market is mapped for it either.
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Actual asking rents or achievable lease terms may not support carrying costs.
  2. Inland-flood exposure and insurance terms may differ materially by parcel.
  3. Workplace employment and a small migration gain may not translate into durable local tenant demand.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Can gross yield be calculated from the supplied record?

No. County market asking rent is not published, and HUD FMR cannot be used as market rent.

What MLS listing-market evidence is available?

No Realtor.com listing price, active-listing, days-on-market, or price-reduction figures are published in the record.

Is there an independent FHFA appreciation measure to compare with Zillow’s direction?

No FHFA annual repeat-transaction HPI observation is supplied.