Counties / Wisconsin / Monroe County

Monroe County, WI

FIPS 55081 · population 46,208 · outside every metro area

$263k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$263k
▲ 5.3% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
Median asking rent
$1,237
▲ 4.6% year over year
Zillow ZORI · direct
Gross yield
5.6%
annual rent ÷ price, before costs
derived: rent × 12 ÷ price ✓
HUD 2-bed standard
$1,036
market rent is 1.19x the standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

Both annual signals move in the same direction
FHFA five-year cumulative+54.5%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06+5.3%FHFA HPI2025+5.3%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-07-28.
Owner-reported value$210k
Surveyed gross rent$914
Rent burden 30%+39.6%
Median year built1980
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
8.6%vacant
20,022estimated housing units
Occupied tenure27.2% renter
owner 72.8%renter 27.2%
Structure mix76.3% single-family
Single-family 76.3%20+ units 2.2%Mobile home 7.9%Other 13.5%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs21,037▼ 1.9% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments1,367annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$1,069▲ 3.3% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorTrade, transportation, and utilities29.7% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS−1.9%WEEKLY WAGE+3.3%Trade, transportation, and utilities29.7%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Monroe County presents a carry-versus-demand test, not a simple appreciation case. Market rent and price growth support investigating rentals, but outmigration and weakening covered employment argue for caution about tenant depth and resale liquidity. Buyers should investigate property-level flood and operating costs; cases dependent on broad job growth or rapid resale are especially exposed. County evidence does not establish metro conditions.

02Housing economics

Zillow’s 2026-06 county record reports median home value $263,334, up 5.3%, and median asking rent $1,237, up 4.56%; supplied gross yield is 5.64% before costs. FHFA’s repeat-transaction HPI from a separate annual 2025 vintage and method shows 5.35% appreciation. It confirms direction, not a dollar value, and cannot be blended with Zillow. Market rent is 19.4% above HUD’s two-bedroom FMR of $1,036; FMR is a payment standard, not asking-rent evidence. The 1.35% effective tax rate and $2,826 median tax reduce carry. Missing operating costs prevent net-yield underwriting.

03Demand & competition

Demand evidence is mixed. Tax-return flows show a net outflow of 93, with average AGI $53,245 for inbound movers versus $55,024 for outbound movers. That is a weaker inflow-income signal, not a rent forecast. QCEW covered workplace employment declined while average weekly wage rose; Trade, transportation, and utilities is the largest disclosed private supersector, not the whole economy. These data are not resident employment, unemployment, or a metro series. Investor mortgages were 36 of 426 purchases, an 8.45% share: participation is present but not dominant in this record.

04Risk & next checks

Inland flood is the dominant hazard; modeled climate loss is 0.15% of building value per year, not an insurance quote. Obtain parcel flood-zone and elevation data, insurance terms, deductibles and claims history. Realtor.com listing measures are not published, so visible supply, marketing time, asking-market competition and seller concessions cannot be assessed. Confirm rent with local comps, then underwrite insurance, repairs, vacancy, management, utilities, financing, inspection findings and lease-up. Missing expenses and market-depth data prevent a net-return, DSCR or demand conclusion.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Monroe County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Sparta city10KTomah city9.5KCashton village1.3KRockland village*745Norwalk village662Wilton village532Warrens village438Ontario village*422
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

14 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Sparta cityIncorporated place
    9,950
  2. 02
    Tomah cityIncorporated place
    9,532
  3. 03
    Cashton villageIncorporated place
    1,281
  4. 04
    Rockland villageIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    745
  5. 05
    Norwalk villageIncorporated place
    662
  6. 06
    Wilton villageIncorporated place
    532
  7. 07
    Warrens villageIncorporated place
    438
  8. 08
    Ontario villageIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    422
  9. 09
    Kendall villageIncorporated place
    379
  10. 10
    Oakdale villageIncorporated place
    321
  11. 11
    Wyeville villageIncorporated place
    159
  12. 12
    Cataract CDPCensus-designated place
    138
Show 2 more places
  1. 13
    Tunnel City CDPCensus-designated place
    105
  2. 14
    Melvina villageIncorporated place
    89

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.149% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax1.35%

$2,826 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration-93

1,144 in · 1,237 out

Arriving vs leaving income−$1,779

$53,245 arriving · $55,024 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors8.5%

36 of 426 mortgages

investorother financed
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Outmigration, lower average income among inbound movers, and declining covered employment could weaken tenant depth or lease-up.
  2. Inland-flood exposure, taxes, insurance, and other unpublished operating costs could materially reduce the supplied gross yield.
  3. Absent Realtor.com supply and marketing data leave buyer competition, seller concessions, and market liquidity untested.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

What rent evidence is actually published?

The record publishes median asking market rent and a gross yield before costs; HUD’s two-bedroom FMR is a payment standard, not market rent.

What do the migration and labor records indicate?

Outflow exceeded inflow, inbound movers had lower average AGI than outbound movers, and QCEW covered employment declined while wages rose. QCEW measures workplace jobs, not resident employment or unemployment.

What risk and market-depth evidence is missing?

The record identifies inland flood as the dominant hazard but lacks parcel flood details, insurance terms, and claims history. Realtor.com listing measures and several operating costs are also absent.