Counties / Ohio / Morgan County

Morgan County, OH

FIPS 39115 · population 13,651 · outside every metro area

$161k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$161k
▲ 6.1% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
ACS median gross rent
$742
occupied-unit survey; not current asking rent
Census ACS · surveyed
Gross yield
n/a
gross yield cannot be computed without measured market rent
requires both measured price and measured rent
HUD 2-bed standard
$973
the Section 8 payment standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

Both annual signals move in the same direction
FHFA five-year cumulative+63.5%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06+6.1%FHFA HPI2025+20.3%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-07-28.
Owner-reported value$151k
Surveyed gross rent$742
Rent burden 30%+48.3%
Median year built1978
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
21.9%vacant
7,320estimated housing units
Occupied tenure21.1% renter
owner 78.9%renter 21.1%
Structure mix76.1% single-family
Single-family 76.1%20+ units 0.8%Mobile home 18.6%Other 4.5%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs2,819▼ 5.8% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments240annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$959▲ 4.8% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorTrade, transportation, and utilities27.5% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS−5.8%WEEKLY WAGE+4.8%Trade, transportation, and utilities27.5%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Morgan County presents a pricing-versus-income-validation tension: the later Zillow county observation labeled 2026-06 puts median home value at $161,102, up 6.12% year over year, while the FHFA annual observation labeled 2025 reports a 20.28% gain in its repeat-transaction HPI. That pairing supports positive price direction, but the index is not a home value and its earlier annual vintage is not comparable as the same interval. This merits work by buyers who can validate property-level leases and flood costs; yield-led underwriting should remain cautious.

02Housing economics

No median asking market rent is published, so gross yield cannot be computed. HUD’s two-bedroom FMR of $973 per month is a payment standard, not an estimate of market asking rent, and must not fill that gap. Carrying costs still require attention: the effective property-tax rate is 0.84%, and median annual property tax is $1,268. Pairing a county median value with a countywide tax statistic is only a screening input; it cannot establish a given parcel’s tax bill or net operating income.

03Demand & competition

MLS listing evidence is mixed rather than a clean demand signal: Realtor.com showed 26 active listings, down 16.13% year over year, yet median marketing time was 68 days, up 1.5%, and 11.26% of listings had a price reduction. These are asking-market supply, marketing-time and concession measures—not closed-sale prices or proof of buyer demand. QCEW recorded 2,819 annual covered jobs at county workplaces, down 5.78%; Trade, transportation, and utilities was the largest disclosed private supersector. This is not resident employment. Tax-return movers posted net migration of negative 28, with inbound average AGI $1,065 above outbound. Non-occupant purchase mortgages were 6.25% of 112 purchases, a limited buyer-competition presence rather than evidence about all-cash activity.

04Risk & next checks

Inland flood is the named dominant hazard, and modeled expected annual building-value loss is 0.20%, so flood-zone status, insurance quotes, deductibles and mitigation history should be checked before translating county economics to an asset. Missing lease comps, vacancy, operating expenses, closed-sale comparables and property-specific hazard and tax records prevent a cash-flow conclusion and a reliable view of exit value. Thin county-level migration, employment and listing indicators also cannot establish neighborhood demand or tenant quality.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Morgan County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
McConnelsville village2KMalta village649Stockport village617Chesterhill village326Rose Farm CDP*77
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

5 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    McConnelsville villageIncorporated place
    1,955
  2. 02
    Malta villageIncorporated place
    649
  3. 03
    Stockport villageIncorporated place
    617
  4. 04
    Chesterhill villageIncorporated place
    326
  5. 05
    Rose Farm CDPCensus-designated place · spans 2 counties
    77

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.203% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax0.84%

$1,268 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration-28

263 in · 291 out

Arriving vs leaving income+$1,065

$43,319 arriving · $42,254 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors6.3%

7 of 112 mortgages

investorother financed
Current listing pressure

What sellers and visible supply are doing

Realtor.com® Economic Research · county inventory 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-28
Active listings26▼ 16.1% year over year
Median days on market68▲ 1.5% year over year
Listings price-reduced11.3%seller-concession signal
Median listing pricen/a▲ 6.8% year over year

Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.

No rent index is published for this county.Zillow’s county rent series does not cover every county, and estimating one from a neighbouring county would be a guess wearing a number’s clothes. Everything above is measured here; no wider market is mapped for it either.
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Unpublished market rent and vacancy could leave property economics materially different from the screening picture.
  2. Flood insurance, mitigation, or location-specific loss exposure could raise carrying costs beyond county-level signals.
  3. Workplace-job decline, net out-migration, and mixed MLS marketing evidence could coincide with weaker tenant or resale liquidity.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Can gross yield be calculated from this record?

No. Median asking market rent is not published, and the HUD two-bedroom FMR is not market rent.

What does the listing record establish about demand?

It shows active MLS supply, marketing time and seller price reductions, not closed-sale pricing or buyer demand by itself.

How broad is observed investor mortgage participation?

It is a minority of recorded purchase mortgages; the record does not identify all-cash investor activity.