States / Ohio
State rental intelligence

Ohio rental market data

A source-traced view across 29 metro markets and 88 counties. State figures below are labelled medians and totals—not a made-up statewide investment score.

18/29 metros scored88/88 counties with FEMA risk14 sources used in this analysis
Median scored metro64.0out of 100 · 18 measured metros
Ohio identity diorama showing regional landscape, cities, housing, and infrastructure
Median metro home value$220kmedian across published metro values
Median metro rent$1,100monthly · published metro values
Median gross yield6.1%annual rent ÷ price · before costs
Median job trend▼ 0.3%trailing 12-month metro employment
Direct monthly rental evidence

Ohio rent market dynamics

Apartment List measures recent leases, rental vacancy and listing time separately. These figures do not replace Zillow, Census or Realtor measures elsewhere on this page.

Recent-lease rent$1,1192026-07 · ▲ 0.0% year over year
Rental Vacancy Index6.3%2026-07 · +0.8 pp in 12 months
Time on market28 days2026-07 · +4 days in 12 months
US recent-lease rent$1,3882026-07 · ▼ 1.1% year over year
Rent and rental vacancy through timesolid state series · dashed national series · no interpolation across missing observations
Recent-lease rent$1,523$1,105$686Rental Vacancy Index9.8%6.1%2.3%2017-012021-102026-07OhioUnited States
State research brief

Flat recent-lease rent sits beside higher rental vacancy and longer listing time, while the median measured metro shows asking-rent growth ahead of home-value growth.

Updated 2026-08-08 · evidence current to the releases listed below.

Ohio's Apartment List recent-lease rent held at $1,119, a 0.0% year-over-year change, while its separate Vacancy Index rose from 5.5% to 6.3% and rental time on market increased from 24.7 to 28.3 days. Those measures point to softer rental liquidity without a recorded rent decline. The counter-signal is that Ohio's measured vacancy remained 0.9 percentage point below the national rate and its listings moved 1.7 days faster, while national rent declined 1.1%.

Zillow's separate metro series presents a different side of the market: median asking-rent growth was 5.3% across 18 measured metros, compared with 4.4% home-value growth across 29, a 0.9-percentage-point gap. That momentum sits against median metro job growth of -0.3% and net county migration of -7,828. Screening therefore needs local confirmation of achievable rent, tenant demand and exit liquidity; these statewide and metro distributions cannot establish a property's occupancy, operating costs or net return.

01

Flat $1,119 recent-lease rent, a 0.8-percentage-point vacancy increase and 3.6 more listing days → stress-test occupancy and marketing assumptions rather than relying on rent stability alone

02

Median metro asking-rent growth of 5.3% versus 4.4% home-value growth → investigate local rent-to-entry-price spreads, but verify achieved rent

03

Net migration of -7,828 and median metro job growth of -0.3% → require property-level demand evidence despite positive job pockets

04

Median county renter burden of 43.0% alongside an 8.4% ACS vacancy rate → screen tenant affordability and usable rental supply as separate issues

05

Property-tax rates ranging from a 1.05% median to 2.00% in Cuyahoga County → use county-specific tax assumptions in cash-flow screening

01
Direct state rental dynamics

Rents held flat as vacancy and rental listing time rose

Apartment List's recent-lease rent was $1,119 both currently and a year earlier. Its separate Vacancy Index increased by 0.8 percentage point to 6.3%, and its time-on-market series lengthened by 3.6 days to 28.3 days. Read as parallel measures, the combination supports more conservative assumptions about rental liquidity even though the rent index itself did not fall.

The comparison is not uniformly weak. Ohio's vacancy rate was below the national 7.2%, and its rental time on market was shorter than the national 30.0 days. Ohio rent was also flat while the national measure fell 1.1%. The state series does not identify which local markets or property types produced the higher vacancy and longer listing time.

Evidence: Apartment List Rent Estimates — recent-lease rent index · Apartment List Time on Market — listing liquidity · Apartment List Vacancy Index — rental vacancy

02
Price and rent momentum

Metro asking rents outran values, but coverage is incomplete

Median Zillow asking-rent growth was 5.3% across 18 measured metros, versus 4.4% median home-value growth across 29. The supplied difference was 0.9 percentage point. Because rent growth has narrower coverage, this does not show that rents outpaced values in every metro or that landlords achieved the reported asking rents.

The named markets also separate momentum from entry yield. Ashland recorded 17.1% rent growth and 6.1% price growth, but its supplied gross yield was 4.5%. Athens showed 11.0% rent growth, 4.7% price growth and a 6.2% gross yield. Sandusky combined 9.7% rent growth with 2.1% price growth and an 8.4% gross yield. These gross figures are screening measures, not returns after expenses.

Evidence: Zillow ZHVI — metro home values · Zillow ZORI — metro market rents

03
Employment and household movement

Population outflow and a soft job median face local growth pockets

Across all 88 counties with migration data, 269,688 movers came in and 277,516 moved out. Reported net migration was -7,828, or -0.7 per 1,000 residents. Metro job growth had a -0.3% median, with the measured range between the 10th and 90th percentiles running from -1.6% to 0.8%.

Local employment readings provide a counter-signal: Sandusky posted 2.1% job growth, Wilmington 1.4% and Athens 1.0%. The screening implication is to verify the specific employment base and renter pool rather than use the state median as a local assumption. The job and migration sources cover different periods, so their combination cannot establish a causal demand trend.

Evidence: Census ACS 5-year — population · BLS CES — payroll employment · BLS LAUS — resident employment · IRS SOI — county migration and mover income

04
Supply and resale conditions

Heavy permitting is concentrated while resale friction varies

The measured metro permit distribution is highly uneven. The median was 136 permitted units and 1.2 units per 1,000 residents, while the 90th percentile reached 1,354 units. Columbus recorded 12,394 permits, or 5.7 per 1,000 residents; Cincinnati recorded 10,518, or 4.6 per 1,000; and Sidney recorded 212, or 4.4 per 1,000. Permit concentration warrants local pipeline review, but permits alone do not establish completed competing supply.

Across measured metros, the median resale market had 2.5 months of supply, 40.5 median days on market, a 27.3% price-drop share and a 97.9% sale-to-list ratio. Cambridge was slower at 75 median days, with 3.6 months of supply and a 95.3% sale-to-list ratio. That combination makes the assumed exit period and resale discount a locality-specific underwriting question.

Evidence: Census Building Permits Survey — permitted units · Redfin Data Center — inventory, days on market, and price cuts

05
Housing stock and tenant conditions

Renter strain coexists with high county housing vacancy

The median county ACS housing vacancy rate was 8.4%, and the 90th percentile was 15.6%. Ottawa County reached 36.0%, Morgan County 22.0% and Monroe County 20.8%. These are ACS county housing-stock measures and should not be blended with Apartment List's separate state rental Vacancy Index.

At the same time, a median 43.0% of county renters were burdened by housing costs of at least 30% of income. The share reached 57.7% in both Adams County and Athens County and 56.1% in Scioto County. The median county housing stock was 78.6% single-family, with a median year built of 1972.5. The figures show that renter strain can coexist with substantial measured vacancy, but they do not identify available rental units, property condition or required capital work.

Evidence: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock

06
Physical risk and property tax

The leading hazard is uniform, but tax and loss burdens are not

Inland flood is the mutually exclusive top-hazard label for all 88 counties, but that county classification is not parcel-level flood exposure. The median FEMA climate loss ratio was 0.107%, rising to 0.165% at the 90th percentile. Lawrence County measured 0.227%, Morgan County 0.203% and Meigs County 0.195%.

The median effective property-tax rate was 1.05%, and the 90th percentile was 1.41%. Cuyahoga County measured 2.00%, Montgomery County 1.73% and Lucas County 1.69%. The highest listed tax burdens and loss ratios occur in different named counties, so tax and physical risk require separate location-specific screens.

Evidence: FEMA National Risk Index — hazard loss ratios · Census ACS 5-year — effective property tax

State ZIP rental intelligence

How direct rental evidence varies inside Ohio

The distribution uses 26 current published ZIP reports across 11 cities and 5 counties. Twelve measured counter-signals are shown below; this is not a statewide neighborhood ranking.

Published ZIP rent range$1,043$2,086full direct-ZORI report cohort
Median rent / income26.6%annual asking rent ÷ ACS household income
Median one-year growth▲ 2.3%exact direct Zillow endpoints
Renter households covered223,792across published ZCTA matches
01 · RENT DISPERSIONRepresentative direct ZIP ZORI
Horizontal bars compare direct Zillow asking-rent indexes for the twelve representative published ZIP reports.45040$2,08644122$1,98544106$1,65843016$1,62943215$1,55643201$1,50644107$1,46744221$1,39444102$1,31243228$1,29344109$1,18045238$1,043
02 · AFFORDABILITY PRESSURERent / income × observed burden
Horizontal position is annual Zillow asking rent divided by ACS median household income. Vertical position is the ACS share of renter households paying thirty percent or more.59.2%49.9%40.6%31.4%22.1%441074322843201441024321544109430164410645238441224422145040Annual asking rent / ACS household income →ACS renter burden share →
03 · PATH QUALITYOne-year growth × variability
Each point compares exact one-year Zillow asking-rent growth with annualized variability from the direct monthly series.5.4%4.3%3.2%2.1%1.0%441074322843201441024321544109430164410645238441224422145040Exact one-year Zillow rent growth →Annualized monthly variability →
WHAT THE STATE DISTRIBUTION SAYS

Across the 26 current published direct-evidence ZIP reports, the Zillow ZORI observed asking-rent index has a $1,479 median, running from $1,043 to $2,086. Mason’s 45040 anchors the high end and Cincinnati’s 45238 the low end among this reporting universe. That dispersion makes a statewide “typical rent” only a starting point: the practical comparison is the current asking-rent level in a candidate ZIP, its relation to local income measures, and whether recent price movement has been smooth or uneven. At a practical level, a renter’s budget will map differently onto this measured range before household income, bedroom needs, and other costs are considered. That framing keeps the comparison focused on recorded rent measures rather than assuming that a city name, a ZIP label, or a statewide figure describes an individual rental. The figures describe the published-report distribution, rather than every Ohio delivery ZIP, neighborhood, listing, or rental home.

Income alignment and renter burden point to related but distinct questions. The median current asking-rent-to-income ratio is 26.6%, with Dublin 43016 at 17.8% and Cleveland 44106 at 46.1%; this ratio places the current ZORI asking-rent index beside ACS five-year ZCTA median household income. Separately, the ACS five-year share of renter households paying at least 30 percent of income toward gross rent has a 44.7% median, ranging from 24.6% in Mason 45040 to 56.7% in Columbus 43201. The first is a current-price-to-income screen, while the second summarizes surveyed households’ gross-rent burden, so neither substitutes for the other or establishes what a particular household can pay.

Momentum is also not volatility. In the direct monthly Zillow series, the median one-year annualized rent change is 2.3%, from a 2.0% decline in Columbus 43228 to 7.9% growth in Cuyahoga Falls 44221. Annualized volatility has a 3.1% median but ranges from 2.0% in Dublin 43016 to 4.4% in Cleveland 44109. The high-volatility endpoint still posted positive one-year growth, so change direction and path variability should be read independently. Both are backward-looking monthly-series measures, not a projection of future rent changes.

HUD supplies a separate administrative reference, not a market-rent verdict. The direct asking-rent-to-HUD two-bedroom benchmark has a 102% median, but it runs from 72.4% in Columbus 43215 to 155.2% in Shaker Heights 44122. HUD FMR/SAFMR figures are bedroom standards derived through an administrative program; ZORI is an observed asking-rent index and is not bedroom-specific in this comparison. A ratio above or below the benchmark therefore does not identify an equivalent unit, tenant payment, lease concession, utility treatment, or property-level asking rent. Likewise, the ACS observations are five-year ZCTA survey estimates, and ZCTAs do not exactly match USPS delivery ZIPs.

Representative direct evidence

Twelve useful contrasts, every one traceable

The statewide summaries use all 26 qualifying reports. The table preserves measured extremes in rent, affordability, burden, momentum, volatility and the HUD benchmark gap.

ZIP reportPlaceZillow rent1Y growthRent / incomeBurden 30%+VariabilityHUD 2BR gap
44107Lakewood$1,467▲ 4.2%25.5%35.4%2.9%▲ 114.7%
43228Columbus$1,293▼ 2.0%25.1%43.2%2.7%▲ 95.8%
43201Columbus$1,506▲ 1.6%41.3%56.7%2.6%▲ 97.8%
44102Cleveland$1,312▲ 5.9%36.9%45.3%2.6%▲ 102.6%
43215Columbus$1,556▲ 0.8%25.2%38.9%3.7%▲ 72.4%
44109Cleveland$1,180▲ 4.2%33.0%46.9%4.4%▲ 92.3%
43016Dublin$1,629▼ 0.3%17.8%35.1%2.0%▲ 84.8%
44106Cleveland$1,658▲ 2.3%46.1%46.8%3.1%▲ 129.6%
45238Cincinnati$1,043▲ 2.7%18.9%44.7%3.1%▲ 85.5%
44122Shaker Heights$1,985▲ 3.5%23.5%39.4%4.3%▲ 155.2%
44221Cuyahoga Falls$1,394▲ 7.9%26.4%38.1%3.1%▲ 101.0%
45040Mason$2,086▲ 1.9%18.8%24.6%2.7%▲ 102.8%
READ BEFORE USING

Zillow ZORI is an observed asking-rent index from the direct monthly series, not a transaction database or a promise of a particular unit’s advertised rent. The state distribution includes only current published direct-evidence ZIP reports and excludes unreported ZIPs and properties.

ACS 2024 five-year ZCTA housing, income, vacancy, and renter-burden values are survey estimates for statistical areas. ZCTAs are not identical to USPS delivery ZIPs. HUD FMR/SAFMR values are administrative bedroom standards, so neither source should be treated as an asking-rent observation.

SOURCE LEDGERCensus ACS five-year — ZCTA housing and incomeACS 2024 5-year ZCTA · pulled 2026-08-08HUD USPS crosswalk and Small Area FMRs — ZIP rent fallbackZIP-CBSA 2025Q4 + SAFMR FY2026 · pulled 2026-07-26Zillow ZORI — ZIP market rentsZORI ZIP 2026-06 · pulled 2026-08-08
Evidence selected for Ohio

The ranges behind the analysis

Each row keeps its own unit and shows the measured 10th percentile, median and 90th percentile. A single-value row is labelled directly.

Price and rent momentumAre home values and asking rents moving together or separating?
10th pct.median90th pct.Home-value change2.1%4.4%7.3%Asking-rent change3.1%5.3%10.1%Rent minus price0.9%
Employment and household movementDo jobs, household movement and mover income point in the same direction?
10th pct.median90th pct.Job change-1.6%-0.3%0.8%Net migration / 1k-0.7Net household movement-7,828
Supply and resale conditionsWhat do permits, inventory, marketing time and price cuts say about pressure?
10th pct.median90th pct.Permits / 1k0.41.23.6Months of supply1.8×2.5×3.5×Days on market29 days41 days54 daysListings with cuts22.9%27.3%34.8%
Shape of the state

Distribution before conclusion

A statewide median can hide a wide spread. These SVG charts render at build time and carry no chart library or browser-side data request.

Metro score distribution18 scored metros · median 64.0
00–19020–39640–591260–79080–100
County evidence coverageEvery gap stays visible as missing—not estimated
58%51/88Rent100%88/88Climate100%88/88Migration
Highest measured metro gross yieldsscreening metric only · before expenses and financing
Sandusky8.4%Marion8.1%Huntington7.7%Wheeling7.6%Toledo7.4%Lima7.2%Springfield7.1%
Metro leaderboard

Markets touching Ohio

Multi-state CBSAs appear in every member state. Score is still a metro score; no value is reweighted into a statewide ranking.

#MetroScorePriceRentYieldJobs
1Sandusky, OH77$243k$1,6898.4%▲ 2.1%
2Athens, OH75$191k$9946.2%▲ 1.0%
3Ashland, OH71$247k$9364.5%▼ 1.8%
4Weirton, WV70$137k$7816.9%▲ 0.1%
5Akron, OH68$245k$1,2686.2%▼ 0.5%
6Findlay, OH67$244k$1,2336.1%▼ 0.4%
7Lima, OH66$196k$1,1777.2%▲ 0.1%
8Youngstown, OH65$180k$1,0467.0%▼ 0.7%
9Canton, OH64$220k$1,1046.0%▼ 0.3%
10Mansfield, OH64$202k$9185.5%▼ 1.1%
11Huntington, WV63$168k$1,0787.7%▲ 0.4%
12Zanesville, OH61$214k$1,0886.1%▲ 0.0%

Showing the top 12 scored metros of 29. Unscored metros remain discoverable through the national rankings.

Below the metro line

Largest counties in Ohio

County figures join on the five-digit FIPS code. The table uses measured local values and prints “n/a” wherever a publisher has no record.

CountyPopulationPriceRentYieldHazard
Franklin County, OH1,333,048$301k$1,5106.0%inland flooding
Cuyahoga County, OH1,245,873$225k$1,4657.8%inland flooding
Hamilton County, OH830,774$276k$1,5396.7%inland flooding
Summit County, OH537,864$233k$1,2606.5%inland flooding
Montgomery County, OH536,096$207k$1,3007.5%inland flooding
Lucas County, OH428,018$180k$1,1767.8%inland flooding
Butler County, OH392,876$321k$1,5996.0%inland flooding
Stark County, OH373,713$221k$1,1136.0%inland flooding
Lorain County, OH317,129$266k$1,3826.2%inland flooding
Warren County, OH250,008$414k$1,9495.7%inland flooding
Lake County, OH232,216$253k$1,4036.7%inland flooding
Delaware County, OH226,834$525k$1,5973.6%inland flooding
County yield sample51/88counties have the rent needed to compute yield
Statewide net migration−7,828IRS tax-return households summed across counties
Median investor share6.4%among counties with HMDA purchase records
Bear case

What can break the thesis

  1. Apartment List's state series cannot identify which Ohio metros, neighborhoods or property types account for rising vacancy and longer listing time.
  2. Zillow rent growth covers 18 metros rather than all 29 measured for prices, while county rent coverage reaches only 51 of 88 counties.
  3. Employment, migration, rent and listing sources cover different periods and populations; their alignment cannot prove a common trend or cause.
  4. Supplied gross yields exclude taxes, insurance, financing, repairs, vacancy losses and capital expenditures, so they do not establish net returns.
  5. FEMA's inland-flood label identifies each county's leading hazard, not parcel-level exposure or an insurance quote.
Investor questions

Before underwriting a property

Is Ohio's measured rental market tightening?

Not on the direct state liquidity measures. Recent-lease rent was flat at $1,119, vacancy rose from 5.5% to 6.3%, and time on market increased from 24.7 to 28.3 days. Ohio nevertheless retained lower vacancy and shorter listing time than the national measures.

Do the demand figures support broad rent growth assumptions?

No. Net migration was -7,828 and median metro job growth was -0.3%. Sandusky, Wilmington and Athens had positive job readings, but those local counter-signals do not establish statewide demand strength.

Does faster asking-rent growth automatically mean a higher gross yield?

No. Ashland had 17.1% rent growth but a 4.5% gross yield, while Sandusky had 9.7% rent growth and an 8.4% gross yield. Entry price and current rent level remain separate screening inputs.

Where does the packet show notable resale friction?

Cambridge had a 75-day median marketing period, 3.6 months of supply and a 95.3% sale-to-list ratio. That is a local reading, not evidence that every Ohio market has the same exit conditions.

Does the statewide inland-flood label mean every property has flood exposure?

No. Inland flood is the mutually exclusive leading-hazard label for all 88 counties in this packet. It does not locate parcel-level exposure, determine insurance cost or replace property-specific diligence.