Direct recent-lease rent history
Monthly overall-rent index; missing observations are not filled from another geography.
FIPS 39061 · population 830,774 · part of Cincinnati, OH
The latest county-level Zillow ZORI is $1,539 per month in 2026-06. It is a typical asking-rent index across rental types—not an arithmetic average, signed lease or quote for one property.
| Bedrooms | HUD monthly FMR | Geography | Measurement boundary |
|---|---|---|---|
| Studio | $958 | Hamilton County, OH | HUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent. |
| 1 bedroom | $1,051 | Hamilton County, OH | HUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent. |
| 2 bedrooms | $1,353 | Hamilton County, OH | HUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent. |
| 3 bedrooms | $1,785 | Hamilton County, OH | HUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent. |
| 4 bedrooms | $1,976 | Hamilton County, OH | HUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent. |
Zillow asking rent, ACS gross rent and HUD FMR describe different housing universes. They remain separate and no metro, city or neighboring-county value replaces missing county evidence.Zillow pulled 2026-07-26 · HUD pulled 2026-07-26
Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.
Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.
Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.
Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2021-2025; latest 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-08-02. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.
BEA per-capita personal income divides all personal income by the county population. It is broader than wages, but it is not household income or a measure of what renters can afford.
HUD CHAS separates renter households by income relative to local HAMFI. Moderate burden means housing costs above 30% through 50% of income; severe burden means more than 50%.
These Apartment List observations match the exact county Census code 39061. They are kept separate from Zillow asking rent, Census occupied-home rent and wider metro measures.
Monthly overall-rent index; missing observations are not filled from another geography.
Hamilton County presents a two-sided underwriting case: Zillow’s 2026-06 county median home value is $275,666, while market rent is published. Yet resale, demand, and carrying-cost evidence do not align cleanly. The thesis is gross-cash-flow potential with a demand-quality question, not a clear appreciation thesis. Underwriters should investigate parcel-level flood exposure and operating costs; buyers depending on rapid turnover should be cautious. County data cannot establish performance for a specific asset or the Cincinnati metro.
At $1,539 per month, median asking rent grew 2.68% and supports a 6.7% gross yield before costs. HUD’s two-bedroom $1,353 FMR is a payment standard, not an asking-rent estimate; market rent is 13.7% above it, but that gap does not prove affordability or collection. A 1.51% effective property-tax rate separates gross yield from net yield; insurance, vacancy, repairs and management are not supplied. FHFA’s annual 2025 repeat-transaction HPI rose 3.95%, but it is an index, not a home value. Its vintage and method differ from Zillow’s, so do not average their growth rates.
Realtor.com’s separate 2026-06 MLS evidence shows visible supply rising 14.85% and median marketing time at 38 days; listing prices are down and reductions are common. These are asking and marketing measures, not closed-sale prices or proof of buyer demand. QCEW’s 2025 annual covered workplace jobs were slightly lower while average weekly wages rose; Education and health services is the largest disclosed private supersector, not the whole labor market, resident employment, or a forecast. Net migration is negative and departing movers have higher average AGI, weakening the demand read. An investor share of 12.12% of purchase mortgages, calculated against total purchases, signals competition without showing dominance.
Inland flood is the dominant hazard, while modeled annual climate loss is 0.10% of building value; that is not an insurance quote or parcel-level loss estimate. Next checks are flood-zone and elevation review, drainage, insurance quotes and deductibles, tax records, condition, and comparable leases. Missing closed-sale data, property-level expenses, vacancy, financing terms, and insurance pricing prevent a net-yield, debt-service, or durable-rent conclusion. The mixed county evidence supports screening, not completed underwriting.
This view uses 12 direct Zillow ZIP markets matched to Census ZCTAs. Each ZIP is assigned by its largest HUD residential county share; this is not an exhaustive county inventory.
The selected direct-evidence set poses a choice question rather than a countywide ranking: which location’s current asking-rent level fits the household budget, required unit size, and search constraints? In June 2026, Zillow ZORI—a typical observed asking-rent index—runs from $1,043 in ZIP 45238 to $1,806 in ZIP 45236. The selected-set median is $1,357, producing a $763 spread. That dispersion makes an initial budget band more useful than treating any single ZIP reading as representative. Use ZORI to screen current advertised-rent tolerance, then test a specific unit’s size, charges, and availability. It cannot answer whether any particular unit meets a household’s needs.
Keep the three rent measures in separate analytical lanes. ACS 2024 five-year median gross rent is a survey estimate, not a current asking-rent index; it ranges from $884 to $1,584 among the selected matches. FY2026 HUD two-bedroom FMR is an administrative standard rather than asking rent, and its selected-match range is $1,120 to $2,030. In ZIP 45202, the Zillow index is 80.4% of that two-bedroom standard; in 45236 it is 132.8%. These comparisons identify how the index differs from a bedroom-specific program benchmark. They do not convert housing types or terms, establish a lease price, or indicate eligibility. Treat the three measures as complements, not substitutes.
Budget pressure and vacancy require a second, separate screen. In ACS five-year estimates, the share of renters with rent burden of at least 30% runs from 33.4% to 63.1%; ZIP 45219 is at the high end. For 45219, the ZORI-based annual income needed to hold the index rent to that share is $58,080, while the ACS median household income is $35,657. This is a household-budget prompt, not an estimate of any particular renter’s burden. ACS vacancy ranges from 3.4% to 14.8% in the selected matches. A lower survey rate warrants verifying live availability promptly; a higher rate does not establish unit condition, concessions, or suitability. Vacancy is a search check, not an affordability offset. Read burden and vacancy together, while retaining their survey basis.
Scope and crosswalk limits bound every comparison. The displayed direct-ZORI ZIP/ZCTA matches were selected from 34 eligible matches and cover 69,110 renter households, so they are not an exhaustive county inventory. Display assignment uses the county with the largest HUD residential-address share. Although every displayed match has full primary-county share in this packet, ZIPs can cross county lines, and Census ZCTAs are statistical areas rather than USPS delivery ZIPs. ACS values remain five-year estimates. Before acting, verify the exact address and county assignment, live advertised rent, bedroom count, utility treatment, available date, lease term, deposits and fees, occupancy or income rules, and the applicable HUD bedroom standard.
34 ZIP profiles passed the county gate; the 12 with the most renter households are shown.
| ZIP / ZCTA | Zillow asking rent | ACS gross rent | HUD 2BR | Burden 30%+ | Vacancy | Income screen | HUD county share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 45238 | $1,043 | $923 | $1,220 | 44.7% | 5.0% | $42k | 100.0% |
| 45211 | $1,206 | $944 | $1,140 | 47.1% | 7.8% | $48k | 100.0% |
| 45202 | $1,633 | $1,584 | $2,030 | 36.2% | 14.2% | $65k | 100.0% |
| 45219 | $1,452 | $1,258 | $1,580 | 63.1% | 14.8% | $58k | 100.0% |
| 45215 | $1,474 | $1,073 | $1,260 | 44.7% | 6.3% | $59k | 100.0% |
| 45237 | $1,237 | $902 | $1,160 | 48.6% | 5.6% | $49k | 100.0% |
| 45212 | $1,398 | $976 | $1,350 | 48.3% | 11.4% | $56k | 100.0% |
| 45239 | $1,257 | $1,015 | $1,230 | 51.7% | 6.0% | $50k | 100.0% |
| 45229 | $1,131 | $884 | $1,120 | 50.8% | 11.2% | $45k | 100.0% |
| 45220 | $1,316 | $970 | $1,390 | 48.6% | 9.8% | $53k | 100.0% |
| 45236 | $1,806 | $1,305 | $1,360 | 33.4% | 5.9% | $72k | 100.0% |
| 45231 | $1,631 | $1,232 | $1,460 | 44.8% | 3.4% | $65k | 100.0% |
Open a five-digit report for asking rent, affordability, rent history and resale liquidity. Each row keeps its ZIP/ZCTA measurement scope.
| ZIP report | City label | Zillow rent | 1Y change | ACS burden 30%+ | Population |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZIP 45227 rental reportHamilton County | Cincinnati, OH | $1,706 | ▲ 5.0% | 48.3% | 18,893 |
| ZIP 45202 rental reportHamilton County | Cincinnati, OH | $1,633 | ▲ 0.6% | 36.2% | 17,869 |
| ZIP 45231 rental reportHamilton County | Cincinnati, OH | $1,631 | ▲ 4.2% | 44.8% | 40,463 |
| ZIP 45230 rental reportHamilton County | Cincinnati, OH | $1,270 | ▲ 5.9% | 47.1% | 27,501 |
| ZIP 45211 rental reportHamilton County | Cincinnati, OH | $1,206 | ▲ 5.4% | 47.1% | 38,049 |
| ZIP 45238 rental reportHamilton County | Cincinnati, OH | $1,043 | ▲ 2.7% | 44.7% | 48,351 |
Zillow ZORI is an asking-rent index. ACS burden and population describe the Census ZCTA; missing observations remain n/a.
Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.
Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.
0.095% of building value expected lost per year
$3,652 median annual bill
18,673 in · 20,498 out
$65,607 arriving · $77,550 leaving
1,090 of 8,991 mortgages
Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.
A metro is an average of these. Which side of a county line a property sits on can change the tax bill, the hazard profile and the tenant pool.
| County | Population | Price | Rent | Yield | Hazard |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hamilton County | 830,774 | $276k | $1,539 | 6.7% | inland flooding |
| Butler County | 392,876 | $321k | $1,599 | 6.0% | inland flooding |
| Warren County | 250,008 | $414k | $1,949 | 5.7% | inland flooding |
| Clermont County | 211,181 | $334k | $1,580 | 5.7% | inland flooding |
| Kenton County | 171,288 | $292k | $1,507 | 6.2% | inland flooding |
| Boone County | 139,841 | $354k | $1,706 | 5.8% | inland flooding |
| Campbell County | 93,426 | $300k | $1,563 | 6.3% | inland flooding |
| Dearborn County | 51,094 | $335k | $1,258 | 4.5% | inland flooding |
| Brown County | 43,845 | $266k | $1,050 | 4.7% | inland flooding |
The published rent is median monthly asking market rent. HUD’s two-bedroom FMR is a payment standard, not a market-rent estimate, and cannot substitute for it.
FHFA provides repeat-transaction HPI evidence about price appreciation direction, not a dollar home value. Its annual observation is a separate vintage from Zillow’s monthly county figure and should not be averaged with it.
QCEW measures annual covered jobs located at county workplaces, not resident employment, unemployment, or a forecast. Migration figures describe tax-return households, and the record shows negative net migration with higher average income among departing movers.