Counties / Ohio / Hamilton County

Hamilton County, OH

FIPS 39061 · population 830,774 · part of Cincinnati, OH

$276k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
Direct county rent answer

What does rent cost in Hamilton County, OH?

The latest county-level Zillow ZORI is $1,539 per month in 2026-06. It is a typical asking-rent index across rental types—not an arithmetic average, signed lease or quote for one property.

County Zillow ZORI$1,5392026-06 · up 2.7% year over year
County ACS gross rent$1,075ACS 2024 5-year · occupied-renter survey
HUD two-bedroom FMR$1,353FY2026 · administrative standard
HUD Fair Market Rent by bedroom count in Hamilton County
BedroomsHUD monthly FMRGeographyMeasurement boundary
Studio$958Hamilton County, OHHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
1 bedroom$1,051Hamilton County, OHHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
2 bedrooms$1,353Hamilton County, OHHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
3 bedrooms$1,785Hamilton County, OHHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
4 bedrooms$1,976Hamilton County, OHHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.

Zillow asking rent, ACS gross rent and HUD FMR describe different housing universes. They remain separate and no metro, city or neighboring-county value replaces missing county evidence.Zillow pulled 2026-07-26 · HUD pulled 2026-07-26

The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$276k
▲ 1.5% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
Median asking rent
$1,539
▲ 2.7% year over year
Zillow ZORI · direct
Gross yield
6.7%
annual rent ÷ price, before costs
derived: rent × 12 ÷ price ✓
HUD 2-bed standard
$1,353
market rent is 1.14x the standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

Both annual signals move in the same direction
FHFA five-year cumulative+54.4%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06+1.5%FHFA HPI2025+4.0%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-08-02.
Owner-reported value$242k
Surveyed gross rent$1,075
Rent burden 30%+48.7%
Median year built1963
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
7.0%vacant
381,356estimated housing units
Occupied tenure40.7% renter
owner 59.3%renter 40.7%
Structure mix62.8% single-family
Single-family 62.8%20+ units 10.2%Mobile home 0.9%Other 26.2%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs514,209▼ 0.3% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments27,177annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$1,518▲ 2.6% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorEducation and health services23.1% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS−0.3%WEEKLY WAGE+2.6%Education and health services23.1%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2021-2025; latest 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-08-02. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

Resident income

How local income has compounded

BEA per-capita personal income divides all personal income by the county population. It is broader than wages, but it is not household income or a measure of what renters can afford.

Per-capita personal income19692024
Per-capita personal income history for Hamilton CountyA line chart of annual BEA per-capita personal income from 1969 through 2024.$0k$40k$80k196919972024$4k$79k
Nominal annual dollars; not adjusted for inflation. A rising line can reflect wage, business-income, transfer-income and investment-income changes together.
Renter affordability

Who carries the heaviest rent burden

HUD CHAS separates renter households by income relative to local HAMFI. Moderate burden means housing costs above 30% through 50% of income; severe burden means more than 50%.

Share of renter households in each income band2018-2022
Renter cost burden by HAMFI income band in Hamilton CountyFive horizontal bars show moderate and severe housing cost burden shares among renter households in each HUD income band.0%25%50%75%100%At or below 30% HAMFI45,43075.2% burdened30–50% HAMFI26,63562.0% burdened50–80% HAMFI27,87526.8% burdened80–100% HAMFI13,2308.4% burdenedAbove 100% HAMFI29,1253.1% burdened
Moderate: >30% to 50%Severe: >50%
Each percentage uses HUD’s published subtotal for that income band. For disclosure, HUD keeps 0 as 0, publishes 1–7 households as 4 and rounds 8 or more to the nearest 5. Independently rounded categories can differ from their displayed sum and are not forced into a percentage.
Direct local rental evidence

Recent leases and rental-market liquidity in Hamilton County, OH

These Apartment List observations match the exact county Census code 39061. They are kept separate from Zillow asking rent, Census occupied-home rent and wider metro measures.

Direct recent-lease rent history

Monthly overall-rent index; missing observations are not filled from another geography.

$1,189$1,093$9972021-082026-07
Recent-lease rent$1,1832026-07 · -0.5% year over year
Rental vacancy6.9%2026-07 · +1.6 percentage points year over year
Time on marketn/an/a
County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Hamilton County presents a two-sided underwriting case: Zillow’s 2026-06 county median home value is $275,666, while market rent is published. Yet resale, demand, and carrying-cost evidence do not align cleanly. The thesis is gross-cash-flow potential with a demand-quality question, not a clear appreciation thesis. Underwriters should investigate parcel-level flood exposure and operating costs; buyers depending on rapid turnover should be cautious. County data cannot establish performance for a specific asset or the Cincinnati metro.

02Housing economics

At $1,539 per month, median asking rent grew 2.68% and supports a 6.7% gross yield before costs. HUD’s two-bedroom $1,353 FMR is a payment standard, not an asking-rent estimate; market rent is 13.7% above it, but that gap does not prove affordability or collection. A 1.51% effective property-tax rate separates gross yield from net yield; insurance, vacancy, repairs and management are not supplied. FHFA’s annual 2025 repeat-transaction HPI rose 3.95%, but it is an index, not a home value. Its vintage and method differ from Zillow’s, so do not average their growth rates.

03Demand & competition

Realtor.com’s separate 2026-06 MLS evidence shows visible supply rising 14.85% and median marketing time at 38 days; listing prices are down and reductions are common. These are asking and marketing measures, not closed-sale prices or proof of buyer demand. QCEW’s 2025 annual covered workplace jobs were slightly lower while average weekly wages rose; Education and health services is the largest disclosed private supersector, not the whole labor market, resident employment, or a forecast. Net migration is negative and departing movers have higher average AGI, weakening the demand read. An investor share of 12.12% of purchase mortgages, calculated against total purchases, signals competition without showing dominance.

04Risk & next checks

Inland flood is the dominant hazard, while modeled annual climate loss is 0.10% of building value; that is not an insurance quote or parcel-level loss estimate. Next checks are flood-zone and elevation review, drainage, insurance quotes and deductibles, tax records, condition, and comparable leases. Missing closed-sale data, property-level expenses, vacancy, financing terms, and insurance pricing prevent a net-yield, debt-service, or durable-rent conclusion. The mixed county evidence supports screening, not completed underwriting.

County ZIP rental landscape

How asking rent and renter pressure vary inside Hamilton County, OH

This view uses 12 direct Zillow ZIP markets matched to Census ZCTAs. Each ZIP is assigned by its largest HUD residential county share; this is not an exhaustive county inventory.

Selected ZIP range$1,043$1,806Zillow asking-rent index
Monthly spread$763highest minus lowest selected ZIP
Observed burden range33.4%63.1%ACS renter households paying 30%+
Renter households covered69,110across the selected ZCTAs
01 · ASKING RENT LADDERDirect ZIP ZORI
Horizontal bars compare Zillow asking-rent indexes across the selected direct-evidence ZIP set.45236$1,80645202$1,63345231$1,63145215$1,47445219$1,45245212$1,39845220$1,31645239$1,25745237$1,23745211$1,20645229$1,13145238$1,043
02 · PRESSURE MATRIXRent × observed burden
Each point is one selected ZIP and ZCTA match. Horizontal position is Zillow asking rent and vertical position is the ACS renter cost-burden share.65.6%56.9%48.2%39.6%30.9%452384521145202452194521545237452124523945229452204523645231Zillow asking-rent index →ACS burden share →
03 · BENCHMARK GAPZORI vs HUD 2BR
Bars show the percentage difference between the Zillow blended asking-rent index and the local HUD two-bedroom standard. Their housing universes differ.45236+132.8%45215+117.0%45231+111.7%45237+106.6%45211+105.8%45212+103.6%45239+102.2%45229+101.0%45220+94.7%45219+91.9%45238+85.5%45202+80.4%
WHAT THE LOCAL DISTRIBUTION SAYS

The selected direct-evidence set poses a choice question rather than a countywide ranking: which location’s current asking-rent level fits the household budget, required unit size, and search constraints? In June 2026, Zillow ZORI—a typical observed asking-rent index—runs from $1,043 in ZIP 45238 to $1,806 in ZIP 45236. The selected-set median is $1,357, producing a $763 spread. That dispersion makes an initial budget band more useful than treating any single ZIP reading as representative. Use ZORI to screen current advertised-rent tolerance, then test a specific unit’s size, charges, and availability. It cannot answer whether any particular unit meets a household’s needs.

Keep the three rent measures in separate analytical lanes. ACS 2024 five-year median gross rent is a survey estimate, not a current asking-rent index; it ranges from $884 to $1,584 among the selected matches. FY2026 HUD two-bedroom FMR is an administrative standard rather than asking rent, and its selected-match range is $1,120 to $2,030. In ZIP 45202, the Zillow index is 80.4% of that two-bedroom standard; in 45236 it is 132.8%. These comparisons identify how the index differs from a bedroom-specific program benchmark. They do not convert housing types or terms, establish a lease price, or indicate eligibility. Treat the three measures as complements, not substitutes.

Budget pressure and vacancy require a second, separate screen. In ACS five-year estimates, the share of renters with rent burden of at least 30% runs from 33.4% to 63.1%; ZIP 45219 is at the high end. For 45219, the ZORI-based annual income needed to hold the index rent to that share is $58,080, while the ACS median household income is $35,657. This is a household-budget prompt, not an estimate of any particular renter’s burden. ACS vacancy ranges from 3.4% to 14.8% in the selected matches. A lower survey rate warrants verifying live availability promptly; a higher rate does not establish unit condition, concessions, or suitability. Vacancy is a search check, not an affordability offset. Read burden and vacancy together, while retaining their survey basis.

Scope and crosswalk limits bound every comparison. The displayed direct-ZORI ZIP/ZCTA matches were selected from 34 eligible matches and cover 69,110 renter households, so they are not an exhaustive county inventory. Display assignment uses the county with the largest HUD residential-address share. Although every displayed match has full primary-county share in this packet, ZIPs can cross county lines, and Census ZCTAs are statistical areas rather than USPS delivery ZIPs. ACS values remain five-year estimates. Before acting, verify the exact address and county assignment, live advertised rent, bedroom count, utility treatment, available date, lease term, deposits and fees, occupancy or income rules, and the applicable HUD bedroom standard.

Selected ZIP evidence

Keep each source universe visible

34 ZIP profiles passed the county gate; the 12 with the most renter households are shown.

ZIP / ZCTAZillow asking rentACS gross rentHUD 2BRBurden 30%+VacancyIncome screenHUD county share
45238$1,043$923$1,22044.7%5.0%$42k100.0%
45211$1,206$944$1,14047.1%7.8%$48k100.0%
45202$1,633$1,584$2,03036.2%14.2%$65k100.0%
45219$1,452$1,258$1,58063.1%14.8%$58k100.0%
45215$1,474$1,073$1,26044.7%6.3%$59k100.0%
45237$1,237$902$1,16048.6%5.6%$49k100.0%
45212$1,398$976$1,35048.3%11.4%$56k100.0%
45239$1,257$1,015$1,23051.7%6.0%$50k100.0%
45229$1,131$884$1,12050.8%11.2%$45k100.0%
45220$1,316$970$1,39048.6%9.8%$53k100.0%
45236$1,806$1,305$1,36033.4%5.9%$72k100.0%
45231$1,631$1,232$1,46044.8%3.4%$65k100.0%
READ BEFORE USING

Zillow ZORI, ACS five-year ZCTA estimates, and HUD FMR represent different concepts, reference periods, and geographic constructions. They must not be averaged, treated as interchangeable rents, or used to infer a lease price, household outcome, property characteristic, or program eligibility.

ZIP display assignment follows the largest HUD residential-address county share, but ZIPs may cross county lines and ZCTAs are not USPS delivery ZIPs. Because the direct-evidence selection is incomplete, its range and pattern cannot establish exhaustive county coverage or a complete local inventory.

SOURCE LEDGERCensus ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stockACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30Census ACS five-year — ZCTA housing and incomeACS 2024 5-year ZCTA · pulled 2026-08-08HUD Fair Market Rents — Section 8 standardFY2026 FMR · pulled 2026-07-26HUD-USPS ZIP-to-county residential-address crosswalkHUD-USPS 2026Q1 · pulled 2026-08-09Zillow ZHVI and ZORI — county values and rentscounty ZHVI/ZORI 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-26Zillow ZORI — ZIP market rentsZORI ZIP 2026-06 · pulled 2026-08-08
Cities & communities

Where people live within Hamilton County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Cincinnati city311.2KFairfield city*44.8KForest Park city20KWhite Oak CDP19.2KNorwood city19.1KSharonville city*14KBridgetown CDP13.5KBlue Ash city13.5K
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

89 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Cincinnati cityIncorporated place
    311,224
  2. 02
    Fairfield cityIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    44,828
  3. 03
    Forest Park cityIncorporated place
    20,025
  4. 04
    White Oak CDPCensus-designated place
    19,216
  5. 05
    Norwood cityIncorporated place
    19,114
  6. 06
    Sharonville cityIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    14,030
  7. 07
    Bridgetown CDPCensus-designated place
    13,464
  8. 08
    Blue Ash cityIncorporated place
    13,455
  9. 09
    Loveland cityIncorporated place · spans 3 counties
    13,197
  10. 10
    Harrison cityIncorporated place
    13,084
  11. 11
    Finneytown CDPCensus-designated place
    12,506
  12. 12
    Monfort Heights CDPCensus-designated place
    12,441
Show 77 more places
  1. 13
    Dent CDPCensus-designated place
    11,973
  2. 14
    Mack CDPCensus-designated place
    11,516
  3. 15
    Springdale cityIncorporated place
    11,033
  4. 16
    Montgomery cityIncorporated place
    10,855
  5. 17
    Forestville CDPCensus-designated place
    10,831
  6. 18
    Northbrook CDPCensus-designated place
    10,742
  7. 19
    Reading cityIncorporated place
    10,502
  8. 20
    North College Hill cityIncorporated place
    9,555
  9. 21
    Madeira cityIncorporated place
    9,484
  10. 22
    Wyoming cityIncorporated place
    8,723
  11. 23
    Cheviot cityIncorporated place
    8,660
  12. 24
    Kenwood CDPCensus-designated place
    8,326
  13. 25
    Groesbeck CDPCensus-designated place
    7,824
  14. 26
    Dry Run CDPCensus-designated place
    7,687
  15. 27
    Mount Healthy cityIncorporated place
    6,919
  16. 28
    Northgate CDPCensus-designated place
    6,723
  17. 29
    Covedale CDPCensus-designated place
    6,500
  18. 30
    Milford cityIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    6,497
  19. 31
    The Village of Indian Hill cityIncorporated place
    6,052
  20. 32
    Pleasant Run CDPCensus-designated place
    5,629
  21. 33
    New Burlington CDPCensus-designated place
    5,426
  22. 34
    Deer Park cityIncorporated place
    5,384
  23. 35
    Miami Heights CDPCensus-designated place
    5,269
  24. 36
    Delhi Hills CDPCensus-designated place
    5,241
  25. 37
    Turpin Hills CDPCensus-designated place
    4,875
  26. 38
    Silverton villageIncorporated place
    4,860
  27. 39
    Pleasant Run Farm CDPCensus-designated place
    4,524
  28. 40
    Taylor Creek CDPCensus-designated place
    4,253
  29. 41
    Fruit Hill CDPCensus-designated place
    4,200
  30. 42
    Cherry Grove CDPCensus-designated place
    4,176
  31. 43
    St. Bernard villageIncorporated place
    3,983
  32. 44
    Delshire CDPCensus-designated place
    3,907
  33. 45
    Woodlawn villageIncorporated place
    3,894
  34. 46
    Amberley villageIncorporated place
    3,826
  35. 47
    Sherwood CDPCensus-designated place
    3,808
  36. 48
    Golf Manor villageIncorporated place
    3,782
  37. 49
    Greenhills villageIncorporated place
    3,702
  38. 50
    Sixteen Mile Stand CDPCensus-designated place
    3,666
  39. 51
    Salem Heights CDP (Hamilton County)Census place
    3,602
  40. 52
    Dillonvale CDPCensus-designated place
    3,514
  41. 53
    Lockland villageIncorporated place
    3,498
  42. 54
    Mariemont villageIncorporated place
    3,474
  43. 55
    Cleves villageIncorporated place
    3,388
  44. 56
    Mount Healthy Heights CDPCensus-designated place
    3,263
  45. 57
    Lincoln Heights villageIncorporated place
    3,124
  46. 58
    Newtown villageIncorporated place
    2,685
  47. 59
    Evendale villageIncorporated place
    2,651
  48. 60
    Dry Ridge CDPCensus-designated place
    2,554
  49. 61
    Elmwood Place villageIncorporated place
    2,466
  50. 62
    Terrace Park villageIncorporated place
    2,295
  51. 63
    Glendale villageIncorporated place
    1,974
  52. 64
    Blue Jay CDPCensus-designated place
    1,797
  53. 65
    Loveland Park CDPCensus-designated place · spans 2 counties
    1,700
  54. 66
    New Baltimore CDPCensus-designated place
    1,585
  55. 67
    Fairfax villageIncorporated place
    1,566
  56. 68
    Coldstream CDPCensus-designated place
    1,540
  57. 69
    Rossmoyne CDPCensus-designated place
    1,504
  58. 70
    Grandview CDPCensus-designated place
    1,382
  59. 71
    Miamitown CDPCensus-designated place
    1,169
  60. 72
    North Bend villageIncorporated place
    1,148
  61. 73
    Highpoint CDPCensus-designated place
    1,132
  62. 74
    Pleasant Hills CDPCensus-designated place
    1,097
  63. 75
    Dunlap CDPCensus-designated place
    1,085
  64. 76
    Skyline Acres CDPCensus-designated place
    1,016
  65. 77
    Arlington Heights villageIncorporated place
    981
  66. 78
    Addyston villageIncorporated place
    904
  67. 79
    Brecon CDPCensus-designated place
    860
  68. 80
    Madison Place CDPCensus-designated place
    815
  69. 81
    Concorde Hills CDPCensus-designated place
    762
  70. 82
    Shawnee CDPCensus-designated place
    739
  71. 83
    Remington CDPCensus-designated place
    604
  72. 84
    Hooven CDPCensus-designated place
    403
  73. 85
    Ridgewood CDPCensus-designated place
    380
  74. 86
    Elizabethtown CDPCensus-designated place
    347
  75. 87
    New Haven CDP (Hamilton County)Census place
    340
  76. 88
    Camp Dennison CDPCensus-designated place
    265
  77. 89
    Plainville CDPCensus-designated place
    100

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.095% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax1.51%

$3,652 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration-1,825

18,673 in · 20,498 out

Arriving vs leaving income−$11,943

$65,607 arriving · $77,550 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors12.1%

1,090 of 8,991 mortgages

investorother financed
Current listing pressure

What sellers and visible supply are doing

Realtor.com® Economic Research · county inventory 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-28
Active listings1,508▲ 14.8% year over year
Median days on market38▲ 22.9% year over year
Listings price-reduced18.4%seller-concession signal
Median listing pricen/a▼ 4.1% year over year

Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.

Same metro

The other counties in Cincinnati, OH

A metro is an average of these. Which side of a county line a property sits on can change the tax bill, the hazard profile and the tenant pool.

CountyPopulationPriceRentYieldHazard
Hamilton County830,774$276k$1,5396.7%inland flooding
Butler County392,876$321k$1,5996.0%inland flooding
Warren County250,008$414k$1,9495.7%inland flooding
Clermont County211,181$334k$1,5805.7%inland flooding
Kenton County171,288$292k$1,5076.2%inland flooding
Boone County139,841$354k$1,7065.8%inland flooding
Campbell County93,426$300k$1,5636.3%inland flooding
Dearborn County51,094$335k$1,2584.5%inland flooding
Brown County43,845$266k$1,0504.7%inland flooding
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Inland flooding could create insurance, deductible, drainage, or capital costs beyond the modeled county loss ratio.
  2. Outmigration, higher-income outflow, and slightly weaker covered employment could undermine tenant and buyer demand.
  3. Greater visible supply, longer marketing time, property taxes, and unreported operating costs could compress cash flow and exit liquidity.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Is the published rent market rent or HUD FMR?

The published rent is median monthly asking market rent. HUD’s two-bedroom FMR is a payment standard, not a market-rent estimate, and cannot substitute for it.

What does FHFA contribute to the housing view?

FHFA provides repeat-transaction HPI evidence about price appreciation direction, not a dollar home value. Its annual observation is a separate vintage from Zillow’s monthly county figure and should not be averaged with it.

What limits apply to the labor and migration evidence?

QCEW measures annual covered jobs located at county workplaces, not resident employment, unemployment, or a forecast. Migration figures describe tax-return households, and the record shows negative net migration with higher average income among departing movers.