ZIP reports / OH / 45230
ZIP rental intelligence · 2026-06

ZIP 45230, Cincinnati, OH

Asking rent, household capacity, housing stock and local context—kept at their original geographic and measurement scopes.

Direct local rent answer

What does rent cost in ZIP 45230?

The latest Zillow ZORI for ZIP 45230 is $1,270 per month in 2026-06. It is a typical observed asking-rent index across rental types—not an arithmetic average, signed lease or quote for one property.

Zillow asking-rent index$1,2702026-06 · up 5.9% year over year
ACS median gross rent$1,053ACS 2024 5-year survey · ±$67 margin of error
HUD two-bedroom standard$1,210Administrative FMR/SAFMR · not asking rent
Bedroom-level rent benchmarks in ZIP 45230
BedroomsModelled asking-rent lensHUD standardHow to use it
Studio$903ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$860HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
1 bedroom$987ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$940HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
2 bedrooms$1,270ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,210HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
3 bedrooms$1,679ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,600HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
4 bedrooms$1,858ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,770HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.

Bedroom estimates are modelled, not observed rents. Zillow, Census ACS and HUD describe different housing universes and remain separate throughout this report.Zillow pulled 2026-08-08

Median household income$89,516ACS 2024 5-year · ±$6,393 MOE
Renter share25.3%3,003 renter households
Rent burden 30%+47.1%1,413 observed households
Housing vacancy2.4%290 of 12,157 units
Six views · one local decision

Read the measures together, without merging them

ZORI tracks observed asking rent, ACS describes occupied renter homes, and HUD publishes an administrative benchmark. The charts preserve those differences and add wider context only where the geography is named.

Three definitions of rent

Useful as a spread, not interchangeable observations.

Three rent measures for ZIP 45230Zillow asking-rent index$1,270ACS median gross rent$1,053HUD two-bedroom standard$1,210

Affordability screen

Annual income implied by 30% of the current ZIP ZORI.

Income screen for ZIP 45230ACS median household income$89,516Income at 30% of ZIP ZORI$50,800

Bedroom ladder

Modelled from ZIP ZORI using the local HUD ladder.

Modelled bedroom rent ladder for ZIP 45230Studio$903One bedroom$987Two bedrooms$1,270Three bedrooms$1,679Four bedrooms$1,858

Observed renter burden

ACS ZCTA households with computable gross-rent burden.

Observed renter cost burden in ZCTA 4523030% or more of income1,413 householdsBelow 30%1,590 households

ZIP versus wider rent context

Each bar retains its own ZIP, city, county or metro scope.

Asking-rent context for ZIP 45230ZIP 45230$1,270Cincinnati city$1,475Hamilton County county$1,539Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN metro$1,583

Monthly asking-rent history

Direct Zillow ZORI observations over the latest five years. Missing months remain visible gaps.

Five-year direct Zillow asking-rent history for ZIP 45230; missing months remain gaps$1,319$1,170$1,020$8712021-062023-122026-06
Five-year change
38.1%exact same-month endpoints
Largest observed drawdown
6.5%peak to a later observed month
Annualized monthly variability
3.1%63 consecutive returns
Monthly coverage
100.0%64 of 64 months
Decision brief

What the evidence says for ZIP 45230

The principal tension in this ZIP is that the rent record strengthened while the resale-price record eased. At the June 2026 endpoint, Zillow’s ZIP-level ZORI was $1,270 per month, up 5.9% from the same month a year earlier. ZORI is a typical observed asking-rent index blended across rental types, rather than a count of signed leases. Redfin’s direct rolling-three-month ZIP resale observation put the median sold price at $305,931, 3.5% below a year earlier; it concerns for-sale transactions, not rentals. Dividing annualized ZORI by that sale price gives a 4.98% cross-source screening ratio only, not a measure of property economics. The divergence records contemporaneous evidence without establishing a relationship between the two markets.

The five-digit 45230 label is both Zillow’s ZIP market identifier and a matched Census ZCTA; a ZCTA is a statistical area and is not identical to a USPS delivery ZIP. Scope also changes the measure. The ACS 2024 five-year ZCTA survey reports median gross rent of $1,053 among occupied renter homes and includes selected utilities, so it is not directly comparable to Zillow’s current asking rent; ZORI sits 20.6% higher. For wider context, Cincinnati city context rent was $1,475, Hamilton County context rent was $1,539, and Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN metro context rent was $1,583; each is broader-context evidence rather than ZIP evidence. The FY2026 HUD two-bedroom FMR/SAFMR standard was $1,210, an administrative bedroom-specific standard rather than an asking rent.

The useful bedroom view is a model, not a local rent survey. Applying the local HUD ladder to the ZIP ZORI produces modelled monthly estimates of $903 for a studio, $987 for one bedroom, $1,270 for two bedrooms, $1,679 for three bedrooms, and $1,858 for four bedrooms. Those values scale the blended ZIP index by the local HUD ladder. They are not measured bedroom rents, listing medians, or lease comparables. The ladder maintains a transparent bedroom relationship for screening, but it does not identify the rent, condition, availability, or utility terms of any specific unit.

Rent history supports a rising long-run path, although it is no promise about a later month. Exact same-month changes annualized to 5.9% over one year, 5.0% over three years, and 6.7% over five years. Recent direction therefore confirms rather than breaks the broader rise: it exceeds the three-year pace but trails the five-year pace. The series has full coverage through 64 monthly observations. Annualized variability of monthly returns was 3.1%, tempering confidence that one current rent snapshot represents a perfectly smooth path. Its maximum peak-to-trough drawdown reached 6.5%, separately demonstrating interim reversals. Transparent national discovery ranks among history-eligible ZIPs were 238 for momentum, 1,817 for stability, and 517 for the balanced measure; lower ranks indicate higher placement, but all are backward-looking descriptors rather than forecasts or investment recommendations.

The ACS ZCTA housing picture is owner-weighted, and its vacancy count is not a unit-availability claim. Of 12,157 housing units, 9,640 were single-family and 561 were in large multifamily structures. The survey’s renter share was 25.3%. It also recorded 290 vacant units, for a 2.4% vacancy rate, including 46 vacant units classified for rent. These five-year ACS estimates describe area-level housing and survey classifications; neither the vacancy rate nor the for-rent count proves that a given home is vacant, rentable, or obtainable at the current ZIP asking-rent index.

Affordability has another source and timing tension. At the current index level, the arithmetic 30% required-income screen is $50,800 annually; it is a budget calculation, not advice and not an applicant qualification rule. That figure can be compared with the ACS ZCTA median household income of $89,516, but it does not describe individual earnings. The ACS five-year burden measure shows 1,413 of 3,003 renter households, or 47.1%, paid the threshold or more of income toward gross rent. Because gross rent includes selected utilities and reflects occupied survey respondents, this burden statistic neither describes current asking rents nor establishes the burden of a particular unit or household.

Resale liquidity reads differently from the price change and must remain inside Redfin’s for-sale universe. The direct rolling-three-month resale observation recorded 98 homes sold; median marketing time was 36 days, inventory was 85 homes, and months of supply measured 2.6. The average sale-to-list ratio was 100.85%, with 49.5% of sales above list. These are sale-market signals, not rental transactions or rental comparables. They challenge any reading of the rent history as a synchronized resale-price trend, because the median sold price was lower year over year even as ZORI rose. At the same time, the sale-to-list evidence means the observed price decline does not by itself support an unambiguous loose-resale-market reading.

Several limits keep the evidence at screening level. ZORI blends rental types, while the modelled bedroom ladder imports HUD relative standards; ACS uses a matched statistical ZCTA, a five-year survey window, occupied renter homes, and selected-utility gross rent; Redfin supplies only rolling-three-month ZIP sales. A property-level record would need the actual advertised rent and observation date, bedroom count, floor area, utility responsibility, lease term and concessions, occupancy and condition, plus current list price, sale contract dates, repair needs, and operating costs. It would also need confirmation that the property’s delivery ZIP and geographic treatment align with the market identifier. Those checks resolve missing unit-specific facts rather than extending these area measures into a forecast, recommendation, or claimed property economics.

Decision signals

What deserves a closer property-level check

Rent and resale moved in different directions

The asking-rent index rose over the past year while the direct ZIP resale median declined. Their annualized-rent-to-price calculation is useful only as a cross-source screen. It does not reconcile the sources into one market or establish unit economics, because it pairs a blended asking-rent index with a for-sale transaction price statistic.

The historical rise was not smooth

Same-month annualized rent history supports a multi-year upward path, but the sequence also contains an interim peak-to-trough decline and meaningful monthly-return variability. The recent pace is stronger than the intermediate historical pace but below the longer historical pace. That pattern is backward-looking and makes a single current ZORI reading less definitive than a smooth history would imply.

Survey affordability differs from current asking rent

ACS gross rent covers occupied renter homes, includes selected utilities, and is measured through a five-year survey. ZORI instead tracks a current typical asking-rent index. The required-income screen is simple arithmetic, while renter burden describes surveyed households rather than an applicant, an advertised home, or a particular lease.

Vacancy and stock provide area context, not availability proof

The matched ZCTA housing stock is predominantly single-family and has a comparatively small renter share. Its overall vacancy rate and count of units classified for rent are useful area-level indicators, but they do not identify a currently obtainable rental. Unit condition, pricing, utility obligations, lease terms, and timing remain outside the ACS vacancy classification.

  • The current rent index, ACS gross-rent survey, and HUD standard differ in timing, sampled population, utility treatment, and purpose. A numerical gap between them can reflect those definition differences rather than a change in any individual property.
  • Past ZIP-level rent gains include an interim drawdown and measurable month-to-month variability. Historical growth and discovery ranks describe prior observations, not a guaranteed future asking-rent path or a stable value for every current listing.
  • Redfin resale evidence measures for-sale transactions over a rolling period, not rental transactions. Sold prices, marketing time, inventory, and sale-to-list behavior cannot substitute for rental comparables, operating costs, or lease-level evidence.
  • Area-level vacancy, renter burden, and structure mix do not establish whether a particular home is available, affordable, habitable, or rentable. ACS survey estimates also carry sampling uncertainty and geographic-boundary limitations.
Direct ZIP resale evidence

For-sale liquidity inside ZIP 45230

Redfin reports these as a rolling three-month ZIP observation through 2026-06-30. They describe the for-sale market, not rental vacancy or the rent of a particular property.

Median sale price$305,931-3.5% year over year
Homes sold98rolling three-month observation
Median days on market36 daysfor-sale listing absorption
Months of supply2.6resale inventory relative to sales pace

Activity and available supply

Direct ZIP counts remain separate because each describes a different stage of the resale funnel.

Direct resale activity for ZIP 45230Active listings191Inventory85Pending sales115Homes sold98

Counter-signals before underwriting

A price alone does not reveal how quickly buyers are absorbing available homes.

Inventory direction

85 observed inventory · -2.4% year over year.

Price realization

100.8% average sale-to-list ratio · 49.5% sold above original list.

Early absorption

79.7% went off market within two weeks; compare this with 36 median days on market.

Measurement boundary

Small ZIP samples can move sharply. This rolling period smooths monthly noise but does not replace current address-level sale and rent comparables.

Redfin Data Center · updated 2026-07-03 · exact five-digit ZIP key. Implausible source values are withheld as n/a rather than repaired or inherited from a broader geography.

Wider market evidence

Listing and rental liquidity around the ZIP

These measures are not ZIP observations. They are labelled county or metro context so they can challenge the local story without being copied into it.

Hamilton County listing conditions

1,508 active Realtor.com listings · 38 median days on market · 18.4% price-reduced share · 2026-06.

Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN resale supply

2.4 months of supply · 37 median days on market · 26.4% listings with price drops · Redfin 2026-05-01.

Apartment List metro liquidity

6.3% reported apartment vacancy · 28 days on market. These are direct metro observations and do not describe a particular ZIP unit.

Property-level next step

Compare live same-bedroom listings, concessions, utilities, condition and days listed inside ZIP 45230. The report frames the market; it does not replace a rent roll, lease review or address-level comparable set.

Questions this report can answer

Scope-aware answers

Why does the current asking-rent index exceed the ACS gross-rent figure?

The measures use different universes. ZORI is a current ZIP-level typical observed asking-rent index blended across rental types, whereas ACS median gross rent is a five-year survey measure for occupied renter homes that includes selected utilities. The matched ZCTA supports area comparison, but it is a statistical geography rather than an identical USPS delivery ZIP.

Are the bedroom figures observed local rents?

No. Each bedroom figure is a modelled monthly estimate created by scaling the ZIP ZORI with the local HUD bedroom ladder. The method provides a transparent relative relationship from studio through four bedrooms, but it does not observe active listings, signed leases, concessions, utility charges, or the condition of a specific rental.

Why is the resale evidence kept separate from rent evidence?

Redfin reports a direct rolling-three-month ZIP for-sale observation, including sold prices, sales volume, marketing time, inventory, supply, and sale-to-list behavior. Those are resale-market measures. They can be compared with asking-rent evidence only as separate cross-market signals and cannot establish rental transaction pricing, lease terms, or property-level economics.

What do the required-income screen and renter-burden statistic establish?

The required-income figure divides annualized current ZORI by the stated threshold, making it an arithmetic screen rather than advice or an applicant qualification rule. The ACS burden statistic describes occupied renter households paying that threshold or more toward gross rent, including selected utilities. Neither measure proves affordability for a particular household or unit.