Counties / Kentucky / Muhlenberg County

Muhlenberg County, KY

FIPS 21177 · population 30,591 · outside every metro area

$130k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$130k
▼ 11.4% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
ACS median gross rent
$718
occupied-unit survey; not current asking rent
Census ACS · surveyed
Gross yield
n/a
gross yield cannot be computed without measured market rent
requires both measured price and measured rent
HUD 2-bed standard
$866
the Section 8 payment standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

The annual signals disagree
FHFA five-year cumulative+61.4%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06−11.4%FHFA HPI2025+11.1%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-07-28.
Owner-reported value$127k
Surveyed gross rent$718
Rent burden 30%+39.7%
Median year built1978
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
10.6%vacant
13,557estimated housing units
Occupied tenure21.2% renter
owner 78.8%renter 21.2%
Structure mix74.3% single-family
Single-family 74.3%20+ units 0.7%Mobile home 18.4%Other 6.6%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs7,840▼ 3.1% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments743annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$1,042▼ 0.8% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorTrade, transportation, and utilities22.8% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS−3.1%WEEKLY WAGE−0.8%Trade, transportation, and utilities22.8%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Muhlenberg County presents a valuation conflict: Zillow’s county value declined while FHFA’s transaction-based index increased, and income production is unmeasured. Buyers seeking a defensible entry price should investigate the split; those relying on appreciation or assumed rent should be cautious. Zillow’s $129,529 county value at 2026-06 was down 11.42% year over year, whereas FHFA’s repeat-transaction HPI rose 11.07% in 2025. The HPI is not a home value, and its method and labeled period differ from Zillow’s, so neither series can be combined into a single growth conclusion.

02Housing economics

No county market rent is published, preventing a gross-yield calculation. HUD’s two-bedroom FMR is $866 per month, but it is a payment standard rather than an estimate of asking rent and cannot substitute. The effective property-tax rate is 0.62%, a recurring carrying-cost input relative to value, but parcel assessment and tax detail are not supplied. Modeled annual climate loss equals 0.17% of building value, and the dominant hazard is inland flood; this is modeled expected loss, not a property-specific flood determination.

03Demand & competition

County workplace conditions add caution rather than a demand verdict: QCEW recorded 7,840 annual average covered jobs in 2025, down 3.10% from its prior annual average. Trade, transportation, and utilities accounted for 22.84% of total private covered employment, identifying concentration in the largest disclosed private supersector, not the whole economy. Tax-return migration was almost balanced, with net migration of two, while incoming movers’ reported average income was below that of departing movers. Investors made 20 of 249 purchases, or 8.03%; this identifies observed non-occupant purchase-mortgage participation, not total investor demand or a buyer-demand measure.

04Risk & next checks

Key checks remain. Market-rent comparables and lease terms are absent, so cash flow, gross yield and rent resilience cannot be underwritten. Realtor.com MLS listing price, active listings, days on market and price-reduced share are not published, preventing a read on visible supply, asking-price positioning, marketing time or concessions; those measures would not be closed sales. Property-level flood maps, insurance quotes, condition, financing terms, and parcel tax bills are also absent, preventing asset-specific carrying-cost and hazard testing.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Muhlenberg County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Central City city5.7KGreenville city4.4KPowderly city931Beechmont CDP771Drakesboro city320Bremen city285Dunmor CDP*209South Carrollton city157
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

9 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Central City cityIncorporated place
    5,707
  2. 02
    Greenville cityIncorporated place
    4,410
  3. 03
    Powderly cityIncorporated place
    931
  4. 04
    Beechmont CDPCensus-designated place
    771
  5. 05
    Drakesboro cityIncorporated place
    320
  6. 06
    Bremen cityIncorporated place
    285
  7. 07
    Dunmor CDPCensus-designated place · spans 2 counties
    209
  8. 08
    South Carrollton cityIncorporated place
    157
  9. 09
    Cleaton CDPCensus-designated place
    38

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.166% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax0.62%

$790 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration+2

435 in · 433 out

Arriving vs leaving income−$414

$42,464 arriving · $42,878 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors8.0%

20 of 249 mortgages

investorother financed
No rent index is published for this county.Zillow’s county rent series does not cover every county, and estimating one from a neighbouring county would be a guess wearing a number’s clothes. Everything above is measured here; no wider market is mapped for it either.
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Comparable rents may materially change property-level cash-flow viability, which this record cannot test.
  2. The countywide Zillow and FHFA split may not describe a target property’s condition, location, or sale comparables.
  3. Flood exposure, insurance costs, and tax liabilities may differ materially by parcel from county-level measures.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Can a gross yield be calculated from this record?

No. County market rent is not published, and the HUD two-bedroom FMR is a payment standard rather than market rent.

What does the investor-purchase measure capture?

It is the share of purchase mortgages to non-occupants, rather than a count of all investor or cash purchases.

What property-specific flood conclusion does the record support?

None. It identifies inland flood as the dominant county hazard and provides modeled building-value loss, not parcel exposure or insurance cost.