Counties / Kansas / Nemaha County

Nemaha County, KS

FIPS 20131 · population 10,160 · outside every metro area

$253k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$253k
▲ 11.2% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
ACS median gross rent
$774
occupied-unit survey; not current asking rent
Census ACS · surveyed
Gross yield
n/a
gross yield cannot be computed without measured market rent
requires both measured price and measured rent
HUD 2-bed standard
$877
the Section 8 payment standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

The annual signals disagree
FHFA five-year cumulative+63.6%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06+11.2%FHFA HPI2025−5.2%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-07-28.
Owner-reported value$217k
Surveyed gross rent$774
Rent burden 30%+36.2%
Median year built1974
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
10.7%vacant
4,512estimated housing units
Occupied tenure22.0% renter
owner 78.0%renter 22.0%
Structure mix85.1% single-family
Single-family 85.1%20+ units 2.0%Mobile home 3.5%Other 9.4%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs5,766▲ 0.3% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments427annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$1,017▲ 3.5% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorManufacturing28.6% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS+0.3%WEEKLY WAGE+3.5%Manufacturing28.6%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Nemaha County is a diligence-before-income case: the recent Zillow county value signal and a weaker FHFA transaction index point in different directions, while rental cash flow is unmeasured. Income-focused buyers should investigate lease evidence and flood-insurance costs before treating an entry price as supportable; buyers relying on appreciation should be cautious about the conflicting price measures. Zillow’s median home value was $253,106 in 2026-06, 11.15% above its prior-year reading. FHFA’s 2025 repeat-transaction HPI, which is not a home value, declined 5.21% year over year; the vintages and methods are separate, not a combined growth rate.

02Housing economics

Housing economics cannot yet establish gross yield: county market asking rent is not published. HUD’s two-bedroom FMR of $877 per month is a payment standard, not market rent, so it cannot substitute for rent or produce yield. The 0.96% effective property-tax rate adds a visible recurring burden against the Zillow value measure, but parcel assessment, insurance, and operating costs are not published. Inland flood is the dominant hazard and the modeled annual climate loss ratio is 0.13% of building value; this is a modeled loss metric, not an insurance quote. Asset-level verification is needed for tax, flood coverage, and rent comps.

03Demand & competition

Demand-side evidence is modestly negative rather than a conclusion on tenancy. Tax returns showed net migration of -57 households, and movers leaving had average AGI $440 higher than arrivals; county-level flows do not identify neighborhood renter demand. QCEW recorded 5,766 annual covered workplace jobs in 2025, up 0.31%. Manufacturing is the largest disclosed private supersector, which concentrates exposure in that employment base but does not describe the whole economy. Of 102 reported purchase mortgages, 10 were to non-occupants, a 9.80% investor share: non-owner competition is present but limited volume makes its persistence unproven.

04Risk & next checks

Key risks: unreported rents, flood insurance, and a thin purchase sample. Obtain signed lease comps, vacancy, parcel tax history, flood-zone determinations, insurance quotes, and Realtor.com MLS inventory, marketing-time, and price-reduction data. The absent listing data prevent assessment of visible supply and seller concessions; closed-sale prices and property condition are also unavailable.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Nemaha County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Sabetha city*2.5KSeneca city2.1KCentralia city501Wetmore city342Corning city187Oneida city137Bern city136Goff city133
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

11 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Sabetha cityIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    2,471
  2. 02
    Seneca cityIncorporated place
    2,090
  3. 03
    Centralia cityIncorporated place
    501
  4. 04
    Wetmore cityIncorporated place
    342
  5. 05
    Corning cityIncorporated place
    187
  6. 06
    Oneida cityIncorporated place
    137
  7. 07
    Bern cityIncorporated place
    136
  8. 08
    Goff cityIncorporated place
    133
  9. 09
    Baileyville CDPCensus-designated place
    126
  10. 10
    St. Benedict CDPCensus-designated place
    36
  11. 11
    Kelly CDPCensus-designated place
    1

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.127% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax0.96%

$2,080 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration-57

183 in · 240 out

Arriving vs leaving income−$440

$52,148 arriving · $52,588 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors9.8%

10 of 102 mortgages

investorother financed
No rent index is published for this county.Zillow’s county rent series does not cover every county, and estimating one from a neighbouring county would be a guess wearing a number’s clothes. Everything above is measured here; no wider market is mapped for it either.
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Actual market rents may not support carrying costs.
  2. Property-specific flood exposure and insurance may exceed the county modeled loss measure.
  3. Small purchase and migration measures may not represent the target submarket.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Can gross yield be calculated from this record?

No. Market asking rent is not published, and HUD FMR cannot be substituted for market rent.

Are the Zillow and FHFA price measures directly comparable?

No. Zillow reports a county home-value measure, while FHFA reports a repeat-transaction appreciation index from a different reported vintage.

Was investor activity dominant among reported purchases?

No. Non-occupant investor purchases represented a minority of the reported purchase-mortgage total.