Counties / Utah / Rich County

Rich County, UT

FIPS 49033 · population 2,631 · outside every metro area

$589k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$589k
▲ 4.8% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
ACS median gross rent
$760
occupied-unit survey; not current asking rent
Census ACS · surveyed
Gross yield
n/a
gross yield cannot be computed without measured market rent
requires both measured price and measured rent
HUD 2-bed standard
$973
the Section 8 payment standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

One annual series is unavailable
FHFA five-year cumulative+76.3%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06+4.8%FHFA HPI2025n/a
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-07-28.
Owner-reported value$335k
Surveyed gross rent$760
Rent burden 30%+19.1%
Median year built1992
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
72.6%vacant
3,373estimated housing units
Occupied tenure15.3% renter
owner 84.7%renter 15.3%
Structure mix75.2% single-family
Single-family 75.2%20+ units 1.4%Mobile home 18.0%Other 5.4%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs1,073▼ 8.6% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments159annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$826▼ 1.7% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorTrade, transportation, and utilities21.2% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS−8.6%WEEKLY WAGE−1.7%Trade, transportation, and utilities21.2%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Rich County’s underwriting tension is an elevated Zillow county median home value of $588,514, up 4.75% year over year, while available listing evidence points to a slower selling environment. This merits investigation by buyers who can verify achievable rent and property-specific flood exposure; those relying on quick resale or untested rental coverage should be cautious. FHFA’s annual repeat-transaction HPI rose 76.30% over five years, supporting a prior appreciation history, but it is an index rather than a home value and uses a different vintage and method from Zillow.

02Housing economics

Housing economics remain unclosed: no county market asking rent is published, so gross yield cannot be computed. HUD’s two-bedroom FMR is a payment standard, not market rent, and cannot fill that gap. The effective property-tax rate is 0.26%, while modeled annual climate loss equals 0.10% of building value and should be read alongside inland flood as the dominant hazard. These county-level carrying-cost signals require parcel-level tax bills, insurance quotes, flood-zone status and actual rent comps; they do not establish operating coverage.

03Demand & competition

Realtor.com’s MLS listing-market evidence shows median asking price down 5.76% year over year, active listings higher, median marketing time at 90 days and up 42.63%, 18.82% of listings reduced, and a 6.40% pending-to-active ratio. These are visible supply, seller-concession and marketing-time measures—not closed-sale prices or standalone proof of buyer demand. Migration was marginally positive and incoming movers reported higher average AGI than outgoing movers, but the scale is too small here to establish durable demand. Investors made 22 of 77 purchases, a 28.57% share, indicating meaningful buyer competition within a limited purchase count.

04Risk & next checks

Annual QCEW workplace evidence adds a demand constraint: covered employment fell 8.60% and average covered-worker weekly wage fell 1.67%. Trade, transportation, and utilities was the largest disclosed private supersector at 21.22% of private covered jobs; it is not the whole economy or resident labor market. The thesis could change with absent closed-sales data, market-rent and vacancy history, property-level insurance and flood costs, and financing terms; without them, sale-price liquidity, income coverage and net operating economics cannot be underwritten.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Rich County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Randolph town722Garden City town608Laketown town437Woodruff town371Garden CDP24
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

5 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Randolph townIncorporated place
    722
  2. 02
    Garden City townIncorporated place
    608
  3. 03
    Laketown townIncorporated place
    437
  4. 04
    Woodruff townIncorporated place
    371
  5. 05
    Garden CDPCensus-designated place
    24

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.098% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax0.26%

$859 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration+3

67 in · 64 out

Arriving vs leaving income+$13,166

$85,104 arriving · $71,938 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors28.6%

22 of 77 mortgages

investorother financed
Current listing pressure

What sellers and visible supply are doing

Realtor.com® Economic Research · county inventory 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-28
Active listings172▲ 5.5% year over year
Median days on market90▲ 42.6% year over year
Listings price-reduced18.8%seller-concession signal
Median listing pricen/a▼ 5.8% year over year

Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.

No rent index is published for this county.Zillow’s county rent series does not cover every county, and estimating one from a neighbouring county would be a guess wearing a number’s clothes. Everything above is measured here; no wider market is mapped for it either.
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Closed-sale execution may differ from MLS asking-price, inventory and marketing-time evidence.
  2. Unpublished market rent, vacancy and operating expenses may leave income coverage unmeasurable.
  3. Parcel flood exposure, insurance costs and tax bills may differ materially from county-level measures.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Can gross yield be calculated from the supplied record?

No. County market rent is not published, and HUD FMR cannot be used to calculate gross yield.

Does the record show investor competition?

Yes. It records investor participation among county purchases, although the purchase base is limited.

Can flood-related operating cost be fully underwritten from this record?

No. The dominant hazard and modeled loss ratio are supplied, but parcel flood-zone and insurance-cost evidence is not published.