Counties / Colorado / Rio Grande County

Rio Grande County, CO

FIPS 08105 · population 11,321 · outside every metro area

$329k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$329k
▲ 2.3% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
ACS median gross rent
$945
occupied-unit survey; not current asking rent
Census ACS · surveyed
Gross yield
n/a
gross yield cannot be computed without measured market rent
requires both measured price and measured rent
HUD 2-bed standard
$1,094
the Section 8 payment standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

Both annual signals move in the same direction
FHFA five-year cumulative+57.2%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06+2.3%FHFA HPI2025+5.1%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-07-28.
Owner-reported value$240k
Surveyed gross rent$945
Rent burden 30%+38.8%
Median year built1978
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
22.4%vacant
6,616estimated housing units
Occupied tenure32.9% renter
owner 67.1%renter 32.9%
Structure mix75.9% single-family
Single-family 75.9%20+ units 2.7%Mobile home 11.5%Other 9.9%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs4,406▼ 1.7% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments497annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$970▲ 2.9% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorTrade, transportation, and utilities24.0% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS−1.7%WEEKLY WAGE+2.9%Trade, transportation, and utilities24.0%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Rio Grande County presents a price-appreciation-versus-absorption tension: Zillow’s 2026-06 median home value is $329,311 and rose 2.26% year over year, while the 2025 FHFA repeat-transaction HPI rose 5.15% in its annual observation and 57.21% cumulatively over five years. The HPI is not a home value, and its annual series and Zillow observation use distinct methods and supplied periods; they establish positive direction rather than one blended growth rate. Income-focused buyers should investigate before underwriting appreciation, while flood-exposed buyers warrant caution.

02Housing economics

No county market asking rent is published, so gross yield cannot be computed. HUD’s two-bedroom FMR of $1,094 is a payment standard, not an asking-rent estimate, and cannot fill that gap. At the reported home-value measure, carrying-cost context includes a 0.39% effective property-tax rate. QCEW reports 4,406 annual-average covered jobs at workplaces in the county, down 1.70%, while the covered-worker average weekly wage rose 2.86%. Trade, transportation, and utilities is the largest disclosed private supersector, not the whole county economy.

03Demand & competition

Realtor.com’s MLS listing market shows 89 active listings, a 71-day median marketing time, 16.68% reduced-price share, and an 11.30% pending-to-active ratio. These are visible supply, marketing-time and seller-concession measures; they are neither closed-sale prices nor independent proof of buyer demand. Tax-return migration was net negative by 64 households, although arriving movers’ average income exceeded departing movers’ by $12,710. Investor mortgages were 4.29% of purchases, measured against only 70 total purchases; this is limited evidence of buyer competition, especially at county scale.

04Risk & next checks

Modeled climate loss equals 0.13% of building value annually and aligns with inland flood as the dominant hazard, but it does not identify parcel exposure or actual insurance cost. Underwriting still lacks market rent, lease-up and vacancy evidence, closed-sale and property-condition data, flood-zone and insurance quotes, debt terms, and operating expenses. Those absences prevent a defensible cash-flow, exit-price, and property-level hazard conclusion; verify them alongside title, tax, and flood diligence.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Rio Grande County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Monte Vista city4.1KCenter town*2.1KDel Norte town1.7KSouth Fork town724Gerrard CDP332Alpine CDP75
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

6 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Monte Vista cityIncorporated place
    4,141
  2. 02
    Center townIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    2,120
  3. 03
    Del Norte townIncorporated place
    1,653
  4. 04
    South Fork townIncorporated place
    724
  5. 05
    Gerrard CDPCensus-designated place
    332
  6. 06
    Alpine CDPCensus-designated place
    75

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.128% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax0.39%

$925 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration-64

359 in · 423 out

Arriving vs leaving income+$12,710

$55,724 arriving · $43,014 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors4.3%

3 of 70 mortgages

investorother financed
Current listing pressure

What sellers and visible supply are doing

Realtor.com® Economic Research · county inventory 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-28
Active listings89▲ 6.0% year over year
Median days on market71▲ 18.3% year over year
Listings price-reduced16.7%seller-concession signal
Median listing pricen/a▲ 6.9% year over year

Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.

No rent index is published for this county.Zillow’s county rent series does not cover every county, and estimating one from a neighbouring county would be a guess wearing a number’s clothes. Everything above is measured here; no wider market is mapped for it either.
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Actual market rents, vacancy, and operating expenses could show inadequate cash flow despite reported price appreciation.
  2. County-level modeled flood loss may not capture a specific property’s flood exposure or insurance burden.
  3. MLS concessions, covered-job decline, and net outmigration may limit buyer depth despite higher-income arriving movers.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Can a market-rent-based gross yield be calculated from this record?

No. County market asking rent is not published, and HUD Fair Market Rent is a payment standard rather than a market-rent substitute.

Do the Realtor.com figures establish closed-sale pricing or buyer demand?

No. They describe the MLS listing market: visible supply, asking-market conditions, marketing time, and seller price reductions.

What property-specific flood conclusion does the county climate evidence support?

It identifies inland flood as the dominant county hazard and reports modeled building-value loss, but it does not determine parcel exposure, flood-zone status, or insurance cost.