Counties / Montana / Rosebud County

Rosebud County, MT

FIPS 30087 · population 8,165 · outside every metro area

$233k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$233k
▼ 0.0% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
ACS median gross rent
$672
occupied-unit survey; not current asking rent
Census ACS · surveyed
Gross yield
n/a
gross yield cannot be computed without measured market rent
requires both measured price and measured rent
HUD 2-bed standard
$1,186
the Section 8 payment standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

The annual signals disagree
FHFA five-year cumulative+71.1%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06−0.0%FHFA HPI2025+8.8%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-07-28.
Owner-reported value$182k
Surveyed gross rent$672
Rent burden 30%+38.0%
Median year built1978
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
18.8%vacant
3,779estimated housing units
Occupied tenure36.4% renter
owner 63.7%renter 36.4%
Structure mix65.7% single-family
Single-family 65.7%20+ units 2.4%Mobile home 17.5%Other 14.4%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs3,616▲ 0.2% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments259annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$1,286▲ 4.8% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorTrade, transportation, and utilities25.7% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS+0.2%WEEKLY WAGE+4.8%Trade, transportation, and utilities25.7%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Rosebud County presents a valuation-versus-cash-flow tension for a cash-flow buyer: the Zillow county observation labeled 2026-06 puts median home value at $233,482, down 0.01% year over year, while the FHFA repeat-transaction HPI labeled 2025 rose 8.80% year over year and gained 71.07% on its supplied five-year cumulative measure. These are different vintages and methods. FHFA is an appreciation index, not a home value, so the figures cannot be merged into one price trend. Buyers relying on appreciation should be cautious until local transaction evidence is verified.

02Housing economics

Cash-flow underwriting is incomplete. No market rent is published, so gross yield cannot be computed. The $1,186 HUD FMR is a payment standard, not an estimate of asking rent, and cannot fill that gap. The effective property-tax rate is 0.70%, a carrying-cost input alongside the home-value benchmark, but assessment basis, insurance, utilities, vacancy and repair costs are not published. Realtor.com listing-price, active-inventory, marketing-time and price-reduction figures are also absent, preventing a read on visible MLS supply, seller concessions or asking-price competition.

03Demand & competition

QCEW’s 2025 annual average reports 3,616 covered jobs at county workplaces and a $1,286 average weekly covered-worker wage. Trade, transportation, and utilities is the largest disclosed private supersector; that identifies the largest disclosed private segment, not the whole economy or resident employment. Tax-return migration was net positive by 8 households, yet incoming movers’ average AGI was $10,679 lower than outgoing movers’. The reported non-occupant purchase-mortgage share was 0%, alongside 39 purchases, limiting evidence of recorded investor competition but not providing a complete buyer census.

04Risk & next checks

Inland flood is the named hazard, and modeled expected annual climate loss equals 0.28% of building value; this is a modeled ratio, not observed damage or a parcel-level loss. County aggregates cannot establish a property’s flood zone, insurance terms, lease demand or resale liquidity. Next underwriting checks are parcel flood and insurance records, current market-rent and lease data, tax bills and assessment history, closed-sale comparables, and complete MLS listing evidence.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Rosebud County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Colstrip city2.1KLame Deer CDP1.9KForsyth city1.7KAshland CDP959Rosebud CDP45Birney CDP17
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

6 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Colstrip cityIncorporated place
    2,101
  2. 02
    Lame Deer CDPCensus-designated place
    1,872
  3. 03
    Forsyth cityIncorporated place
    1,728
  4. 04
    Ashland CDPCensus-designated place
    959
  5. 05
    Rosebud CDPCensus-designated place
    45
  6. 06
    Birney CDPCensus-designated place
    17

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.279% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax0.70%

$1,285 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration+8

191 in · 183 out

Arriving vs leaving income−$10,679

$48,654 arriving · $59,333 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors0.0%

0 of 39 mortgages

investorother financed
No rent index is published for this county.Zillow’s county rent series does not cover every county, and estimating one from a neighbouring county would be a guess wearing a number’s clothes. Everything above is measured here; no wider market is mapped for it either.
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Different valuation methods and period labels leave the direction of local prices unresolved.
  2. Missing market-rent, operating-cost and MLS evidence could materially change cash-flow and resale-liquidity conclusions.
  3. Countywide flood, migration and QCEW measures may not describe the subject parcel or tenant base.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Can gross yield be calculated from the supplied record?

No. Market rent is not published, and HUD FMR cannot be substituted for asking rent.

What hazard requires parcel-level verification?

Inland flood; the climate-loss figure is modeled rather than observed parcel damage.

What does the investor-share record establish?

It reports no non-occupant purchase-mortgage share, but it does not provide a complete census of buyer types.