States / Montana
State rental intelligence

Montana rental market data

A source-traced view across 7 metro markets and 56 counties. State figures below are labelled medians and totals—not a made-up statewide investment score.

7/7 metros scored56/56 counties with FEMA risk14 sources used in this analysis
Median scored metro42.0out of 100 · 7 measured metros
Montana identity diorama showing regional landscape, cities, housing, and infrastructure
Median metro home value$480kmedian across published metro values
Median metro rent$1,567monthly · published metro values
Median gross yield4.1%annual rent ÷ price · before costs
Median job trend▼ 0.2%trailing 12-month metro employment
Direct monthly rental evidence

Montana rent market dynamics

Apartment List measures recent leases, rental vacancy and listing time separately. These figures do not replace Zillow, Census or Realtor measures elsewhere on this page.

Recent-lease rent$1,1092026-07 · ▲ 0.6% year over year
Rental Vacancy Indexn/anot published for this state
Time on marketn/anot published for this state
US recent-lease rent$1,3882026-07 · ▼ 1.1% year over year
Rent and rental vacancy through timesolid state series · dashed national series · no interpolation across missing observations
Recent-lease rent$1,519$1,123$726Rental Vacancy Index7.8%5.6%3.4%2017-012021-102026-07MontanaUnited States
State research brief

Measured metro rents rose at a 2.2% median, yet median employment fell 0.2% and featured resale supply reached 6.5 months.

Updated 2026-08-08 · evidence current to the releases listed below.

Rent and home-value growth remain closely matched across Montana's seven measured metros: median annual rent growth was 2.2%, compared with 2.3% for home values. The local mix is less uniform. Great Falls, Missoula and Billings each posted faster rent growth than value growth, but their measured gross yields ranged from 3.2% to 4.7%, showing that momentum does not necessarily produce stronger entry economics.

The demand evidence is mixed. Measured counties recorded net in-migration of 3,081 people, while median metro employment declined 0.2%. Separately, the statewide Apartment List recent-lease rent measure increased 0.6%. Resale conditions also require attention: the featured metro markets carried 4.3 to 6.5 months of supply and 65 to 72 days on market. The combination supports locality-level screening of tenant demand, entry price and exit liquidity; it does not establish a statewide return or uniform rental shortage.

01

Seven-metro median rent growth of 2.2% nearly matches 2.3% home-value growth → screen for local rent-price separation rather than assuming statewide yield expansion

02

Net migration of 3,081 sits beside a 0.2% median employment decline → require current local tenant-demand evidence before relying on migration

03

Butte's 5.5% gross yield exceeds the named Great Falls and Billings examples → test whether operating costs and tenant-income pressure preserve that entry advantage

04

Kalispell's 6.5 months of supply and 72-day resale time → include greater exit friction in acquisition screening

05

A 77.9% median county single-family share and 1.1% large-multifamily share → match property-type assumptions to the local stock rather than a generic apartment model

01
Price and rent momentum

Rent growth edges past values in three named metros, but yields diverge

Across seven measured metros, annual home-value growth had a 2.3% median and ranged from 0.2% at the 10th percentile to 4.1% at the 90th. Rent growth had a 2.2% median and a narrower positive range of 1.5% to 4.3%. The supplied median rent-minus-price measure was negative 0.1 percentage point, so the statewide metro distribution does not show a broad rent-growth advantage over values.

Local results create the useful asymmetry. Great Falls recorded 5.2% rent growth against 3.7% value growth and a 4.7% gross yield. Missoula's rent grew 3.8% against 1.2% for values, but its gross yield was only 3.2%. Billings combined 3.5% rent growth, 2.3% value growth and a 4.2% gross yield. Screening therefore needs both momentum and entry yield rather than treating faster rent growth as sufficient.

Evidence: Zillow ZHVI — metro home values · Zillow ZORI — metro market rents

02
Employment and household movement

Positive migration is not confirmed by current employment breadth

The migration measure shows 33,425 people moving in and 30,348 moving out across 46 counties, for net migration of 3,081, or 2.8 people per 1,000 residents. Aggregate mover income also had a positive balance: $3,053,903 moving in versus $2,727,121 moving out, a supplied gap of $326,782.

Employment provides a counter-signal. Across seven measured metros, annual job growth had a negative 0.2% median, with a 10th-to-90th-percentile range from negative 1.3% to positive 0.3%. Kalispell was positive at 1.0%, while Bozeman and Helena were each down about 0.2%. Migration and employment are not contemporaneous measures, so the inflow cannot be treated as proof of current tenant demand in any one metro.

Evidence: Census ACS 5-year — population · BLS CES — payroll employment · BLS LAUS — resident employment · IRS SOI — county migration and mover income

03
Entry cost and affordability

Butte offers the strongest named gross yield, with a higher tenant-income load

Among the three named entry-cost examples, Butte had a $292,640 home value, $1,334 monthly rent and 5.5% gross yield. Great Falls measured $345,114, $1,365 and 4.7%, while Billings measured $412,595, $1,444 and 4.2%. The lower entry price in Butte therefore coincided with the strongest gross income ratio in this group.

The tenant-income comparison points in the other direction. Rent equaled 25.9% of measured income in Butte, 24.2% in Great Falls and 22.5% in Billings. Price-to-income ratios were 4.74, 5.10 and 5.34, respectively. Butte's stronger gross yield does not come with the lowest tenant-income load, and none of these gross yields accounts for vacancy, operating expenses, taxes, insurance, repairs or financing.

Evidence: Census ACS 5-year — household income and gross rent · HUD Fair Market Rents — Section 8 standard · Zillow ZHVI — metro home values · Zillow ZORI — metro market rents

04
Supply and resale conditions

Kalispell combines the deepest featured supply with the slowest resale time

Kalispell had 6.5 months of supply and a 72-day median resale time, compared with 4.7 months and 70 days in Bozeman and 4.3 months and 65 days in Helena. Price-drop shares were 19.5%, 17.6% and 21.1%, respectively. All three named markets were slower than the seven-metro median of 59 days, while the metro median price-drop share was 20.5%.

Permitting was also material: Bozeman recorded 1,346 permitted units, or 10.9 per 1,000 residents; Helena had 786, or 8.4 per 1,000; and Kalispell had 748, or 6.8 per 1,000. Permits are not completed units, and resale supply does not measure rental vacancy. The packet also supplies no metro sale-to-list observations, leaving one part of exit-price execution unmeasured.

Evidence: Census Building Permits Survey — permitted units · Redfin Data Center — inventory, days on market, and price cuts

05
Housing stock and tenant conditions

Single-family stock dominates while county renter stress varies widely

Across all 56 counties, the median renter share was 27.6%, while the median single-family share was 77.9% and the median large-multifamily share was only 1.1%. Total housing vacancy had a 19.3% county median and ranged from 11.1% at the 10th percentile to 29.8% at the 90th. This ACS vacancy measure covers all housing and cannot be read as the share of long-term rentals available to tenants.

The median share of renters spending at least 30% of income on rent was 39.5%, reaching 50.0% at the 90th percentile. Musselshell County measured 61.5% rent burden despite a 14.9% renter share; Broadwater County measured 58.2% burden and a 12.2% renter share; Sanders County measured 56.2% burden and an 18.7% renter share. These county estimates identify affordability pressure, but they do not establish current rent-collection performance or lease-up speed.

Evidence: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock

06
Direct state rental dynamics

State recent-lease rent edged up, but Montana rental liquidity is unmeasured

The Apartment List statewide recent-lease rent measure was $1,109, up from $1,102, or 0.6%. The corresponding national measure fell 1.1%, leaving Montana's growth rate 1.7 percentage points higher. This is a direct state rent series and should be interpreted separately from Zillow's metro market-rent measures.

The packet's Apartment List vacancy and time-on-market figures are national rather than Montana-specific. National vacancy was 7.2%, up about 0.1 percentage point, and national time on market increased from 28 to 30 days. Because those are separate series with different coverage and no Montana observations are supplied, they cannot establish whether the state's rental vacancy or listing time moved with its recent-lease rent.

Evidence: Apartment List Rent Estimates — recent-lease rent index · Apartment List Time on Market — listing liquidity · Apartment List Vacancy Index — rental vacancy

Evidence selected for Montana

The ranges behind the analysis

Each row keeps its own unit and shows the measured 10th percentile, median and 90th percentile. A single-value row is labelled directly.

Price and rent momentumAre home values and asking rents moving together or separating?
10th pct.median90th pct.Home-value change0.2%2.3%4.1%Asking-rent change1.5%2.2%4.3%Rent minus price-0.1%
Employment and household movementDo jobs, household movement and mover income point in the same direction?
10th pct.median90th pct.Job change-1.3%-0.2%0.3%Net migration / 1k2.8Net household movement3,081
Entry cost and affordabilityHow far do local prices, rents, incomes and HUD rent standards stretch?
10th pct.median90th pct.Gross yield3.4%4.1%5.0%Price / income5.0×6.1×8.2×Rent / income23.5%25.2%29.8%Home value$324K$480K$675K
Shape of the state

Distribution before conclusion

A statewide median can hide a wide spread. These SVG charts render at build time and carry no chart library or browser-side data request.

Metro score distribution7 scored metros · median 42.0
00–19320–39440–59060–79080–100
County evidence coverageEvery gap stays visible as missing—not estimated
23%13/56Rent100%56/56Climate82%46/56Migration
Highest measured metro gross yieldsscreening metric only · before expenses and financing
Butte5.5%Great Falls4.7%Billings4.2%Helena4.1%Bozeman3.8%Kalispell3.6%Missoula3.2%
Metro leaderboard

Markets touching Montana

Multi-state CBSAs appear in every member state. Score is still a metro score; no value is reweighted into a statewide ranking.

#MetroScorePriceRentYieldJobs
1Butte, MT45$293k$1,3345.5%▼ 0.2%
2Billings, MT43$413k$1,4444.2%▼ 0.5%
3Missoula, MT43$583k$1,5673.2%▼ 0.2%
4Great Falls, MT42$345k$1,3654.7%▼ 2.5%
5Kalispell, MT37$654k$1,9403.6%▲ 1.0%
6Helena, MT35$480k$1,6474.1%▼ 0.2%
7Bozeman, MT29$708k$2,2373.8%▼ 0.2%
Below the metro line

Largest counties in Montana

County figures join on the five-digit FIPS code. The table uses measured local values and prints “n/a” wherever a publisher has no record.

CountyPopulationPriceRentYieldHazard
Yellowstone County, MT168,957$403k$1,4444.3%inland flooding
Gallatin County, MT124,074$708k$2,2373.8%inland flooding
Missoula County, MT120,672$583k$1,5673.2%inland flooding
Flathead County, MT110,695$654k$1,9403.6%inland flooding
Cascade County, MT84,606$345k$1,3654.8%inland flooding
Lewis and Clark County, MT73,464$472k$1,6484.2%inland flooding
Ravalli County, MT46,727$614k$1,8823.7%wildfire
Silver Bow County, MT35,785$293k$1,3345.5%inland flooding
Lake County, MT32,561$606k$1,4252.8%inland flooding
Lincoln County, MT21,175$435kn/an/ainland flooding
Park County, MT17,710$617k$1,4332.8%inland flooding
Hill County, MT16,155$239k$9885.0%inland flooding
County yield sample13/56counties have the rent needed to compute yield
Statewide net migration+3,081IRS tax-return households summed across counties
Median investor share6.7%among counties with HMDA purchase records
Bear case

What can break the thesis

  1. Migration and employment are measured over different periods, so their apparent tension may reflect timing rather than a durable demand split.
  2. The direct state rental series provides no Montana vacancy or time-on-market values, leaving current rental liquidity unresolved.
  3. Gross yields omit vacancy, operating costs, property taxes, insurance, repairs and financing, any of which can reverse the entry-price ranking.
  4. Permits measure authorized units rather than completions, while resale inventory and days on market do not establish rental supply.
  5. ACS county vacancy covers all vacant housing, not only units available for long-term rent, so it may overstate usable rental availability.
Investor questions

Before underwriting a property

Are rents clearly outrunning home values across Montana's measured metros?

No. Median rent growth was 2.2% versus 2.3% for home values. Great Falls, Missoula and Billings each had faster rent growth than value growth, but their gross yields still ranged from 3.2% to 4.7%.

Which named lower-entry metro has the strongest measured gross yield?

Butte, at 5.5% on a $292,640 value and $1,334 monthly rent. That is a gross ratio, not a net return, and Butte also had the highest rent-to-income measure of the three named examples at 25.9%.

Does positive migration resolve the weak employment signal?

No. Net migration was positive by 3,081 people, but median metro employment declined 0.2%. The series are not contemporaneous and do not prove current demand in any individual market.

Where is resale liquidity weakest among the featured metros?

Kalispell had the deepest supply at 6.5 months and the longest median resale time at 72 days. Bozeman and Helena measured 4.7 and 4.3 months, with 70 and 65 days, respectively.

Can the packet establish Montana's current rental vacancy rate?

No. The county ACS measure is total housing vacancy, and the Apartment List vacancy figures supplied are national rather than Montana-specific. Neither establishes current statewide long-term rental availability.