Counties / Kansas / Stanton County

Stanton County, KS

FIPS 20187 · population 2,038 · outside every metro area

$158k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$158k
▲ 5.9% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
ACS median gross rent
$705
occupied-unit survey; not current asking rent
Census ACS · surveyed
Gross yield
n/a
gross yield cannot be computed without measured market rent
requires both measured price and measured rent
HUD 2-bed standard
$877
the Section 8 payment standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

One annual series is unavailable
FHFA five-year cumulativen/anot annualized · through n/a
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06+5.9%FHFA HPIperiod n/an/a
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-07-28.
Owner-reported value$68k
Surveyed gross rent$705
Rent burden 30%+11.7%
Median year built1968
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
16.8%vacant
1,029estimated housing units
Occupied tenure23.5% renter
owner 76.5%renter 23.5%
Structure mix75.0% single-family
Single-family 75.0%20+ units 0.0%Mobile home 22.6%Other 2.3%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs680▼ 24.1% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments91annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$905▼ 7.7% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorNatural resources and mining48.1% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS−24.1%WEEKLY WAGE−7.7%Natural resources and mining48.1%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Stanton County presents a price-versus-local-income tension: Zillow’s county median home value rose 5.89% in 2026-06, while QCEW annual covered employment at county workplaces fell 24.11%. That combination makes the county worth investigation for an investor able to verify asset-level rent and liquidity, but warrants caution for anyone treating the value move as broad operating strength. Zillow’s measure is a home-value estimate, not a closed-sale series; no FHFA annual repeat-transaction HPI is supplied to independently test its direction.

02Housing economics

The reported median home value is $157,549, but market asking rent is not published, so gross yield cannot be computed. HUD’s two-bedroom FMR of $877 per month is a payment standard, not a market-rent estimate and cannot fill that gap. Carrying costs require attention: the effective property-tax rate is 2.46%, and median annual property tax is $1,667. These county figures do not establish tax, insurance, condition, or rent for a specific property.

03Demand & competition

QCEW reports 680 annual-average covered jobs located in the county; average weekly covered-worker wage fell 7.75%. Natural resources and mining is the largest disclosed private supersector and represents 48.06% of private covered employment, a concentration to test against a property’s tenant base rather than a description of the whole economy. Tax-return migration shows a net loss of 7 households, while average AGI for incoming movers was $10,924 below that of outgoing movers. The reported investor share is 0% across 4 purchases, too thin to demonstrate either absent competition or owner-occupant demand.

04Risk & next checks

Inland flood is the dominant hazard, and modeled climate loss equals 0.10% of building value per year; this is a modeled expected-loss ratio, not a parcel-specific dollar loss. Obtain flood-zone, elevation, insurance-quote and coverage information before treating carrying costs as known. Realtor.com’s inventory source is supplied, but no MLS listing price, active-listing, days-on-market, or price-reduction figures are published; visible supply and seller concessions therefore cannot be assessed. Closed-sale evidence is also absent. These gaps prevent confirmation of resale liquidity and entry pricing; verify market rent, lease terms, and property-specific taxes.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Stanton County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Johnson City city1.5KManter city142Big Bow CDP86
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

3 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Johnson City cityIncorporated place
    1,549
  2. 02
    Manter cityIncorporated place
    142
  3. 03
    Big Bow CDPCensus-designated place
    86

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.097% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax2.46%

$1,667 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration-7

22 in · 29 out

Arriving vs leaving income−$10,924

$37,455 arriving · $48,379 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors0.0%

0 of 4 mortgages

investorother financed
No rent index is published for this county.Zillow’s county rent series does not cover every county, and estimating one from a neighbouring county would be a guess wearing a number’s clothes. Everything above is measured here; no wider market is mapped for it either.
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. The countywide Zillow value measure may not match a property’s achievable acquisition or resale price.
  2. Thin purchase and migration counts may not represent the relevant neighborhood or buyer pool.
  3. Parcel flood exposure and insurance terms may differ materially from the countywide modeled hazard ratio.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Can gross yield be calculated from this record?

No. Market asking rent is not published, and HUD FMR cannot substitute for market rent.

What does the record show about non-occupant investor purchases?

The reported investor share is 0% across 4 purchases, which is a limited sample.

Is there an FHFA appreciation measure to cross-check Zillow’s direction?

No. An FHFA annual repeat-transaction HPI observation is not supplied.