Counties / Texas / Starr County

Starr County, TX

FIPS 48427 · population 66,067 · outside every metro area

$142k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$142k
▲ 1.5% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
ACS median gross rent
$726
occupied-unit survey; not current asking rent
Census ACS · surveyed
Gross yield
n/a
gross yield cannot be computed without measured market rent
requires both measured price and measured rent
HUD 2-bed standard
$973
the Section 8 payment standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

Both annual signals move in the same direction
FHFA five-year cumulative+71.1%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06+1.5%FHFA HPI2025+21.3%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-07-28.
Owner-reported value$95k
Surveyed gross rent$726
Rent burden 30%+55.8%
Median year built1994
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
17.2%vacant
23,139estimated housing units
Occupied tenure30.5% renter
owner 69.5%renter 30.5%
Structure mix80.3% single-family
Single-family 80.3%20+ units 1.3%Mobile home 9.9%Other 8.5%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs15,052▲ 2.1% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments670annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$805▲ 5.2% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorEducation and health services46.8% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS+2.1%WEEKLY WAGE+5.2%Education and health services46.8%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Starr County presents a valuation-evidence tension that warrants property-level investigation rather than a broad county call. Zillow’s county median home value was $141,954 in 2026-06, up 1.49% year over year, while the FHFA repeat-transaction HPI rose 21.29% in annual 2025 data. Both measures are positive, but they have distinct vintages and methods: FHFA is an index, not a home value. Buyers relying on appreciation or refinancing assumptions should be cautious until local closed-sale comps reconcile the difference.

02Housing economics

Income underwriting is the central constraint: market rent is not published, so gross yield cannot be computed. HUD’s two-bedroom FMR is $973 per month, but it is a payment standard rather than asking rent and cannot fill that gap. The effective property-tax rate is 1.14%, with a $1,083 median annual tax; these are carrying-cost inputs, not evidence of rent coverage. Achieved and asking rents, parcel taxes, insurance, and operating expenses need verification before cash flow can be assessed.

03Demand & competition

Realtor.com MLS evidence shows a 4.79% decline in median asking price, while median marketing time shortened from the prior year; these are listing conditions, not closed-sale evidence or proof of buyer demand. Annual QCEW identifies Education and health services as the largest disclosed private supersector, representing 46.84% of private covered employment rather than the whole county economy. Tax-return households showed net migration of -180, with movers out reporting $39,747 of average AGI versus $36,746 for movers in. Non-owner purchase mortgages made up 4.29% of 140 purchases, a limited observed buyer segment that does not capture all-cash activity.

04Risk & next checks

Inland flood is the dominant hazard, and modeled climate loss equals 0.14% of building value annually; a county-level model does not determine a parcel’s exposure, premium, deductible, or mitigation needs. The record lacks market rent, property-level flood-zone and insurance evidence, closed-sale comps, vacancy, condition, and financing terms. Those omissions prevent a gross-yield calculation, a net operating-cost test, and a conclusion that visible listing-market signals translate into executable acquisitions.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Starr County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Rio Grande City city15.4KRoma city11.5KEscobares city2.6KLas Lomas CDP2.2KMikes CDP1.7KLa Grulla city1.3KAlto Bonito Heights CDP1.1KMi Ranchito Estate CDP1.1K
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

115 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Rio Grande City cityIncorporated place
    15,396
  2. 02
    Roma cityIncorporated place
    11,545
  3. 03
    Escobares cityIncorporated place
    2,573
  4. 04
    Las Lomas CDPCensus-designated place
    2,154
  5. 05
    Mikes CDPCensus-designated place
    1,688
  6. 06
    La Grulla cityIncorporated place
    1,341
  7. 07
    Alto Bonito Heights CDPCensus-designated place
    1,121
  8. 08
    Mi Ranchito Estate CDPCensus-designated place
    1,091
  9. 09
    Nina CDPCensus-designated place
    965
  10. 10
    West Alto Bonito CDPCensus-designated place
    822
  11. 11
    El Refugio CDPCensus-designated place
    780
  12. 12
    El Rancho Vela CDPCensus-designated place
    623
Show 103 more places
  1. 13
    La Puerta CDPCensus-designated place
    582
  2. 14
    El Castillo CDPCensus-designated place
    566
  3. 15
    Garza-Salinas II CDPCensus-designated place
    559
  4. 16
    Mesquite CDPCensus-designated place
    515
  5. 17
    Santa Rosa CDPCensus-designated place
    502
  6. 18
    Olivia Lopez de Gutierrez CDPCensus-designated place
    455
  7. 19
    Valle Vista CDPCensus-designated place
    424
  8. 20
    El Cenizo CDPCensus-designated place
    377
  9. 21
    Camargito CDPCensus-designated place
    376
  10. 22
    Regino Ramirez CDPCensus-designated place
    369
  11. 23
    J.F. Villareal CDPCensus-designated place
    353
  12. 24
    La Esperanza CDPCensus-designated place
    347
  13. 25
    East Alto Bonito CDPCensus-designated place
    340
  14. 26
    La Minita CDPCensus-designated place
    337
  15. 27
    Flor del Rio CDPCensus-designated place
    326
  16. 28
    Palo Blanco CDPCensus-designated place
    321
  17. 29
    La Paloma Ranchettes CDPCensus-designated place
    319
  18. 30
    Pablo Pena CDPCensus-designated place
    319
  19. 31
    La Victoria CDPCensus-designated place
    314
  20. 32
    Sammy Martinez CDPCensus-designated place
    303
  21. 33
    Santa Cruz CDPCensus-designated place
    285
  22. 34
    El Chaparral CDPCensus-designated place
    282
  23. 35
    Los Ebanos CDP (Starr County)Census place
    281
  24. 36
    Ranchitos del Norte CDPCensus-designated place
    263
  25. 37
    Los Alvarez CDPCensus-designated place
    245
  26. 38
    Rancho Viejo CDPCensus-designated place
    238
  27. 39
    Manuel Garcia CDPCensus-designated place
    219
  28. 40
    San Isidro CDPCensus-designated place
    214
  29. 41
    Fronton CDPCensus-designated place
    205
  30. 42
    Garciasville CDPCensus-designated place
    196
  31. 43
    Delmita CDPCensus-designated place
    183
  32. 44
    North Escobares CDPCensus-designated place
    171
  33. 45
    B and E CDPCensus-designated place
    169
  34. 46
    La Escondida CDPCensus-designated place
    167
  35. 47
    San Juan CDPCensus-designated place
    161
  36. 48
    Garceno CDPCensus-designated place
    149
  37. 49
    La Chuparosa CDPCensus-designated place
    148
  38. 50
    Los Barreras CDPCensus-designated place
    148
  39. 51
    Zarate CDPCensus-designated place
    146
  40. 52
    Villarreal CDPCensus-designated place
    140
  41. 53
    Benjamin Perez CDPCensus-designated place
    133
  42. 54
    Loma Vista CDPCensus-designated place
    130
  43. 55
    Eugenio Saenz CDPCensus-designated place
    120
  44. 56
    Evergreen CDPCensus-designated place
    116
  45. 57
    Ramos CDPCensus-designated place
    115
  46. 58
    E. Lopez CDPCensus-designated place
    108
  47. 59
    Fronton Ranchettes CDPCensus-designated place
    98
  48. 60
    Guadalupe Guerra CDPCensus-designated place
    98
  49. 61
    Chapeno CDPCensus-designated place
    95
  50. 62
    El Brazil CDPCensus-designated place
    94
  51. 63
    Narciso Pena CDPCensus-designated place
    91
  52. 64
    Olmito and Olmito CDPCensus-designated place
    79
  53. 65
    Salineño North CDPCensus-designated place
    77
  54. 66
    Ramirez-Perez CDPCensus-designated place
    69
  55. 67
    Sunset CDP (Starr County)Census place
    65
  56. 68
    La Loma de Falcon CDPCensus-designated place
    57
  57. 69
    La Rosita CDPCensus-designated place
    56
  58. 70
    San Fernando CDPCensus-designated place
    55
  59. 71
    Amada Acres CDPCensus-designated place
    52
  60. 72
    El Quiote CDPCensus-designated place
    51
  61. 73
    Salineño CDPCensus-designated place
    51
  62. 74
    Barrera CDPCensus-designated place
    49
  63. 75
    El Socio CDPCensus-designated place
    49
  64. 76
    Lago Vista CDPCensus-designated place
    48
  65. 77
    Campo Verde CDPCensus-designated place
    43
  66. 78
    Rafael Pena CDPCensus-designated place
    42
  67. 79
    Quesada CDPCensus-designated place
    40
  68. 80
    Jardin de San Julian CDPCensus-designated place
    34
  69. 81
    El Mesquite CDPCensus-designated place
    32
  70. 82
    La Casita CDPCensus-designated place
    25
  71. 83
    Longoria CDPCensus-designated place
    23
  72. 84
    Chaparrito CDPCensus-designated place
    16
  73. 85
    Gutierrez CDPCensus-designated place
    11
  74. 86
    Martinez CDPCensus-designated place
    11
  75. 87
    Airport Heights CDPCensus-designated place
    0
  76. 88
    Anacua CDPCensus-designated place
    0
  77. 89
    Buena Vista CDPCensus-designated place
    0
  78. 90
    Casa Blanca CDPCensus-designated place
    0
  79. 91
    Casas CDPCensus-designated place
    0
  80. 92
    Elias-Fela Solis CDPCensus-designated place
    0
  81. 93
    Falcon Heights CDPCensus-designated place
    0
  82. 94
    Falcon Village CDPCensus-designated place
    0
  83. 95
    Falconaire CDPCensus-designated place
    0
  84. 96
    Fernando Salinas CDPCensus-designated place
    0
  85. 97
    H. Cuellar Estates CDPCensus-designated place
    0
  86. 98
    Hilltop CDP (Starr County)Census place
    0
  87. 99
    Indio CDPCensus-designated place
    0
  88. 100
    La Carla CDPCensus-designated place
    0
  89. 101
    Loma Linda East CDP (Starr County)Census place
    0
  90. 102
    Loma Linda West CDPCensus-designated place
    0
  91. 103
    Los Arrieros CDPCensus-designated place
    0
  92. 104
    Manuel Garcia II CDPCensus-designated place
    0
  93. 105
    Miguel Barrera CDPCensus-designated place
    0
  94. 106
    Moraida CDPCensus-designated place
    0
  95. 107
    Netos CDPCensus-designated place
    0
  96. 108
    Pena CDPCensus-designated place
    0
  97. 109
    Rivereno CDPCensus-designated place
    0
  98. 110
    Sandoval CDPCensus-designated place
    0
  99. 111
    Santa Anna CDPCensus-designated place
    0
  100. 112
    Santel CDPCensus-designated place
    0
  101. 113
    Tierra Dorada CDPCensus-designated place
    0
  102. 114
    Valle Hermoso CDPCensus-designated place
    0
  103. 115
    Victoria Vera CDPCensus-designated place
    0

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.138% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax1.14%

$1,083 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration-180

631 in · 811 out

Arriving vs leaving income−$3,001

$36,746 arriving · $39,747 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors4.3%

6 of 140 mortgages

investorother financed
Current listing pressure

What sellers and visible supply are doing

Realtor.com® Economic Research · county inventory 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-28
Active listings116▲ 0.9% year over year
Median days on market86▼ 10.4% year over year
Listings price-reduced8.8%seller-concession signal
Median listing pricen/a▼ 4.8% year over year

Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.

No rent index is published for this county.Zillow’s county rent series does not cover every county, and estimating one from a neighbouring county would be a guess wearing a number’s clothes. Everything above is measured here; no wider market is mapped for it either.
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Achieved rents or vacancy could be insufficient to support carrying costs, and gross yield is unavailable.
  2. Zillow home-value growth and FHFA index growth diverge in magnitude across distinct methods and vintages, weakening exit-value assumptions.
  3. County-level flood-loss modeling may mask parcel-specific insurance costs or exposure that materially changes underwriting.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Can gross yield be calculated from this record?

No. Market rent is not published, and HUD FMR cannot be substituted for market rent.

What does the Realtor.com evidence establish?

It establishes MLS listing-market conditions, not closed-sale prices or proof of buyer demand.

What does QCEW measure in this record?

Annual covered employment at workplaces in the county, not resident employment, unemployment, or a forecast.