Counties / Wisconsin / Taylor County

Taylor County, WI

FIPS 55119 · population 20,024 · outside every metro area

$234k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$234k
▲ 9.6% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
ACS median gross rent
$823
occupied-unit survey; not current asking rent
Census ACS · surveyed
Gross yield
n/a
gross yield cannot be computed without measured market rent
requires both measured price and measured rent
HUD 2-bed standard
$973
the Section 8 payment standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

Both annual signals move in the same direction
FHFA five-year cumulative+60.6%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06+9.6%FHFA HPI2025+16.6%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-07-28.
Owner-reported value$197k
Surveyed gross rent$823
Rent burden 30%+35.0%
Median year built1978
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
15.6%vacant
9,537estimated housing units
Occupied tenure20.3% renter
owner 79.7%renter 20.3%
Structure mix78.6% single-family
Single-family 78.6%20+ units 1.4%Mobile home 8.5%Other 11.5%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs7,774▼ 0.7% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments542annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$999▲ 8.7% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorManufacturing39.0% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS−0.7%WEEKLY WAGE+8.7%Manufacturing39.0%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Taylor County’s tension is rising price evidence without rent data to test cash flow, alongside softer workforce and migration readings. Cash-flow underwriters and buyers relying on local resale depth should be cautious. Zillow’s median home value was $233,997 in 2026-06, up 9.60% year over year. FHFA’s separate 2025 repeat-transaction HPI rose 16.57% annually. Both point upward, but their vintages and methods differ; HPI is not a home value and the rates cannot be combined.

02Housing economics

Housing economics remain unresolved. Market asking rent is not published, so gross yield cannot be computed from the home value. HUD’s two-bedroom FMR is $973 per month, but it is a payment standard, not market rent, and cannot fill that gap. The 1.39% effective property-tax rate is a recurring carrying-cost input. Insurance and repair costs are not published in this record, so parcel tax bills, insurance quotes, repairs, and lease comparables are needed to test operating economics.

03Demand & competition

Demand evidence narrows rather than settles the case. In QCEW’s 2025 annual workplace data, covered employment fell 0.74%; Manufacturing, the largest disclosed private supersector, accounted for 38.99% of private covered jobs. This is workplace employment, not resident employment, unemployment, or a forecast. Tax-return migration showed a net outflow of 43 households, while incoming movers’ average AGI was $5,324 below outgoing movers’. Investor purchases were 16 of 182 total purchases, or 8.79%; that measures non-owner participation, not buyer demand or the full buyer mix.

04Risk & next checks

Risk remains site-specific. Inland flood is the dominant hazard, and modeled expected annual climate loss equals 0.11% of building value; it is a modeled ratio, not a dollar-loss estimate. County evidence cannot resolve flood zone, elevation, drainage, insurance availability, deductible, or property condition. Realtor.com listing-market figures—asking price, active listings, days on market, and price-reduced share—are not published here, preventing a current test of visible supply, marketing time, or seller concessions. Next checks are lease comps, parcel tax bills, flood and insurance records, and sale comps.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Taylor County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Medford city4.4KRib Lake village888Stetsonville village575Gilman village388Westboro CDP227Lublin village110Whittlesey CDP77Chelsea CDP75
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

9 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Medford cityIncorporated place
    4,431
  2. 02
    Rib Lake villageIncorporated place
    888
  3. 03
    Stetsonville villageIncorporated place
    575
  4. 04
    Gilman villageIncorporated place
    388
  5. 05
    Westboro CDPCensus-designated place
    227
  6. 06
    Lublin villageIncorporated place
    110
  7. 07
    Whittlesey CDPCensus-designated place
    77
  8. 08
    Chelsea CDPCensus-designated place
    75
  9. 09
    Jump River CDPCensus-designated place
    43

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.106% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax1.39%

$2,748 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration-43

381 in · 424 out

Arriving vs leaving income−$5,324

$51,197 arriving · $56,521 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors8.8%

16 of 182 mortgages

investorother financed
No rent index is published for this county.Zillow’s county rent series does not cover every county, and estimating one from a neighbouring county would be a guess wearing a number’s clothes. Everything above is measured here; no wider market is mapped for it either.
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Market rent, insurance, and repair costs are not published, so cash-flow screening may reverse once verified.
  2. County climate modeling may not match a parcel’s flood exposure, insurability, or deductible.
  3. Absent Realtor.com listing measures leave visible supply, concessions, and marketing time untested.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Can gross yield be calculated from this record?

No. Market asking rent is not published, and HUD FMR cannot substitute for it.

What does the QCEW employment measure represent?

Annual average covered jobs located at workplaces in the county, not resident employment or unemployment.

What dominant hazard accompanies the modeled climate-loss measure?

Inland flood.