Counties / Kansas / Thomas County

Thomas County, KS

FIPS 20193 · population 7,885 · outside every metro area

$185k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$185k
▲ 3.5% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
ACS median gross rent
$752
occupied-unit survey; not current asking rent
Census ACS · surveyed
Gross yield
n/a
gross yield cannot be computed without measured market rent
requires both measured price and measured rent
HUD 2-bed standard
$877
the Section 8 payment standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

The annual signals disagree
FHFA five-year cumulative+39.2%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06+3.5%FHFA HPI2025−3.2%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-07-28.
Owner-reported value$173k
Surveyed gross rent$752
Rent burden 30%+59.2%
Median year built1967
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
12.2%vacant
3,575estimated housing units
Occupied tenure24.8% renter
owner 75.3%renter 24.8%
Structure mix80.9% single-family
Single-family 80.9%20+ units 0.3%Mobile home 6.3%Other 12.5%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs4,102▼ 0.0% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments405annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$963▲ 4.4% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorTrade, transportation, and utilities34.2% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS−0.0%WEEKLY WAGE+4.4%Trade, transportation, and utilities34.2%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Thomas County presents a split signal for an income buyer: the county Zillow observation for 2026-06 puts median home value at $184,656, up 3.51%, while the FHFA annual observation for 2025 shows repeat-transaction HPI down 3.21%; its cumulative five-year change is 39.20%. These are different vintages and methods, not one growth rate. With 7,885 residents, the thesis is selective rather than broad: investigate property-level rent and liquidity before treating the Zillow increase as investable momentum; buyers relying on appreciation should be cautious.

02Housing economics

Income underwriting stops at the rent line. Market rent is not published, so gross yield cannot be computed. The $877 HUD two-bedroom FMR is a payment standard, not asking rent and cannot fill that gap. The effective property-tax rate is 1.41%, with median annual tax of $2,440; that carrying cost must be tested against verified rent, insurance, repairs, vacancy, and financing. The price signal therefore does not establish cash-flow coverage.

03Demand & competition

Demand evidence is mixed, and QCEW is workplace-based, not resident employment or metro evidence. Tax returns show 147 households moved in versus 225 out, a net migration of -78; average AGI was $46,612 for inbound movers and $59,200 for outbound movers. That combination points to weaker household retention and a higher-income outflow in this record, without proving cause. Covered employment was nearly flat while wages rose; trade, transportation, and utilities is the largest disclosed private supersector, not the whole economy. Buyer competition also appears limited in the transaction set: 46 total purchases included 6 investor purchases, or 13.04%.

04Risk & next checks

Risk limits the thesis. The modeled climate loss ratio is 0.09% of building value per year, and inland flood is the dominant hazard; that is a modeled loss measure, not a quoted premium or a guarantee of property performance. The record omits market rent, actual insurance terms, flood-zone/elevation and property condition, as well as Realtor MLS supply, marketing-time, price-reduction and closed-sale evidence. Those gaps prevent a gross-yield, insurance-adjusted cash-flow, liquidity, or buyer-demand conclusion. Next checks are parcel-level rent comps, tax/insurance quotes, flood documentation, leases, and closed sales.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Thomas County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Colby city5.4KOakley city*2KBrewster city459Rexford city146Gem city98Levant CDP63Menlo city24
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

7 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Colby cityIncorporated place
    5,387
  2. 02
    Oakley cityIncorporated place · spans 3 counties
    2,009
  3. 03
    Brewster cityIncorporated place
    459
  4. 04
    Rexford cityIncorporated place
    146
  5. 05
    Gem cityIncorporated place
    98
  6. 06
    Levant CDPCensus-designated place
    63
  7. 07
    Menlo cityIncorporated place
    24

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.093% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax1.41%

$2,440 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration-78

147 in · 225 out

Arriving vs leaving income−$12,588

$46,612 arriving · $59,200 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors13.0%

6 of 46 mortgages

investorother financed
No rent index is published for this county.Zillow’s county rent series does not cover every county, and estimating one from a neighbouring county would be a guess wearing a number’s clothes. Everything above is measured here; no wider market is mapped for it either.
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Actual market rent could be insufficient to support the purchase price and carrying costs.
  2. Inland-flood exposure could create insurance or property costs not captured by the modeled loss ratio.
  3. Out-migration, limited transaction volume, and conflicting appreciation measures could weaken occupancy or resale liquidity.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Can gross rental yield be calculated from this record?

No. Market rent is not published, and HUD FMR is a payment standard rather than market rent.

How should the two appreciation measures be reconciled?

Zillow's labeled observation shows price growth, while FHFA's annual HPI is negative and its separate five-year cumulative measure is positive; they are different vintages and methods.

What does the demand and buyer evidence show?

Out-movers exceed in-movers, outbound average AGI exceeds inbound average AGI, and investor purchases are a minority of total purchases.