Counties / Montana / Valley County

Valley County, MT

FIPS 30105 · population 7,519 · outside every metro area

$199k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$199k
▲ 7.9% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
ACS median gross rent
$767
occupied-unit survey; not current asking rent
Census ACS · surveyed
Gross yield
n/a
gross yield cannot be computed without measured market rent
requires both measured price and measured rent
HUD 2-bed standard
$1,200
the Section 8 payment standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

The annual signals disagree
FHFA five-year cumulative+30.3%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06+7.9%FHFA HPI2025−7.4%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-07-28.
Owner-reported value$198k
Surveyed gross rent$767
Rent burden 30%+42.9%
Median year built1966
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
30.6%vacant
4,254estimated housing units
Occupied tenure21.5% renter
owner 78.5%renter 21.5%
Structure mix74.9% single-family
Single-family 74.9%20+ units 2.1%Mobile home 4.5%Other 18.5%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs2,831▼ 3.0% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments342annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$1,007▲ 5.4% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorEducation and health services29.5% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS−3.0%WEEKLY WAGE+5.4%Education and health services29.5%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Valley County is a verify-before-bidding market for investors able to underwrite property-level rents and flood costs; those needing a demonstrated county yield or synchronized price trend should be cautious. Zillow’s 2026-06 county median home value was $198,940, up 7.93% year over year, while FHFA’s 2025 annual repeat-transaction HPI fell 7.44% year over year despite a 30.28% five-year cumulative rise. These measures use different methods and vintages: FHFA HPI is not a home value, and the changes should not be merged into one growth rate.

02Housing economics

No county market rent is published, so gross yield cannot be computed from this record. HUD’s $1,200 two-bedroom FMR is a payment standard, not an estimate of asking rent, and cannot substitute for market rent. At a 1.18% effective property-tax rate and $2,333 median annual tax, carrying costs warrant parcel review; these county measures do not connect the reported home value to a specific tax bill. Inland flood is the dominant hazard, and modeled annual building-value loss is 0.12%, a screening input rather than a site-level loss estimate.

03Demand & competition

Demand evidence is mixed rather than conclusive. Net migration was negative 45 tax-return households, and departing movers had average AGI $16,821 higher than arrivals, weakening the income profile of net movement without establishing renter demand. The 2025 QCEW recorded 2,831 annual covered jobs at county workplaces, down 2.98%; its $1,007 average weekly wage applies to covered workers, not residents. Education and health services was the largest disclosed private supersector, not the entire economy. Investors accounted for 2 of 51 purchases, or 3.92%, indicating limited observed non-owner competition in a small purchase count.

04Risk & next checks

Key limits prevent a property-level purchase conclusion: no measured market rent blocks yield and rent-to-price analysis; no Realtor.com listing price, active-listing, days-on-market, or reduction-share data blocks an MLS supply and seller-concession read; and no parcel flood, insurance, condition, or financing data tests actual carrying cost. Next checks are current asking and executed rents by unit type, tax and insurance quotes, flood-zone and elevation documentation, and recent comparable sales. These checks matter more than extrapolating from county averages or treating FMR, migration, or covered employment as property demand.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Valley County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Glasgow city3.2KFrazer CDP387St. Marie CDP306Fort Peck town280Nashua town279Hinsdale CDP233Opheim town86
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

7 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Glasgow cityIncorporated place
    3,190
  2. 02
    Frazer CDPCensus-designated place
    387
  3. 03
    St. Marie CDPCensus-designated place
    306
  4. 04
    Fort Peck townIncorporated place
    280
  5. 05
    Nashua townIncorporated place
    279
  6. 06
    Hinsdale CDPCensus-designated place
    233
  7. 07
    Opheim townIncorporated place
    86

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.115% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax1.18%

$2,333 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration-45

129 in · 174 out

Arriving vs leaving income−$16,821

$43,736 arriving · $60,557 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors3.9%

2 of 51 mortgages

investorother financed
No rent index is published for this county.Zillow’s county rent series does not cover every county, and estimating one from a neighbouring county would be a guess wearing a number’s clothes. Everything above is measured here; no wider market is mapped for it either.
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. County-level home value and tax measures may not represent the target property's rent, tax bill, or condition.
  2. The flood-loss model may diverge from parcel-specific flood zone, elevation, insurance availability, and deductible terms.
  3. Small investor purchase counts and absent MLS measures may misstate buyer competition or resale conditions.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Can gross yield be calculated from this record?

No. Market rent is not published, and the $1,200 HUD two-bedroom FMR is a payment standard rather than market asking rent.

Were the supplied price indicators aligned?

No. Zillow’s 2026-06 median home value rose 7.93% year over year, while FHFA’s 2025 repeat-transaction HPI declined 7.44% year over year.

How much observed purchase activity involved investors?

Investors accounted for 2 of 51 purchases, or 3.92%.