Counties / Missouri / Wright County

Wright County, MO

FIPS 29229 · population 18,965 · outside every metro area

$217k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$217k
▼ 0.8% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
ACS median gross rent
$625
occupied-unit survey; not current asking rent
Census ACS · surveyed
Gross yield
n/a
gross yield cannot be computed without measured market rent
requires both measured price and measured rent
HUD 2-bed standard
$888
the Section 8 payment standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

The annual signals disagree
FHFA five-year cumulative+66.2%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06−0.8%FHFA HPI2025+2.1%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-07-28.
Owner-reported value$160k
Surveyed gross rent$625
Rent burden 30%+43.5%
Median year built1978
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
14.1%vacant
8,367estimated housing units
Occupied tenure22.9% renter
owner 77.1%renter 22.9%
Structure mix80.5% single-family
Single-family 80.5%20+ units 0.4%Mobile home 10.3%Other 8.8%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs4,679▲ 0.6% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments612annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$796▲ 3.8% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorTrade, transportation, and utilities34.2% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS+0.6%WEEKLY WAGE+3.8%Trade, transportation, and utilities34.2%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Wright County presents a direction-conflict screen rather than a clean entry signal: underwriters with access to local sales comps should investigate, while those relying on a single automated price series should be cautious. At Zillow’s 2026-06 county observation, the median home value was $216,951, down 0.81% year over year. Separately, the FHFA 2025 repeat-transaction HPI rose 2.06% annually. That index tracks repeat-sale appreciation, not a dollar home value; its different method and vintage cannot be blended with Zillow into one growth rate.

02Housing economics

Housing economics remain unpriced for a landlord because market asking rent is not published; gross yield therefore cannot be computed. HUD’s $888 two-bedroom FMR is a payment standard, not market rent, and cannot fill that gap. The effective property-tax rate is 0.40%, with median annual tax of $640, but neither establishes the tax bill on a particular acquisition. Inland flood is the dominant hazard, and modeled annual building-value loss is 0.16%; this adds a risk screen rather than a property-specific loss estimate.

03Demand & competition

County workplace evidence gives a limited demand context. QCEW’s 2025 annual average reports 4,679 covered jobs, while Trade, transportation, and utilities—the largest disclosed private supersector—accounts for 34.21% of private covered employment. QCEW is workplace employment, not resident employment or an unemployment measure. Tax-return movers produced net migration of 71 households, and inbound movers’ average AGI exceeded outbound movers’ by a calculated $3,431. Those measures do not establish tenant formation. Investors represented 11.73% of 162 purchase mortgages, a defined non-owner segment rather than total buyer participation.

04Risk & next checks

Key limits are consequential: Realtor.com MLS listing measures are not published, so visible asking-price supply, marketing time, and seller-concession conditions cannot be screened; they would not be closed-sale evidence in any event. Obtain lease comps and achieved rents to test yield, parcel-level tax and flood/insurance terms to test carrying cost, and closed-sale comps plus MLS inventory and reductions to test liquidity. The thesis remains county-level: it cannot resolve neighborhood exposure, property condition, financing, or cash-buyer activity.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Wright County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Mountain Grove city*4.5KMansfield city1.5KNorwood city681Hartville city610Grovespring CDP25
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

5 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Mountain Grove cityIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    4,491
  2. 02
    Mansfield cityIncorporated place
    1,524
  3. 03
    Norwood cityIncorporated place
    681
  4. 04
    Hartville cityIncorporated place
    610
  5. 05
    Grovespring CDPCensus-designated place
    25

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.162% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax0.40%

$640 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration+71

540 in · 469 out

Arriving vs leaving income+$3,431

$46,030 arriving · $42,599 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors11.7%

19 of 162 mortgages

investorother financed
No rent index is published for this county.Zillow’s county rent series does not cover every county, and estimating one from a neighbouring county would be a guess wearing a number’s clothes. Everything above is measured here; no wider market is mapped for it either.
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Published market rent could materially change the property-level economics that cannot be tested from FMR.
  2. Parcel-level flood exposure, insurance cost, and tax treatment may diverge from county aggregates.
  3. Unavailable MLS supply, reduction, and closed-sale evidence may alter the apparent price and liquidity picture.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Can HUD FMR be used as market asking rent or to calculate gross yield?

No. It is a payment standard, while market rent is not published, so gross yield cannot be computed.

Can the FHFA HPI be treated as a county home value?

No. It is a repeat-transaction appreciation index, not a dollar home value, and it has a different period and method from Zillow.

Does the investor share represent all county buyers?

No. It measures purchase mortgages to non-occupants, not total buyer participation.