Counties / Alaska / Yukon-Koyukuk Census Area

Yukon-Koyukuk Census Area, AK

FIPS 02290 · population 5,195 · outside every metro area

$99k
ACS owner-reported value · ACS 2024 5-year
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

ACS owner-reported value
$99k
survey estimate; not a current listing or sale price
Census ACS · surveyed
ACS median gross rent
$1,084
occupied-unit survey; not current asking rent
Census ACS · surveyed
Gross yield
n/a
gross yield cannot be computed without measured market rent
requires both measured price and measured rent
HUD 2-bed standard
$1,126
the Section 8 payment standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Owner-reported value$99k
Surveyed gross rent$1,084
Rent burden 30%+23.8%
Median year built1984
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
38.4%vacant
3,724estimated housing units
Occupied tenure30.1% renter
owner 69.9%renter 30.1%
Structure mix95.5% single-family
Single-family 95.5%20+ units 0.2%Mobile home 1.4%Other 2.8%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs2,308▲ 0.7% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments244annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$1,076▲ 7.4% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorTrade, transportation, and utilities29.0% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS+0.7%WEEKLY WAGE+7.4%Trade, transportation, and utilities29.0%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Yukon-Koyukuk Census Area is a thin-market, carrying-cost screen rather than a county-level pricing call. The decision tension is modest labor improvement against limited transaction evidence: QCEW reports 2,308 annual average covered jobs at county workplaces, up 0.70%, while only six purchase mortgages are recorded. Investors needing dependable current rent, easy resale, or broad comparable-sales support should be cautious; operators able to verify an individual asset’s income, insurance, and buyer pool should investigate.

02Housing economics

ACS survey data provide context, not live market quotes: the $98,500 median is an owner-reported value among owner-occupied homes, and $1,084 is surveyed gross rent among occupied units. Those medians cover different housing sets and cannot be combined into gross yield. Current market rent is not published, so gross yield cannot be computed. HUD’s $1,126 two-bedroom FMR is a payment standard, not asking rent. The 1.13% effective property-tax rate and $1,109 median annual tax warrant parcel-level carrying-cost review, but neither identifies a specific property’s tax bill.

03Demand & competition

Tax-return migration is negative: 68 households moved in and 134 moved out, a net outflow of 66. Incoming movers’ average income exceeded outgoing movers’ by $876, a calculation from the reported averages, so the outflow alone does not describe mover income quality. Investors accounted for 16.67% of purchase mortgages—one of six purchases—too small a base to establish durable buyer competition. No Realtor.com MLS listing-price, active-listing, days-on-market, or price-reduction figures are supplied; visible supply, marketing time, and seller concessions cannot be evaluated.

04Risk & next checks

Wildfire is the dominant hazard, and the modeled annual climate-loss ratio is 0.15% of building value; it is a modeled risk measure, not a property loss estimate. Confirm replacement cost, insurance availability and terms, mitigation obligations, parcel tax assessment, rent roll, and local sales and MLS records. Zillow county values and FHFA repeat-transaction HPI observations are absent, so no price-direction conclusion is supported; missing market rent prevents yield underwriting, and missing MLS evidence prevents a county-level exit-liquidity conclusion.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Yukon-Koyukuk Census Area

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Fort Yukon city656Galena city611Nenana city479Tanana city334McGrath city255Nulato city255Ruby city237Minto CDP214
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

38 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Fort Yukon cityIncorporated place
    656
  2. 02
    Galena cityIncorporated place
    611
  3. 03
    Nenana cityIncorporated place
    479
  4. 04
    Tanana cityIncorporated place
    334
  5. 05
    McGrath cityIncorporated place
    255
  6. 06
    Nulato cityIncorporated place
    255
  7. 07
    Ruby cityIncorporated place
    237
  8. 08
    Minto CDPCensus-designated place
    214
  9. 09
    Coldfoot CDPCensus-designated place
    211
  10. 10
    Holy Cross cityIncorporated place
    205
  11. 11
    Grayling cityIncorporated place
    173
  12. 12
    Allakaket cityIncorporated place
    167
Show 26 more places
  1. 13
    Arctic Village CDPCensus-designated place
    164
  2. 14
    Central CDPCensus-designated place
    108
  3. 15
    Chalkyitsik CDPCensus-designated place
    80
  4. 16
    Anvik cityIncorporated place
    79
  5. 17
    Venetie CDPCensus-designated place
    76
  6. 18
    Kaltag cityIncorporated place
    68
  7. 19
    Circle CDPCensus-designated place
    54
  8. 20
    Huslia cityIncorporated place
    51
  9. 21
    Nikolai cityIncorporated place
    44
  10. 22
    Hughes cityIncorporated place
    40
  11. 23
    Shageluk cityIncorporated place
    34
  12. 24
    Manley Hot Springs CDPCensus-designated place
    32
  13. 25
    Koyukuk cityIncorporated place
    29
  14. 26
    Beaver CDPCensus-designated place
    17
  15. 27
    Evansville CDPCensus-designated place
    17
  16. 28
    Bettles cityIncorporated place
    16
  17. 29
    Takotna CDPCensus-designated place
    15
  18. 30
    Alatna CDPCensus-designated place
    11
  19. 31
    Lake Minchumina CDPCensus-designated place
    7
  20. 32
    Birch Creek CDPCensus-designated place
    0
  21. 33
    Flat CDPCensus-designated place
    0
  22. 34
    Four Mile Road CDPCensus-designated place
    0
  23. 35
    Livengood CDPCensus-designated place
    0
  24. 36
    Rampart CDPCensus-designated place
    0
  25. 37
    Stevens Village CDPCensus-designated place
    0
  26. 38
    Wiseman CDPCensus-designated place
    0

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardwildfire

0.154% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax1.13%

$1,109 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration-66

68 in · 134 out

Arriving vs leaving income+$876

$57,279 arriving · $56,403 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors16.7%

1 of 6 mortgages

investorother financed
No rent index is published for this county.Zillow’s county rent series does not cover every county, and estimating one from a neighbouring county would be a guess wearing a number’s clothes. Everything above is measured here; no wider market is mapped for it either.
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Thin purchase activity may not represent actual resale liquidity or investor demand.
  2. County-level climate modeling may not match a parcel’s wildfire exposure or insurance terms.
  3. ACS survey medians may not reflect an investable unit’s current rent, value, or vacancy.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Can gross yield be calculated from this record?

No. Market rent is not published, and HUD FMR cannot substitute for market rent.

Can historical price direction be confirmed?

No. The record has no Zillow county value series or FHFA repeat-transaction HPI observation.

What does investor activity establish?

It shows some non-owner participation, but the thin purchase base does not establish durable buyer competition.