States / Alaska
State rental intelligence

Alaska rental market data

A source-traced view across 3 metro markets and 30 counties. State figures below are labelled medians and totals—not a made-up statewide investment score.

2/3 metros scored30/30 counties with FEMA risk13 sources used in this analysis
Median scored metro48.0out of 100 · 2 measured metros
Alaska identity diorama showing regional landscape, cities, housing, and infrastructure
Median metro home value$427kmedian across published metro values
Median metro rent$1,787monthly · published metro values
Median gross yield5.8%annual rent ÷ price · before costs
Median job trend▼ 0.7%trailing 12-month metro employment
Direct monthly rental evidence

Alaska rent market dynamics

Apartment List measures recent leases, rental vacancy and listing time separately. These figures do not replace Zillow, Census or Realtor measures elsewhere on this page.

Recent-lease rent$1,6562026-07 · ▲ 1.3% year over year
Rental Vacancy Indexn/anot published for this state
Time on marketn/anot published for this state
US recent-lease rent$1,3882026-07 · ▼ 1.1% year over year
Rent and rental vacancy through timesolid state series · dashed national series · no interpolation across missing observations
Recent-lease rent$1,735$1,326$917Rental Vacancy Index7.8%5.6%3.4%2017-012022-032026-07AlaskaUnited States
State research brief

Rents are still rising across Alaska’s measured rental series even as metro employment and county migration weaken, making local tenant depth the central screening question.

Updated 2026-08-08 · evidence current to the releases listed below.

Apartment List’s July 2026 recent-lease rent for Alaska was $1,656 per month, up 1.3% from $1,634 a year earlier, while the comparable national series fell 1.1%. Separately, Zillow metro rents rose a median 5.0% across two measured metros, while home values rose a median 4.5% across three. The two rental sources measure different market universes, but both show positive rent momentum in their measured Alaska coverage.

Demand evidence is less supportive: employment fell a median 0.7% across three measured metros, and county-level migration records show a net loss of 1,502 people, or 2.0 per 1,000 residents, plus a negative aggregate mover-income gap of $193,519. Juneau is a genuine counter-signal, with employment up 1.6%. Screening should therefore test local employers, tenant turnover, achievable rent and property-level vacancy rather than treat statewide rent growth as proof of broad demand. The packet cannot establish future occupancy, net returns or conditions in unmeasured submarkets.

01

Alaska recent-lease rent rose 1.3% while the national series fell 1.1% → verify local achievable rent instead of assuming national softness applies

02

Median metro employment fell 0.7% and county-level net migration was negative by 2.0 per 1,000 residents → stress tenant depth and turnover assumptions

03

Fairbanks rent growth exceeded value growth and its gross yield was 6.6%, while Anchorage rent lagged value growth with a 5.0% yield → use metro-specific entry and income assumptions

04

Anchorage sold in 13 median days versus 51 in Fairbanks, while permits ranged from 0.2 to 2.6 per 1,000 residents across named metros → treat resale liquidity and new supply as local variables

05

Median county-level ACS vacancy was 26.7% alongside an 80.2% single-family stock share → do not count broad housing vacancy as available rental competition

01
Direct state rental dynamics

Alaska recent-lease rent rose against a falling national series

Apartment List’s Alaska recent-lease rent increased 1.3% year over year to $1,656 in July 2026. The national rent series declined 1.1%, leaving Alaska’s measured growth 2.4 percentage points higher. This supports testing current local rents rather than importing the direction of the national series into an Alaska underwriting case.

The packet does not provide Alaska values for Apartment List’s Vacancy Index or time-on-market series. The separate national measures show vacancy at 7.16%, up 0.09 percentage points, and time on market at 30 days, up from 28. Those are national liquidity indicators, not evidence of Alaska vacancy or listing time.

Evidence: Apartment List Rent Estimates — recent-lease rent index · Apartment List Time on Market — listing liquidity · Apartment List Vacancy Index — rental vacancy

02
Employment and household movement

Juneau is the job-growth exception to broader measured weakness

Employment declined a median 0.7% across three measured metros. Juneau grew 1.6%, but Anchorage declined 0.7% and Fairbanks declined 1.8%. Juneau therefore prevents a uniform weak-demand reading, while the other two metros require more conservative checks on employer concentration and tenant depth.

Across 27 county-level areas with migration records, net migration was negative by 1,502 people, equal to 2.0 per 1,000 residents. Aggregate adjusted gross income associated with movers also had a negative gap of $193,519. These migration records cover 2022–2023, so they provide a demand warning rather than a same-period explanation for 2026 rent movements.

Evidence: Census ACS 5-year — population · BLS CES — payroll employment · BLS LAUS — resident employment · IRS SOI — county migration and mover income

03
Price and rent momentum

Rent outran values in Fairbanks, not Anchorage

Fairbanks rent rose 5.7% while home value rose 3.1%, a calculated 2.6 percentage-point rent lead. Its measured rent was $1,744 against a $316,216 value, producing a 6.6% gross yield. That combination is more favorable to gross income relative to entry price than Anchorage within this two-metro comparison.

Anchorage moved in the opposite direction: rent rose 4.3% while home value increased 6.1%, so rent lagged by a calculated 1.9 percentage points. Its gross yield was 5.0%. These are gross ratios before operating, financing, tax and insurance costs, and they do not establish property-level returns.

Evidence: Zillow ZHVI — metro home values · Zillow ZORI — metro market rents

04
Supply and resale conditions

A 38-day resale gap separates Anchorage and Fairbanks

Redfin’s for-sale series shows Anchorage at 13 median days on market and Fairbanks at 51, a calculated 38-day difference. Months of supply were much closer at 1.8 and 1.9, respectively. Price drops affected 29.7% of Anchorage listings and 34.1% of Fairbanks listings, even as both measured sale-to-list ratios remained slightly above 100%.

Permitting was also uneven: Juneau recorded 2.6 permitted units per 1,000 residents, compared with 0.7 in Anchorage and 0.2 in Fairbanks. These figures support metro-specific exit and supply assumptions; they do not establish neighborhood inventory or the condition of competing rentals.

Evidence: Census Building Permits Survey — permitted units · Redfin Data Center — inventory, days on market, and price cuts

05
Housing stock and tenant conditions

Broad ACS vacancy does not equal available rental supply

Across 30 county-level areas, the ACS housing-vacancy median was 26.7%, with the measured distribution running from 14.3% at the 10th percentile to 51.2% at the 90th. The median single-family share was 80.2%, while the median large-multifamily share was only 1.3%. Lake and Peninsula Borough illustrates the distinction: its vacancy rate was 75.8%, but 92.2% of its stock was single-family.

The packet does not identify how many vacant units are available to year-round tenants. Affordability is a separate concern: the median share of renters spending at least 30% of income on rent was 34.5% across the measured areas, reaching 52.9% in Haines Borough, 52.7% in Matanuska-Susitna Borough and 49.0% in Ketchikan Gateway Borough.

Evidence: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock

06
Investor participation

The highest investor shares rest on one purchase each

The packet records 371 non-occupant purchases among 7,142 county purchase originations. Dividing those supplied totals gives a calculated 5.2% share, while the median county share across 27 measured areas was 3.1% and the 90th percentile was 12.8%.

The highest named shares come from very small denominators. Hoonah-Angoon Census Area and Yukon-Koyukuk Census Area each recorded one non-occupant purchase among six purchases, or 16.7%. Aleutians West Census Area recorded one among seven, or 14.3%. Those percentages flag activity for review but do not establish deep or repeatable investor competition.

Evidence: HMDA / CFPB — purchases by occupancy type

Evidence selected for Alaska

The ranges behind the analysis

Each row keeps its own unit and shows the measured 10th percentile, median and 90th percentile. A single-value row is labelled directly.

Employment and household movementDo jobs, household movement and mover income point in the same direction?
10th pct.median90th pct.Job change-1.6%-0.7%1.1%Net migration / 1k-2.0Net household movement-1,502
Price and rent momentumAre home values and asking rents moving together or separating?
10th pct.median90th pct.Home-value change3.4%4.5%5.8%Asking-rent change4.4%5.0%5.5%Rent minus price0.4%
Supply and resale conditionsWhat do permits, inventory, marketing time and price cuts say about pressure?
10th pct.median90th pct.Permits / 1k0.30.72.3Months of supply1.8×1.9×1.9×Days on market17 days32 days47 daysListings with cuts30.2%31.9%33.6%
Shape of the state

Distribution before conclusion

A statewide median can hide a wide spread. These SVG charts render at build time and carry no chart library or browser-side data request.

Metro score distribution2 scored metros · median 48.0
00–19020–39240–59060–79080–100
County evidence coverageEvery gap stays visible as missing—not estimated
17%5/30Rent100%30/30Climate90%27/30Migration
Highest measured metro gross yieldsscreening metric only · before expenses and financing
Fairbanks6.6%Juneau5.8%Anchorage5.0%
Metro leaderboard

Markets touching Alaska

Multi-state CBSAs appear in every member state. Score is still a metro score; no value is reweighted into a statewide ranking.

#MetroScorePriceRentYieldJobs
1Anchorage, AK49$427k$1,7875.0%▼ 0.7%
2Fairbanks, AK47$316k$1,7446.6%▼ 1.8%

Showing the top 2 scored metros of 3. Unscored metros remain discoverable through the national rankings.

Below the metro line

Largest counties in Alaska

County figures join on the five-digit FIPS code. The table uses measured local values and prints “n/a” wherever a publisher has no record.

CountyPopulationPriceRentYieldHazard
Anchorage Municipality, AK288,976$437k$1,7554.8%earthquake
Matanuska-Susitna Borough, AK112,988$410k$2,0155.9%earthquake
Fairbanks North Star Borough, AK95,460$316k$1,7446.6%earthquake
Kenai Peninsula Borough, AK60,413$350k$1,5765.4%earthquake
Juneau City and Borough, AK31,794$484k$2,3425.8%inland flooding
Bethel Census Area, AK18,394n/an/an/ainland flooding
Ketchikan Gateway Borough, AK13,768$410kn/an/ainland flooding
Kodiak Island Borough, AK12,771$413kn/an/aearthquake
North Slope Borough, AK10,810$324kn/an/ainland flooding
Nome Census Area, AK9,866n/an/an/aearthquake
Sitka City and Borough, AK8,368$494kn/an/aearthquake
Kusilvak Census Area, AK8,176n/an/an/awinter weather
County yield sample5/30counties have the rent needed to compute yield
Statewide net migration−1,502IRS tax-return households summed across counties
Median investor share3.1%among counties with HMDA purchase records
Bear case

What can break the thesis

  1. Apartment List recent-lease rent and Zillow metro rent use different coverage and definitions, so their growth rates cannot be merged into one statewide series.
  2. The migration data cover 2022–2023, while several rent, employment and listing measures are from 2026; timing differences limit conclusions about demand.
  3. Alaska-specific Apartment List vacancy and time-on-market figures are missing, so the packet cannot confirm whether rising recent-lease rent coincides with tighter state rental liquidity.
  4. ACS housing vacancy does not identify units available to year-round renters, making it an incomplete measure of investable rental competition.
  5. The highest HMDA non-occupant shares are based on one purchase each, and purchase originations do not establish the full depth of investor demand.
Investor questions

Before underwriting a property

Are measured Alaska rents rising?

Yes within the supplied coverage. Apartment List recent-lease rent rose 1.3% statewide, while Zillow rent rose a median 5.0% across two measured metros. The series should remain separate.

Does positive rent growth prove that tenant demand is strong?

No. Median employment fell 0.7% across three metros, county-level net migration was negative, and mover income had a negative aggregate gap. Juneau’s 1.6% employment growth is the main measured counter-signal.

Which of Fairbanks and Anchorage has the stronger measured gross rent-to-value position?

Fairbanks, at a 6.6% gross yield versus 5.0% in Anchorage. Gross yield does not include operating, financing, tax or insurance costs.

Is resale liquidity similar in Anchorage and Fairbanks?

No. Anchorage’s median for-sale marketing time was 13 days versus 51 in Fairbanks, despite similar measured supply of 1.8 and 1.9 months.

Do the highest county investor shares indicate deep acquisition competition?

Not by themselves. The leading named areas each had only one non-occupant purchase, with total purchase counts of six or seven.