States / Alaska
State rental intelligence

Alaska rental market data

A source-traced view across 3 metro markets and 30 counties. State figures below are labelled medians and totals—not a made-up statewide investment score.

2/3 metros scored30/30 counties with FEMA risk15 sources used in this analysis
Median scored metro48.0out of 100 · 2 measured metros
Alaska identity diorama showing regional landscape, cities, housing, and infrastructure
Median metro home value$427kmedian across published metro values
Median metro rent$1,787monthly · published metro values
Median gross yield5.8%annual rent ÷ price · before costs
Median job trend▼ 0.7%trailing 12-month metro employment
State research brief

Rising rents and home values are colliding with weaker labor and migration readings, making local liquidity rather than statewide momentum the central Alaska screening question.

Updated 2026-07-31 · evidence current to the releases listed below.

Across three measured metros, median home-value growth was 4.5%; across the two with rent-growth data, median rent growth was 5.0%. Those gains contrast with a 0.7% decline in median metro employment and net migration of -1,502 across 27 county-level areas, equal to -2.0 per 1,000 residents. Juneau is a genuine counter-signal: its employment increased 1.6% while Anchorage declined 0.7% and Fairbanks declined 1.8%.

The evidence supports metro- and county-specific screening rather than a statewide demand conclusion. Inventory is lean in Anchorage and Fairbanks, but their marketing times differ sharply; gross yields also vary alongside affordability, employment and hazard costs. The packet cannot establish that rental demand is weakening statewide because rent growth covers only two metros, county rent levels cover five areas and the employment, migration and housing series use different periods and geographies.

01

Median metro rent growth of 5.0% alongside median employment growth of -0.7% and net migration of -1,502 → require local evidence that tenant depth supports the asking-rent trend.

02

Anchorage and Fairbanks have only 1.8 to 1.9 months of supply but 13 versus 51 median days on market → separate inventory scarcity from expected resale speed.

03

Measured gross yields range from 5.0% to 6.6% while rent-to-income ranges from 21.3% to 27.7% → pair yield rankings with affordability and operating-cost review.

04

Five-year county appreciation can coexist with a current annual decline and listing pools as small as zero to four active properties → use local transaction depth rather than long-run appreciation alone.

05

County hazard-loss ratios and property-tax rates identify different cost concentrations → screen both instead of treating either as a complete property-risk measure.

01
Employment and household movement

Rent gains run against negative migration and two metro job declines

Measured employment was mixed but tilted negative. Juneau increased 1.6% year over year, while Anchorage declined 0.7% and Fairbanks declined 1.8%; the median across the three metros was -0.7%. County-level migration also registered 20,042 arrivals against 21,574 departures, producing net migration of -1,502 across 27 areas.

Juneau prevents a blanket weak-demand reading, but the combined figures do not confirm that rising rents are backed by broad labor and household growth. For screening, projected occupancy and rent collections need support from the specific local tenant base. The county migration total cannot be assigned directly to any of the three metros, and it does not measure current leasing activity.

Evidence: Census ACS 5-year — population · BLS CES — payroll employment · BLS LAUS — resident employment · IRS SOI — county migration and mover income

02
Price and rent momentum

Fairbanks rent growth leads prices while Anchorage reverses the pattern

Median home-value growth was 4.5% across three metros, while median asking-rent growth was 5.0% across the two metros with rent momentum. Because those coverage sets differ, the 0.4 percentage-point median gap is directional rather than a matched statewide comparison.

Fairbanks shows the more favorable rent-price relationship: rent increased 5.7% against 3.1% home-value growth. Calculated from the supplied figures, rent led by 2.6 percentage points. Anchorage moved the other way, with home values up 6.1% and rent up 4.3%, a calculated 1.9-point price lead. These opposing patterns rule out using one appreciation or rent-growth assumption for both markets.

Evidence: Zillow ZHVI — metro home values · Zillow ZORI — metro market rents

03
Supply and resale conditions

Fairbanks takes longer to sell despite similarly lean inventory

Permitting differs substantially across the measured metros. Juneau recorded 84 permitted units, or 2.64 per 1,000 residents. Anchorage recorded 296 units but only 0.74 per 1,000, while Fairbanks recorded 20 units, or 0.21 per 1,000. Permit counts indicate a construction pipeline, not completed rental supply.

Anchorage and Fairbanks had similarly lean inventory at 1.8 and 1.9 months, yet median marketing time was 13 days in Anchorage and 51 days in Fairbanks. Price reductions appeared on 29.7% and 34.1% of listings, respectively. The counter-signal is that sale-to-list ratios remained just above 100% in both markets. Low inventory therefore does not establish equal resale liquidity or eliminate negotiation risk.

Evidence: Census Building Permits Survey — permitted units · Redfin Data Center — inventory, days on market, and price cuts

04
Entry cost and affordability

Fairbanks has the highest gross yield while Juneau has the highest rent-income load

Fairbanks pairs a $316,216 home value with $1,744 monthly rent and a 6.6% gross yield. Juneau pairs $483,570 with $2,343 and a 5.8% yield, while Anchorage pairs $426,596 with $1,787 and a 5.0% yield. Fairbanks has the strongest headline yield, but that measure is before vacancy, maintenance, financing, taxes, insurance and capital work.

Affordability points in a different direction. Rent equals 23.7% of measured income in Fairbanks, 27.7% in Juneau and 21.3% in Anchorage. Across the three metros, the rent-to-two-bedroom-FMR distribution had a median of 1.19 times and a 10th-to-90th-percentile span of 1.07 to 1.30 times. Juneau's higher rent and rent-income ratio may constrain underwriting even though its employment reading is the strongest of the three.

Evidence: Census ACS 5-year — household income · HUD Fair Market Rents — Section 8 standard · Zillow ZHVI — metro home values · Zillow ZORI — metro market rents

05
County market dispersion

Long-run county gains coexist with a Sitka reversal and extremely thin listings

Kenai Peninsula Borough recorded 4.6% annual and 53.1% five-year HPI growth, with a $350,343 value, $1,576 rent and 5.4% gross yield. Matanuska-Susitna Borough recorded 5.3% annual and 50.1% five-year growth, with a $410,373 value, $2,015 rent and 5.9% yield. Sitka City and Borough is the counter-signal: its five-year change was still 47.2%, but its latest annual reading was -6.5%.

Some long marketing times come from exceptionally small listing pools. Skagway Municipality reported 319 days on market with one active listing; Lake and Peninsula Borough reported 157 days with four; Nome Census Area reported 124 days with zero active listings in the snapshot. These observations flag uncertain exit liquidity, but their tiny denominators cannot establish a stable county-wide selling period or discount opportunity.

Evidence: FHFA House Price Index — annual county appreciation · Realtor.com Economic Research — county listing inventory · Zillow ZHVI and ZORI — county values and rents

06
Physical risk and property tax

Tax and hazard-loss screens point to different Alaska areas

County-level climate loss ratios run from 0.03% at the 10th percentile to 0.44% at the 90th across 30 areas. Property-tax rates run from 0.14% to 1.21% at the same percentiles across 28 areas. Under FEMA's mutually exclusive leading-hazard classification, earthquake is the top label for 19 areas, inland flood for eight, wildfire for two and winter weather for one.

The two cost screens do not align mechanically. Aleutians East Borough has a 0.64% climate loss ratio but a 0.15% property-tax rate and $199 median tax. Dillingham Census Area has a much lower 0.07% loss ratio but a 1.72% tax rate and $2,738 median tax. Anchorage Municipality reports a 0.36% loss ratio, 1.26% tax rate and $4,982 median tax. These are area-level screening measures: the leading-hazard labels and loss ratios do not establish parcel exposure, insurability or an actual premium.

Evidence: FEMA National Risk Index — hazard loss ratios · Census ACS 5-year — effective property tax

Evidence selected for Alaska

The ranges behind the analysis

Each row keeps its own unit and shows the measured 10th percentile, median and 90th percentile. A single-value row is labelled directly.

Employment and household movementDo jobs, household movement and mover income point in the same direction?
10th pct.median90th pct.Job change-1.6%-0.7%1.1%Net migration / 1k-2.0Net household movement-1,502
Price and rent momentumAre home values and asking rents moving together or separating?
10th pct.median90th pct.Home-value change3.4%4.5%5.8%Asking-rent change4.4%5.0%5.5%Rent minus price0.4%
Supply and resale conditionsWhat do permits, inventory, marketing time and price cuts say about pressure?
10th pct.median90th pct.Permits / 1k0.30.72.3Months of supply1.8×1.9×1.9×Days on market17 days32 days47 daysListings with cuts30.2%31.9%33.6%
Shape of the state

Distribution before conclusion

A statewide median can hide a wide spread. These SVG charts render at build time and carry no chart library or browser-side data request.

Metro score distribution2 scored metros · median 48.0
00–19020–39240–59060–79080–100
County evidence coverageEvery gap stays visible as missing—not estimated
17%5/30Rent100%30/30Climate90%27/30Migration
Highest measured metro gross yieldsscreening metric only · before expenses and financing
Fairbanks6.6%Juneau5.8%Anchorage5.0%
Metro leaderboard

Markets touching Alaska

Multi-state CBSAs appear in every member state. Score is still a metro score; no value is reweighted into a statewide ranking.

#MetroScorePriceRentYieldJobs
1Anchorage, AK49$427k$1,7875.0%▼ 0.7%
2Fairbanks, AK47$316k$1,7446.6%▼ 1.8%

Showing the top 2 scored metros of 3. Unscored metros remain discoverable through the national rankings.

Below the metro line

Largest counties in Alaska

County figures join on the five-digit FIPS code. The table uses measured local values and prints “n/a” wherever a publisher has no record.

CountyPopulationPriceRentYieldHazard
Anchorage Municipality, AK288,976$437k$1,7554.8%earthquake
Matanuska-Susitna Borough, AK112,988$410k$2,0155.9%earthquake
Fairbanks North Star Borough, AK95,460$316k$1,7446.6%earthquake
Kenai Peninsula Borough, AK60,413$350k$1,5765.4%earthquake
Juneau City and Borough, AK31,794$484k$2,3425.8%inland flooding
Bethel Census Area, AK18,394n/an/an/ainland flooding
Ketchikan Gateway Borough, AK13,768$410kn/an/ainland flooding
Kodiak Island Borough, AK12,771$413kn/an/aearthquake
North Slope Borough, AK10,810$324kn/an/ainland flooding
Nome Census Area, AK9,866n/an/an/aearthquake
Sitka City and Borough, AK8,368$494kn/an/aearthquake
Kusilvak Census Area, AK8,176n/an/an/awinter weather
County yield sample5/30counties have the rent needed to compute yield
Statewide net migration−1,502IRS tax-return households summed across counties
Median investor share3.1%among counties with HMDA purchase records
Sources used in this analysis

Measured releases, not a global source count

Only sources supporting the selected evidence modules are listed here.

Bear case

What can break the thesis

  1. Alaska-specific coverage is limited: home values cover three metros, rent growth covers two, county rents cover five areas, county listings cover 16 and migration covers 27 of 30 county-level areas.
  2. The employment, migration, asking-rent, home-value and listing series use different periods and geographies, so their tension cannot establish causation or a single contemporaneous demand trend.
  3. Gross yields are pre-expense measures and omit financing, vacancy, maintenance, capital work, insurance and taxes; the apparent metro ranking may not survive property-level underwriting.
  4. Skagway Municipality, Lake and Peninsula Borough and Nome Census Area have extremely small active-listing counts, making their reported marketing times unstable indicators of normal resale conditions.
  5. FEMA leading-hazard labels are mutually exclusive county-level classifications, not overlapping hazard counts or parcel-level exposure; property taxes are also missing for two Alaska areas.
Investor questions

Before underwriting a property

Do rising rents show that Alaska rental demand is broadly strengthening?

Not by themselves. Median rent growth was 5.0% across two metros, but median employment fell 0.7% across three and 27 county-level areas recorded net migration of -1,502. Juneau's 1.6% job growth is a counter-signal, so the evidence supports local rather than statewide demand conclusions.

Which measured metro has the strongest headline gross yield?

Fairbanks at 6.6%, compared with 5.8% in Juneau and 5.0% in Anchorage. Fairbanks also had a 1.8% employment decline and 51 median days on market, so the yield does not establish superior risk-adjusted performance.

Does low inventory imply an easy resale in both Anchorage and Fairbanks?

No. Months of supply were similar at 1.8 in Anchorage and 1.9 in Fairbanks, but median marketing time was 13 versus 51 days. Both retained sale-to-list ratios just above 100%, making the evidence mixed rather than uniformly weak.

Does Sitka's five-year appreciation establish positive current momentum?

No. Sitka City and Borough recorded a 47.2% five-year HPI change but a -6.5% latest annual change. The two horizons show that long-run appreciation and current direction can diverge.

Can the FEMA and property-tax figures price a specific acquisition?

No. They can identify county-level areas for further review, but FEMA's leading-hazard label is not parcel exposure, and the loss ratio does not provide an insurance quote. The tax figures are area-level effective rates and median bills rather than the tax liability of a selected property.