City limitsPlace boundary
Curated city comparison

BaltimoreWashington

Neighboring Mid-Atlantic cities with material differences across every city comparison lens, including price, yield, pressure and housing form.

Baltimore, MD cityscape
Washington, DC cityscape
Decision memo

The trade-off before property underwriting

The interpretation uses direct city records only. County and metro averages are not substituted into this comparison.

Baltimore, MD merits property-level underwriting first for cash-flow and entry-affordability strategies. Its Zillow value index is $192,669 versus $579,159 in Washington, DC, while gross yield is 11.20% versus 5.25%. Baltimore’s price-to-income measure is also lower, at 3.10 versus 5.27. That combination offers a substantially lower acquisition hurdle and more gross income relative to indexed value, but it is not a net-return forecast.

Washington better fits renter-pressure and local-demand objectives. Renters represent 58.49% of Washington households versus 52.49% in Baltimore, and vacancy is lower at 10.12% versus 13.34%. Population change between overlapping ACS vintages was -1.64% in Washington and -5.88% in Baltimore. Yet affordability pressure points the other way: Baltimore’s rent-burden rate is 53.68%, compared with 46.60% in Washington, signaling constrained tenant budgets rather than automatically stronger rent-growth capacity.

Housing-stock fit depends on the intended asset. Baltimore is 65.13% single-family and has a 1947 median year built, favoring house-oriented sourcing but requiring close inspection of systems and capital needs. Washington is 42.03% large multifamily, making it more aligned with apartment underwriting, while its 1958 median year built still warrants physical diligence. Next, compare neighborhood-level asking rents, occupancy, taxes, insurance, licensing, deferred maintenance and renovation scope for actual candidates before advancing either city.

Direct city matrix

The same definition on both sides

“n/a” remains missing. Zillow indexes and ACS survey measures stay visibly separate.

Decision evidenceBaltimore, MDWashington, DC
Typical home valueZillow ZHVI · city$192,669$579,159
Observed market rentZillow ZORI · city$1,799$2,532
Gross yieldZORI × 12 ÷ ZHVI · before costs11.2%5.2%
Price to household incomeZillow value ÷ ACS income3.10x5.27x
Annual rent to incomeZillow rent × 12 ÷ ACS income34.7%27.7%
Rent burdenACS renter households paying 30%+53.7%46.6%
Renter shareACS occupied housing52.5%58.5%
Vacancy rateACS all housing units13.3%10.1%
Population changebetween ACS vintages · not annualized▼ 5.9%▼ 1.6%
UnemploymentACS civilian labor force6.5%6.3%
Entry and income screen

Price, rent and yield do not tell the same story

Bars begin at zero within each measure. Gross yield remains a before-cost screen.

BaltimoreWashingtonTypical home valueZillow ZHVI · city$193k$579kObserved market rentZillow ZORI · monthly city index$2k$3kGross yieldZORI × 12 ÷ ZHVI · before costs11.2%5.2%
Zillow city ZHVI and ZORI · 2026-06 / 2026-06
Price and rent history

Two city paths, each rebased to 100

Each panel keeps price and rent in its own city; no level is borrowed across geographies.

Five-year path

Price and rent, rebased to 100

ZHVI +9.4%ZORI +24.1%
12411095202120222023202420252026
Each series starts at 100 so their direction can be compared without pretending that a home value and a monthly rent share the same unit.
Five-year path

Price and rent, rebased to 100

ZHVI −10.3%ZORI +16.0%
11710390202120222023202420252026
Each series starts at 100 so their direction can be compared without pretending that a home value and a monthly rent share the same unit.
Fit by objective

There is no universal city winner

Five city questions remain separate so a yield lead cannot erase affordability or demand risk.

01
Cash-flow screenBaltimore

Baltimore, MD better fits cash_flow: its 11.20% gross yield exceeds Washington, DC’s 5.25%, and its Zillow rent index is $1,799 against a $192,669 value index. Washington’s higher $2,532 rent does not offset its much higher $579,159 value at the city-index level. Underwrite actual achievable rent, vacancy, taxes, insurance, management, repairs, utilities, financing and capital work before treating Baltimore’s gross spread as investable cash flow.

02
Entry affordabilityBaltimore

Baltimore, MD better fits entry_affordability. Its Zillow value index is $192,669, compared with $579,159 for Washington, DC, and its price-to-income measure is 3.10 versus 5.27. Both indexes had negative year-over-year movement, at -2.29% in Baltimore and -2.34% in Washington, so neither city-level reading establishes a property bargain. Check neighborhood sale comparables, required rehabilitation, closing costs and financing terms for each candidate.

03
Renter pressureDepends on the property

Washington, DC has the clearer occupancy-side indicators: renters are 58.49% of households and vacancy is 10.12%, versus 52.49% and 13.34% in Baltimore, MD. Baltimore, however, has greater tenant affordability stress, with 53.68% rent-burdened compared with 46.60% in Washington. The fit therefore depends on whether the strategy prioritizes a broader renter base and lower vacancy or interprets high burden as collection and rent-growth risk. Verify submarket concessions and applicant income.

04
Housing stockDepends on the property

Baltimore, MD better matches a single-family strategy because that form represents 65.13% of its stock, versus 32.71% in Washington, DC. Washington better matches large-multifamily sourcing, at 42.03% versus Baltimore’s 15.04%. Median year built is 1947 in Baltimore and 1958 in Washington, so both require property-level review of roofs, structure, mechanical systems, utilities and code compliance. Select the city only after matching the target asset form and renovation tolerance.

05
Local demand riskWashington

Washington, DC better fits local_demand on the available city indicators. Population change across overlapping ACS vintages was -1.64%, compared with -5.88% in Baltimore, MD, while unemployment was 6.35% versus 6.54%. Washington also has median household income of $109,870, compared with Baltimore’s $62,177. Neither city shows population growth in this measure, and these overlapping-vintage changes are not annualized. Test employment access, neighborhood population patterns and leasing velocity around each property.

Household pressure

Acquisition and renter affordability

BaltimoreWashingtonPrice to incomeZillow value ÷ ACS household income3.1x5.3xRent to incomeAnnual Zillow rent ÷ ACS household income34.7%27.7%Rent-burdened householdsACS renters paying 30% or more53.7%46.6%
Zillow city indexes divided by direct ACS city household measures.
Housing system

Tenure, vacancy and structure

BaltimoreWashingtonRenter shareACS occupied housing52.5%58.5%Vacancy rateACS all housing units13.3%10.1%Single-family stockACS one-unit structures65.1%32.7%Large multifamily stockACS structures with 20+ units15.0%42.0%
ACS citywide housing characteristics; not rentable inventory or lease-up speed.
Underwriting boundary

What this city comparison cannot decide

City evidence narrows a search; it does not appraise, inspect or finance a property.

  1. 01

    Zillow’s city home-value and rent indexes measure market trends, while ACS median value and gross rent describe surveyed housing. They should not be averaged or treated as competing appraisals; property underwriting still needs current comparable sales and leases.

  2. 02

    Gross yield excludes vacancy, management, repairs, taxes, insurance, utilities, financing and capital work. Baltimore’s older stock and Washington’s higher entry value can produce very different net outcomes once building condition, operating expenses and debt terms are verified.

  3. 03

    Population change uses overlapping ACS vintages and is not annualized. Citywide vacancy, renter share, poverty and unemployment can also conceal large neighborhood differences, so local leasing evidence and block-level property diligence are essential.