Counties / California / Alpine County

Alpine County, CA

FIPS 06003 · population 1,616 · part of Gardnerville Ranchos, NV

$516k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
Direct county rent answer

What does rent cost in Alpine County, CA?

Neither Zillow ZORI nor ACS median gross rent is published for this county. The current rent answer is n/a; no wider geography is substituted.

County Zillow ZORIn/aNot published for this county
County ACS gross rentn/aACS 2024 5-year · occupied-renter survey
HUD two-bedroom FMR$1,529FY2026 · administrative standard
HUD Fair Market Rent by bedroom count in Alpine County
BedroomsHUD monthly FMRGeographyMeasurement boundary
Studio$1,068Alpine County, CAHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
1 bedroom$1,165Alpine County, CAHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
2 bedrooms$1,529Alpine County, CAHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
3 bedrooms$2,126Alpine County, CAHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
4 bedrooms$2,527Alpine County, CAHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.

Zillow asking rent, ACS gross rent and HUD FMR describe different housing universes. They remain separate and no metro, city or neighboring-county value replaces missing county evidence.ACS pulled 2026-07-30 · HUD pulled 2026-07-26

Current county rent evidence is unavailable; the bedroom table remains HUD policy guidance only.ACS 2024 5-year

The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$516k
▼ 1.8% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
ACS median gross rent
n/a
no rent estimate published here
n/a
Gross yield
n/a
gross yield cannot be computed without measured market rent
requires both measured price and measured rent
HUD 2-bed standard
$1,529
the Section 8 payment standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

One annual series is unavailable
FHFA five-year cumulativen/anot annualized · through n/a
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06−1.8%FHFA HPIperiod n/an/a
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-08-02.
Owner-reported value$590k
Surveyed gross rentn/a
Rent burden 30%+9.2%
Median year built1981
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
72.1%vacant
1,558estimated housing units
Occupied tenure21.8% renter
owner 78.2%renter 21.8%
Structure mix74.2% single-family
Single-family 74.2%20+ units 7.9%Mobile home 1.7%Other 16.2%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs1,012▲ 3.8% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments96annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$937▲ 0.5% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorLeisure and hospitality76.0% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS+3.8%WEEKLY WAGE+0.5%Leisure and hospitality76.0%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2021-2025; latest 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-08-02. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

Resident income

How local income has compounded

BEA per-capita personal income divides all personal income by the county population. It is broader than wages, but it is not household income or a measure of what renters can afford.

Per-capita personal income19692024
Per-capita personal income history for Alpine CountyA line chart of annual BEA per-capita personal income from 1969 through 2024.$0k$45k$90k196919972024$5k$88k
Nominal annual dollars; not adjusted for inflation. A rising line can reflect wage, business-income, transfer-income and investment-income changes together.
Renter affordability

Who carries the heaviest rent burden

HUD CHAS separates renter households by income relative to local HAMFI. Moderate burden means housing costs above 30% through 50% of income; severe burden means more than 50%.

Share of renter households in each income band2018-2022
Renter cost burden by HAMFI income band in Alpine CountyFive horizontal bars show moderate and severe housing cost burden shares among renter households in each HUD income band.0%25%50%75%100%At or below 30% HAMFI4100.0% burdened30–50% HAMFI2556.0% burdened50–80% HAMFI100.0% burdened80–100% HAMFI150.0% burdenedAbove 100% HAMFI150.0% burdened
Moderate: >30% to 50%Severe: >50%
Each percentage uses HUD’s published subtotal for that income band. For disclosure, HUD keeps 0 as 0, publishes 1–7 households as 4 and rounds 8 or more to the nearest 5. Independently rounded categories can differ from their displayed sum and are not forced into a percentage.
County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Alpine County presents a thin-evidence underwriting tension: the Zillow county median home value was $515,689 in 2026-06, down 1.81% year over year, while county economic and buyer indicators are mixed rather than decisively weak. This is a market for investors willing to validate individual assets, leases, insurance, and access to demand; those needing demonstrated rent coverage or broad transaction depth should be cautious. Important pricing and liquidity tests remain unresolved.

02Housing economics

Housing economics cannot yet be underwritten from a yield lens. The effective property-tax rate is 0.77%, and median annual property tax is $4,530; the latter is a separate median and should not be applied mechanically to the Zillow value. HUD's two-bedroom FMR is $1,529 per month, but FMR is a payment standard rather than an asking-rent estimate. Market rent is not published, so gross yield and rent-to-price coverage cannot be computed. No FHFA annual repeat-transaction HPI observation is supplied, so it cannot corroborate or challenge the Zillow direction.

03Demand & competition

Demand evidence is mixed. Net migration was a net outflow of 38 tax-return households, while incoming movers' average AGI exceeded outgoing movers' by $18,691. That pairing describes mover composition, not a demand conclusion. In 2025, QCEW reported 1,012 annual-average covered jobs at county workplaces, up 3.79%; Leisure and hospitality, the largest disclosed private supersector, represented 76.03% of total private covered jobs. That is not a description of the whole economy. Investor mortgage participation was 18.18% of 22 purchase mortgages, showing buyer presence but not pricing power or total cash buying.

04Risk & next checks

Inland flood is the dominant hazard, and modeled climate loss equals 0.33% of building value per year; this is a modeled expected-loss ratio, not a site-specific insurance quote or dollar loss. Missing Realtor.com MLS measures for 2026-06 prevent a reading of asking prices, visible active supply, marketing time, and seller price reductions; those are listing evidence, not closed sales. Next checks are property-level flood zone, insurance terms, actual signed market rents and expenses, and recent closed comparable sales. County aggregates cannot establish parcel performance.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Alpine County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Mesa Vista CDP445Kirkwood CDP*218Alpine Village CDP210Bear Valley CDP (Alpine C…120Markleeville CDP110
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

5 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Mesa Vista CDPCensus-designated place
    445
  2. 02
    Kirkwood CDPCensus-designated place · spans 2 counties
    218
  3. 03
    Alpine Village CDPCensus-designated place
    210
  4. 04
    Bear Valley CDP (Alpine County)Census place
    120
  5. 05
    Markleeville CDPCensus-designated place
    110

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.329% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax0.77%

$4,530 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration-38

22 in · 60 out

Arriving vs leaving income+$18,691

$96,591 arriving · $77,900 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors18.2%

4 of 22 mortgages

investorother financed
No rent index is published for this county.Zillow’s county rent series does not cover every county, and estimating one from a neighbouring county would be a guess wearing a number’s clothes. Everything above is measured here; for a rent figure, the Gardnerville Ranchos, NV page covers the wider market.
Same metro

The other counties in Gardnerville Ranchos, NV

A metro is an average of these. Which side of a county line a property sits on can change the tax bill, the hazard profile and the tenant pool.

CountyPopulationPriceRentYieldHazard
Alpine County1,616$516kn/an/ainland flooding
Douglas County49,623$709k$2,6184.4%earthquake
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Actual rents and operating expenses may not support acquisition carrying costs.
  2. Absent MLS listing and closed-sale evidence may conceal weak liquidity or seller concessions.
  3. Parcel-specific flood exposure and insurance terms may differ materially from the county-level modeled loss ratio.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Can gross yield be calculated from this record?

No. Market rent is not published, and HUD FMR is a payment standard rather than an asking-rent measure.

What does QCEW establish about the employment base?

It reports covered jobs at county workplaces and identifies leisure and hospitality as the largest disclosed private supersector; it is not resident employment or a measure of the whole economy.

Is investor participation reported?

Yes. The record reports investor purchase-mortgage participation, but it does not report cash purchases or establish buyer pricing power.