Counties / Arizona / Cochise County

Cochise County, AZ

FIPS 04003 · population 125,566 · part of Sierra Vista, AZ

$265k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$265k
▲ 0.1% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
Median asking rent
$1,253
▲ 2.1% year over year
Zillow ZORI · direct
Gross yield
5.7%
annual rent ÷ price, before costs
derived: rent × 12 ÷ price ✓
HUD 2-bed standard
$1,257
market rent is 1.00x the standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

Both annual signals move in the same direction
FHFA five-year cumulative+54.9%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06+0.1%FHFA HPI2025+3.1%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-07-28.
Owner-reported value$218k
Surveyed gross rent$995
Rent burden 30%+48.2%
Median year built1987
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
14.5%vacant
59,666estimated housing units
Occupied tenure29.0% renter
owner 71.0%renter 29.0%
Structure mix67.7% single-family
Single-family 67.7%20+ units 4.0%Mobile home 20.0%Other 8.4%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs34,471▼ 1.4% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments2,567annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$1,176▲ 2.2% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorTrade, transportation, and utilities26.2% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS−1.4%WEEKLY WAGE+2.2%Trade, transportation, and utilities26.2%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Cochise County’s decision tension is modest Zillow price movement versus faster measured rent growth and a negative covered-job change. The county median home value was $264,829, up 0.08%, while median asking rent was $1,253 per month, up 2.11%; the supplied gross yield is 5.68% before costs. This is an income-to-price case only where property-level expenses hold; operators able to verify them should investigate, while buyers depending on appreciation or untested flood costs should be cautious.

02Housing economics

FHFA’s annual 2025 repeat-transaction HPI rose 3.13%. This is positive index movement, not a dollar home value, and its vintage and method differ from Zillow’s, so the rates cannot be combined. HUD’s two-bedroom FMR is a payment standard, not an asking-rent estimate. The 0.60% effective property-tax rate adds carrying cost. The inland-flood climate-loss ratio of 0.25% is a modeled annual share of building value, not a property-specific loss.

03Demand & competition

QCEW’s annual covered workplace employment fell 1.38%; it is neither resident employment nor unemployment, and Trade, transportation, and utilities is only the largest disclosed private supersector. Realtor.com’s MLS listing-market evidence recorded 500 active listings, a median listing price down 7.85%, and 17.13% price-reduced. These are asking-price, visible-supply and seller-concession evidence, not closed-sale prices or proof of buyer demand by themselves. Tax-return migration was net positive by 248 households, with inbound movers’ average AGI $1,133 above outbound movers’; investor participation was 4.15% of purchase mortgages, a limited measured buyer component.

04Risk & next checks

County evidence leaves major underwriting limits. Published data do not provide closed-sale comps by submarket, vacancy and lease concessions, unit-level operating costs, flood-zone and insurance quotes, building condition, or financing terms. Those gaps prevent a net-cash-flow conclusion, a property-specific flood-cost assessment, and confirmation that listing conditions translate into achievable rents or exit values. Next checks are parcel hazard and insurance records, current lease and turnover files, and recent closed comparables.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Cochise County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Sierra Vista city45.2KDouglas city16KSierra Vista Southeast CDP14.3KBenson city5.4KBisbee city5KWillcox city3.2KWhetstone CDP3KPirtleville CDP1.9K
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

22 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Sierra Vista cityIncorporated place
    45,155
  2. 02
    Douglas cityIncorporated place
    15,981
  3. 03
    Sierra Vista Southeast CDPCensus-designated place
    14,330
  4. 04
    Benson cityIncorporated place
    5,417
  5. 05
    Bisbee cityIncorporated place
    4,977
  6. 06
    Willcox cityIncorporated place
    3,222
  7. 07
    Whetstone CDPCensus-designated place
    2,971
  8. 08
    Pirtleville CDPCensus-designated place
    1,939
  9. 09
    Mescal CDPCensus-designated place
    1,760
  10. 10
    Huachuca City townIncorporated place
    1,614
  11. 11
    St. David CDPCensus-designated place
    1,098
  12. 12
    Naco CDPCensus-designated place
    1,060
Show 10 more places
  1. 13
    Tombstone cityIncorporated place
    1,026
  2. 14
    Miracle Valley CDPCensus-designated place
    716
  3. 15
    Sunsites CDPCensus-designated place
    611
  4. 16
    Bowie CDPCensus-designated place
    384
  5. 17
    Palominas CDPCensus-designated place
    253
  6. 18
    McNeal CDPCensus-designated place
    246
  7. 19
    San Simon CDPCensus-designated place
    244
  8. 20
    Elfrida CDPCensus-designated place
    194
  9. 21
    Sunizona CDPCensus-designated place
    191
  10. 22
    Dragoon CDPCensus-designated place
    85

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.248% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax0.60%

$1,310 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration+248

3,805 in · 3,557 out

Arriving vs leaving income+$1,133

$57,052 arriving · $55,919 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors4.2%

59 of 1,422 mortgages

investorother financed
Current listing pressure

What sellers and visible supply are doing

Realtor.com® Economic Research · county inventory 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-28
Active listings500▲ 3.0% year over year
Median days on market67▼ 0.8% year over year
Listings price-reduced17.1%seller-concession signal
Median listing pricen/a▼ 7.8% year over year

Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.

Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Actual flood exposure, insurance costs, and repairs could make the pre-cost gross yield inadequate.
  2. County covered-job decline may coincide with weaker tenant or buyer depth than county aggregates reveal.
  3. Countywide asking rent and MLS concessions may not translate into subject-property realized rent or closed value.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Can gross yield be calculated without using HUD FMR?

Yes. Published market asking rent and a supplied gross yield are present; HUD FMR is not used as market rent.

Does FHFA provide a county home value?

No. The record identifies FHFA as a repeat-transaction appreciation index, not a dollar home-value estimate.

Does the record establish property-specific flood cost and insurability?

No. It provides a county-level modeled climate-loss ratio and dominant hazard, not parcel data, insurance quotes, or building-specific condition evidence.