Direct recent-lease rent history
Monthly overall-rent index; missing observations are not filled from another geography.
FIPS 04003 · population 125,566 · part of Sierra Vista, AZ
The latest county-level Zillow ZORI is $1,253 per month in 2026-06. It is a typical asking-rent index across rental types—not an arithmetic average, signed lease or quote for one property.
| Bedrooms | HUD monthly FMR | Geography | Measurement boundary |
|---|---|---|---|
| Studio | $887 | Cochise County, AZ | HUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent. |
| 1 bedroom | $1,111 | Cochise County, AZ | HUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent. |
| 2 bedrooms | $1,257 | Cochise County, AZ | HUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent. |
| 3 bedrooms | $1,748 | Cochise County, AZ | HUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent. |
| 4 bedrooms | $2,109 | Cochise County, AZ | HUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent. |
Zillow asking rent, ACS gross rent and HUD FMR describe different housing universes. They remain separate and no metro, city or neighboring-county value replaces missing county evidence.Zillow pulled 2026-07-26 · HUD pulled 2026-07-26
Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.
Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.
Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.
Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2021-2025; latest 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-08-02. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.
BEA per-capita personal income divides all personal income by the county population. It is broader than wages, but it is not household income or a measure of what renters can afford.
HUD CHAS separates renter households by income relative to local HAMFI. Moderate burden means housing costs above 30% through 50% of income; severe burden means more than 50%.
These Apartment List observations match the exact county Census code 04003. They are kept separate from Zillow asking rent, Census occupied-home rent and wider metro measures.
Monthly overall-rent index; missing observations are not filled from another geography.
Cochise County’s decision tension is modest Zillow price movement versus faster measured rent growth and a negative covered-job change. The county median home value was $264,829, up 0.08%, while median asking rent was $1,253 per month, up 2.11%; the supplied gross yield is 5.68% before costs. This is an income-to-price case only where property-level expenses hold; operators able to verify them should investigate, while buyers depending on appreciation or untested flood costs should be cautious.
FHFA’s annual 2025 repeat-transaction HPI rose 3.13%. This is positive index movement, not a dollar home value, and its vintage and method differ from Zillow’s, so the rates cannot be combined. HUD’s two-bedroom FMR is a payment standard, not an asking-rent estimate. The 0.60% effective property-tax rate adds carrying cost. The inland-flood climate-loss ratio of 0.25% is a modeled annual share of building value, not a property-specific loss.
QCEW’s annual covered workplace employment fell 1.38%; it is neither resident employment nor unemployment, and Trade, transportation, and utilities is only the largest disclosed private supersector. Realtor.com’s MLS listing-market evidence recorded 500 active listings, a median listing price down 7.85%, and 17.13% price-reduced. These are asking-price, visible-supply and seller-concession evidence, not closed-sale prices or proof of buyer demand by themselves. Tax-return migration was net positive by 248 households, with inbound movers’ average AGI $1,133 above outbound movers’; investor participation was 4.15% of purchase mortgages, a limited measured buyer component.
County evidence leaves major underwriting limits. Published data do not provide closed-sale comps by submarket, vacancy and lease concessions, unit-level operating costs, flood-zone and insurance quotes, building condition, or financing terms. Those gaps prevent a net-cash-flow conclusion, a property-specific flood-cost assessment, and confirmation that listing conditions translate into achievable rents or exit values. Next checks are parcel hazard and insurance records, current lease and turnover files, and recent closed comparables.
Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.
Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.
0.248% of building value expected lost per year
$1,310 median annual bill
3,805 in · 3,557 out
$57,052 arriving · $55,919 leaving
59 of 1,422 mortgages
Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.
Yes. Published market asking rent and a supplied gross yield are present; HUD FMR is not used as market rent.
No. The record identifies FHFA as a repeat-transaction appreciation index, not a dollar home-value estimate.
No. It provides a county-level modeled climate-loss ratio and dominant hazard, not parcel data, insurance quotes, or building-specific condition evidence.