Counties / Arizona / Coconino County

Coconino County, AZ

FIPS 04005 · population 144,508 · part of Flagstaff, AZ

$633k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$633k
▼ 0.8% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
Median asking rent
$2,123
▲ 1.0% year over year
Zillow ZORI · direct
Gross yield
4.0%
annual rent ÷ price, before costs
derived: rent × 12 ÷ price ✓
HUD 2-bed standard
$1,921
market rent is 1.10x the standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

The annual signals disagree
FHFA five-year cumulative+61.9%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06−0.8%FHFA HPI2025+2.3%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-07-28.
Owner-reported value$448k
Surveyed gross rent$1,473
Rent burden 30%+51.6%
Median year built1991
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
22.0%vacant
70,645estimated housing units
Occupied tenure40.3% renter
owner 59.7%renter 40.3%
Structure mix64.5% single-family
Single-family 64.5%20+ units 5.4%Mobile home 13.4%Other 16.8%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs66,371▲ 0.6% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments4,157annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$1,095▲ 4.5% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorLeisure and hospitality32.5% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS+0.6%WEEKLY WAGE+4.5%Leisure and hospitality32.5%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Coconino presents a price-versus-yield tension: Zillow’s median home value is $633,105 against median asking rent of $2,123 per month and a supplied gross yield of 4.02% before costs. Zillow’s price is down 0.78% year over year, while FHFA’s repeat-transaction HPI is up 2.30% in its 2025 annual observation. That is not the same period as Zillow’s 2026-06 observation, and neither index is a cash value; their methods should not be averaged. Yield-focused buyers should be cautious; an appreciation thesis needs reconciliation and property-level diligence.

02Housing economics

The rent signal does not settle carrying costs. The $1,921 HUD two-bedroom FMR is a payment standard, not market rent; market rent exceeds it. The effective property-tax rate is 0.46%, with median annual tax of $2,051. Since gross yield is before insurance, maintenance, vacancy, management, financing and taxes, it is not a net-return conclusion. The modeled climate-loss ratio is 0.33% of building value per year, with inland flood dominant. Verify flood-zone status, insurance, deductibles, drainage and mitigation for the target property.

03Demand & competition

Demand and competition are mixed. Tax-return flows show net migration of -691, while incoming mover AGI was $1,870 below outgoing AGI, a demand-quality caution. QCEW reports covered employment and average weekly wage growth, but those are workplace measures, not resident employment or unemployment; leisure and hospitality is the largest disclosed private supersector, not the whole economy. Investors made 170 of 1,460 purchases, or 11.64%: participation, not dominance. Realtor.com’s MLS evidence shows a 60-day median marketing time and a 20.74% price-reduced share—marketing and concession signals, not closed-sale demand.

04Risk & next checks

Underwrite this as potentially rent-supported but cost-sensitive, not as a self-validating appreciation trade. Missing property-level lease comps, vacancy, operating expenses, insurance quotes, flood maps and claims, financing terms, and closed-sale comps prevent testing net yield, achievable rent, and the relevance of Zillow’s value to the target property. Next, audit leases and expenses, obtain flood and insurance diligence, and compare closed sales and local job exposure. County evidence cannot establish property-specific performance or represent the Flagstaff metro.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Coconino County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Flagstaff city76.4KSedona city*9.8KTuba City CDP8KPage city7.3KDoney Park CDP6.3KWilliams city3.4KKachina Village CDP3.2KMountain View Ranches CDP2K
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

35 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Flagstaff cityIncorporated place
    76,445
  2. 02
    Sedona cityIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    9,777
  3. 03
    Tuba City CDPCensus-designated place
    7,960
  4. 04
    Page cityIncorporated place
    7,345
  5. 05
    Doney Park CDPCensus-designated place
    6,253
  6. 06
    Williams cityIncorporated place
    3,369
  7. 07
    Kachina Village CDPCensus-designated place
    3,212
  8. 08
    Mountain View Ranches CDPCensus-designated place
    1,984
  9. 09
    Timberline-Fernwood CDPCensus-designated place
    1,973
  10. 10
    Fort Valley CDPCensus-designated place
    1,761
  11. 11
    Parks CDPCensus-designated place
    1,706
  12. 12
    Bellemont CDPCensus-designated place
    1,701
Show 23 more places
  1. 13
    Red Lake CDPCensus-designated place
    1,676
  2. 14
    Kaibito CDPCensus-designated place
    1,661
  3. 15
    Grand Canyon Village CDPCensus-designated place
    1,599
  4. 16
    Kaibab Estates West CDPCensus-designated place
    1,403
  5. 17
    LeChee CDPCensus-designated place
    1,307
  6. 18
    Mountainaire CDPCensus-designated place
    1,103
  7. 19
    Fredonia townIncorporated place
    1,061
  8. 20
    Blue Ridge CDPCensus-designated place
    992
  9. 21
    Leupp CDPCensus-designated place
    882
  10. 22
    Moenkopi CDPCensus-designated place
    879
  11. 23
    Cameron CDPCensus-designated place
    782
  12. 24
    Munds Park CDPCensus-designated place
    608
  13. 25
    Bitter Springs CDPCensus-designated place
    504
  14. 26
    Tolani Lake CDPCensus-designated place
    439
  15. 27
    Valle CDPCensus-designated place
    436
  16. 28
    Tusayan townIncorporated place
    368
  17. 29
    Oak Creek Canyon CDPCensus-designated place
    356
  18. 30
    Winslow West CDPCensus-designated place · spans 2 counties
    335
  19. 31
    Greenehaven CDPCensus-designated place
    325
  20. 32
    Tonalea CDPCensus-designated place
    205
  21. 33
    Forest Lakes CDPCensus-designated place
    204
  22. 34
    Mormon Lake CDPCensus-designated place
    153
  23. 35
    Supai CDPCensus-designated place
    0

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.326% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax0.46%

$2,051 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration-691

4,782 in · 5,473 out

Arriving vs leaving income−$1,870

$61,366 arriving · $63,236 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors11.6%

170 of 1,460 mortgages

investorother financed
Current listing pressure

What sellers and visible supply are doing

Realtor.com® Economic Research · county inventory 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-28
Active listings747▼ 0.9% year over year
Median days on market60▲ 0.4% year over year
Listings price-reduced20.7%seller-concession signal
Median listing pricen/a▲ 4.0% year over year

Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.

Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Property-level flood exposure, insurance cost, or mitigation needs could erase the gross-yield cushion.
  2. Outmigration and lower incoming mover income could weaken tenant demand and resale liquidity.
  3. Leisure-and-hospitality concentration plus MLS marketing friction could make income and pricing assumptions fail.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Is the published rent market rent or HUD FMR?

Both are present: market rent is median asking rent, while HUD FMR is a payment standard; FMR is not an asking-rent estimate.

What does QCEW employment measure?

QCEW covers annual average covered jobs located in the county and their average weekly wage. It is not resident employment or unemployment, and leisure and hospitality is only the largest disclosed private supersector.

What buyer-competition evidence is available?

The record provides investor participation as a share of total purchases, plus Realtor.com active listings, marketing time, price reductions and pending measures. These are participation and MLS listing signals, not closed-sale proof.