Counties / Maine / Cumberland County

Cumberland County, ME

FIPS 23005 · population 308,827 · part of Portland, ME

$574k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
Direct county rent answer

What does rent cost in Cumberland County, ME?

The latest county-level Zillow ZORI is $2,445 per month in 2026-06. It is a typical asking-rent index across rental types—not an arithmetic average, signed lease or quote for one property.

County Zillow ZORI$2,4452026-06 · up 3.5% year over year
County ACS gross rent$1,589ACS 2024 5-year · occupied-renter survey
HUD two-bedroom FMR$1,833FY2026 · administrative standard
HUD Fair Market Rent by bedroom count in Cumberland County
BedroomsHUD monthly FMRGeographyMeasurement boundary
Studio$1,264Cumberland County, MEHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
1 bedroom$1,397Cumberland County, MEHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
2 bedrooms$1,833Cumberland County, MEHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
3 bedrooms$2,380Cumberland County, MEHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
4 bedrooms$3,038Cumberland County, MEHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.

Zillow asking rent, ACS gross rent and HUD FMR describe different housing universes. They remain separate and no metro, city or neighboring-county value replaces missing county evidence.Zillow pulled 2026-07-26 · HUD pulled 2026-07-26

The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$574k
▲ 0.9% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
Median asking rent
$2,445
▲ 3.5% year over year
Zillow ZORI · direct
Gross yield
5.1%
annual rent ÷ price, before costs
derived: rent × 12 ÷ price ✓
HUD 2-bed standard
$1,833
market rent is 1.33x the standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

Both annual signals move in the same direction
FHFA five-year cumulative+67.2%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06+0.9%FHFA HPI2025+4.1%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-08-02.
Owner-reported value$451k
Surveyed gross rent$1,589
Rent burden 30%+49.9%
Median year built1976
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
13.8%vacant
153,286estimated housing units
Occupied tenure30.2% renter
owner 69.8%renter 30.2%
Structure mix68.3% single-family
Single-family 68.3%20+ units 7.1%Mobile home 4.0%Other 20.6%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs194,200▲ 0.9% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments17,541annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$1,425▲ 3.9% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorEducation and health services25.7% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS+0.9%WEEKLY WAGE+3.9%Education and health services25.7%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2021-2025; latest 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-08-02. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

Resident income

How local income has compounded

BEA per-capita personal income divides all personal income by the county population. It is broader than wages, but it is not household income or a measure of what renters can afford.

Per-capita personal income19692024
Per-capita personal income history for Cumberland CountyA line chart of annual BEA per-capita personal income from 1969 through 2024.$0k$50k$100k196919972024$4k$90k
Nominal annual dollars; not adjusted for inflation. A rising line can reflect wage, business-income, transfer-income and investment-income changes together.
Renter affordability

Who carries the heaviest rent burden

HUD CHAS separates renter households by income relative to local HAMFI. Moderate burden means housing costs above 30% through 50% of income; severe burden means more than 50%.

Share of renter households in each income band2018-2022
Renter cost burden by HAMFI income band in Cumberland CountyFive horizontal bars show moderate and severe housing cost burden shares among renter households in each HUD income band.0%25%50%75%100%At or below 30% HAMFI9,44563.3% burdened30–50% HAMFI6,07574.1% burdened50–80% HAMFI8,92543.8% burdened80–100% HAMFI4,83515.3% burdenedAbove 100% HAMFI9,2755.3% burdened
Moderate: >30% to 50%Severe: >50%
Each percentage uses HUD’s published subtotal for that income band. For disclosure, HUD keeps 0 as 0, publishes 1–7 households as 4 and rounds 8 or more to the nearest 5. Independently rounded categories can differ from their displayed sum and are not forced into a percentage.
County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Cumberland County presents a price-versus-rent tension: rent growth exceeds a nearly flat value reading, yet the entry basis requires an expense test. It merits investigation by buyers who can verify asset-level costs; highly leveraged buyers should be cautious. In Zillow’s 2026-06 county observation, median home value was $573,656, up 0.93% year over year; median asking rent was $2,445 monthly, up 3.54%, and reported gross yield was 5.11%.

02Housing economics

That yield uses measured market asking rent before costs, not net cash flow. The effective property-tax rate is 1.04%, with median annual tax of $4,707; both are carrying-cost inputs, not a parcel-specific bill. HUD FMR is a payment standard, not an asking-rent estimate, and cannot replace market rent or produce another yield. Insurance, utilities, maintenance, vacancy, financing, and unit mix are not published, preventing a net-income conclusion.

03Demand & competition

Realtor.com’s 2026-06 MLS evidence is mixed: median listing price fell 3% year over year, while active listings rose and median marketing time fell; price reductions were also present. These are asking-price, visible-supply, marketing-time, and concession measures—not closed sales or independent proof of buyer demand. Annual QCEW shows growth in county workplace covered employment and covered-worker wages, not resident employment or unemployment; Education and health services is the largest disclosed private supersector, not the whole economy. Tax-return migration was positive by 512 households, with higher average AGI for inbound than outbound movers. Investor mortgages were 7.35% of 3,374 purchases, participation rather than evidence of buyer control.

04Risk & next checks

Risk limits remain material. FHFA’s repeat-transaction HPI rose 4.06% in its 2025 annual observation, directionally stronger than Zillow’s value change but neither a dollar value nor the same observation period, so the measures should not be averaged. Inland flood is the dominant hazard, and modeled annual building-value loss is 0.09%; that county average cannot assign parcel exposure. Obtain closed-sale comps, rent roll and lease terms, tax and insurance quotes, operating history, flood maps and elevation, and financing terms; without them, net yield, resale basis, and flood-cost underwriting remain unresolved.

County ZIP rental landscape

How asking rent and renter pressure vary inside Cumberland County, ME

This view uses 8 direct Zillow ZIP markets matched to Census ZCTAs. Each ZIP is assigned by its largest HUD residential county share; this is not an exhaustive county inventory.

Selected ZIP range$2,109$2,722Zillow asking-rent index
Monthly spread$613highest minus lowest selected ZIP
Observed burden range43.8%53.5%ACS renter households paying 30%+
Renter households covered31,600across the selected ZCTAs
01 · ASKING RENT LADDERDirect ZIP ZORI
Horizontal bars compare Zillow asking-rent indexes across the selected direct-evidence ZIP set.04103$2,72204074$2,69404106$2,53304096$2,47004092$2,42704102$2,40104101$2,38904011$2,109
02 · PRESSURE MATRIXRent × observed burden
Each point is one selected ZIP and ZCTA match. Horizontal position is Zillow asking rent and vertical position is the ACS renter cost-burden share.56.0%52.4%48.7%45.0%41.3%0410104103041060410204092040110407404096Zillow asking-rent index →ACS burden share →
03 · BENCHMARK GAPZORI vs HUD 2BR
Bars show the percentage difference between the Zillow blended asking-rent index and the local HUD two-bedroom standard. Their housing universes differ.04103+158.6%04074+157.0%04106+147.6%04096+143.9%04092+141.4%04102+139.9%04101+139.2%04011+122.9%
WHAT THE LOCAL DISTRIBUTION SAYS

Among the selected direct-evidence ZIP/ZCTA matches, Zillow’s June 2026 ZORI—a typical observed asking-rent index—runs from $2,109 in 04011 to $2,722 in 04103. Its selected-set median is $2,448.50, a $613 spread, while the county Zillow figure is $2,445. The distribution therefore presents a real current asking-index range rather than one uniform county price signal. The decision question is not simply which label has the lowest index: it is whether a unit’s current quote, bedroom configuration, and applicant budget remain workable when considered alongside the distinct historical ACS and administrative HUD reference series below.

Do not collapse the three sources into one rent measure. ACS 2024 five-year ZCTA median gross-rent estimates range from $1,392 to $1,956; the county ACS value is $1,589. These are survey estimates, not current ZORI observations. Separately, HUD’s FY2026 two-bedroom administrative standard supplied for each displayed ZIP is $1,716, versus the county FMR of $1,833. The direct Zillow index equals 1.23 to 1.59 times that ZIP-specific HUD standard. This ratio contextualizes the two price references only; it does not convert a non-bedroom-specific Zillow index into a two-bedroom asking rent or determine unit eligibility.

ACS burden and vacancy measures sharpen the budget-and-search trade-off but do not guarantee affordability or availability. The selected ZCTAs represent 31,600 renter households, and renter shares vary from 19.6% to 77.3%, so the readings sit within markedly different tenure mixes. The share of renter households paying at least 30% of income ranges from 43.8% to 53.5%; reported vacancy ranges from 3.7% to 10.2%. For example, 04101 combines 10.2% vacancy with 50.0% burden, while 04096 has 3.7% vacancy and 50.1% burden. These cross-sectional ACS readings do not establish why differences occur or identify units for rent; vacancy should not be read as live availability.

Coverage and geography limit precision. The display includes all eligible direct-ZORI matches under the stated rule, yet the supplied selected-evidence set is explicitly not an exhaustive county inventory. County assignment follows the largest HUD residential-address share, although a ZIP can cross county lines. ACS values correspond to ZCTAs, statistical areas that are not identical to USPS delivery ZIPs. Before a property-level decision, confirm the actual address, a date-specific quoted rent, bedroom count, included utilities and fees, lease length, occupancy timing, and any screening or income requirements. Also obtain written confirmation of deposit, renewal, and other recurring-charge terms. A current quote may vary by unit and timing, details that none of the ZIP-level measures specifies.

Selected ZIP evidence

Keep each source universe visible

All 8 eligible direct-evidence ZIP profiles are shown.

ZIP / ZCTAZillow asking rentACS gross rentHUD 2BRBurden 30%+VacancyIncome screenHUD county share
04101$2,389$1,566$1,71650.0%10.2%$96k100.0%
04103$2,722$1,620$1,71649.8%5.9%$109k100.0%
04106$2,533$1,812$1,71653.2%4.9%$101k100.0%
04102$2,401$1,543$1,71643.8%7.2%$96k100.0%
04092$2,427$1,392$1,71645.4%4.6%$97k100.0%
04011$2,109$1,469$1,71653.5%6.4%$84k100.0%
04074$2,694$1,956$1,71649.4%10.2%$108k100.0%
04096$2,470$1,693$1,71650.1%3.7%$99k100.0%
READ BEFORE USING

ZCTA data are ACS 2024 five-year survey estimates, whereas ZCTAs are statistical approximations rather than USPS delivery ZIPs; they should not be treated as current address-level or property-level measurements.

The displayed ZIPs are assigned to Cumberland County by the largest HUD residential-address share and the direct-evidence selection is not an exhaustive inventory; ZIP geography may cross county lines, so verify the property’s actual address, county, quote date, unit terms, and bedroom count.

SOURCE LEDGERCensus ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stockACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30Census ACS five-year — ZCTA housing and incomeACS 2024 5-year ZCTA · pulled 2026-08-08HUD Fair Market Rents — Section 8 standardFY2026 FMR · pulled 2026-07-26HUD-USPS ZIP-to-county residential-address crosswalkHUD-USPS 2026Q1 · pulled 2026-08-09Zillow ZHVI and ZORI — county values and rentscounty ZHVI/ZORI 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-26Zillow ZORI — ZIP market rentsZORI ZIP 2026-06 · pulled 2026-08-08
Cities & communities

Where people live within Cumberland County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Portland city68.9KSouth Portland city26.9KWestbrook city20.8KBrunswick CDP17.7KGorham CDP7.6KYarmouth CDP6.3KOak Hill CDP5.6KNorth Windham CDP5.4K
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

23 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Portland cityIncorporated place
    68,854
  2. 02
    South Portland cityIncorporated place
    26,930
  3. 03
    Westbrook cityIncorporated place
    20,775
  4. 04
    Brunswick CDPCensus-designated place
    17,652
  5. 05
    Gorham CDPCensus-designated place
    7,593
  6. 06
    Yarmouth CDPCensus-designated place
    6,289
  7. 07
    Oak Hill CDPCensus-designated place
    5,631
  8. 08
    North Windham CDPCensus-designated place
    5,417
  9. 09
    Cumberland Center CDPCensus-designated place
    2,790
  10. 10
    Dunstan CDPCensus-designated place
    2,363
  11. 11
    Falmouth Foreside CDPCensus-designated place
    2,051
  12. 12
    Steep Falls CDPCensus-designated place
    1,861
Show 11 more places
  1. 13
    Bridgton CDPCensus-designated place
    1,756
  2. 14
    Falmouth CDPCensus-designated place
    1,585
  3. 15
    Freeport CDPCensus-designated place
    1,441
  4. 16
    South Windham CDPCensus-designated place
    1,212
  5. 17
    Gray CDPCensus-designated place
    938
  6. 18
    Little Falls CDPCensus-designated place
    718
  7. 19
    Cousins Island CDPCensus-designated place
    658
  8. 20
    Casco CDPCensus-designated place
    618
  9. 21
    Naples CDPCensus-designated place
    527
  10. 22
    Standish CDPCensus-designated place
    360
  11. 23
    Littlejohn Island CDPCensus-designated place
    73

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.093% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax1.04%

$4,707 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration+512

9,380 in · 8,868 out

Arriving vs leaving income+$9,016

$85,960 arriving · $76,944 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors7.3%

248 of 3,374 mortgages

investorother financed
Current listing pressure

What sellers and visible supply are doing

Realtor.com® Economic Research · county inventory 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-28
Active listings824▲ 14.2% year over year
Median days on market32▼ 14.7% year over year
Listings price-reduced17.5%seller-concession signal
Median listing pricen/a▼ 3.0% year over year

Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.

Same metro

The other counties in Portland, ME

A metro is an average of these. Which side of a county line a property sits on can change the tax bill, the hazard profile and the tenant pool.

CountyPopulationPriceRentYieldHazard
Cumberland County308,827$574k$2,4455.1%inland flooding
York County216,731$537k$2,1514.8%inland flooding
Sagadahoc County37,285$443k$1,8685.1%inland flooding
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Published gross yield omits operating costs, vacancy, insurance, and financing.
  2. County-level listing and migration evidence may not translate to a specific neighborhood or property type.
  3. County-average inland-flood loss may materially understate a parcel’s exposure or insurance cost.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Is HUD FMR a substitute for county market asking rent?

No. It is a payment standard, not an estimate of asking rent, and cannot be used to calculate a separate market yield.

What share of purchases involved investor mortgages?

Investor mortgages represented 7.35% of 3,374 purchases.

What climate hazard is identified and what is the modeled loss metric?

Inland flood is the dominant hazard, with modeled annual building-value loss of 0.09%.