Counties / South Dakota / Harding County

Harding County, SD

FIPS 46063 · population 1,148 · outside every metro area

$269k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$269k
▲ 16.8% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
ACS median gross rent
$521
occupied-unit survey; not current asking rent
Census ACS · surveyed
Gross yield
n/a
gross yield cannot be computed without measured market rent
requires both measured price and measured rent
HUD 2-bed standard
$948
the Section 8 payment standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

One annual series is unavailable
FHFA five-year cumulativen/anot annualized · through n/a
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06+16.8%FHFA HPIperiod n/an/a
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-07-28.
Owner-reported value$166k
Surveyed gross rent$521
Rent burden 30%+5.1%
Median year built1973
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
27.6%vacant
688estimated housing units
Occupied tenure23.5% renter
owner 76.5%renter 23.5%
Structure mix67.0% single-family
Single-family 67.0%20+ units 0.0%Mobile home 24.3%Other 8.7%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs453▲ 2.0% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments69annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$973▲ 8.5% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorConstruction29.4% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS+2.0%WEEKLY WAGE+8.5%Construction29.4%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Harding County presents a thin-market decision tension: the supplied Zillow county home-value measure is $269,462 and up 16.76%, but the county has 1,148 residents and only five purchase mortgages, with a 0% investor share. That combination warrants investigating whether a specific property has durable local demand, rather than treating headline appreciation as investable liquidity. Investors should be cautious until comparable rents, completed sales, and a property-level exit path are verified.

02Housing economics

No market rent is published, so gross yield cannot be computed. HUD’s two-bedroom FMR of $948 is a payment standard, not an asking-rent estimate, and cannot fill that gap. The effective property-tax rate is 1.12%, with median annual tax of $1,863. Those figures establish carrying-cost benchmarks, but price appreciation without rent evidence cannot show whether operating income supports the price; insurance, repairs, vacancy, and financing are also not supplied.

03Demand & competition

QCEW reports 453 annual average covered jobs in the county, up 2.03%, and a $973 average weekly wage, up 8.47%. Construction is the largest disclosed private supersector, representing 29.41% of private covered jobs; this is workplace employment, not resident employment or the whole economy. The wage and job measures provide limited demand context, not an affordability test. Realtor.com listing-market measures are not supplied, so visible supply, marketing time, seller price reductions, and listing-based competition cannot be assessed.

04Risk & next checks

Inland flood is the dominant hazard, and the modeled annual building-value loss ratio is 0.19%; that is not a property-specific loss estimate or insurance quote. FHFA repeat-transaction evidence, migration flows and incomes, operating expenses, financing terms, and property-level condition are not published. The incomplete record prevents a defensible conclusion on yield, migration-backed demand, or exit liquidity. Next checks are rent comps, closed-sale comps, flood maps and elevation, insurance, taxes, utilities, and a physical inspection.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Harding County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Buffalo town278Camp Crook town41
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

2 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Buffalo townIncorporated place
    278
  2. 02
    Camp Crook townIncorporated place
    41

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.194% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax1.12%

$1,863 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migrationn/a

Household flow not published

Arriving vs leaving incomen/a

Income flow not published

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors0.0%

0 of 5 mortgages

investorother financed
No rent index is published for this county.Zillow’s county rent series does not cover every county, and estimating one from a neighbouring county would be a guess wearing a number’s clothes. Everything above is measured here; no wider market is mapped for it either.
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. The apparent price strength may not translate into income because market rent and gross yield are unpublished.
  2. The small purchase-mortgage sample and absent Realtor listing metrics may conceal weak exit liquidity or buyer competition.
  3. Inland-flood exposure, insurance terms, elevation, and property condition could make the county-level modeled loss an inadequate cost measure.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Can gross yield be calculated from this record?

No. Market rent is not published, and HUD FMR is a payment standard rather than market rent.

What does the employment evidence actually measure?

QCEW measures annual average covered jobs located at county workplaces and their covered-worker wage; it is not resident employment, unemployment, or a metro series.

What hazard requires property-level checking?

Inland flood; the county modeled loss ratio does not provide a property-specific loss estimate or insurance quote.