Counties / Michigan / Kent County

Kent County, MI

FIPS 26081 · population 663,150 · part of Grand Rapids, MI

$361k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
Direct county rent answer

What does rent cost in Kent County, MI?

The latest county-level Zillow ZORI is $1,630 per month in 2026-06. It is a typical asking-rent index across rental types—not an arithmetic average, signed lease or quote for one property.

County Zillow ZORI$1,6302026-06 · up 2.8% year over year
County ACS gross rent$1,243ACS 2024 5-year · occupied-renter survey
HUD two-bedroom FMR$1,531FY2026 · administrative standard
HUD Fair Market Rent by bedroom count in Kent County
BedroomsHUD monthly FMRGeographyMeasurement boundary
Studio$1,232Kent County, MIHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
1 bedroom$1,278Kent County, MIHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
2 bedrooms$1,531Kent County, MIHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
3 bedrooms$1,980Kent County, MIHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
4 bedrooms$2,189Kent County, MIHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.

Zillow asking rent, ACS gross rent and HUD FMR describe different housing universes. They remain separate and no metro, city or neighboring-county value replaces missing county evidence.Zillow pulled 2026-07-26 · HUD pulled 2026-07-26

The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$361k
▲ 4.1% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
Median asking rent
$1,630
▲ 2.8% year over year
Zillow ZORI · direct
Gross yield
5.4%
annual rent ÷ price, before costs
derived: rent × 12 ÷ price ✓
HUD 2-bed standard
$1,531
market rent is 1.06x the standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

Both annual signals move in the same direction
FHFA five-year cumulative+60.2%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06+4.1%FHFA HPI2025+4.5%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-08-02.
Owner-reported value$290k
Surveyed gross rent$1,243
Rent burden 30%+49.0%
Median year built1977
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
4.6%vacant
269,136estimated housing units
Occupied tenure29.7% renter
owner 70.3%renter 29.7%
Structure mix71.4% single-family
Single-family 71.4%20+ units 8.0%Mobile home 3.8%Other 16.8%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs417,325▲ 0.4% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments18,477annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$1,246▲ 4.0% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorEducation and health services20.2% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS+0.4%WEEKLY WAGE+4.0%Education and health services20.2%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2021-2025; latest 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-08-02. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

Resident income

How local income has compounded

BEA per-capita personal income divides all personal income by the county population. It is broader than wages, but it is not household income or a measure of what renters can afford.

Per-capita personal income19692024
Per-capita personal income history for Kent CountyA line chart of annual BEA per-capita personal income from 1969 through 2024.$0k$40k$80k196919972024$4k$73k
Nominal annual dollars; not adjusted for inflation. A rising line can reflect wage, business-income, transfer-income and investment-income changes together.
Renter affordability

Who carries the heaviest rent burden

HUD CHAS separates renter households by income relative to local HAMFI. Moderate burden means housing costs above 30% through 50% of income; severe burden means more than 50%.

Share of renter households in each income band2018-2022
Renter cost burden by HAMFI income band in Kent CountyFive horizontal bars show moderate and severe housing cost burden shares among renter households in each HUD income band.0%25%50%75%100%At or below 30% HAMFI18,48575.7% burdened30–50% HAMFI12,97085.5% burdened50–80% HAMFI17,89540.2% burdened80–100% HAMFI8,6409.7% burdenedAbove 100% HAMFI17,8002.2% burdened
Moderate: >30% to 50%Severe: >50%
Each percentage uses HUD’s published subtotal for that income band. For disclosure, HUD keeps 0 as 0, publishes 1–7 households as 4 and rounds 8 or more to the nearest 5. Independently rounded categories can differ from their displayed sum and are not forced into a percentage.
Direct local rental evidence

Recent leases and rental-market liquidity in Kent County, MI

These Apartment List observations match the exact county Census code 26081. They are kept separate from Zillow asking rent, Census occupied-home rent and wider metro measures.

Direct recent-lease rent history

Monthly overall-rent index; missing observations are not filled from another geography.

$1,326$1,236$1,1452021-082026-07
Recent-lease rent$1,3242026-07 · +1.8% year over year
Rental vacancy4.8%2026-07 · -1.0 percentage points year over year
Time on marketn/an/a
County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Kent County presents a decision tension: a positive headline gross yield against carrying-cost, supply, and flood diligence rather than a simple appreciation case. For buyers able to verify operating costs and flood exposure, Zillow’s 2026-06 county median home value was $361,485, up 4.06%, while the published median asking rent was $1,630 per month and the stated gross yield was 5.41%. Investors needing durable net cash flow should be cautious until taxes, insurance, repairs, and vacancy are property-specific.

02Housing economics

The yield uses measured market rent, not HUD Fair Market Rent; FMR is a payment standard and cannot substitute for asking rent. The effective property-tax rate is 1.11%, with a $3,217 median annual tax, material carrying-cost inputs beside price. FHFA’s 2025 repeat-transaction HPI rose 4.48% annually and 60.19% cumulatively over five years. It supports Zillow’s positive direction but is not a home value and should not be averaged with Zillow’s differently dated measure.

03Demand & competition

Realtor.com’s 2026-06 MLS evidence shows 888 active listings, an increase in visible supply, a reported median marketing time, and a published price-reduced share. These are asking-market supply and seller-concession signals—not sale prices or proof of buyer demand. The supplied QCEW annual workplace series identifies Education and health services as the largest disclosed private supersector; it is not resident employment or a forecast. Tax-return migration is slightly negative: more households moved out than in, and incoming movers’ average AGI was below outgoing movers’. Investor purchase mortgages represented 4.52% of total purchases, a minority of recorded activity that does not capture all-cash investors.

04Risk & next checks

Inland flood is the named dominant hazard, and modeled annual climate loss equals 0.09% of building value; it is a modeled expected loss, not a property insurance quote. The county record lacks insurance premiums, flood-zone status, deductible terms, vacancy, operating expenses, financing terms, property condition, lease mix, and closed-sale comparables. Those gaps prevent a net-yield conclusion, a parcel-level hazard assessment, and confirmation that MLS conditions translate into executable purchase pricing. Check each address’s tax bill, flood disclosure and insurance quote, rent roll, and recent closed comparables.

County ZIP rental landscape

How asking rent and renter pressure vary inside Kent County, MI

This view uses 12 direct Zillow ZIP markets matched to Census ZCTAs. Each ZIP is assigned by its largest HUD residential county share; this is not an exhaustive county inventory.

Selected ZIP range$1,392$1,871Zillow asking-rent index
Monthly spread$479highest minus lowest selected ZIP
Observed burden range37.4%54.9%ACS renter households paying 30%+
Renter households covered61,342across the selected ZCTAs
01 · ASKING RENT LADDERDirect ZIP ZORI
Horizontal bars compare Zillow asking-rent indexes across the selected direct-evidence ZIP set.49418$1,87149506$1,82849534$1,82349505$1,81749546$1,81049508$1,78049512$1,63849503$1,53949507$1,53649519$1,47549504$1,47349509$1,392
02 · PRESSURE MATRIXRent × observed burden
Each point is one selected ZIP and ZCTA match. Horizontal position is Zillow asking rent and vertical position is the ACS renter cost-burden share.57.4%51.8%46.2%40.6%34.9%495034950449508495074951249505495194954649418495094950649534Zillow asking-rent index →ACS burden share →
03 · BENCHMARK GAPZORI vs HUD 2BR
Bars show the percentage difference between the Zillow blended asking-rent index and the local HUD two-bedroom standard. Their housing universes differ.49418+140.3%49506+137.0%49534+136.7%49505+136.2%49546+135.7%49508+133.4%49512+122.8%49503+115.4%49507+115.1%49519+110.6%49504+110.4%49509+104.3%
WHAT THE LOCAL DISTRIBUTION SAYS

In the selected direct-evidence set, Zillow's June ZORI, a typical observed asking-rent index, runs from $1,392 to $1,871, with a $1,709 median and a $479 spread. The selected-set median is above the county Zillow value of $1,630, but it should be read as a selection-set result rather than a countywide average. The decision is therefore not simply which ZIP label appears least expensive: it is whether the target unit, household budget, and move timing fit the observed range, and where a property-by-property search is warranted. A ZIP label is a search filter, not a promise about a unit. The low end is represented by 49509; the upper end should not by itself be read as a better or worse rental choice.

Zillow, ACS, and HUD answer different questions and should not be merged. ACS five-year ZCTA median gross-rent survey estimates span $1,051 to $1,408; they are not current asking rents or a measure of change from ZORI. The packet's administrative, bedroom-specific HUD FMR is $1,334 in every shown record, while the county figure is $1,531; it is a program standard, not asking rent. ZORI is 4.3% to 40.3% above the ZIP HUD standard, useful for a screening comparison but not proof of a particular unit's rent. Differences in timing and measurement make conversion between these series inappropriate. The annual income mechanically required to hold ZORI at 30% of income runs from $55,680 to $74,840, before utilities, fees, or other household costs.

Affordability pressure does not line up neatly with ACS vacancy estimates. Across the shown ZCTAs, the ACS share of renter households spending at least 30% of income on rent ranges from 37.4% to 54.9%, around a county estimate of 49.0%. ACS vacancy rates range from 2.9% to 7.6%, versus 4.6% countywide. At the low-vacancy extreme, 49509 has a 53.2% burden share; at the high-vacancy extreme, 49504 has a 50.3% share. This cross-section does not establish a relationship, and a survey vacancy estimate does not identify an available unit. Rankings can change depending on whether the search screen is burden or vacancy. Check advertised rent, income rules, and lease terms directly.

The display covers 12 of 16 eligible matched ZIP/ZCTA records and 61,342 renter households, so it is selected evidence rather than an exhaustive county inventory. Assignment follows the largest HUD residential-address county share, not a boundary test. Displayed assignment shares of 64.4% and 84.9% mean that those ZIP-based records can include addresses outside Kent County. Census ZCTAs are statistical areas, not USPS delivery ZIPs. Before acting on any listing, verify the bedroom count, advertised rent, utility responsibility, recurring and move-in fees, deposit, income qualification, availability date, and that the address matches the intended geography. Confirm that any concessions are included in a written quote and apply to the required lease term.

Selected ZIP evidence

Keep each source universe visible

16 ZIP profiles passed the county gate; the 12 with the most renter households are shown.

ZIP / ZCTAZillow asking rentACS gross rentHUD 2BRBurden 30%+VacancyIncome screenHUD county share
49503$1,539$1,301$1,33437.4%7.1%$62k100.0%
49504$1,473$1,231$1,33450.3%7.6%$59k100.0%
49508$1,780$1,264$1,33454.9%4.5%$71k100.0%
49507$1,536$1,108$1,33453.2%3.9%$61k100.0%
49512$1,638$1,249$1,33445.1%7.4%$66k100.0%
49505$1,817$1,324$1,33451.0%3.7%$73k100.0%
49519$1,475$1,205$1,33451.2%6.7%$59k100.0%
49546$1,810$1,408$1,33448.4%3.5%$72k100.0%
49418$1,871$1,261$1,33448.9%4.1%$75k84.9%
49509$1,392$1,051$1,33453.2%2.9%$56k100.0%
49506$1,828$1,359$1,33442.5%3.8%$73k100.0%
49534$1,823$1,280$1,33439.2%3.6%$73k64.4%
READ BEFORE USING

Census ZCTAs are statistical areas rather than USPS delivery ZIPs, and the ACS figures are five-year survey estimates. They cannot establish conditions for a specific building, listing, household, or lease date.

ZIP records are assigned to Kent County using the largest HUD residential-address share, so cross-county geographies may include addresses elsewhere. The direct-evidence selection is not an exhaustive county inventory and does not provide property-level availability.

SOURCE LEDGERCensus ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stockACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30Census ACS five-year — ZCTA housing and incomeACS 2024 5-year ZCTA · pulled 2026-08-08HUD Fair Market Rents — Section 8 standardFY2026 FMR · pulled 2026-07-26HUD-USPS ZIP-to-county residential-address crosswalkHUD-USPS 2026Q1 · pulled 2026-08-09Zillow ZHVI and ZORI — county values and rentscounty ZHVI/ZORI 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-26Zillow ZORI — ZIP market rentsZORI ZIP 2026-06 · pulled 2026-08-08
Cities & communities

Where people live within Kent County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Grand Rapids city198.5KWyoming city77.4KKentwood city54.3KForest Hills CDP28.7KWalker city25.4KCutlerville CDP18.8KGrandville city16.4KNorthview CDP15.3K
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

20 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Grand Rapids cityIncorporated place
    198,535
  2. 02
    Wyoming cityIncorporated place
    77,353
  3. 03
    Kentwood cityIncorporated place
    54,296
  4. 04
    Forest Hills CDPCensus-designated place
    28,695
  5. 05
    Walker cityIncorporated place
    25,386
  6. 06
    Cutlerville CDPCensus-designated place
    18,780
  7. 07
    Grandville cityIncorporated place
    16,356
  8. 08
    Northview CDPCensus-designated place
    15,268
  9. 09
    East Grand Rapids cityIncorporated place
    11,445
  10. 10
    Comstock Park CDPCensus-designated place
    10,577
  11. 11
    Byron Center CDPCensus-designated place
    7,403
  12. 12
    Rockford cityIncorporated place
    6,218
Show 8 more places
  1. 13
    Sparta villageIncorporated place
    4,271
  2. 14
    Lowell cityIncorporated place
    4,139
  3. 15
    Cedar Springs cityIncorporated place
    3,670
  4. 16
    Caledonia villageIncorporated place
    1,671
  5. 17
    Kent City villageIncorporated place
    1,203
  6. 18
    Cannonsburg CDPCensus-designated place
    510
  7. 19
    Sand Lake villageIncorporated place
    484
  8. 20
    Casnovia villageIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    377

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.090% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax1.11%

$3,217 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration-227

15,118 in · 15,345 out

Arriving vs leaving income−$6,740

$61,718 arriving · $68,458 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors4.5%

335 of 7,404 mortgages

investorother financed
Current listing pressure

What sellers and visible supply are doing

Realtor.com® Economic Research · county inventory 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-28
Active listings888▲ 6.1% year over year
Median days on market32▼ 4.5% year over year
Listings price-reduced16.1%seller-concession signal
Median listing pricen/a▼ 0.4% year over year

Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.

Same metro

The other counties in Grand Rapids, MI

A metro is an average of these. Which side of a county line a property sits on can change the tax bill, the hazard profile and the tenant pool.

CountyPopulationPriceRentYieldHazard
Kent County663,150$361k$1,6305.4%inland flooding
Ottawa County301,203$402k$1,8025.4%inland flooding
Montcalm County67,816$242kn/an/ainland flooding
Ionia County66,574$270k$1,3626.1%inland flooding
Barry County63,409$307k$1,6986.6%inland flooding
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Property-level flood exposure, insurance cost, or deductibles may exceed the county modeled loss measure.
  2. Unpublished operating expenses, vacancy, and financing terms may reduce gross yield below an acceptable net result.
  3. County-level rent and MLS measures may not represent the target property’s submarket, condition, or executable purchase price.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Is the reported rent a HUD payment standard?

No. The record publishes median asking market rent separately; HUD Fair Market Rent is a payment standard.

What does the FHFA measure add to the price evidence?

It provides a repeat-transaction appreciation index, not a dollar home value or a closed-sale price.

Does the investor-share measure include all-cash acquisitions?

No. It is based on purchase mortgages to non-occupants, so all-cash investor activity is not captured.