Counties / South Dakota / Lawrence County

Lawrence County, SD

FIPS 46081 · population 27,233 · part of Spearfish, SD

$455k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$455k
▼ 1.2% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
Median asking rent
$1,428
n/a year over year
Zillow ZORI · direct
Gross yield
3.8%
annual rent ÷ price, before costs
derived: rent × 12 ÷ price ✓
HUD 2-bed standard
$1,046
market rent is 1.36x the standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

The annual signals disagree
FHFA five-year cumulative+68.1%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06−1.2%FHFA HPI2025+4.3%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-07-28.
Owner-reported value$347k
Surveyed gross rent$938
Rent burden 30%+33.9%
Median year built1987
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
18.8%vacant
14,840estimated housing units
Occupied tenure34.9% renter
owner 65.1%renter 34.9%
Structure mix69.7% single-family
Single-family 69.7%20+ units 6.8%Mobile home 9.4%Other 14.1%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs13,694▲ 0.9% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments1,687annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$980▲ 1.6% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorLeisure and hospitality32.2% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS+0.9%WEEKLY WAGE+1.6%Leisure and hospitality32.2%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Lawrence County presents a mixed entry screen: the $454,822 Zillow county median home value in 2026-06 was down 1.18% year over year, while published median asking rent was $1,428 per month and the supplied gross yield was 3.77%. Buyers needing high in-place income or verified sales pricing should be cautious; investigators willing to test individual leases and expenses have a measurable rent starting point, not a valuation conclusion.

02Housing economics

Housing economics require source separation. HUD’s two-bedroom FMR of $1,046 is a payment standard, not an asking-rent estimate, and cannot substitute for the published market rent or change the gross-yield calculation. The effective property-tax rate is 0.79%, a carrying-cost input beside price and rent. FHFA’s repeat-transaction HPI rose 4.28% in annual 2025; it is an index, not a home value. That direction conflicts with Zillow’s 2026-06 value movement, and the unlike methods and observation labels cannot be averaged.

03Demand & competition

Realtor.com’s MLS evidence indicates a less tight visible listing market: 254 active listings and median days on market of 76. These are asking-market supply and marketing-time measures, not closed prices or demand proof. Tax-return migration was net positive, and movers in had average income $28,757 above movers out, a useful demand screen but not tenant-income evidence. Investor mortgages accounted for 14.33% of 314 purchases, indicating buyer competition within that purchase subset rather than all transactions.

04Risk & next checks

Risk remains property-specific. Inland flood is the dominant hazard, and modeled climate loss equals 0.20% of building value per year; this is not a dollar loss, flood-zone determination, or insurance quote. QCEW reports annual covered jobs at county workplaces, not resident employment, and names leisure and hospitality as the largest disclosed private supersector rather than the whole economy. Missing property-level flood and insurance records, vacancy and operating expenses, lease terms, closed-sale comparables, and financing terms prevent a net-cash-flow, value, or resilience conclusion.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Lawrence County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Spearfish city12.9KLead city3KNorth Spearfish CDP1.9KDeadwood city1.2KWhitewood city912Boulder Canyon CDP841Mountain Plains CDP350Crook City CDP279
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

10 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Spearfish cityIncorporated place
    12,930
  2. 02
    Lead cityIncorporated place
    3,006
  3. 03
    North Spearfish CDPCensus-designated place
    1,858
  4. 04
    Deadwood cityIncorporated place
    1,209
  5. 05
    Whitewood cityIncorporated place
    912
  6. 06
    Boulder Canyon CDPCensus-designated place
    841
  7. 07
    Mountain Plains CDPCensus-designated place
    350
  8. 08
    Crook City CDPCensus-designated place
    279
  9. 09
    Central City cityIncorporated place
    140
  10. 10
    St. Onge CDPCensus-designated place
    40

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.200% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax0.79%

$2,744 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration+441

1,427 in · 986 out

Arriving vs leaving income+$28,757

$93,281 arriving · $64,524 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors14.3%

45 of 314 mortgages

investorother financed
Current listing pressure

What sellers and visible supply are doing

Realtor.com® Economic Research · county inventory 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-28
Active listings254▲ 10.4% year over year
Median days on market76▲ 18.2% year over year
Listings price-reduced16.7%seller-concession signal
Median listing pricen/a▼ 2.7% year over year

Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.

Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Flood exposure, insurance availability, and mitigation costs may differ materially by parcel.
  2. Unpublished vacancy, operating expenses, and lease terms could make gross yield a poor proxy for cash flow.
  3. MLS listing conditions may not translate to closed-sale pricing or future tenant demand.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Is a county market rent available for a gross-yield screen?

Yes. The record publishes a county median asking rent and a supplied gross yield.

How much investor participation is shown in the purchase-mortgage data?

Investor mortgages represented 14.33% of 314 purchases; this is a purchase-subset measure, not all transactions.

What hazard requires property-level diligence?

Inland flood is the dominant hazard, while the climate-loss measure remains modeled county-level evidence rather than a parcel-specific loss estimate.