Counties / Michigan / Marquette County

Marquette County, MI

FIPS 26103 · population 67,112 · part of Marquette, MI

$266k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$266k
▲ 9.1% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
Median asking rent
$1,253
▲ 5.4% year over year
Zillow ZORI · direct
Gross yield
5.7%
annual rent ÷ price, before costs
derived: rent × 12 ÷ price ✓
HUD 2-bed standard
$1,137
market rent is 1.10x the standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

Both annual signals move in the same direction
FHFA five-year cumulative+69.5%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06+9.1%FHFA HPI2025+5.7%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-07-28.
Owner-reported value$217k
Surveyed gross rent$949
Rent burden 30%+53.6%
Median year built1971
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
15.9%vacant
33,607estimated housing units
Occupied tenure30.3% renter
owner 69.7%renter 30.3%
Structure mix73.7% single-family
Single-family 73.7%20+ units 6.0%Mobile home 4.2%Other 16.1%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs26,640▲ 1.0% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments1,823annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$1,102▲ 4.9% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorEducation and health services23.5% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS+1.0%WEEKLY WAGE+4.9%Education and health services23.5%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Marquette County presents a tension: recent value appreciation exceeded asking-rent growth, so income-focused buyers should test whether property-level costs preserve a modest gross return, while buyers relying on additional appreciation should be cautious. In Zillow’s county June 2026 reading, median home value was $265,628, up 9.12%, while median asking rent was $1,253, up 5.36%; the supplied gross yield is 5.66% before costs.

02Housing economics

Measured market rent, not a proxy based on assistance standards, supports that yield. HUD’s two-bedroom FMR is $1,137 monthly, but it is a payment standard rather than an asking-rent estimate. The effective property-tax rate is 0.97%; taxes, insurance, repairs, vacancy, debt terms, and property-level rent are needed to convert gross yield into net underwriting. FHFA’s 2025 HPI increased 5.71% annually; as a repeat-transaction index, it supports a positive direction but neither prices homes nor shares Zillow’s vintage or method.

03Demand & competition

Listing conditions complicate a simple scarcity reading. Realtor.com MLS active inventory grew 24.90% year over year, while median marketing time was 21 days and 13.82% of listings had price reductions. These are asking-price, visible-supply, marketing-time, and seller-concession evidence—not closed sales or proof of buyer demand. Tax-return migration was net positive by 109 households, and incoming movers’ average AGI exceeded outgoing movers’ by $8,600. Non-occupant mortgage purchases were a minority of total purchase mortgages, so reported investor participation does not establish investor-led pricing.

04Risk & next checks

Primary risk is inland flood: modeled expected annual building-value loss is 0.08%, a county-level model rather than a parcel exposure or insurance-cost estimate. QCEW measures annual covered employment at county workplaces and average covered-worker wages, not resident employment or a forecast; education and health services is only the largest disclosed private supersector. Missing parcel flood maps, insurance quotes, condition and utility costs, lease comps, vacancy and collection history, assessed-value detail, and closed-sale data prevent a net-yield, affordability, or resale-liquidity conclusion. Next checks are address-level hazard and insurance, executed rents and expense history, and recent comparable sales.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Marquette County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Marquette city21.3KIshpeming city6.2KNegaunee city4.7KHarvey CDP2.9KWest Ishpeming CDP2.9KK. I. Sawyer CDP2.8KTrowbridge Park CDP2.4KGwinn CDP1.4K
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

12 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Marquette cityIncorporated place
    21,325
  2. 02
    Ishpeming cityIncorporated place
    6,181
  3. 03
    Negaunee cityIncorporated place
    4,656
  4. 04
    Harvey CDPCensus-designated place
    2,880
  5. 05
    West Ishpeming CDPCensus-designated place
    2,851
  6. 06
    K. I. Sawyer CDPCensus-designated place
    2,817
  7. 07
    Trowbridge Park CDPCensus-designated place
    2,396
  8. 08
    Gwinn CDPCensus-designated place
    1,435
  9. 09
    Republic CDPCensus-designated place
    519
  10. 10
    Palmer CDPCensus-designated place
    309
  11. 11
    Big Bay CDPCensus-designated place
    306
  12. 12
    Michigamme CDPCensus-designated place
    229

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.082% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax0.97%

$2,109 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration+109

1,503 in · 1,394 out

Arriving vs leaving income+$8,600

$61,515 arriving · $52,915 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors5.8%

28 of 486 mortgages

investorother financed
Current listing pressure

What sellers and visible supply are doing

Realtor.com® Economic Research · county inventory 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-28
Active listings158▲ 24.9% year over year
Median days on market21▼ 43.8% year over year
Listings price-reduced13.8%seller-concession signal
Median listing pricen/a▲ 15.5% year over year

Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.

Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Parcel-specific flood exposure, insurance costs, or utility costs could erase the indicated gross-return cushion.
  2. Published asking rent may not be achieved after concessions, vacancy, collections, repairs, and financing costs.
  3. MLS listing and migration indicators may not translate into closed-sale liquidity or durable tenant demand.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Is market rent available for gross-yield underwriting?

Yes. The record publishes median asking market rent and a gross yield, but does not publish the expense inputs required for net yield.

Does HUD Fair Market Rent establish achievable asking rent?

No. The record identifies HUD FMR as a two-bedroom payment standard, not an estimate of market asking rent.

Does the record prove broad buyer demand?

No. It provides MLS inventory, marketing-time, and price-reduction evidence, but no closed-sale or transaction-demand evidence.