Counties / Michigan / Muskegon County

Muskegon County, MI

FIPS 26121 · population 175,961 · part of Muskegon, MI

$259k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$259k
▲ 4.8% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
Median asking rent
$1,212
▲ 8.2% year over year
Zillow ZORI · direct
Gross yield
5.6%
annual rent ÷ price, before costs
derived: rent × 12 ÷ price ✓
HUD 2-bed standard
$1,236
market rent is 0.98x the standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

Both annual signals move in the same direction
FHFA five-year cumulative+70.3%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06+4.8%FHFA HPI2025+6.7%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-07-28.
Owner-reported value$198k
Surveyed gross rent$1,028
Rent burden 30%+52.5%
Median year built1969
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
10.0%vacant
75,266estimated housing units
Occupied tenure21.9% renter
owner 78.1%renter 21.9%
Structure mix80.2% single-family
Single-family 80.2%20+ units 4.6%Mobile home 6.8%Other 8.4%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs62,028▼ 2.3% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments3,258annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$1,130▲ 10.5% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorManufacturing24.8% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS−2.3%WEEKLY WAGE+10.5%Manufacturing24.8%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Muskegon County’s tension is a usable headline gross yield against carrying-cost, labor, and flood uncertainty. Zillow reports a $258,867 median value, up 4.83%, and $1,212 median asking market rent, supporting a 5.62% supplied gross yield before costs. Buyers able to test site-level costs merit investigation; thin-margin cases warrant caution. FHFA’s repeat-transaction HPI rose 6.69%, directionally consistent with Zillow, but it is not a home value. The Zillow county and FHFA annual observations use different stated periods and methods; do not blend their growth rates.

02Housing economics

Rent increased 8.24%, which improves the gross screen, but neither yield nor rent measures vacancy, repairs, insurance, or financing. The effective property-tax rate is 1.18% and median annual tax is $2,348; each is a county statistic, not a bill for a selected parcel. HUD’s two-bedroom FMR is $1,236 per month. It is a payment standard, not an asking-rent estimate, and cannot replace the published market-rent figure or establish net income.

03Demand & competition

Annual QCEW workplace covered employment was 62,028, down 2.28%, while average weekly covered-worker wages rose 10.46%; Manufacturing is the largest disclosed private supersector, not the entire economy. On Realtor.com’s MLS listing market, active listings rose 5.96% and 17.21% carried reductions, visible supply and seller concessions rather than closed-sale pricing or proof of demand. Tax-return migration was net positive by 460 households, with incoming movers averaging $4,691 more AGI than outmovers. Investor purchases were 98 of 2,218 total purchases, a calculated 4.42% share: a minority, yet still a buyer cohort to identify at the neighborhood level.

04Risk & next checks

Inland flood is the dominant hazard; the modeled climate loss ratio is 0.08% of building value per year, not an inspection finding or a dollar loss. Missing flood-zone, elevation, insurance, deductible, condition, utility, vacancy, rent-roll, expense, and closed-sale-comparable data prevents a property-level net-yield, resilience, or exit-price conclusion. Next checks should tie parcel flood exposure and insurance quotes to actual leases, taxes, operating costs, and nearby sale evidence.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Muskegon County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Muskegon city37.2KNorton Shores city25KMuskegon Heights city9.8KWolf Lake CDP4.7KRoosevelt Park city4.1KNorth Muskegon city4.1KWhitehall city3KMontague city2.5K
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

13 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Muskegon cityIncorporated place
    37,226
  2. 02
    Norton Shores cityIncorporated place
    25,041
  3. 03
    Muskegon Heights cityIncorporated place
    9,841
  4. 04
    Wolf Lake CDPCensus-designated place
    4,654
  5. 05
    Roosevelt Park cityIncorporated place
    4,144
  6. 06
    North Muskegon cityIncorporated place
    4,098
  7. 07
    Whitehall cityIncorporated place
    3,024
  8. 08
    Montague cityIncorporated place
    2,531
  9. 09
    Twin Lake CDPCensus-designated place
    2,036
  10. 10
    Ravenna villageIncorporated place
    1,540
  11. 11
    Lakewood Club villageIncorporated place
    1,255
  12. 12
    Fruitport villageIncorporated place
    1,212
Show 1 more places
  1. 13
    Casnovia villageIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    377

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.075% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax1.18%

$2,348 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration+460

3,506 in · 3,046 out

Arriving vs leaving income+$4,691

$55,381 arriving · $50,690 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors4.4%

98 of 2,218 mortgages

investorother financed
Current listing pressure

What sellers and visible supply are doing

Realtor.com® Economic Research · county inventory 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-28
Active listings382▲ 6.0% year over year
Median days on market39▲ 2.0% year over year
Listings price-reduced17.2%seller-concession signal
Median listing pricen/a▼ 2.4% year over year

Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.

Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Property-specific flood exposure and insurance costs could overwhelm the headline gross yield.
  2. Covered-job contraction could weaken tenant payment capacity or absorption.
  3. County medians may not reflect a target property's rent, tax burden, condition, or sale comparables.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

What does the published rent measure?

It is median asking market rent, separate from HUD Fair Market Rent.

Can FHFA HPI be treated as the county's home value?

No. It is a repeat-transaction appreciation index rather than a dollar home-value estimate.

Does the record support a property-level net-yield conclusion?

No. Property-specific operating, insurance, vacancy, condition, and flood-exposure evidence is not published.