Counties / Arizona / Pinal County

Pinal County, AZ

FIPS 04021 · population 469,006 · part of Phoenix, AZ

$364k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$364k
▼ 2.6% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
Median asking rent
$1,839
▲ 0.8% year over year
Zillow ZORI · direct
Gross yield
6.1%
annual rent ÷ price, before costs
derived: rent × 12 ÷ price ✓
HUD 2-bed standard
$1,839
market rent is 1.00x the standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

The annual signals disagree
FHFA five-year cumulative+59.3%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06−2.6%FHFA HPI2025+1.1%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-07-28.
Owner-reported value$349k
Surveyed gross rent$1,537
Rent burden 30%+46.8%
Median year built2004
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
12.3%vacant
184,651estimated housing units
Occupied tenure18.3% renter
owner 81.7%renter 18.3%
Structure mix78.5% single-family
Single-family 78.5%20+ units 1.3%Mobile home 15.8%Other 4.4%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs80,218▲ 3.3% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments5,343annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$1,181▲ 5.6% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorTrade, transportation, and utilities24.5% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS+3.3%WEEKLY WAGE+5.6%Trade, transportation, and utilities24.5%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Pinal County presents a buy-box tension: a falling Zillow value backdrop sits beside positive measured asking-rent economics. In June 2026, the county median home value was $363,684, down 2.56% year over year, while median asking rent was $1,839 per month and reported gross yield was 6.07% before costs. Income-focused buyers should investigate whether that spread survives expenses; price-sensitive and hazard-constrained underwriters should be cautious. The rent is measured market asking-rent evidence. HUD’s two-bedroom FMR has the same dollar figure, but it is a payment standard, not an asking-rent estimate or a basis to calculate yield.

02Housing economics

Price measures should not be combined. FHFA’s 2025 repeat-transaction HPI increased 1.11% over its annual comparison and 59.26% cumulatively over five years; it tracks repeat sales rather than a dollar home value, and neither rate can be blended with Zillow’s June 2026 change. At Realtor.com’s June 2026 MLS inventory observation, active listings were lower than a year earlier and 27.86% had price reductions. These are asking-market supply and seller-concession signals, not closed sales or independent proof of buyer demand. The effective property-tax rate was 0.47%, a carrying-cost input against the pre-cost yield.

03Demand & competition

Demand evidence is mixed rather than conclusive. Tax-return household migration produced net migration of 6,770, and average AGI for movers-in exceeded movers-out by $10,683; this describes filing-household movement and income, not tenant demand. Non-owner-occupant purchase mortgages represented 3.19% of total purchases, quantifying one buyer-competition channel but not cash buyers. QCEW’s 2025 annual series reports growth in covered workplace employment and average weekly wage; Trade, transportation, and utilities was the largest disclosed private supersector. These are county workplace measures, not resident employment, unemployment, or a forecast.

04Risk & next checks

Risk limits remain material. Inland flood is the dominant hazard, and modeled annual climate loss equals 0.17% of building value; this is a modeled ratio, not a property insurance quote or realized loss. Vacancy, lease-renewal, operating-expense, insurance, flood-zone, condition, financing, and closed-sale-comparable evidence is not published. That prevents a net-yield conclusion and prevents testing whether county figures fit a specific asset. Next checks are address-level flood and insurance records, rent rolls and achieved-rent comparables, tax assessment, and current sale comparables.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Pinal County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
San Tan Valley CDP109.2KQueen Creek town*71.9KMaricopa city67.2KCasa Grande city60.9KMarana town*56.9KApache Junction city*41.1KFlorence town25.6KEloy city17.4K
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

44 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    San Tan Valley CDPCensus-designated place
    109,189
  2. 02
    Queen Creek townIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    71,867
  3. 03
    Maricopa cityIncorporated place
    67,163
  4. 04
    Casa Grande cityIncorporated place
    60,905
  5. 05
    Marana townIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    56,938
  6. 06
    Apache Junction cityIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    41,058
  7. 07
    Florence townIncorporated place
    25,570
  8. 08
    Eloy cityIncorporated place
    17,433
  9. 09
    Coolidge cityIncorporated place
    16,636
  10. 10
    Gold Canyon CDPCensus-designated place
    13,107
  11. 11
    Saddlebrooke CDPCensus-designated place
    13,085
  12. 12
    Arizona City CDPCensus-designated place
    9,543
Show 32 more places
  1. 13
    San Manuel CDPCensus-designated place
    3,491
  2. 14
    Sacaton CDPCensus-designated place
    3,429
  3. 15
    Red Rock CDP (Pinal County)Census place
    3,277
  4. 16
    Oracle CDPCensus-designated place
    3,146
  5. 17
    Superior townIncorporated place
    2,535
  6. 18
    Kearny townIncorporated place
    2,109
  7. 19
    Blackwater CDPCensus-designated place
    1,958
  8. 20
    Casa Blanca CDPCensus-designated place
    1,697
  9. 21
    Mammoth townIncorporated place
    1,191
  10. 22
    Ak-Chin Village CDPCensus-designated place
    1,132
  11. 23
    Queen Valley CDPCensus-designated place
    1,118
  12. 24
    Dudleyville CDPCensus-designated place
    684
  13. 25
    Stanfield CDPCensus-designated place
    646
  14. 26
    Cactus Forest CDPCensus-designated place
    640
  15. 27
    Sacaton Flats Village CDPCensus-designated place
    604
  16. 28
    Goodyear Village CDPCensus-designated place
    590
  17. 29
    Wet Camp Village CDPCensus-designated place
    397
  18. 30
    Hayden townIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    331
  19. 31
    Picacho CDPCensus-designated place
    297
  20. 32
    Lower Santan Village CDPCensus-designated place
    289
  21. 33
    Sacate Village CDPCensus-designated place
    283
  22. 34
    Chuichu CDPCensus-designated place
    278
  23. 35
    Upper Santan Village CDPCensus-designated place
    234
  24. 36
    Winkelman townIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    191
  25. 37
    Vaiva Vo CDPCensus-designated place
    184
  26. 38
    Top-of-the-World CDPCensus-designated place · spans 2 counties
    142
  27. 39
    Sweet Water Village CDPCensus-designated place
    106
  28. 40
    Stotonic Village CDPCensus-designated place
    78
  29. 41
    Campo Bonito CDPCensus-designated place
    0
  30. 42
    Kohatk CDPCensus-designated place
    0
  31. 43
    Santa Cruz CDPCensus-designated place
    0
  32. 44
    Tat Momoli CDPCensus-designated place
    0

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.167% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax0.47%

$1,636 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration+6,770

20,487 in · 13,717 out

Arriving vs leaving income+$10,683

$70,276 arriving · $59,593 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors3.2%

361 of 11,304 mortgages

investorother financed
Current listing pressure

What sellers and visible supply are doing

Realtor.com® Economic Research · county inventory 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-28
Active listings2,660▼ 4.0% year over year
Median days on market68▼ 3.5% year over year
Listings price-reduced27.9%seller-concession signal
Median listing pricen/a▼ 2.1% year over year

Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.

Same metro

The other counties in Phoenix, AZ

A metro is an average of these. Which side of a county line a property sits on can change the tax bill, the hazard profile and the tenant pool.

CountyPopulationPriceRentYieldHazard
Pinal County469,006$364k$1,8396.1%inland flooding
Maricopa County4,559,748$461k$1,7294.5%inland flooding
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Property-specific flood exposure and insurance cost may differ materially from the county modeled loss ratio.
  2. Reported gross yield excludes expenses, while vacancy, leasing, and operating-cost evidence is not published.
  3. MLS listings and Zillow and FHFA measures may not translate into a subject property's closed-sale exit value.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Does HUD Fair Market Rent validate the county's asking rent?

No. HUD FMR is a two-bedroom payment standard, while the supplied rent figure is measured median asking rent.

Can FHFA appreciation be blended with Zillow's county value change?

No. FHFA is a repeat-transaction index for 2025, while Zillow is a county home-value observation for June 2026.

Can net yield be underwritten from this record?

No. The record provides gross yield before costs but does not publish vacancy, operating expenses, insurance, financing, or property-specific condition data.