Counties / California / Placer County

Placer County, CA

FIPS 06061 · population 419,156 · part of Sacramento, CA

$695k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
Direct county rent answer

What does rent cost in Placer County, CA?

The latest county-level Zillow ZORI is $2,627 per month in 2026-06. It is a typical asking-rent index across rental types—not an arithmetic average, signed lease or quote for one property.

County Zillow ZORI$2,6272026-06 · up 2.4% year over year
County ACS gross rent$2,069ACS 2024 5-year · occupied-renter survey
HUD two-bedroom FMR$2,255FY2026 · administrative standard
HUD Fair Market Rent by bedroom count in Placer County
BedroomsHUD monthly FMRGeographyMeasurement boundary
Studio$1,748Placer County, CAHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
1 bedroom$1,832Placer County, CAHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
2 bedrooms$2,255Placer County, CAHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
3 bedrooms$3,002Placer County, CAHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
4 bedrooms$3,460Placer County, CAHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.

Zillow asking rent, ACS gross rent and HUD FMR describe different housing universes. They remain separate and no metro, city or neighboring-county value replaces missing county evidence.Zillow pulled 2026-07-26 · HUD pulled 2026-07-26

The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$695k
▼ 0.2% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
Median asking rent
$2,627
▲ 2.4% year over year
Zillow ZORI · direct
Gross yield
4.5%
annual rent ÷ price, before costs
derived: rent × 12 ÷ price ✓
HUD 2-bed standard
$2,255
market rent is 1.17x the standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

The annual signals disagree
FHFA five-year cumulative+33.5%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06−0.2%FHFA HPI2025+0.9%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-08-02.
Owner-reported value$688k
Surveyed gross rent$2,069
Rent burden 30%+57.9%
Median year built1994
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
11.9%vacant
179,266estimated housing units
Occupied tenure25.2% renter
owner 74.8%renter 25.2%
Structure mix81.8% single-family
Single-family 81.8%20+ units 5.4%Mobile home 2.5%Other 10.3%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs188,161▲ 0.7% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments16,692annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$1,460▲ 4.3% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorEducation and health services23.2% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS+0.7%WEEKLY WAGE+4.3%Education and health services23.2%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2021-2025; latest 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-08-02. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

Resident income

How local income has compounded

BEA per-capita personal income divides all personal income by the county population. It is broader than wages, but it is not household income or a measure of what renters can afford.

Per-capita personal income19692024
Per-capita personal income history for Placer CountyA line chart of annual BEA per-capita personal income from 1969 through 2024.$0k$45k$90k196919972024$4k$88k
Nominal annual dollars; not adjusted for inflation. A rising line can reflect wage, business-income, transfer-income and investment-income changes together.
Renter affordability

Who carries the heaviest rent burden

HUD CHAS separates renter households by income relative to local HAMFI. Moderate burden means housing costs above 30% through 50% of income; severe burden means more than 50%.

Share of renter households in each income band2018-2022
Renter cost burden by HAMFI income band in Placer CountyFive horizontal bars show moderate and severe housing cost burden shares among renter households in each HUD income band.0%25%50%75%100%At or below 30% HAMFI7,13075.8% burdened30–50% HAMFI5,96589.2% burdened50–80% HAMFI7,70072.4% burdened80–100% HAMFI4,74548.5% burdenedAbove 100% HAMFI14,4059.4% burdened
Moderate: >30% to 50%Severe: >50%
Each percentage uses HUD’s published subtotal for that income band. For disclosure, HUD keeps 0 as 0, publishes 1–7 households as 4 and rounds 8 or more to the nearest 5. Independently rounded categories can differ from their displayed sum and are not forced into a percentage.
Direct local rental evidence

Recent leases and rental-market liquidity in Placer County, CA

These Apartment List observations match the exact county Census code 06061. They are kept separate from Zillow asking rent, Census occupied-home rent and wider metro measures.

Direct recent-lease rent history

Monthly overall-rent index; missing observations are not filled from another geography.

$2,126$2,033$1,9402021-082026-07
Recent-lease rent$2,0652026-07 · -0.1% year over year
Rental vacancy4.0%2026-07 · +0.6 percentage points year over year
Time on marketn/an/a
County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Placer County presents a valuation-versus-income underwriting tension: Zillow’s county median home value was $694,843 in June 2026, while median asking rent was $2,627 per month and supplied gross yield was 4.54% before expenses. Zillow’s value measure edged down 0.18% year over year, whereas the FHFA repeat-transaction HPI rose 0.91% in annual 2025 data. These distinct methods and periods cannot be merged. This county merits investigation by investors able to verify property-level expenses; buyers reliant on appreciation or thin operating margins should be cautious.

02Housing economics

The median asking rent is above HUD’s two-bedroom FMR payment standard of $2,255. FMR is a payment standard, not an asking-rent estimate, and cannot validate market income. The effective property-tax rate is 0.85%, with a $5,812 median annual tax. The stated gross yield must absorb that tax and unreported insurance, maintenance, vacancy and management costs; without those data, net yield and cash flow cannot be calculated.

03Demand & competition

Tax-return migration shows net inflow of 1,992 households, and incoming movers’ average AGI exceeded outgoing movers’ by $15,171. Investor purchase mortgages represented 9.39% of purchase mortgages, indicating non-owner competition but not its pricing effect. Realtor.com’s MLS listing market had fewer active listings and shorter marketing times year over year, while its 43.66% pending-to-active ratio and price-reduced listings leave conditions mixed. Listing prices are asks, inventory is visible supply, and neither is a closed-sale measure or proof of buyer demand alone.

04Risk & next checks

Inland flood is the named dominant hazard, and modeled annual climate loss equals 0.16% of building value; the model does not establish a parcel’s exposure or insurability. QCEW’s annual 2025 figures cover jobs at county workplaces, with Education and health services the largest disclosed private supersector; they do not measure resident employment or unemployment. Missing vacancy, operating expenses, insurance quotes, financing terms, property condition and flood-zone data prevent a net-income, debt-service or asset-specific hazard conclusion. These require local verification before county averages can support an asset decision.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Placer County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Roseville city156KRocklin city73.3KLincoln city53KGranite Bay CDP21.7KAuburn city13.8KNorth Auburn CDP13.5KLoomis town6.9KMeadow Vista CDP3.2K
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

23 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Roseville cityIncorporated place
    155,955
  2. 02
    Rocklin cityIncorporated place
    73,327
  3. 03
    Lincoln cityIncorporated place
    52,956
  4. 04
    Granite Bay CDPCensus-designated place
    21,673
  5. 05
    Auburn cityIncorporated place
    13,768
  6. 06
    North Auburn CDPCensus-designated place
    13,480
  7. 07
    Loomis townIncorporated place
    6,853
  8. 08
    Meadow Vista CDPCensus-designated place
    3,162
  9. 09
    Kings Beach CDPCensus-designated place
    2,736
  10. 10
    Colfax cityIncorporated place
    2,407
  11. 11
    Sunnyside-Tahoe City CDPCensus-designated place
    1,599
  12. 12
    Newcastle CDPCensus-designated place
    1,585
Show 11 more places
  1. 13
    Foresthill CDPCensus-designated place
    1,483
  2. 14
    Dollar Point CDPCensus-designated place
    1,477
  3. 15
    Sheridan CDPCensus-designated place
    1,183
  4. 16
    Penryn CDPCensus-designated place
    1,114
  5. 17
    Cedar Flat CDPCensus-designated place
    1,089
  6. 18
    Tahoe Vista CDPCensus-designated place
    1,048
  7. 19
    Tahoma CDPCensus-designated place · spans 2 counties
    873
  8. 20
    Alta CDPCensus-designated place
    656
  9. 21
    Carnelian Bay CDPCensus-designated place
    391
  10. 22
    Dutch Flat CDPCensus-designated place
    200
  11. 23
    Kingvale CDPCensus-designated place · spans 2 counties
    0

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.158% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax0.84%

$5,812 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration+1,992

13,861 in · 11,869 out

Arriving vs leaving income+$15,171

$103,351 arriving · $88,180 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors9.4%

539 of 5,738 mortgages

investorother financed
Current listing pressure

What sellers and visible supply are doing

Realtor.com® Economic Research · county inventory 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-28
Active listings1,436▼ 6.4% year over year
Median days on market43▼ 2.8% year over year
Listings price-reduced19.2%seller-concession signal
Median listing pricen/a▲ 0.1% year over year

Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.

Same metro

The other counties in Sacramento, CA

A metro is an average of these. Which side of a county line a property sits on can change the tax bill, the hazard profile and the tenant pool.

CountyPopulationPriceRentYieldHazard
Placer County419,156$695k$2,6274.5%inland flooding
Sacramento County1,594,006$533k$2,1975.0%inland flooding
Yolo County220,564$625k$2,5064.8%inland flooding
El Dorado County192,662$662k$2,6174.7%inland flooding
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Unpublished vacancy, insurance, repair, management and financing costs could eliminate the stated pre-expense yield.
  2. County-level migration and workplace employment may not translate into demand for the subject submarket or unit type.
  3. Inland-flood exposure, insurance availability and modeled loss may differ materially by parcel.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Is HUD Fair Market Rent a measure of Placer County asking rent?

No. The record identifies FMR as a two-bedroom payment standard, while market rent is separately reported as median asking rent.

Do Zillow and FHFA provide one unified appreciation reading?

No. Zillow reports a county home-value change for June 2026, while FHFA reports a repeat-transaction index change for annual 2025.

Can net yield or cash flow be calculated from this record?

No. A pre-expense gross yield is supplied, but vacancy, operating expenses, insurance, management costs and financing terms are not published.