Counties / Michigan / Saginaw County

Saginaw County, MI

FIPS 26145 · population 188,665 · part of Saginaw, MI

$178k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$178k
▲ 7.3% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
Median asking rent
$1,142
▲ 7.6% year over year
Zillow ZORI · direct
Gross yield
7.7%
annual rent ÷ price, before costs
derived: rent × 12 ÷ price ✓
HUD 2-bed standard
$1,117
market rent is 1.02x the standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

Both annual signals move in the same direction
FHFA five-year cumulative+54.0%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06+7.3%FHFA HPI2025+3.8%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-07-28.
Owner-reported value$153k
Surveyed gross rent$947
Rent burden 30%+55.0%
Median year built1968
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
9.6%vacant
86,208estimated housing units
Occupied tenure25.9% renter
owner 74.1%renter 25.9%
Structure mix79.0% single-family
Single-family 79.0%20+ units 4.5%Mobile home 3.8%Other 12.7%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs80,199▲ 0.9% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments4,076annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$1,173▲ 5.1% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorTrade, transportation, and utilities22.9% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS+0.9%WEEKLY WAGE+5.1%Trade, transportation, and utilities22.9%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Saginaw County presents a yield-versus-resilience tension: Zillow’s 2026-06 county observation pairs a $177,680 median home value with $1,142 monthly median asking market rent and a 7.71% gross yield before costs. It warrants investigation by buyers who can verify expenses and flood exposure; buyers relying on appreciation or headline yield should be cautious. The market-rent measure is asking rent. HUD’s two-bedroom FMR is instead a payment standard, not an estimate of asking rent or a basis for recalculating yield.

02Housing economics

Within Zillow’s labeled county series, home value rose 7.32% year over year and asking rent 7.59%, setting the price-and-rent context for the supplied gross yield but not establishing net cash flow. The 1.50% effective property-tax rate is a material carrying-cost input against that gross measure. Separately, FHFA’s 2025 repeat-transaction HPI increased 3.82% annually. It supports a positive price direction but is neither a dollar home value nor a measure to average with Zillow, given the distinct method and labeled timing.

03Demand & competition

County workplace evidence is limited to worksites: QCEW annual covered employment was 80,199. Trade, transportation, and utilities is the largest disclosed private supersector, not the whole county economy or resident labor market. Tax-return households produced a net outflow of 341, while incoming movers’ average income exceeded outgoing movers’ by $2,728; this mix does not identify tenant demand. Investors accounted for 6.10% of 1,804 purchases, indicating participation but not whether they set prices or rents.

04Risk & next checks

Risk limits are material: modeled climate loss equals 0.14% of building value per year, and inland flood is the dominant hazard. That modeled ratio is not an insurance quote or a site-specific loss estimate. The record does not publish Realtor.com MLS listing figures for asking prices, active supply, marketing time, reductions, or pending listings; visible supply, seller concessions, and liquidity therefore cannot be assessed, nor can closed-sale prices be inferred. Obtain parcel flood and insurance evidence, actual taxes, leases, collections, vacancy, repairs, and financing terms before converting gross yield into net underwriting.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Saginaw County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Saginaw city43.5KFreeland CDP7.6KShields CDP7.4KBridgeport CDP6.9KBuena Vista CDP5.8KFrankenmuth city5.2KChesaning village2.5KSt. Charles village1.9K
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

16 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Saginaw cityIncorporated place
    43,536
  2. 02
    Freeland CDPCensus-designated place
    7,557
  3. 03
    Shields CDPCensus-designated place
    7,402
  4. 04
    Bridgeport CDPCensus-designated place
    6,884
  5. 05
    Buena Vista CDPCensus-designated place
    5,798
  6. 06
    Frankenmuth cityIncorporated place
    5,157
  7. 07
    Chesaning villageIncorporated place
    2,484
  8. 08
    St. Charles villageIncorporated place
    1,934
  9. 09
    Zilwaukee cityIncorporated place
    1,609
  10. 10
    Hemlock CDPCensus-designated place
    1,529
  11. 11
    Birch Run villageIncorporated place
    1,439
  12. 12
    Burt CDPCensus-designated place
    1,339
Show 4 more places
  1. 13
    Reese villageIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    1,274
  2. 14
    Merrill villageIncorporated place
    798
  3. 15
    Robin Glen-Indiantown CDPCensus-designated place
    660
  4. 16
    Oakley villageIncorporated place
    257

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.140% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax1.49%

$2,284 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration-341

3,690 in · 4,031 out

Arriving vs leaving income+$2,728

$55,227 arriving · $52,499 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors6.1%

110 of 1,804 mortgages

investorother financed
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Inland-flood exposure and related insurance or repair costs could consume gross income.
  2. Net outmigration may not support property-level tenant demand despite higher incoming mover income.
  3. Unpublished listing, vacancy, and transaction evidence may reveal weak liquidity or greater seller concessions.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Is the rental input measured market rent or HUD FMR?

Measured market rent is median monthly asking rent; HUD two-bedroom FMR is separately a payment standard.

What hazard requires parcel-level diligence?

Inland flood is the dominant hazard, while the published climate-loss measure is county-level modeled evidence rather than a site-specific estimate.

What buyer-competition measure is available?

Non-owner-occupant purchase mortgages represent 6.10% of total purchase mortgages; the record does not show their bidding behavior.