Counties / California / Shasta County

Shasta County, CA

FIPS 06089 · population 181,436 · part of Redding, CA

$377k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$377k
▼ 0.7% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
Median asking rent
$1,650
▲ 3.3% year over year
Zillow ZORI · direct
Gross yield
5.3%
annual rent ÷ price, before costs
derived: rent × 12 ÷ price ✓
HUD 2-bed standard
$1,590
market rent is 1.04x the standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

Both annual signals move in the same direction
FHFA five-year cumulative+29.2%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06−0.7%FHFA HPI2025−0.0%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-07-28.
Owner-reported value$366k
Surveyed gross rent$1,317
Rent burden 30%+53.3%
Median year built1982
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
11.0%vacant
80,068estimated housing units
Occupied tenure34.4% renter
owner 65.5%renter 34.4%
Structure mix73.1% single-family
Single-family 73.1%20+ units 3.9%Mobile home 9.8%Other 13.2%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs71,732▲ 2.3% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments9,061annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$1,178▲ 3.2% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorEducation and health services30.0% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS+2.3%WEEKLY WAGE+3.2%Education and health services30.0%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Shasta County presents a selective rental thesis, not a broad appreciation thesis: asking rent and covered wages are firm while current home-price evidence is soft, but nearly flat migration and inland-flood exposure require caution. An income-focused buyer should investigate parcel-level costs and rent support; a buyer depending on appreciation should be cautious. Zillow's 2026-06 median home value is $377,325, down 0.71% year over year. Its median asking rent is $1,650 per month, up 3.32%, producing a 5.25% gross yield before costs.

02Housing economics

Market rent is above HUD's $1,590 two-bedroom FMR, but FMR is a payment standard, not an asking-rent estimate, so it cannot validate lease-up. FHFA's 2025 repeat-transaction HPI was essentially flat and its cumulative five-year change was 29.21%; this is an appreciation index, not a home value, and it cannot be averaged with Zillow's different vintage. The effective property-tax rate is 0.69%; that rate and the missing asset-specific bill, insurance, and operating costs prevent a net-yield conclusion.

03Demand & competition

Demand evidence is mixed. QCEW records 71,732 annual covered workplace jobs and an average weekly wage of $1,178; this is workplace employment, not resident labor, and education and health services is only the largest disclosed private supersector, not the whole economy. Tax-return migration was nearly balanced, with net migration of -16, although incoming movers had higher average AGI than outgoing movers; counts and income therefore point in different directions. Realtor.com MLS evidence for 2026-06 shows 595 active listings, down 13.97%: visible supply is tighter, but this is not a closed-sale or buyer-demand measure. Investors made 104 of 1,856 purchases, or 5.6%, indicating participation without evidence of dominant investor competition.

04Risk & next checks

Risk limits are material. The modeled climate-loss ratio is 0.34%, and inland flood is the dominant hazard; verify flood status, elevation, drainage, claims, insurance, and deductible before relying on gross yield. The record does not publish vacancy, operating expenses, financing, property condition, or asset-specific rent comps, so net cash flow and rent durability cannot be underwritten. It also lacks closed-sale data and resident labor measures, preventing firm conclusions on exit pricing or employment stability. Next checks are a parcel file, verified rent comps, and a full operating statement.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Shasta County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Redding city93.4KAnderson city11.3KShasta Lake city10.3KCottonwood CDP (Shasta Co…7.4KHappy Valley CDP5.9KBella Vista CDP4.5KPalo Cedro CDP3.7KBurney CDP2.7K
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

32 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Redding cityIncorporated place
    93,409
  2. 02
    Anderson cityIncorporated place
    11,255
  3. 03
    Shasta Lake cityIncorporated place
    10,311
  4. 04
    Cottonwood CDP (Shasta County)Census place
    7,408
  5. 05
    Happy Valley CDPCensus-designated place
    5,944
  6. 06
    Bella Vista CDPCensus-designated place
    4,511
  7. 07
    Palo Cedro CDPCensus-designated place
    3,685
  8. 08
    Burney CDPCensus-designated place
    2,668
  9. 09
    Shingletown CDPCensus-designated place
    2,164
  10. 10
    Centerville CDP (Shasta County)Census place
    1,954
  11. 11
    Shasta CDPCensus-designated place
    1,387
  12. 12
    Jones Valley CDPCensus-designated place
    1,122
Show 20 more places
  1. 13
    Johnson Park CDPCensus-designated place
    943
  2. 14
    Millville CDPCensus-designated place
    939
  3. 15
    Mountain Gate CDPCensus-designated place
    742
  4. 16
    Oak Run CDPCensus-designated place
    596
  5. 17
    Lakehead CDPCensus-designated place
    577
  6. 18
    Fall River Mills CDPCensus-designated place
    444
  7. 19
    McArthur CDPCensus-designated place
    346
  8. 20
    Keswick CDPCensus-designated place
    240
  9. 21
    Whitmore CDPCensus-designated place
    207
  10. 22
    Castella CDPCensus-designated place
    204
  11. 23
    Round Mountain CDPCensus-designated place
    169
  12. 24
    French Gulch CDPCensus-designated place
    154
  13. 25
    Montgomery Creek CDPCensus-designated place
    134
  14. 26
    Cassel CDPCensus-designated place
    118
  15. 27
    Igo CDPCensus-designated place
    90
  16. 28
    Big Bend CDPCensus-designated place
    67
  17. 29
    Hat Creek CDPCensus-designated place
    57
  18. 30
    Ono CDPCensus-designated place
    37
  19. 31
    Old Station CDPCensus-designated place
    0
  20. 32
    Platina CDPCensus-designated place
    0

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.335% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax0.69%

$2,542 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration-16

3,730 in · 3,746 out

Arriving vs leaving income+$7,055

$66,269 arriving · $59,214 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors5.6%

104 of 1,856 mortgages

investorother financed
Current listing pressure

What sellers and visible supply are doing

Realtor.com® Economic Research · county inventory 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-28
Active listings595▼ 14.0% year over year
Median days on market54▼ 4.9% year over year
Listings price-reduced20.0%seller-concession signal
Median listing pricen/a▼ 3.2% year over year

Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.

Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Inland-flood exposure, insurance availability, deductibles, or property-level drainage problems could materially weaken the gross-yield case.
  2. Missing vacancy, operating, financing, insurance, condition, and asset-specific tax inputs could turn the supplied gross yield into inadequate net cash flow.
  3. Nearly balanced migration and the absence of closed-sale and resident-labor evidence leave tenant depth and exit pricing unproven.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Is the published rent a market-rent measure or a HUD standard?

It is median monthly asking rent; HUD FMR is a two-bedroom payment standard, not a market-rent estimate.

What does QCEW employment tell an underwriter?

It measures annual average covered jobs located at county workplaces and covered-worker wages; it is not resident employment, unemployment, or a metro series.

What prevents a net-cash-flow conclusion?

The record supplies gross yield and a tax-rate measure but does not publish vacancy, operating expenses, financing, insurance, condition, or asset-specific rent and tax inputs.