ZIP reports / NC / 27609
ZIP rental intelligence · 2026-06

ZIP 27609, Raleigh, NC

Asking rent, household capacity, housing stock and local context—kept at their original geographic and measurement scopes.

Direct local rent answer

What does rent cost in ZIP 27609?

The latest Zillow ZORI for ZIP 27609 is $1,529 per month in 2026-06. It is a typical observed asking-rent index across rental types—not an arithmetic average, signed lease or quote for one property.

Zillow asking-rent index$1,5292026-06 · down 0.6% year over year
ACS median gross rent$1,474ACS 2024 5-year survey · ±$65 margin of error
HUD two-bedroom standard$1,820Administrative FMR/SAFMR · not asking rent
Bedroom-level rent benchmarks in ZIP 27609
BedroomsModelled asking-rent lensHUD standardHow to use it
Studio$1,336ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,590HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
1 bedroom$1,395ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,660HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
2 bedrooms$1,529ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,820HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
3 bedrooms$1,915ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$2,280HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
4 bedrooms$2,562ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$3,050HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.

Bedroom estimates are modelled, not observed rents. Zillow, Census ACS and HUD describe different housing universes and remain separate throughout this report.Zillow pulled 2026-08-08

Median household income$83,065ACS 2024 5-year · ±$4,677 MOE
Renter share50.2%8,825 renter households
Rent burden 30%+50.1%4,417 observed households
Housing vacancy12.7%2,548 of 20,140 units
Six views · one local decision

Read the measures together, without merging them

ZORI tracks observed asking rent, ACS describes occupied renter homes, and HUD publishes an administrative benchmark. The charts preserve those differences and add wider context only where the geography is named.

Three definitions of rent

Useful as a spread, not interchangeable observations.

Three rent measures for ZIP 27609Zillow asking-rent index$1,529ACS median gross rent$1,474HUD two-bedroom standard$1,820

Affordability screen

Annual income implied by 30% of the current ZIP ZORI.

Income screen for ZIP 27609ACS median household income$83,065Income at 30% of ZIP ZORI$61,160

Bedroom ladder

Modelled from ZIP ZORI using the local HUD ladder.

Modelled bedroom rent ladder for ZIP 27609Studio$1,336One bedroom$1,395Two bedrooms$1,529Three bedrooms$1,915Four bedrooms$2,562

Observed renter burden

ACS ZCTA households with computable gross-rent burden.

Observed renter cost burden in ZCTA 2760930% or more of income4,417 householdsBelow 30%4,408 households

ZIP versus wider rent context

Each bar retains its own ZIP, city, county or metro scope.

Asking-rent context for ZIP 27609ZIP 27609$1,529Raleigh city$1,579Wake County county$1,676Raleigh-Cary, NC metro$1,689

Monthly asking-rent history

Direct Zillow ZORI observations over the latest five years. Missing months remain visible gaps.

Five-year direct Zillow asking-rent history for ZIP 27609; missing months remain gaps$1,627$1,506$1,386$1,2652021-062023-122026-06
Five-year change
17.2%exact same-month endpoints
Largest observed drawdown
4.9%peak to a later observed month
Annualized monthly variability
3.3%102 consecutive returns
Monthly coverage
100.0%103 of 103 months
Decision brief

What the evidence says for ZIP 27609

At the center of the 27609 reading is a divergence between a cooling asking-rent series and a firmer resale signal. Zillow ZORI for June 2026 is $1,529 per month, a 0.6% year-over-year decline. This five-digit label is both Zillow’s ZIP market identifier and a matched Census ZCTA; a ZCTA is a statistical area, not an area identical to a USPS delivery ZIP. The one-year exact same-month measure and the three-year measure each show the stated annualized decline, while the five-year measure remains a 3.2% annualized gain. Recent direction therefore breaks from, rather than confirms, the longer rent path: the ZIP’s current asking-rent level follows longer-term appreciation but has softened over the nearer comparison windows.

The history is complete enough to support that distinction, with 103 monthly observations, 100% coverage, and 102 consecutive monthly returns through the stated endpoint. Annualized monthly-return variability of 3.3% suggests that the ZIP index has generally moved in moderate increments, so one current rent snapshot has useful but not absolute precision. Separately, the maximum drawdown was 4.9%, showing that the historical decline from a prior index high was material but limited relative to the level of the index. Transparent national discovery ranks among history-eligible ZIPs place momentum at 2,578, stability at 2,047, and the balanced measure at 2,695, where a lower rank is stronger. These are backward-looking measurements only, not forecasts or investment recommendations.

Source definitions matter before comparing those figures. Zillow ZORI is a typical observed asking-rent index blended across rental types, whereas the ACS 2024 five-year survey reports a $1,474 median gross rent, with a $65 margin of error, among occupied renter homes and includes selected utilities. The current ZIP asking index is 3.7% above that survey median, but the difference does not establish a market-wide rent increase because the universes and time structures differ. For wider context only, Raleigh city context rent is $1,579, Wake County context rent is $1,676, and Raleigh-Cary, NC metro context rent is $1,689. Those city, county, and metro values provide named geographic benchmarks, not substitutes for direct ZIP evidence.

The bedroom figures are modelled estimates rather than measured bedroom rents. They scale the ZIP ZORI using the local HUD ladder, yielding monthly estimates of $1,336 for a studio, $1,395 for one bedroom, $1,529 for two bedrooms, $1,915 for three bedrooms, and $2,562 for four bedrooms. The underlying HUD administrative standards run from $1,590 for a studio to $3,050 for four bedrooms, including $1,820 for two bedrooms. HUD FMR or SAFMR is a bedroom-specific administrative standard, not an asking-rent observation. Thus, the modelled ladder is useful for sizing a ZIP-level rent index across unit types, but it cannot verify the advertised rent, condition, utility treatment, or lease terms of any particular apartment or house.

The arithmetic affordability screen places the current ZIP asking level against broad income evidence without qualifying any applicant. Paying this asking rent at the 30% screen boundary requires $61,160 in annual income, below the ZCTA median household income of $83,065; the resulting asking-rent-to-income screen is 22.1%. That comparison is not advice, a tenant-income estimate, or an applicant qualification rule, since household-income and renter populations need not match. The ACS burden result adds an important counterweight: 4,417 of 8,825 renter households, or 50.1%, reported paying at least the screen threshold. Housing stock totals 20,140 units, with 2,548 vacant units for a 12.7% vacancy rate; 836 were classified as vacant for rent. Those survey classifications do not prove availability, affordability, or burden for a specific unit.

Redfin supplies a separate tension in the direct rolling-three-month ZIP resale universe, not rental transactions. Its median sold price is $604,863, up 4.3% year over year, while 136 homes sold with 35 median days on market. Inventory stood at 151 homes and months of supply at 3.4, giving liquidity context rather than a rental comparable set. Average sale-to-list was 98.2%, and 18.2% of sales closed above list, signals that do not fully align with a simple weak-resale interpretation. Annualized ZIP ZORI divided by the median sold price produces a 3.0% cross-source screening ratio only. The rising sold-price result challenges the cooling rent history, while the sub-list average sale signal and the rent slowdown temper any claim of uniformly strong market conditions.

The combined evidence is most useful as a bounded comparison rather than a single verdict. The direct ZIP asking-rent index is below the supplied city, county, and metro context rents, yet the survey burden share remains substantial and the near-term history is negative. Meanwhile, the resale data describe completed ZIP home sales, whereas Zillow describes asking rents and ACS describes occupied renter households. Neither wider-geography context nor the HUD standard can reconcile those differences automatically. The rental snapshot deserves more confidence than a sparse series because coverage is complete, but variability, drawdown, and the recent reversal mean that an advertised rent should be checked against current listing-level evidence rather than assumed to represent every property in the ZIP.

Property-level review should therefore identify the actual bedroom count, advertised monthly rent, included utilities, lease duration, concessions, availability date, and whether the listing is newly marketed or renewed. A reader comparing a purchase listing should separately verify sale status, original and revised list prices, closing date, condition, financing assumptions, taxes, insurance, association charges, repairs, and operating expenses; the Redfin screening ratio cannot answer those questions. For a rental, verify whether the stated price applies to the exact floor plan and whether mandatory charges alter the monthly payment. Does the specific property’s current listing evidence support the broad ZIP signals, or does it materially differ from them?

Decision signals

What deserves a closer property-level check

Near-term rent cooling interrupts the longer trend

Zillow’s direct ZIP asking-rent index is modestly lower than a year earlier, and the three-year annualized measure is also negative. That contrasts with positive five-year annualized growth. Complete historical coverage strengthens the measurement record, but moderate variability and a prior drawdown mean the current index should be treated as a market snapshot rather than a guaranteed rent for every listing.

Survey rent and asking rent are close but not interchangeable

The Zillow asking-rent index exceeds the matched ACS median gross rent by a modest amount. Zillow reflects a blended typical asking-rent index, while ACS reflects a five-year survey of occupied renter homes and includes selected utilities. The comparison is useful for scale, but it cannot establish that current asking rents are universally above the rents paid by current tenants.

Affordability screen is offset by reported renter burden

The broad household-income comparison places the asking-rent screen below the stated median household income, but it is only arithmetic and does not describe individual renter eligibility. At the same time, about half of surveyed renter households report paying at least 30% of income toward gross rent. This tension makes household-level lease, utility, and income evidence especially important.

Resale firmness challenges a simple cooling narrative

Redfin’s direct ZIP resale evidence shows a higher median sold price year over year, measurable sales volume, and limited months of supply, even as Zillow rent history is cooling. Sale-to-list results are more mixed than an unqualified strong-market reading. Because sale prices and asking rents come from different transaction universes, the contrast is a screening tension rather than evidence of causation.

  • Zillow ZORI is a blended ZIP asking-rent index, so it may not match the advertised price, unit size, concession package, utility treatment, condition, or lease term for a particular available property.
  • ACS burden, gross-rent, vacancy, and income measures are five-year survey estimates for a matched ZCTA population. They cannot demonstrate that any individual renter, building, or currently vacant unit has the same financial profile.
  • HUD bedroom standards support the modelled ladder but are administrative standards rather than measured asking rents. A bedroom estimate should not be used as a substitute for current comparable listings of the same unit type.
  • Redfin resale statistics concern completed for-sale transactions during a rolling period. Median sold price and the rent-price screening ratio omit operating expenses, financing, property condition, and rental operating performance.
Direct ZIP resale evidence

For-sale liquidity inside ZIP 27609

Redfin reports these as a rolling three-month ZIP observation through 2026-06-30. They describe the for-sale market, not rental vacancy or the rent of a particular property.

Median sale price$604,863+4.3% year over year
Homes sold136rolling three-month observation
Median days on market35 daysfor-sale listing absorption
Months of supply3.4resale inventory relative to sales pace

Activity and available supply

Direct ZIP counts remain separate because each describes a different stage of the resale funnel.

Direct resale activity for ZIP 27609Active listings292Inventory151Pending sales133Homes sold136

Counter-signals before underwriting

A price alone does not reveal how quickly buyers are absorbing available homes.

Inventory direction

151 observed inventory · +8.3% year over year.

Price realization

98.2% average sale-to-list ratio · 18.2% sold above original list.

Early absorption

44.1% went off market within two weeks; compare this with 35 median days on market.

Measurement boundary

Small ZIP samples can move sharply. This rolling period smooths monthly noise but does not replace current address-level sale and rent comparables.

Redfin Data Center · updated 2026-07-03 · exact five-digit ZIP key. Implausible source values are withheld as n/a rather than repaired or inherited from a broader geography.

Wider market evidence

Listing and rental liquidity around the ZIP

These measures are not ZIP observations. They are labelled county or metro context so they can challenge the local story without being copied into it.

Wake County listing conditions

4,147 active Realtor.com listings · 48 median days on market · 23.0% price-reduced share · 2026-06.

Raleigh-Cary, NC resale supply

3.0 months of supply · 34 median days on market · 37.7% listings with price drops · Redfin 2026-05-01.

Apartment List metro liquidity

8.2% reported apartment vacancy · 33 days on market. These are direct metro observations and do not describe a particular ZIP unit.

Property-level next step

Compare live same-bedroom listings, concessions, utilities, condition and days listed inside ZIP 27609. The report frames the market; it does not replace a rent roll, lease review or address-level comparable set.

Questions this report can answer

Scope-aware answers

Why does the report distinguish the ZIP from the Census ZCTA?

The same five-digit label is used here for Zillow’s ZIP market identifier and the matched Census ZCTA, but the boundaries serve different purposes. A ZCTA is a Census statistical area and is not identical to a USPS delivery ZIP. That distinction matters because the Zillow, ACS, HUD, and Redfin evidence may not represent precisely identical property or household universes.

What does the 30% required-income screen mean?

It is a straightforward arithmetic calculation: annualized asking rent divided by 30% produces an income threshold for comparison. It is not a recommendation, a lending or leasing standard, or an applicant qualification rule. The comparison with median household income is broad context, while reported ACS burden describes surveyed renter households rather than a specific prospective tenant.

Are the bedroom rents observed market rents?

No. The bedroom amounts are modelled ZIP estimates created by scaling the overall Zillow asking-rent index with the local HUD bedroom ladder. They are not measured rents from bedroom-specific listings. HUD’s standards are administrative figures, not asking-rent observations, so actual units can differ because of location, condition, utilities, concessions, timing, and lease structure.

How should the Redfin rent-price screening ratio be used?

It should be used only as a cross-source screening ratio formed by annualizing ZIP Zillow ZORI and dividing by Redfin’s median sold price. It does not capture expenses, vacancy at a property, debt service, taxes, insurance, maintenance, capital needs, or transaction costs. It therefore cannot establish the economics or outcome of purchasing and renting a particular property.