ZIP reports / MO / 64154
ZIP rental intelligence · 2026-06

ZIP 64154, Kansas City, MO

Asking rent, household capacity, housing stock and local context—kept at their original geographic and measurement scopes.

Direct local rent answer

What does rent cost in ZIP 64154?

The latest Zillow ZORI for ZIP 64154 is $1,518 per month in 2026-06. It is a typical observed asking-rent index across rental types—not an arithmetic average, signed lease or quote for one property.

Zillow asking-rent index$1,5182026-06 · up 1.9% year over year
ACS median gross rent$1,441ACS 2024 5-year survey · ±$84 margin of error
HUD two-bedroom standard$1,560Administrative FMR/SAFMR · not asking rent
Bedroom-level rent benchmarks in ZIP 64154
BedroomsModelled asking-rent lensHUD standardHow to use it
Studio$1,226ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,260HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
1 bedroom$1,343ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,380HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
2 bedrooms$1,518ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,560HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
3 bedrooms$1,975ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$2,030HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
4 bedrooms$2,355ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$2,420HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.

Bedroom estimates are modelled, not observed rents. Zillow, Census ACS and HUD describe different housing universes and remain separate throughout this report.Zillow pulled 2026-08-08

Median household income$86,213ACS 2024 5-year · ±$7,924 MOE
Renter share49.6%3,058 renter households
Rent burden 30%+39.5%1,209 observed households
Housing vacancy6.9%454 of 6,622 units
Six views · one local decision

Read the measures together, without merging them

ZORI tracks observed asking rent, ACS describes occupied renter homes, and HUD publishes an administrative benchmark. The charts preserve those differences and add wider context only where the geography is named.

Three definitions of rent

Useful as a spread, not interchangeable observations.

Three rent measures for ZIP 64154Zillow asking-rent index$1,518ACS median gross rent$1,441HUD two-bedroom standard$1,560

Affordability screen

Annual income implied by 30% of the current ZIP ZORI.

Income screen for ZIP 64154ACS median household income$86,213Income at 30% of ZIP ZORI$60,720

Bedroom ladder

Modelled from ZIP ZORI using the local HUD ladder.

Modelled bedroom rent ladder for ZIP 64154Studio$1,226One bedroom$1,343Two bedrooms$1,518Three bedrooms$1,975Four bedrooms$2,355

Observed renter burden

ACS ZCTA households with computable gross-rent burden.

Observed renter cost burden in ZCTA 6415430% or more of income1,209 householdsBelow 30%1,849 households

ZIP versus wider rent context

Each bar retains its own ZIP, city, county or metro scope.

Asking-rent context for ZIP 64154ZIP 64154$1,518Kansas City city$1,444Platte County county$1,646Kansas City, MO-KS metro$1,545

Monthly asking-rent history

Direct Zillow ZORI observations over the latest five years. Missing months remain visible gaps.

Five-year direct Zillow asking-rent history for ZIP 64154; missing months remain gaps$1,569$1,413$1,256$1,1002021-062023-122026-06
Five-year change
31.9%exact same-month endpoints
Largest observed drawdown
2.1%peak to a later observed month
Annualized monthly variability
3.0%63 consecutive returns
Monthly coverage
100.0%64 of 64 months
Decision brief

What the evidence says for ZIP 64154

Resale strength versus slower rent momentum is the central tension in 64154. The five-digit label is both Zillow’s ZIP market identifier and the matching Census ZCTA; a ZCTA is a statistical area, not identical to a USPS delivery ZIP. The current ZIP asking-rent signal, its multi-year path, and direct ZIP resale data point to different rates of change rather than a single property-level answer. Reading those sources as separate evidence universes is especially important here: one describes typical observed asking rents, another describes occupied households, and another records completed for-sale activity.

In the June Zillow ZORI reading, the monthly index is $1,518. It is a typical observed asking-rent index blended across rental types, not a survey median or an advertised rent for every unit. This index is 5.34% above the ACS 2024 five-year median gross rent of $1,441. ACS instead surveys occupied renter homes and its gross-rent measure includes selected utilities, so timing, occupancy and utility treatment all differ. HUD FMR/SAFMR has a local two-bedroom standard of $1,560 in FY2026, an administrative bedroom-specific standard rather than asking rent. Scaling ZIP ZORI by that local HUD ladder produces modelled—not measured—monthly ZIP estimates: $1,226 for a studio, $1,343 for one bedroom, the index level for two bedrooms, $1,975 for three bedrooms, and $2,355 for four bedrooms.

The reported history category is mixed, but backward-looking exact same-month ZORI changes at the endpoint are +1.93% over one year, +3.07% annualized over three years, and +5.69% annualized over five years. Thus the most recent direction remains positive and confirms, rather than breaks from, the longer upward path; however, its lower one-year pace marks deceleration relative to those longer measurements. Annualized monthly-return variability is 2.98%, maximum drawdown is -2.08%, and history coverage is 100%. The transparent national discovery ranks among history-eligible ZIPs are 1,270 for momentum, 1,595 for stability and 1,438 for balanced history, where lower ranks are higher. These records describe the past, not a forecast or investment recommendation. Modest variability and drawdown support more confidence in the stability of this snapshot than a highly erratic series would, while still leaving one current index reading insufficient for a particular unit.

The area-level affordability screen does not erase the renter-burden signal. Applying a 30% share of income to the current monthly index gives required annual income of $60,720; this is arithmetic, not advice or an applicant qualification rule. The matched ZCTA ACS median household income is $86,213, placing annualized index rent at 21.13% of that median by calculation. Yet ACS estimates 1,209 of 3,058 renter households as paying at least that share of income toward gross rent, a 39.54% burden share. This survey-based burden measure reflects existing occupied renter situations, not a conclusion about a new tenant, a listed unit, or any individual household.

ACS ZCTA stock estimates list 6,622 housing units: 6,168 occupied and 454 vacant, yielding a 6.86% vacancy rate. Of the occupied homes, 3,058 are renter occupied, and 206 vacant units are classified for rent. The structure mix includes 3,400 single-family units and 701 units in large multifamily structures. These counts frame aggregate stock and broad availability classification rather than the condition, price, lease timing, or actual vacancy of a specific property. In particular, neither a ZCTA vacancy rate nor a vacant-for-rent count proves that a particular unit is available or that its rent will match ZORI.

Geographic context changes the benchmark but not the ZIP evidence. For wider context only, the Kansas City city-scope rent measure is $1,444, the Platte County-scope rent measure is $1,646, and the Kansas City, MO-KS metro-scope rent measure is $1,545; each city, county and metro value is context, not a ZIP observation. The ZIP index therefore lies above the city measure and below the county and metro measures. These wider figures cannot resolve the difference between ZORI asking-rent methodology and ACS occupied-home gross rent, nor can they replace a ZIP-level or property-level comparison.

Unlike all rent measures, Redfin supplies a direct rolling-three-month ZIP resale observation, not rental transactions. Median sold price is $420,905, up 6.33% year over year, with 84 homes sold and 13 median days on market. Inventory is 56 homes and months of supply is 2.0. Sale-to-list signals remain within this for-sale universe: the average sale-to-list percentage is 100.71%, 31.74% of homes sold above list, and 57.08% went off market within two weeks. Annualized ZIP ZORI divided by median sold price is a 4.33% cross-source screening ratio only, not a cap rate, net return, expected return, or property yield. Faster resale price change, short marketing time and limited supply confirm a brisk resale reading, while the contrast with 1.93% one-year rent growth challenges any claim that rent momentum is keeping pace.

Several limits prevent these aggregate indicators from becoming a valuation or a unit-level rent quote. Zillow combines rental types in a typical asking-rent index; ACS is older five-year survey evidence with sampling uncertainty and utility-inclusive gross-rent treatment; HUD is an administrative standard; and Redfin records sales rather than leases. Before applying the report to a property, check its current advertised rent, bedroom count, rental type, included utilities, concessions, lease term, days active and actual availability; if a sale comparison is relevant, check the subject’s list history and comparable closed sales. Confirm whether the property’s characteristics match the blended index and whether its actual rent differs from the modelled ladder. Which source facts still apply once those property-specific checks are complete?

Decision signals

What deserves a closer property-level check

Positive rent path, faster resale movement

The ZIP’s $1,518 Zillow ZORI is still positive on a one-year basis, but the historical sequence slows from the longer annualized measures. Meanwhile, Redfin’s resale price change is faster than recent ZORI growth. That difference is the principal cross-source tension: it describes divergent aggregate rent-index and resale movements, not a conclusion about any home’s economics.

Bedroom ladder is modelled, not observed

The studio-through-four-bedroom figures are modelled ZIP estimates derived by scaling the direct ZORI level with the local HUD ladder. They create a consistent bedroom pattern for screening, but are not measured bedroom rents or listing medians. The HUD inputs remain administrative standards. A unit-level comparison still needs the actual bedroom count, rental type, utility treatment, lease terms, and advertised monthly amount.

Income screen and renter burden point to different populations

The ZCTA income screen is more favorable than the burden result might suggest: the index-based 30% income threshold is below the area median household income, yet a substantial share of occupied renter households reports burden at or above that threshold. These statements use different arithmetic and survey populations. They cannot determine affordability or qualification for a prospective tenant or any specific address.

Aggregate vacancy is not unit availability

The housing-unit count, vacancy rate, vacant-for-rent count, and structure mix describe the matched ZCTA’s aggregate stock. They provide context for broad rental supply classification but do not verify condition, current market status, pricing, lease timing, or concessions for a specific listing. A particular unit can differ materially from both the ZORI blend and the vacancy statistics.

  • The current asking-rent index is a blended, typical measure and cannot establish a current quote for a specific address, bedroom count, utility package, lease term, or concession structure.
  • ACS estimates come from a five-year ZCTA survey of occupied renter homes, so the older collection window and sampling margins of error limit precision against a current asking-rent index.
  • The HUD ladder is an administrative bedroom-specific standard, not market asking rent; scaling ZORI from it creates modelled estimates that must not be treated as observed bedroom rents or unit-specific comparables.
  • Redfin records rolling-three-month ZIP for-sale activity, not leases. Its annualized-rent-to-price screen joins separate sources and cannot establish property-specific transaction economics, a cap rate, a net return, or an expected return.
Direct ZIP resale evidence

For-sale liquidity inside ZIP 64154

Redfin reports these as a rolling three-month ZIP observation through 2026-06-30. They describe the for-sale market, not rental vacancy or the rent of a particular property.

Median sale price$420,905+6.3% year over year
Homes sold84rolling three-month observation
Median days on market13 daysfor-sale listing absorption
Months of supply2.0resale inventory relative to sales pace

Activity and available supply

Direct ZIP counts remain separate because each describes a different stage of the resale funnel.

Direct resale activity for ZIP 64154Active listings125Inventory56Pending sales65Homes sold84

Counter-signals before underwriting

A price alone does not reveal how quickly buyers are absorbing available homes.

Inventory direction

56 observed inventory · -6.8% year over year.

Price realization

100.7% average sale-to-list ratio · 31.7% sold above original list.

Early absorption

57.1% went off market within two weeks; compare this with 13 median days on market.

Measurement boundary

Small ZIP samples can move sharply. This rolling period smooths monthly noise but does not replace current address-level sale and rent comparables.

Redfin Data Center · updated 2026-07-03 · exact five-digit ZIP key. Implausible source values are withheld as n/a rather than repaired or inherited from a broader geography.

Wider market evidence

Listing and rental liquidity around the ZIP

These measures are not ZIP observations. They are labelled county or metro context so they can challenge the local story without being copied into it.

Platte County listing conditions

313 active Realtor.com listings · 49 median days on market · 15.4% price-reduced share · 2026-06.

Kansas City, MO-KS resale supply

1.8 months of supply · 18 median days on market · 32.1% listings with price drops · Redfin 2026-05-01.

Apartment List metro liquidity

6.7% reported apartment vacancy · 30 days on market. These are direct metro observations and do not describe a particular ZIP unit.

Property-level next step

Compare live same-bedroom listings, concessions, utilities, condition and days listed inside ZIP 64154. The report frames the market; it does not replace a rent roll, lease review or address-level comparable set.

Questions this report can answer

Scope-aware answers

Is 64154 the same geography as a USPS delivery ZIP?

Zillow uses 64154 as a ZIP market identifier, while ACS information is reported for the matching Census ZCTA. The match supports geographic comparison, but a ZCTA is a statistical area built for data tabulation and is not identical to a USPS delivery ZIP. Delivery boundaries and statistical boundaries can differ.

Why do Zillow, ACS and HUD rent figures differ?

ZORI records a typical observed asking-rent index blended across rental types. ACS median gross rent is a five-year survey of occupied renter homes and includes selected utilities. HUD FMR/SAFMR is an administrative standard set by bedroom. Different dates, populations, utility treatment, and purposes mean the figures should not be treated as interchangeable rent quotes.

Does the rent history establish a future trajectory?

The history shows positive exact same-month annualized changes at one, three, and five years, with the latest pace lower than the longer measures. Its volatility, drawdown, full coverage, and discovery ranks summarize past monthly index behavior only. They offer context for how representative one current snapshot may be; they do not estimate future rent or investment performance.

What does the Redfin resale block show, and what does it not show?

Redfin’s rolling-three-month ZIP observation describes completed for-sale activity. Sold price, marketing time, homes sold, inventory, supply, and sale-to-list measures belong to that resale universe and are not rental comparables. Dividing annualized ZORI by median sold price is merely a cross-source screen because it pairs aggregate rent and resale measures rather than matching a specific property or lease.