ZIP reports / AR / 72703
ZIP rental intelligence · 2026-06

ZIP 72703, Fayetteville, AR

Asking rent, household capacity, housing stock and local context—kept at their original geographic and measurement scopes.

Direct local rent answer

What does rent cost in ZIP 72703?

The latest Zillow ZORI for ZIP 72703 is $1,573 per month in 2026-06. It is a typical observed asking-rent index across rental types—not an arithmetic average, signed lease or quote for one property.

Zillow asking-rent index$1,5732026-06 · down 0.1% year over year
ACS median gross rent$1,006ACS 2024 5-year survey · ±$55 margin of error
HUD two-bedroom standard$1,347Administrative FMR/SAFMR · not asking rent
Bedroom-level rent benchmarks in ZIP 72703
BedroomsModelled asking-rent lensHUD standardHow to use it
Studio$1,176ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,007HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
1 bedroom$1,302ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,115HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
2 bedrooms$1,573ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,347HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
3 bedrooms$2,187ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,873HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
4 bedrooms$2,584ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$2,213HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.

Bedroom estimates are modelled, not observed rents. Zillow, Census ACS and HUD describe different housing universes and remain separate throughout this report.Zillow pulled 2026-08-08

Median household income$60,568ACS 2024 5-year · ±$7,671 MOE
Renter share62.0%10,088 renter households
Rent burden 30%+44.9%4,526 observed households
Housing vacancy6.5%1,125 of 17,396 units
Six views · one local decision

Read the measures together, without merging them

ZORI tracks observed asking rent, ACS describes occupied renter homes, and HUD publishes an administrative benchmark. The charts preserve those differences and add wider context only where the geography is named.

Three definitions of rent

Useful as a spread, not interchangeable observations.

Three rent measures for ZIP 72703Zillow asking-rent index$1,573ACS median gross rent$1,006HUD two-bedroom standard$1,347

Affordability screen

Annual income implied by 30% of the current ZIP ZORI.

Income screen for ZIP 72703ACS median household income$60,568Income at 30% of ZIP ZORI$62,920

Bedroom ladder

Modelled from ZIP ZORI using the local HUD ladder.

Modelled bedroom rent ladder for ZIP 72703Studio$1,176One bedroom$1,302Two bedrooms$1,573Three bedrooms$2,187Four bedrooms$2,584

Observed renter burden

ACS ZCTA households with computable gross-rent burden.

Observed renter cost burden in ZCTA 7270330% or more of income4,526 householdsBelow 30%5,562 households

ZIP versus wider rent context

Each bar retains its own ZIP, city, county or metro scope.

Asking-rent context for ZIP 72703ZIP 72703$1,573Fayetteville city$1,720Washington County county$1,648Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers, AR metro$1,599

Monthly asking-rent history

Direct Zillow ZORI observations over the latest five years. Missing months remain visible gaps.

Five-year direct Zillow asking-rent history for ZIP 72703; missing months remain gaps$1,656$1,468$1,280$1,0922021-062023-122026-06
Five-year change
36.3%exact same-month endpoints
Largest observed drawdown
2.0%peak to a later observed month
Annualized monthly variability
2.7%102 consecutive returns
Monthly coverage
100.0%103 of 103 months
Decision brief

What the evidence says for ZIP 72703

In the June 2026 reading, ZIP 72703’s Zillow Observed Rent Index is $1,573 per month. Zillow ZORI is a typical observed asking-rent index blended across rental types, so it is neither an executed lease result nor a quote for one particular home. The label is both a Zillow ZIP market identifier and a matching Census ZCTA; a ZCTA is a statistical area and is not identical to a USPS delivery ZIP. In the matched ACS 2024 five-year survey, median gross rent is $1,006 for occupied renter homes and includes selected utilities. The asking index is 56.4% above that survey median, reflecting different source populations and the ACS measure’s utility treatment rather than a contradiction or a pricing rule.

Using current asking-index annualization, an annual household income of $62,920 corresponds to a 30% rent screen. The matched ZCTA’s ACS median household income is $60,568. That comparison is an arithmetic screen, not advice and not an applicant qualification rule: income is median household data and the index reflects typical asking rents across listings. Separately, ACS estimates 44.9% of renter-occupied households pay gross rent at or above that threshold. This burden statistic is a five-year survey estimate for occupied renter homes; it does not establish affordability, income, utility costs, or burden for a particular available unit.

Bedroom detail adds a useful scale but not new direct rent observations. The local HUD FY2026 ladder is an administrative bedroom-specific FMR standard, not asking rent. Scaling the ZIP ZORI through that ladder produces modelled estimates of $1,176 for a studio, $1,302 for one bedroom, $1,573 for two, $2,187 for three, and $2,584 for four. They are modelled estimates, never measured bedroom rents; the two-bedroom result matches the all-types index by construction. The local HUD two-bedroom FMR is $1,347, a benchmark used in the scaling rather than evidence of a lease offer or utility-inclusive rent.

The backward-looking ZORI path is mixed. Exact same-month history shows a one-year annualized decline of 0.07%, alongside three-year annualized growth of 3.72% and five-year annualized growth of 6.39%. Thus, recent direction breaks from rather than confirms the longer positive path. Full 100% history coverage supports use of the available record, while annualized monthly-return variability of 2.73% and a maximum drawdown of -1.97% show that prior index moves were not constant. Transparent national discovery ranks among history-eligible ZIPs are 1,655 for momentum, 1,106 for stability, and 1,462 for balanced history, where lower ranks are higher. These are backward-looking measurements, not forecasts or investment recommendations. The latest cooling and documented variability mean one current asking-rent snapshot is informative but not conclusive.

Redfin’s direct rolling-three-month ZIP resale observation, ending June 30, is a for-sale market measure, not rental transaction evidence. Median sold price was $498,737, down 0.15% year over year, with 140 homes sold and a median marketing time of 18 days. Inventory was 127 homes and months of supply was 2.8. Average sale-to-list was 97.99%; 11.78% of sales cleared above list and 48.34% went off market within two weeks. This resale mix challenges any simple claim that ZORI’s recent cooling alone signals parallel for-sale weakening: the price change was nearly flat and marketing was short, although sale and rent observations remain separate universes. Annualized ZIP ZORI divided by median sold price is 3.78%, only a cross-source screening ratio, not a cap rate, net return, expected return, or property yield.

The ACS matched ZCTA describes a rental-heavy housing stock: 17,396 units, with 1,125 vacant, or a 6.5% vacancy rate. Of occupied homes, 10,088 are renter occupied, a 62.0% renter share; 265 vacant units are classified for rent. These are ACS five-year survey estimates rather than an up-to-date available-unit count. Vacancy categories neither tell whether any specific apartment is currently offered nor reveal its rent, condition, size, or concessions. Likewise, the renter share and burden estimate characterize the ZCTA’s households, not the likely experience of a given household or property.

The Fayetteville city context has an approximately $1,720 rental index, the Washington County context has $1,648, and the Fayetteville–Springdale–Rogers, AR metro context has $1,599; each is wider context only, not a ZIP observation. All three exceed the ZIP’s current ZORI, but none resolves the ACS gross-rent gap, the income screen, or a building’s terms because their geographies and source populations differ. Read together, the record holds two real tensions: long-run ZORI growth versus the latest decline, and a lower-than-context ZIP asking index versus a resale market whose direct signals do not move in lockstep. Those comparisons describe levels and timing, not causation.

Each series has a different observation design, date, and unit definition: Zillow tracks blended asking rents, ACS surveys occupied renters, HUD sets an administrative standard, and Redfin observes resale closings and listings. No series supplies a verified rent roll, all-in monthly charge, actual unit vacancy, building condition, or lease outcome for a specific property. Concrete property-level checks remain unresolved: bedroom count; asking rent and included utilities; term, concessions, and availability date; physical condition; recent like-for-like rental listings; and recent closed sale comparables. The central decision question is whether those verified, property-specific facts align with the broad ZIP screens without treating any index, survey, or resale statistic as a promise.

Decision signals

What deserves a closer property-level check

Asking-index and ACS-rent gap

At $1,573, the current Zillow ZIP asking-rent index is 56.4% above the $1,006 ACS median gross rent. This comparison is meaningful but not a unit quote: ZORI is blended observed asking rent, while ACS is a five-year survey of occupied renter homes with selected utilities included. The spread primarily signals different source design, timing, population, and rent definitions rather than a pricing rule.

Cooling interrupts a longer positive rent path

The latest one-year ZORI move is a 0.07% decline, while exact same-month annualized growth remains 3.72% across three years and 6.39% across five years. Recent direction therefore breaks from the longer record. Full coverage, 2.73% annualized variability, and a -1.97% maximum drawdown describe past index behavior; none provides a forecast or an investment conclusion.

Area-level income screen remains tight

Annualizing the current index produces a $62,920 income figure at the 30% arithmetic screen, compared with a $60,568 ACS median household income. The $2,352 difference is not a tenant eligibility result. Separately, 44.9% of ACS renter-occupied households are burdened at or above the stated threshold. Both figures are area-level screens, not evidence about any specific household, unit, or utility bill.

Resale liquidity does not mirror rent cooling

Redfin shows a direct ZIP for-sale snapshot with a $498,737 median sold price, 140 sales, and 18 median days on market. Its 2.8 months of supply and sale-to-list signals describe resale liquidity, not rentals. The 3.78% annualized ZORI-to-price calculation is a cross-source screening ratio only. It cannot represent net operating results, a property’s economics, or any predicted sales or rent outcome.

  • The wide spread between the asking-rent index and ACS gross-rent median can reflect tenancy status, utilities, timing, and sampling, so it cannot price a particular vacant unit or lease.
  • The complete ZORI history still captures an index rather than each unit; its recent decline and past variability are backward looking, leaving no basis for a rent forecast.
  • ACS vacancy and burden values are five-year ZCTA estimates with margins of error and category definitions, so they cannot establish present vacancy, expenses, household qualifications, or demand at a specific building.
  • The resale screen combines annualized asking-rent index with median sold price from different source universes; it excludes financing, operating costs, taxes, unit condition, and actual property cash flows.
Direct ZIP resale evidence

For-sale liquidity inside ZIP 72703

Redfin reports these as a rolling three-month ZIP observation through 2026-06-30. They describe the for-sale market, not rental vacancy or the rent of a particular property.

Median sale price$498,737-0.1% year over year
Homes sold140rolling three-month observation
Median days on market18 daysfor-sale listing absorption
Months of supply2.8resale inventory relative to sales pace

Activity and available supply

Direct ZIP counts remain separate because each describes a different stage of the resale funnel.

Direct resale activity for ZIP 72703Active listings283Inventory127Pending sales147Homes sold140

Counter-signals before underwriting

A price alone does not reveal how quickly buyers are absorbing available homes.

Inventory direction

127 observed inventory · +47.5% year over year.

Price realization

98.0% average sale-to-list ratio · 11.8% sold above original list.

Early absorption

48.3% went off market within two weeks; compare this with 18 median days on market.

Measurement boundary

Small ZIP samples can move sharply. This rolling period smooths monthly noise but does not replace current address-level sale and rent comparables.

Redfin Data Center · updated 2026-07-03 · exact five-digit ZIP key. Implausible source values are withheld as n/a rather than repaired or inherited from a broader geography.

Wider market evidence

Listing and rental liquidity around the ZIP

These measures are not ZIP observations. They are labelled county or metro context so they can challenge the local story without being copied into it.

Washington County listing conditions

967 active Realtor.com listings · 58 median days on market · 17.5% price-reduced share · 2026-06.

Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers, AR resale supply

3.4 months of supply · 35 median days on market · 29.8% listings with price drops · Redfin 2026-05-01.

Apartment List metro liquidity

7.1% reported apartment vacancy · n/a. These are direct metro observations and do not describe a particular ZIP unit.

Property-level next step

Compare live same-bedroom listings, concessions, utilities, condition and days listed inside ZIP 72703. The report frames the market; it does not replace a rent roll, lease review or address-level comparable set.

Questions this report can answer

Scope-aware answers

Why can ZIP 72703 be paired with ACS information while still requiring a geography warning?

The packet aligns the Zillow ZIP market identifier with a Census ZCTA carrying the same five-digit label. That alignment permits contextual comparison in this report, but matching labels do not make the areas identical. A ZCTA is a Census statistical area, whereas USPS delivery ZIPs are mail-routing constructs that can differ in boundaries and coverage.

Are the bedroom figures direct observations of local rents?

No. The studio-through-four-bedroom figures are modelled estimates. They scale the all-types ZIP ZORI using the local FY2026 HUD FMR bedroom ladder. HUD FMR is an administrative bedroom-specific standard and ZORI is a blended asking-rent index. Consequently, the displayed ladder does not measure observed asking rents, signed rents, building-specific rents, or utility charges for bedrooms.

Does the 30% required-income screen determine whether a renter qualifies?

No. The calculation annualizes the current asking-rent index and applies the stated 30% threshold to produce an area-level arithmetic income screen. It does not measure applicant income, household composition, lease terms, included utilities, credit standards, or property-specific qualification requirements. The ACS median income is also a population statistic, not an individual applicant record.

Why should Redfin resale figures not be treated as rental comparables?

Redfin reports direct ZIP for-sale and resale observations over a rolling three-month window, including sold price, sales activity, marketing time, inventory, supply, and sale-to-list outcomes. Those measures do not document rental transactions or lease terms. Combining annualized ZORI with median sold price creates only a cross-source screening ratio and omits operating costs, property condition, and unit-level comparability.