ZIP reports / TX / 78413
ZIP rental intelligence · 2026-06

ZIP 78413, Corpus Christi, TX

Asking rent, household capacity, housing stock and local context—kept at their original geographic and measurement scopes.

Direct local rent answer

What does rent cost in ZIP 78413?

The latest Zillow ZORI for ZIP 78413 is $1,237 per month in 2026-06. It is a typical observed asking-rent index across rental types—not an arithmetic average, signed lease or quote for one property.

Zillow asking-rent index$1,2372026-06 · up 2.6% year over year
ACS median gross rent$1,400ACS 2024 5-year survey · ±$47 margin of error
HUD two-bedroom standard$1,366Administrative FMR/SAFMR · not asking rent
Bedroom-level rent benchmarks in ZIP 78413
BedroomsModelled asking-rent lensHUD standardHow to use it
Studio$934ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,031HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
1 bedroom$1,012ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,117HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
2 bedrooms$1,237ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,366HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
3 bedrooms$1,626ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,796HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
4 bedrooms$1,860ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$2,054HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.

Bedroom estimates are modelled, not observed rents. Zillow, Census ACS and HUD describe different housing universes and remain separate throughout this report.Zillow pulled 2026-08-08

Median household income$72,815ACS 2024 5-year · ±$3,973 MOE
Renter share42.8%5,954 renter households
Rent burden 30%+48.7%2,901 observed households
Housing vacancy11.4%1,796 of 15,713 units
Six views · one local decision

Read the measures together, without merging them

ZORI tracks observed asking rent, ACS describes occupied renter homes, and HUD publishes an administrative benchmark. The charts preserve those differences and add wider context only where the geography is named.

Three definitions of rent

Useful as a spread, not interchangeable observations.

Three rent measures for ZIP 78413Zillow asking-rent index$1,237ACS median gross rent$1,400HUD two-bedroom standard$1,366

Affordability screen

Annual income implied by 30% of the current ZIP ZORI.

Income screen for ZIP 78413ACS median household income$72,815Income at 30% of ZIP ZORI$49,480

Bedroom ladder

Modelled from ZIP ZORI using the local HUD ladder.

Modelled bedroom rent ladder for ZIP 78413Studio$934One bedroom$1,012Two bedrooms$1,237Three bedrooms$1,626Four bedrooms$1,860

Observed renter burden

ACS ZCTA households with computable gross-rent burden.

Observed renter cost burden in ZCTA 7841330% or more of income2,901 householdsBelow 30%3,053 households

ZIP versus wider rent context

Each bar retains its own ZIP, city, county or metro scope.

Asking-rent context for ZIP 78413ZIP 78413$1,237Corpus Christi city$1,415Nueces County county$1,415Corpus Christi, TX metro$1,422

Monthly asking-rent history

Direct Zillow ZORI observations over the latest five years. Missing months remain visible gaps.

Five-year direct Zillow asking-rent history for ZIP 78413; missing months remain gaps$1,282$1,212$1,141$1,0702021-062023-122026-06
Five-year change
12.3%exact same-month endpoints
Largest observed drawdown
5.8%peak to a later observed month
Annualized monthly variability
4.2%60 consecutive returns
Monthly coverage
100.0%61 of 61 months
Decision brief

What the evidence says for ZIP 78413

The immediate tension in ZIP 78413 is a modest asking-rent rebound alongside softer resale pricing. Zillow’s typical observed asking-rent index, blended across rental types, was $1,237 in June 2026, up 2.63% from the same month a year earlier. It remained below the wider-context Zillow figures: the Corpus Christi city scope was $1,414.56, the Nueces County scope was $1,415, and the Corpus Christi, TX metro scope was $1,422. Those city, county, and metro values are comparators rather than substitutes for ZIP evidence. Zillow’s measure is an asking-rent index, so it does not describe signed leases, occupied homes, or a particular available unit.

Bedroom figures should be read as modelled estimates, not measured bedroom rents. Scaling ZIP ZORI through the local HUD bedroom ladder produces estimated monthly levels of $934 for a studio, $1,012 for one bedroom, $1,237 for two bedrooms, $1,626 for three bedrooms, and $1,860 for four bedrooms. The ZIP-wide index is 90.6% of the local two-bedroom HUD standard. HUD fair-market-rent standards are administrative, bedroom-specific benchmarks; they are not asking rents. The modelled ladder is therefore useful for maintaining a locally consistent size relationship, but it cannot establish the achieved rent, concession level, utility treatment, or condition premium for any individual property.

The matched Census ZCTA offers a different rent universe and a different timing framework. A ZCTA is a statistical area and is not identical to a USPS delivery ZIP. In the ACS 2024 five-year survey, which covers occupied renter homes and includes selected utilities in gross rent, median gross rent was $1,400. That measure should not be merged with Zillow’s current asking-rent index. The ZCTA median household income was $72,815. Applying a 30% rent-to-income calculation to the Zillow index gives required annual income of $49,480; this is arithmetic only, not advice or an applicant qualification rule. ACS counted 2,901 of 5,954 renter households as paying at least 30% of income toward rent, or 48.7%, but that burden statistic cannot prove the payment pressure facing any particular unit or household.

Housing stock and vacancy add a separate supply-side lens. The ZCTA contained 15,713 housing units, of which 13,917 were occupied and 1,796 vacant, producing an 11.4% vacancy rate. Of the vacant homes, 1,024 were classified as for rent. That is an area-level classification rather than confirmation that those homes are currently marketable, comparable, or priced near Zillow’s index. The stock included 9,284 single-family units and 1,655 units in larger multifamily structures, indicating that the housing base is not limited to one structure type. The ZIP vacancy rate is below the Corpus Christi city-context and Nueces County-context vacancy rates, but those wider geographies remain context rather than direct ZIP rental inventory.

The rent history supports caution about treating one current reading as a stable trend. Coverage was complete across 61 Zillow observations. The one-year same-month change was 2.63%, reversing a slightly negative three-year annualized change of 0.10%, while the five-year annualized change was positive at 2.35%. Recent direction therefore breaks from the intermediate soft patch but still fits the longer positive path. Month-to-month changes translated to 4.19% annualized variability, so a single current index level carries less precision than a smooth series would imply. Separately, the historical peak-to-trough decline reached 5.76%, showing that prior rent levels have retreated materially from earlier highs. Transparent national discovery ranks were 1,706 for momentum, 2,672 for stability, and 2,486 for the balanced measure, where lower ranks are higher; these are backward-looking discovery measures, not forecasts or investment recommendations.

The direct rolling-three-month Redfin ZIP resale observation tells a more cautious for-sale story, not a rental-transactions story. Median sold price was $269,439, down 3.83% year over year, with 71 homes sold and a median 39 days on market. Inventory stood at 154 homes and months of supply at 6.6. Sellers averaged 98.11% of list price, while 7.25% of sales closed above list. These resale signals sit in a distinct evidence universe from Zillow and ACS. They show a ZIP for-sale market with lower median pricing and less-than-list closing on average, rather than evidence about lease execution, tenant demand for a specific property, or rental operating economics.

Cross-source screening sharpens the central tension without resolving it. Annualized ZIP ZORI divided by the Redfin median sold price equals 5.51%. This is only a screening ratio joining an asking-rent index to a resale median; it is not a cap rate, net return, expected return, or property yield. The latest rent increase and the positive five-year rent history support a different signal from the resale price decline, elevated months of supply, and below-list average sale outcome. Meanwhile, the income screen sits below median household income, but the ACS burden share remains substantial. Together, the evidence supports neither a simple strength narrative nor a simple weakness narrative.

Several limits remain material. Zillow is a blended ZIP asking-rent index, ACS is a lagged five-year ZCTA survey of occupied renters, HUD is an administrative standard, and Redfin is a rolling resale observation; their dates, samples, and definitions differ. Property-level review would need current same-bedroom asking comparables, lease term and concession details, included utilities, fees, unit condition, exact location, and evidence that advertised availability is still active. A resale review would separately need recent comparable sales, listing histories, and the relationship between list and closed prices. Those checks determine whether the ZIP-level tension appears in a specific property rather than merely in these aggregate series.

Decision signals

What deserves a closer property-level check

Rent has risen recently, but the multi-year path is uneven

ZIP asking rent increased over the latest same-month year, yet the three-year annualized history was slightly negative while the five-year history remained positive. The series also had meaningful month-to-month variability and a prior drawdown. That combination makes the current Zillow reading useful as a snapshot, but less reliable as a standalone trend statement.

Area affordability signals are mixed across survey measures

The arithmetic income screen based on current Zillow asking rent falls below the ZCTA median household income, but ACS reports that nearly half of renter households paid at least 30% of income toward rent. The figures describe different populations and concepts. They do not determine affordability for an individual household, lease, or unit.

Resale evidence challenges a uniformly strong rent narrative

The direct ZIP resale observation shows a year-over-year decline in median sold price, multiple months of supply, and average closings below list price. Those signals contrast with the recent improvement in Zillow asking rent. Because Redfin measures for-sale transactions rather than rentals, the contrast is a market-screen tension, not proof of a causal relationship.

Bedroom figures are a consistent model, not observed rent comps

The studio-through-four-bedroom estimates scale the ZIP-wide Zillow index using the local HUD bedroom ladder. This creates a transparent size progression while preserving the distinction between Zillow asking rent and HUD administrative standards. Actual rents can differ because the model does not observe unit quality, lease terms, utilities, concessions, or availability.

  • The Zillow index blends rental types and does not identify the property mix, concessions, utilities, lease length, or unit condition behind the current ZIP-level asking-rent reading.
  • ACS rent, income, burden, occupancy, and vacancy data come from a five-year ZCTA survey universe, with timing and geography that differ from the current Zillow ZIP market identifier.
  • The resale median and sale-to-list measures describe recent for-sale transactions only; they cannot establish rental income, expenses, tenant demand, or economics for a specific property.
  • The modelled bedroom ladder depends on HUD relative standards, so it may not match observed asking rents where property quality, structure type, fees, or utility treatment differs.
Direct ZIP resale evidence

For-sale liquidity inside ZIP 78413

Redfin reports these as a rolling three-month ZIP observation through 2026-06-30. They describe the for-sale market, not rental vacancy or the rent of a particular property.

Median sale price$269,439-3.8% year over year
Homes sold71rolling three-month observation
Median days on market39 daysfor-sale listing absorption
Months of supply6.6resale inventory relative to sales pace

Activity and available supply

Direct ZIP counts remain separate because each describes a different stage of the resale funnel.

Direct resale activity for ZIP 78413Active listings238Inventory154Pending sales83Homes sold71

Counter-signals before underwriting

A price alone does not reveal how quickly buyers are absorbing available homes.

Inventory direction

154 observed inventory · +13.1% year over year.

Price realization

98.1% average sale-to-list ratio · 7.2% sold above original list.

Early absorption

13.2% went off market within two weeks; compare this with 39 median days on market.

Measurement boundary

Small ZIP samples can move sharply. This rolling period smooths monthly noise but does not replace current address-level sale and rent comparables.

Redfin Data Center · updated 2026-07-03 · exact five-digit ZIP key. Implausible source values are withheld as n/a rather than repaired or inherited from a broader geography.

Wider market evidence

Listing and rental liquidity around the ZIP

These measures are not ZIP observations. They are labelled county or metro context so they can challenge the local story without being copied into it.

Nueces County listing conditions

2,704 active Realtor.com listings · 84 median days on market · 20.3% price-reduced share · 2026-06.

Corpus Christi, TX resale supply

n/a · n/a · n/a listings with price drops · Redfin 2026-05-01.

Apartment List metro liquidity

8.6% reported apartment vacancy · n/a. These are direct metro observations and do not describe a particular ZIP unit.

Property-level next step

Compare live same-bedroom listings, concessions, utilities, condition and days listed inside ZIP 78413. The report frames the market; it does not replace a rent roll, lease review or address-level comparable set.

Questions this report can answer

Scope-aware answers

Why does the Zillow asking-rent index differ from ACS median gross rent?

They measure different universes. Zillow is a current ZIP-level typical observed asking-rent index blended across rental types. ACS is a five-year survey of occupied renter homes in the matched ZCTA and gross rent includes selected utilities. A ZCTA is statistical geography, not the same thing as a USPS delivery ZIP.

Are the bedroom rent figures direct market observations?

No. They are modelled monthly estimates created by scaling the ZIP-wide Zillow index through the local HUD bedroom ladder. HUD standards are administrative and bedroom-specific, while Zillow is a blended asking-rent index. The resulting figures do not measure achieved rents or establish pricing for a particular apartment or house.

What does the 30% required-income figure mean?

It is a simple arithmetic screen: annualized Zillow asking rent divided by 30% produces an income amount. It is not financial advice, a tenant-screening rule, or a qualification threshold. Household composition, other obligations, utilities, fees, subsidies, and actual lease terms are outside that calculation.

How should the rent-to-sale screening ratio be interpreted?

It divides annualized ZIP Zillow asking rent by the Redfin ZIP median sold price. Because it joins two different aggregate sources and omits financing, taxes, insurance, repairs, vacancy, operating costs, and property characteristics, it is only a cross-source screen. It is not a cap rate, return measure, or property yield.